Texas Drifter: Obama’s War on Due Process Justice
Marshall’s Law Dateline - Brief Recycled News - Obama as President has been asking citizens to empathize with Blacks murdering law enforcement personnel. Why, so as to try and understand why some Black Americans, have felt entitled to randomly ambush and murder law enforcement personnel. Why, out of “reasonable” revenge.
There are at least two problems with Obama’s efforts to get people to be empathetic to some Blacks acting like hate motivated assassins.
1) Individual law enforcement targets for Black hate groups have not been individually accused of committing any specific crimes.
2) Law enforcement targets have not had their constitutional due process “days in court” to defend themselves in courts of law before juries of their peers; against public indictments, much less lynch mobs’ fantasy crimes.
3) Seems Obama’s loyalties to constitutional due process procedures have been re-placed by same policies used by KKK. Voters should expect similar devotions too lynch mob justice from President H. Clinton; if she should ever be elected President of United America.
4) Above three observations TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Poetic irony that both Obama and H. Clinton’s policies have evolved into policies similar to those of KKK.
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
Monday, July 18, 2016
Continue Plus 898
Texas Drifter: Legacy Question for President Obama
Marshall’s Law Dateline – A personal question directed specifically to you, President Obama: You seem to have become an accessory to law abiding peace officers being murdered (not just killed) by groups like “only some Black lives matter”. As it seems, lives of Black law enforcement personnel do not seem to matter.
Back to original question directed towards Obama: You seem to have become an accessory to law abiding peace officers being murdered (not just killed) by groups like “only some Black lives matter;” as lives of Black law enforcement personnel do not seem to matter.
How, by implying that “systemic” racism still exists in America for groups like “Only Black Lives Matter” and other haters who believe the world owes them livings with fringe benefits. Your endorsement of “systemic” racism in America asks others to understand these haters “justifiable reasons to hate”, ambush, and assassinate laws enforcement personnel.
You need to verify two starting facts, 1) that problem is “systematic” racism (system wide racism, system managed racism, and system condoned racism) not acute racism plaguing America (acute - isolated and temporary cases based on different individual’s hatreds).
Following are undeniable observations about America’s political system – closer description; civil rights have evolved from beyond just equal opportunities to including “equal opportunities with privileges” which discriminates against majorities nor minorities. Samples:
1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Policies /Actions
2. Affirmative Action Programs /Actions
3. Justice Department Civil Rights Division (described by some as Progressive Democrats gangster thugs for minority special interests)
4. Elections and appointments of minority members to public office
5. Other examples Reader might add to list
Seems that those most likely to be discriminated against in contemporary America are not racial / ethnic minorities, gender orientation, sexual activity orientation; rather most likely to be discriminated against are Judeo-Christian White males. How often do citizens see this most discriminated group in contemporary America; begging, whining, running around and randomly murdering any other groups of citizens?
Reader might reference more information at: Texas Drifter Library Index Entry # 895 “Texas Drifter: Obama Black Supremacist Plus?”
Considerations for Obama before answering question:
1) Obama you have credibility and integrity problems, where is your proof that in contemporary times, America’s political system is systemic racist and not acute racist?
2) How can you justify “understanding” murdering law enforcement personnel? When ninety-nine plus percent (99 + %) of law enforcement personnel being threatened, injured, and murdered are not violating; have not violated any public laws? Also any laws being broken by law enforcement cannot be legally determined as crimes; until constitutional due process system, has finished it usually long slow process?
3) Obama guess your legacy will be that you were an accessory to murdering law enforcement personnel who were not breaking laws 99 + % of time. Also, you tried to understand the law enforcement assassins even before NON- accused law enforcement people, had opportunity to follow constitutional due process defenses against your fabricated fantasy crimes.
TRUE not FALSE
Bonus thought question – Back to original question: President Obama can you explain why your legacy should not be; you becoming an accessory to law abiding peace officers being threatened, injured, murdered (not just killed) by groups like “only some Black lives matter”. As it seems, lives of Black law enforcement personnel do not seem to matter. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note - Reader should not expect the preceding question to be honestly answered by H. Clinton or her 2016 Presidential Campaign; Progressive Democrats; Hollywood and Sports celebrities; other haters of all things America who support Obama; and or corporate fascist internationalist Mussolini Republicans known as ruling class aristocrats. TRUE not FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – A personal question directed specifically to you, President Obama: You seem to have become an accessory to law abiding peace officers being murdered (not just killed) by groups like “only some Black lives matter”. As it seems, lives of Black law enforcement personnel do not seem to matter.
Back to original question directed towards Obama: You seem to have become an accessory to law abiding peace officers being murdered (not just killed) by groups like “only some Black lives matter;” as lives of Black law enforcement personnel do not seem to matter.
How, by implying that “systemic” racism still exists in America for groups like “Only Black Lives Matter” and other haters who believe the world owes them livings with fringe benefits. Your endorsement of “systemic” racism in America asks others to understand these haters “justifiable reasons to hate”, ambush, and assassinate laws enforcement personnel.
You need to verify two starting facts, 1) that problem is “systematic” racism (system wide racism, system managed racism, and system condoned racism) not acute racism plaguing America (acute - isolated and temporary cases based on different individual’s hatreds).
Following are undeniable observations about America’s political system – closer description; civil rights have evolved from beyond just equal opportunities to including “equal opportunities with privileges” which discriminates against majorities nor minorities. Samples:
1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Policies /Actions
2. Affirmative Action Programs /Actions
3. Justice Department Civil Rights Division (described by some as Progressive Democrats gangster thugs for minority special interests)
4. Elections and appointments of minority members to public office
5. Other examples Reader might add to list
Seems that those most likely to be discriminated against in contemporary America are not racial / ethnic minorities, gender orientation, sexual activity orientation; rather most likely to be discriminated against are Judeo-Christian White males. How often do citizens see this most discriminated group in contemporary America; begging, whining, running around and randomly murdering any other groups of citizens?
Reader might reference more information at: Texas Drifter Library Index Entry # 895 “Texas Drifter: Obama Black Supremacist Plus?”
Considerations for Obama before answering question:
1) Obama you have credibility and integrity problems, where is your proof that in contemporary times, America’s political system is systemic racist and not acute racist?
2) How can you justify “understanding” murdering law enforcement personnel? When ninety-nine plus percent (99 + %) of law enforcement personnel being threatened, injured, and murdered are not violating; have not violated any public laws? Also any laws being broken by law enforcement cannot be legally determined as crimes; until constitutional due process system, has finished it usually long slow process?
3) Obama guess your legacy will be that you were an accessory to murdering law enforcement personnel who were not breaking laws 99 + % of time. Also, you tried to understand the law enforcement assassins even before NON- accused law enforcement people, had opportunity to follow constitutional due process defenses against your fabricated fantasy crimes.
TRUE not FALSE
Bonus thought question – Back to original question: President Obama can you explain why your legacy should not be; you becoming an accessory to law abiding peace officers being threatened, injured, murdered (not just killed) by groups like “only some Black lives matter”. As it seems, lives of Black law enforcement personnel do not seem to matter. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note - Reader should not expect the preceding question to be honestly answered by H. Clinton or her 2016 Presidential Campaign; Progressive Democrats; Hollywood and Sports celebrities; other haters of all things America who support Obama; and or corporate fascist internationalist Mussolini Republicans known as ruling class aristocrats. TRUE not FALSE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)