Continue Plus 846

Texas Drifter: Lady Justice America’s Salvation

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Lady Justice, can be known by several names: Themis (Greek), Maat (Egyptian) or Justitia (Roman). Lady Justice covers her eyes with a blindfold; in one hand carries scales to balance truth and lies; and carries a double edged sword in her other hand. Purpose of the Goddess’s tools: to enforce truthful fair equitable constitutional due process justice. Reader might recall last writing exercise, Entry # 845, “Justice Opposite of Revenge”.

Brief background: Summary of one source about one of History’s most ignored documents which contributed to America’s War for Independence.

Reference - New Netherland Institute - www.newnetherlandinstitute.org/ - About the New Netherland Institute. For a quarter century NNI has ... New Netherland Institute, P.O. Box 2536, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12220-053

THE ACT OF ABJURATION AND THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

"All these considerations give us more than sufficient reason to renounce the King of Spain, and seek some other powerful and more gracious prince to take us under his protection."

On July 26, 1581, the States General of the United Provinces of the Low Countries issued the Plakkaat van Verlatinge. The Plakkaat, commonly known in English as the Act of Abjuration, argued that the actions of King Phillip II of Spain delegitimized his rule over the Low Countries. As stated in its preamble, when a "prince" does not "defend them from oppression and violence as the shepherd his sheep.... but, on the contrary, oppresses them, seeking opportunities to infringe their ancient customs and privileges, exacting from them slavish compliance, then he is no longer a prince, but a tyrant, and the subjects are to consider him in no other view. And particularly when this is done deliberately, unauthorized by the states, they may not only disallow his authority, but legally proceed to the choice of another prince for their defense."

One who is not familiar with the Plakkaat might find these sentiments familiar; this is likely because of its similarities to the American Declaration of Independence, which states that "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Moving on to few definitions for this writing exercise.

• Abjure – one definition is to publicly renounce oath
• Example – Abjuration Act 1581 (reread above brief review)
• Antonym - word opposite in meaning to another word
• Opposite “to publicly renounce” (abjure) is “treason” – one definition: betrayal of trust; treachery

Is not publicly renouncing oath “to uphold, protect, and defend”: while conducting actions which do not uphold, protect, and defend U.S. Constitution; make one a traitor to both Heaven and American people, to whom oath was publicly taken?

If Reader’s should be obvious answer, is yes; does it also follow that America’s “criminal political class” are traitors?
Reference to penalties - 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. - Originally based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 1, 2 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§ 1, 2,35 Stat. 1088).

Is violating first standard “owing allegiance to the United States” treason; when one “non-publicly abjures their oath to both Heaven and the American people with actions that do not uphold, protect and defend U.S. Constitution? Especially actions which threaten domestic tranquility, national security, and or national sovereignty?

Who might be some members of America’s “criminal political class” who HAVE NOT (publicly) abjured their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend America’s Constitution? Reader might start list with Obama, Biden, H. Clinton, McConnell, Boehner; just to get list started.

What is status of elected political officials who HAVE (publicly) abjured their oaths to publicly uphold, protect, and defend U.S. Constitution? Could one answer be “enemy combatants”? Why, most Americans do not usually allow “non-oath taking” or “oath violating” politicians or their political appointees; to serve in Americans’ “by their people, of their people, for their people” governments. TRUE or FALSE

Question: America, Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic is approaching political precipice which threatens both America’s domestic tranquility and national security. It is foolish for any PSC (patriotic security conservative) or any other American to consider starting to rebuild America’s Republic; before decline caused by America’s criminal political class has been stopped period. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question: Most expedient and cost effective in terms of avoiding and preventing, human casualties and suffering; is conducting due process trials which remove America’s criminal political class from power. Process begins by first removing most obviously evil among us in U.S. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought question: Reader might list some of most obvious members of America’s “criminal political class”. Why, so members of America’s “political criminal class”, can be introduced to - 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason. Why, so America’s criminal political class can have life changing moments with America’s Lady Justice. Thinking about who might deserve to be on “America’s Lady Justice Salvation List” is not yet a crime. TRUE or FALSE

Texas Drifter Clue - Lady Justice America’s Salvation

Continue Plus 845

Texas Drifter: Justice Opposite of Revenge

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Due process truth is always prerequisite for justice. Emotional rabid hatred is always prerequisite for mob rule lynching. Mob rule generally remains popular only until, mob starts looking for new person to lynch; like maybe you my Reader. Possible future question, most citizens, care about successful actions not successful whining.

What is difference between conservative ratings motivated cult celebrities, advocating lynch mob revenge for Planned Parenthood’s accused; and rioting Blacks advocating mob rule lynching of law enforcement personnel? Reader might further refine their answer by distinguishing between constitutional due process “personalities”; and rabid acting lynch mob personalities?

Reader might wish to settle back, as this writing exercise consist of three parts:
1. One part theory
2. One part hypocrite’s revenge
3. One part justice for politically evil among us in U.S.

PART I: THEORY

Disclaimer, even human managed non-prejudicial due process investigations; due process trials including appellate courts can make mistakes in administering justice. Proper question: How many more mistakes resulting in unjust penalties do hate motivated mob rule lynch mobs make, compared to constitutional due processes?

Some consequences of rabid acting lynch mob personalities.
1. Texas Drifter worked case more than two decades ago; client stopped me on the street and blurted out: I want you to prove my wife and best friend are having an affair. Informed potential client that investigations were about providing information; that it was court’s job to prove innocence or guilt. Getting to point, reported to client that I saw his wife and best friend enter hotel room on two different occasions, but was not sure they were involved in romantic affair.

Told him they never embraced before entering, or when leaving hotel room; also that I tipped hotel maid to let me in their room after they left. Bed covers were not even slightly wrinkled. None of bath towels had been used. Maid also told me that she never had to clean or straighten room after they left.

Client screamed at me and said I was a fool (not fool enough to have not gotten my money before taking the case). Client said he would confront his x-wife and x-best friend because he knew they were guilty. Client did, turns out his soon x-wife and soon x-best friend were meeting at hotel to plan client’s surprise birthday party! Client ended up losing his wife, family, friends and job, and eventually became perpetual loser. Glad I got my meager assignment wages up front.

2. Public records suggest Missouri / Kansas Jayhawkers were guerilla fighters that were often undisciplined, unprincipled, thieving and murderous. Some reports suggest that these future carpetbaggers during South’s reconstruction put (number varies) 19 Southern women and children into wood frame building and burned it down just to enjoy listening to them scream. These are anti-slavery lynch mob forces that conservative media celebrities refuse to claim as their own.
3. Yankee Republican carpet baggers who engaged in economic, political, cultural, and physical genocide against Southerners during reconstruction; against wishes of their prophet Lincoln. Reader can reference origins of Texas 1876 post re-construction Constitution. Yankee conservatives and contemporary carpet bagger media celebrities need to recognize that that Southerners have a right to learn truthful history. Starting with “Texas Drifter: America’s Lost Second Tradition Found”.
4. Democrat Party Blacks rioting and wanting to lynch law enforcement personnel in Democrat Party ruled places like Fergusson, Missouri; Baltimore, Chicago, Washington D.C.; and every other city where Blacks feel America owes them lynch mob justice. Since Missourians supported Lincoln first emancipating Blacks only in South not in North. Why, allow Blacks opportunity to become terrorists to murder, rape, torture, Southern women, children, and old people while men were away on front lines. Perhaps race motivated riots is karma on over-due visit to Missouri? Just asking, not accusing.

Continuing on, there is a difference between defending one’s right to due process trial and agreeing with or liking what defendant is accused of doing. Lynch mobs are no less criminal elements that those accused of committing a crime. In fact lynching even a guilty man makes the lynch mob members accessories to capital murder; and entitles them to due process capital murder due process trial.

Undeniable fact, America is built on concept of “constitutional due process law and order”; not “lynch mob rule anarchy”. Due process justice is intended to help provide meaningless over used word: closure. All hateful revenge motivated lynch mob rule anarchy provides, is incentives for more “primitive tribal” revenge.

Not suggesting that their might not be need for revenge if it serves as self-defense. Anyway, topic for another writing exercise.

Reader questioning above theory, might reference legal scholars like 1. Conservative like Ted Cruz, or 2. Liberal like Alan Dershowitz. No reason for Reader to accept theory by one Texas farmer’s son, who devoted his career to conducting non-prejudicial investigations.

PART II: Some Pro-Life Celebrities Hypocrites?

Question, does only whining about “evil doers” and not trying to reach out to “confused” considering an abortion; make some “pro-life” ratings driven celebrity talk show hosts and religious stars hypocrites?

Reader might ask one of hypocrite suspects, how many individual personal counseling sessions have you personally provided to troubled souls considering abortions in last five years? Or perhaps ask, how much money have you devoted to recruit and train volunteers to counsel troubled souls considering abortions in last five years.

Reader might find answers like none; I am into spiritual administration and public relations not individual ministering. Translation, I prefer being a celebrity whiner; which fertilizes my vanity.

Texas Drifter makes no claim of being a religious scholar; still would not some of following options be preferable to being a whiner, just to fertilize one’s vanity?
1. Abortions will more likely be reduced with individual spiritual counseling; not with having government enforce more laws.
2. Would a reasonable suggestion be, “let non-prejudicial legal investigations combined with constitutional due process judicial judgments” deal with Planned Parenthood’s alleged abuses?
3. First Amendment decrees “separation of government and church” which means no public tax dollars should go to Planned Parenthood type agencies.
4. Why have States not held a constitutional convention amending U.S. Constitution declaring Roe V. Wade is Tenth Amendment issue “reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”?
5. Reader might also consider “Texas Drifter: Myth That Respect Can Be Charity”

Question, after Reader considers definition of word accessory, Reader might ask: are those who limit their opposition to abortions to whining or transferring their responsibilities to government – neither of which is likely to reduce abortions; accessories to abortions and other abuses which celebrity whiners whine about?

Closing point PART II – As for all hysteria about pro-choice environmentalists being “more upset” about poachers’ death of game refuge lion, than un-born fetuses. Why would anyone be surprised about their reaction? Crimes have different statuary levels. Example selling pound of recreational marijuana and selling pound of military grade ricin are different crimes.

How is whining about pro-life environmentalists complaints about death of game refuge lion, going to prevent one single abortion? Chances are it won’t; so why do celebrity pro-lifers continue do engage in feel good activities that do not reduce number of abortions?

Many will find following answer objectionable – Who cares, being honest is generally oxymoron to being popular. In case Reader did not know, only thing more hypocritical than “Liberal Fascist Political Correctness” is “CONSERVATIVE FASCIST POLITICAL CORRECTNESS”. Yes Reader, Satan’s left hand is “L.F.P.C.” and Satan’s right hand is “C.F.P.C” – TRUE not FALSE

Time to finish PART II - Will review, maybe later; some CFPC home places. Could one of those CFPC home places start with letter “B” and end with letter “k”? Will only time provide the answer - just asking, not accusing.

PART III: Justice for Politically Evil among Us in U.S.

Recall repetition is good teaching or training tool: Why P.S.C. (patriotic security conservatives) are necessary to help other conservatives (reference Entry # 844) – brief answer, help “pilgrim conservatives” not only survive, but also have a place to survive in.

Question, where is justice not revenge for America’s law abiding innocents from crimes by Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama; Obama’s Administration and bureaucrats; public subsidy addicts; and allies like Mussolini Republicans; illegal immigrants; and all other world owes us America haters that Reader can list?

There seems to be none, as it keeps getting harder to convince innocents that revenge is no option for justice. Texas Drifter has one possible solution – how about “even dozen independent prosecutors”? Find twelve disciples of justice not revenge to conduct twelve non-prejudicial investigations for constitutional twelve due process judicial rulings. TRUE or FALSE

List of twelve starting points include:
1. H. Clinton’s E-mail allegations
2. H. Clinton’s Fast and Furious 2 (Benghazi) allegations
3. H. Clinton’s (and her family’s) non-profit organization’s bribery allegations
4. Other H. Clinton’s possible crimes
5. Obama’s Fast and Furious I criminal allegations
6. Obama’s I.R.S. criminal allegations
7. Obama’s Iran Nuke Treaty treason allegations
8. Obama’s public lies allegations involving Obama Care
9. Obama’s race hatred promotion allegations
10. Obama’s illegal immigrants Constitution violations allegations
11. Other Obama perjuries and un-Constitutional actions allegations
12. Other Obama high crimes and treason allegations Reader can list.

Bonus question – The purpose of even dozen independent prosecutors is to insure that Clinton and Obama and their accessories to crimes and treasons against domestic tranquility and national security are subject to justice which negates their innocent victims' desires for revenge. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought question - Justice for America’s innocents for crimes and treasons committed by America's CRIMINAL POLITICAL CLASS, is perhaps only way to prevent anarchy motivated by revenge. Citizens are not likely to rise up in anger against constitutional due process governments trying to provide liberty and justice for all. TRUE not FALSE