Continue Plus 852

Texas Drifter: Recycling Treason Times Three

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Treason times three can equal: one spirit of law treason; plus one Constitutional letter of law treason; plus one statutory letter of law treason. Following writing exercise is partially recycled Library Entry 588 - : “Players in America’s Second Civil War”.

For example, America’s first civil war players were mostly from “North and South”; could America’s second civil war players will be divided between patriots and traitors times three. Can definition of treason include act/s of betrayal like violating sacred oath to U.S. Constitution? Can treason can be defined by inciting words or personal actions?

Moving on to treason times three (one plus one plus one equals three):

1) Could violating spirit of Constitutional law include? Is not publicly renouncing one’s oath “to uphold, protect, and defend”; while conducting covert actions which do not uphold, protect, and defend U.S. Constitution. Make one a traitor to both Heaven and American people, to whom oath was publicly taken? If Reader’s should be obvious answer, is yes; does it also follow that America’s “criminal political class” are traitors?

2) Letter of U.S. Constitutional law involving treason.
Article III Section 3 of U.S. Constitution states: Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted. (End excerpt)

3) Statutory letter of law in America.
Reference to penalties - 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. - Originally based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 1, 2 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§ 1, 2,35 Stat. 1088).

Why does one need to recognize traitors; Reader who does not know answer, has no need to keep reading this writing exercise. Can traitors’ actions can seemingly be additionally prosecuted as domestic war crimes? Comparable to international prosecutions in Nuremberg Trials for the purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice. Second issue involves domestic war criminal traitors not having due process rights during time frame traitors, suspended constitutional rule?

Traitors’ allies can be prosecuted as accessories to traitor’s treasons and war crimes. These allies can be classified into at least three categories: spies, collaborators, and sympathizers.

Any citizen can be tempted to evolve into a traitor. Three examples: Judas, Brutus, and Benedict Arnold. Contemporary examples involve Obama allies identified as Obama Republicans (Mussolini Republicans) masquerading as conservatives in public while acting as traitors behind closed doors.

Observation, it does not matter which of following rationalizations Obama Republicans use to “explain away” their acts of betrayal?
1. Ignorance
2. Cowardice
3. Greed
4. Vanity
5. Revenge
6. Hate
7. Or other reasons Reader can list.

Reader should never forget following excerpt from President Washington’s Farewell Address: the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government. (End excerpt)

Undeniable inalienable truth: Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama who change or act outside of America’s Constitution without “explicit and authentic act of the whole people”, are acting like traitors.

Same verdicts apply to Obama Republicans who condone Obama’s treasons with their silence; plus Supreme Court Justices issuing “activists” decisions apart from Constitution as written.

Other example of extra-constitutional illegal acts include; treason by negligence which is still treason. Case in point: threatening both national security and domestic tranquility by supporting porous America’s Southern border which has allowed estimated thirty million illegal immigrants who commit estimated twenty percent to thirty percent of all crimes on American soil. Bottom line illegal immigrants not allowed on American soil would not be committing crimes against Americans on American soil.

Reader can list all extra-legal constitutional crimes Obama and his Administration, with silence condoning support from Obama Republicans have committed against Americans, and Heaven’s favorite due process constitutional republic with its ethical capitalist economic system.

All Obama’s previous unconstitutional actions including Obama Care will dwarf what Obama’s “perfect crisis” will do to America and Americans’ future. Obama seems to be planning his “perfect economic storm” crisis.

Reader needs to understand that Obama is trying to provoke civil unrest so he can declare “public emergency” or some other police state justifying phrase. Why, to justify Obama using his eighty plus federal agencies (each with their own SWAT teams including Department of Education) to “transform” America into Obama’s very own Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat police state. TRUE or FALSE

Easy assignment bonus question, news media organizations and journalists which propagandize for Obama are accessories to treason. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought question: Do citizens’ apathies which tolerate rule by or for government traitors make the citizens apathetic accessories to treason TRUE or FALSE
Coming soon, perhaps next? “Recycling Immigration Policies?

Continue Plus 851

Texas Drifter: Sneak Preview Recycled Immigration Policies

Marshall’s Law Dateline – False prophets advocate violating “spirit of the law” to rationalize violating “letter of the law”. This writing exercise reviews Texas Drifter immigration policies that started evolving along America’s Southern porous border estimated thirty years ago.

Despite propaganda broadcast by "pretender" conservative talk shows in Lower Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas; who do not know difference between "make it up as they go along" liberal law professors, and “strict constructionists”. Reader might consider following example: U.S. Constitution’s “spirit of law” for illegal immigrants’ “anchor babies”.

Excerpt: http://www.14thamendment.us/birthright_citizenship/original_intent.

Post-Civil War reforms focused on injustices to African Americans. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. It was written in a manner so as to prevent state governments from ever denying citizenship to blacks born in the United States. But in 1868, the United States had no formal immigration policy, and the authors therefore saw no need to address immigration explicitly in the amendment.

In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by stating:
"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated: "[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."

The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship. (End excerpt)

Reader can do their own research: WWW.14thamendment.us/birthright_citizenship/original_intent.

Letter of the Constitutional law: Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution - "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

Now some immigration policies that will uphold, protect, and defend, from all enemies domestic and foreign.

(Insert Body of Text)

Bonus question: Not being a legal scholar - America's 14th Amendment does not need to be amended to resolve “anchor baby” legal status issues. Consider following conceptual definitions; plus simple solution of following both spirit of Constitutional law and letter of Constitutional law.

1. Spirit of law is intent of those who wrote the law.
2. Definition of rescission: The abrogation of a contract, effective from its inception, thereby restoring the parties to the positions they would have occupied if no contract had ever been formed.
3. Is there “right for one of the parties of a contract to rescind or cancel the contract for cause”, like fraud which violates spirit of law?

Can one conclude that supporters of “anchor baby” concept are violating spirit of law which is intent of law by authors of 14th Amendment; plus violating letter of law, as anchor babies are not included in Constitutional letter of law? Translation, anchor babies are beneficiaries of contract based on fraud which should result in rescission of “anchor baby statuses” and resulting benefits. Benefits from contract based on fraud are still products based on fraud. TRUE or FALSE

Editor Marshall Note: Text of Library Entry # 852 – “Recycled Immigration Policies” coming soon to Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library!

Continue Plus 850

Texas Drifter: Managing Feed Lot Health Care

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Feed lot health care, one by-product of Obama Care, involves many “assembly line clinics” and their health care providers treating their patients like feed lot livestock.

Standard meaning of feed lots are places where usually cattle are fed, fattened, and moved out. Feed lot clinics are places where: 1) government subsidized health care patients are assembly line diagnosed 2) public subsidy payments are collected 3) patients are moved out.

Managing feed lot health care systems or processes for better, starts with individual patients being “pro-active” in being part of their health care delivery systems. Reader might look up definition of “pro-active”. Why, so reader might remember definition longer.

Another brutal reality, many health care providers like doctors, physician-assistants, registered nurses, and other medical technicians; get so used to Medicare, Medicaid, and indigent patients, treating them like infallible gods. Constant over stroking of health care providers’ vanities; results in some to many health care providers, treating their patients like feed lot assembly line livestock.

One example, consider following letter written for an old Texas Drifter friend and professional associate. Names have been deleted to protect patient and the guilty.
Date –
To –
From –
Subject – Things to hopefully discuss next appointment.
1. My health care maintenance depends on my financial budget, not unaffordable pharmaceutical salesmen “text book” prescriptions.
2. Example, you recently prescribed “------” which I have not used for 2- 3 years; which also, costs more for one month than all my other drugs in my ninety day prescription budget.
3. Noticed upon picking up my prescriptions; you did not re-prescribe my blood pressure medicine (-------) without any explanation of why medicine I had been taking for estimated fifteen months was suddenly stopped – luckily I had enough in reserve to last me until about (----) this month.
4. Also notice when picking up my prescriptions that my -------- and ------ had both been reduced by fifty percent; again without any explanation. Since the reduction, I have noticed swelling in my foot and ankle on right side which was side effected by my stroke during September -----.
5. Not of your, doing but your office sent me medical notices in “unsealed” envelopes by mail which anyone could take out and read.
6. Should get my (------) heart test results on ------ this year; maybe by then we can start a data base which allows me to get my prescription drugs on six month schedule.
7. I do not pretend to be medical professional; however, since I am the primary one, I depend on for my health maintenance care; I try to read latest materials best I can. For example, believe there is a difference between “pre-maintenance tests” and “during maintenance tests”. Which might explain why I was interested why medications I had been taking for over a year were stopped and reduced; just days before my heart test.
8. Understand this; I have only one interest, maintaining my health care on my available financial resources – seems best way to do that, is my being apart of decision making process. Would like re-consideration for re-prescribing my high blood pressure medicine (-------) for thirty days until I come in shortly after results of my heart test (--------).
You can respond by reaching me at phone: (000)-000-0000 Monday through Friday 9AM – 430PM.
Your time and interest are appreciated – (inserted patient’s name)

Reader might reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entries before continuing this writing exercise.
822 Texas Drifter: Fact Obama Care Worse Than V.A. Care?
820 Texas Drifter: Obama's Policies Reducing Life Expectancy in America?

Texas Drifter will take brief break from writing exercise to allow Reader to review above Library Entry Numbers --- Intermission ---

(Intermission Over)

Perhaps good starting point following “Intermission” might be excerpt by MAYO CLINIC: My blood pressure is always higher in the doctor's office than it is at home. Why is this? - Answers from Rekha Mankad, M.D. - You could have white coat hypertension. White coat hypertension occurs when the blood pressure readings at your doctor's office are higher than they are in other settings, such as your home. It's called white coat hypertension because the health care professionals who measure your blood pressure sometimes wear white coats. (End excerpt)

Some studies reveal that many doctors are targets of frivolous civil suits primarily due to doctor’s offensive “bed side manner”. Could it be that “white coat hypertension” is by-product of doctor’s reputation for treating patients like “too stupid to understand livestock”?

Moving on to profiling doctors in third world culture regions in U. S.
1. Incompetent
2. Frauds
3. Minority racists
4. Mixture of above three personality traits
5. Different than above: by being honest, competent, not greedy, not racists

Odds seem to be one of five (20%) that patient will blinding encounter: honest, competent, not greedy, not racist health providers. Only way for patient to improve their chances of finding: honest, competent, not greedy, non-racist health care providers is to be proactive in their selection of (often transitory) health maintenance processes. TRUE or FALSE

Clues – Some health providers engage in some frauds by (there are many others):
1. Ripping off patients by accepting “plastic” they know health providers, are not in “network” to be reimbursed for – scam is to tell patient “premium payer” changed policies; so patient is responsible for paying bill, which is usually several times higher than average charges.
2. Ripping off “insurance” company by double, even triple submitting same invoice for services; another scam is charging for unnecessary tests or services patient does not need. Clever way is to change prescription medications before maintenance test is conducted to “slant test”. Why, to show patient needs extensive treatments like unnecessary surgeries. Other fraud practices Reader can learn about on their own.
3. Simplest fraud is patient being too lazy to question purpose of treatment maintenance models. Lazy patients make “easy suckers”.

Best cure to use medial term for resolving Obama Care “feed lot assembly line health care” for dummies is nation-wide crossing all state boundaries ethical capitalist consumer market accountable health care. Translation, let incompetent dishonest racist frauds compete for business against honest competent non-racist health care providers. TRUE not FALSE

Clue, what a strange concept, pro-active patients relying on consumer awareness and their personal free will assisting in their own health care maintenance programs.

Bonus question, honor alone, will never ever be sufficient standard for managing Obama Care “feed lot assembly line health care” systems. Why, Obama feed lot assemble line health care systems will always be managed by the incompetent greedy who have no honor. TRUE not FALSE

Bonus thought question, might be “compassionate” to use good Obama and Bush Clan word; not to blame all medical health care providers for being part of Obama’s Obama Care “feed lot assembly line health care” system. Why, good intentions can get lost and replaced with greed along debtor’s highway. Consider following:
1. Continuing decreasing socialist government reimbursement fees after provider expenses incurred and services rendered
2. Massive student loans
3. Facilities, equipment, staff, insurance fees, plus other costs constantly increasing in Obama’s “zero inflation” economy
4. Health care providers can probably add to this list
TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Guess truth in adage, one gets what one pays for. Translation: paying for good health care is a privilege. While getting free Obama Care “feed lot assembly line health care” may be one of Obama’s “welfare civil rights” for those entitled to be lazy. Certainly not one of Heaven’s inalienable rights America’s pro-active defend!

Continue Plus 849

Texas Drifter: Open Letter to Mr. Donald Trump

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Mr., as used above is title of respect. Recently, a Border Patrol Union member, publicly stated in publicly broadcast radio interview, that Border Patrol agents are forced to purchase their own “drinking water” when on patrol. It also seems that Border Patrol agents when encountering those illegally crossing the border into America provide illegals drinking water that agent’s paid for “out of their own pockets”.

Mr. Trump, I personally have no reason to doubt integrity of those putting their lives on a southern porous border, every time they report for duty. Perhaps you might have your sources verify seriousness of America’s taxpayers’ representatives not providing law enforcement agents’ water in hundred plus degree temperatures.

Check out my words, maybe then, you might call on Americans to donate drinking water to those risking their lives for all Americans’ families and loved ones.

Other issues for other times
1. Illegal immigrants seem to know that they will not be prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys for physically assaulting Border Patrol agents?
2. Illegal immigrants “other than Mexicans” (O.T.M.’s) know they cannot be deported to Mexico and have to be deported back to their country of origin. Which is one reason these OTM’s seek out Border Patrol agents “to turn themselves in”. Why, so they can get their “release to appear” forms of which 80% to 90% never appear which is “de-facto amnesty”?
3. Border Patrol is currently stopping 500 -700 illegals day, which is estimated less than half of those illegally entering America every day. Many of these not being detained, are drug smugglers, sex slave traders, gang members, murders, rapists, other criminals evading arrest in Mexico, and Middle East terrorists.

Back to issue of this writing exercise: getting system to provide safe drinking water for Border Patrol Agents and illegal immigrants. Why, so Border Patrol agents do not have to purchase on duty water with their “own money”. Mr. Trump, I am guessing that you do not make your employees pay for their own drinking water when working for you?

Editor Marshall Note: Texas Drifter wanted me to tell you that following words are his alone and related to none of people above: I know there are people who “hate” all unions. Texas Drifter believes that it is better to dislike organizations based on their actions, not just their names. Granted there are some public sector unions, which based on their actions seem to act like America hating Satan’s children. Make no mistake, Border Patrol Union is not one of those groups.

Two undisputable facts
1. Only reason any American has any knowledge about what is really happening on America’s Southern porous border, is because of Border Patrol union members; not because of any blatant lies Obama Administration or Bush Clan ever have and continue to report.
2. People who blindly hate Border Patrol Union members just for being a Border Patrol Union member; are no different a hater, than Obama who hates all things American plus anything not Black.

Only one question - American tax payers provide illegal immigrants more rights, welfare benefits, and social status; than due process rights, jobs, and benefits for America’s law abiding citizens including America’s unemployed, and welfare class – not a question, fact.

Yet these same tax payers do not even provide Border Patrol agents one single glass of water while working in some of harshest environments and climates in America – not a question, fact.

This observation made by apolitical American P.S.C. (patriot security conservative); perhaps if your parents had talked to you with same honest bluntness Mr. Trump often uses, above two facts would not be brutal truths? TRUE not FALSE