Continue Plus 806

Texas Drifter: Obama’s Darkest Secret?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Perhaps Obama’s darkest secret could very well be, Obama’s sub-conscious addiction to subserviently please a Rasputin type master? Just asking, as Americans have God given inalienable right to know what motivates their President and Commander-In-Chief.

Why ask above question, tens of millions of Americans from all parts of America’s society are asking. Why Obama is engaging in what millions and millions are calling irrational totally non-pragmatic political management decisions which seemed aimed at destroying America’s traditions, values, principles, Constitution, domestic tranquility and national security.

Two brief excerpts about Rasputin:
First: Rasputin - J. Kadosh 1998 – Rasputin In Brief – Tripod .com
Rasputin gave the royal family a bad reputation as heavily reliant on him and his advice to them. He made several bad political decisions through the tsar and tsaritsa which caused the people (and the tsar) much trouble. He was one major reason for the downfall of the Russian royal family. Hence, one may safely state that he had a very negative influence on the royal family in general.

Second: Rasputin type personality profile: He was argued to be a mystic with the ability to heal and tell the future. . . Strangely, he was also a promiscuous drunkard who embraced a philosophy that to reach God, one must sin and then repent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Rasputin

Reader can do continuing research on if Obama’s sub-conscious is addicted to subserviently pleasing a Rasputin type master. Consider the following, seems that Obama’s closest “advisers” are women like: Valerie Jarrett. Consider following: AMERICAN THINKER August 14, 2012 – “Obama’s Strange Dependence on Valerie Jarrett” - Valerie Jarrett is the most powerful woman in Washington. She has guided the president's decisions on health care, the budget, the stimulus, the deficit, foreign affairs.
Read more http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/08/obamas_strange_dependence_on_valerie_jarrett.html#ixzz3WBCYBN00

Two points, first is there something about Obama’s “personality development” that might cause Obama to depend on women like Jarrett, Rice, Clinton and others Reader can list? Perhaps reader might reference materials by a psychiatrist?

Second, will future historians write how Valerie Jarrett was Obama’s Rasputin; that not only destroyed Obama’s sacred future legacy; Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats future role in American politics; not including all the damage caused to America’s Constitution, America’s domestic tranquility, America’s national security?

If Obama does have a Rasputin, Reader might research all deaths, and destruction Rasputin caused Russia’s Royal Family, and Russian people; which eventually led to Stalin’s reign of terror that caused more deaths than Hitler several times over.

Question what will be final total numbers in senseless deaths caused by Obama allegedly following Jarrett’s “making nice” with Iran’s contemporary government? Policies which will result in one hundred percent odds that Iran will eventually try to use nuclear weapons against Israel, Europe, America, and Islamic peoples not suitable to Iran’s thousand years’ hatreds?

Question would good campaign issue in 2016 Presidential Election, be Obama “replacing” in last few years over four hundred United States high ranking Armed Forces officers, then replacing them with under qualified affirmative action political appointees probably based on Jarrett’s recommendations? Reader can do their own research to firm up dates, numbers, and names of professional patriot officers purged by Obama based probably on Jarrett’s advice.

Did not Obama’s closest frequent visitors to Whitehouse Muslim Brotherhood attempt same tactic in Egypt until Egypt’s Military had had enough government by Islamic Radicals called terrorists by many?

Question – Is what is happening in Middle East a diversion to what Iran plans to do to “Great Satin” on U.S. soil? How, by exploiting Obama’s and probably Jarrett’s Southern porous border. Only time will tell, if Reader is willing to wager their families future: lives; health; and liberties on Obama advice received from Jarrett. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – side note – one basic investigation tool includes “time-line coincidences”. One reliable lesson of intelligence industry is never over look or readily dismiss what is called “unknown variable”. Perhaps Obama has at least two personalities, and one happens to be his very own Rasputin. Who knows perhaps Obama’s closest advisers are Rasputin elves, like Santa Claus has his own elves?

Above might explain question being asked by millions of Americans: how is it that Obama cannot see what his failed policies are causing to happen in America; in the Middle East; Eastern Europe; and throughout rest of the world. Translation, could it be that Obama only see’s reality through Obama’s own second personality’s Rasputin eyes; and Obama only gets advice from “only tell Obama what Obama wants to hear” Rasputin elves? TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Not all political leaders are immune from having multiple personalities.

Bonus question – Perhaps the State of Texas should Send America’s Federal Government a bill for all financial costs to Texas for Federal Government not securing Texas border with Mexico. Before all liberals starting squealing about not having enough money; Texas Drifter has simple answer: appraise values of all Federal lands in Texas. Then Texas can take possession of lands Feds do not manage well anyway. TRUE or FALSE

Feds are prone to spend hard earned tax payer dollars on studies to discover that native flora attracts native fauna. Translation, native animal eat native plants. Apparently not an idea that common sense could determine?

Bonus thought question, concerning an inquiry to Texas Drifter about Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 805 – “Some Americans Still Support Crucifixion?” – Is it proper to tell one that allegedly based on their actions, and their public words still supports crucifixion of Heaven’s Son: Why should I voluntarily socialize or engage in commerce with you? What say you Reader – YES or NO?

Final thought, if Reader verifies Obama’s darkest secret; please for the good of America’s future generations; spread the truth near, far, and beyond!

Continue Plus 805

Texas Drifter: Some Americans Still Support Crucifixion?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Observation, judgment day is personal. Not being a religious scholar, just asking: Will Americans who still support Crucifixion of Heaven’s Son, be able to use “excuse” on their personal judgment days, “I did not know any better”?

Brief background of Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
1. First signed into law by President Clinton 1993
2. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that RFRA could not be applied to States
3. Since Supreme Court ruling over twenty States have adopted similar legislation to RFRA

Controversy seems to be:
1. That businesses (are not corporations businesses) have “free exercise” rights equaling rights matching those of individuals and churches
2. Businesses / corporations have free exercise rights “defense” against a private law suit by another person rather than actions simply brought by government

Bottom line is that opponents to RFRA seemingly wish to provide individual haters same “rights” as government to engage in activities that violate:
1. First Commandment of Ten – Thou shall have no other gods before me (tyranny like government)
2. First Bill of Right of Ten - prohibit citizens who own or run businesses from exercising their religious beliefs while engaged in commerce (tyranny like government)
3. Tenth Bill of Right – prohibit States from exercising States Rights

Seems opponents to above laws might have felt that a citizen mob should have been allowed to crucify Heaven’s Son, because haters are entitled to act like private sector tyrants, just as most governments act like tyrants. These “whole world owes us, because we haters believe that we are entitled to sovereignty immunity, because only our rights matter."

Translation concepts like inalienable rights; U.S. Constitutional guaranteed rights plus those in Bill of Rights do not apply to Judeo-Christians, or anyone else not willing to worship the self-appointed we are better than you false prophets.

It is not a very long journey from ruining or destroying: reputations, financial lives, physical health and well-being of Judeo-Christian citizens for not sacrificing their sacred honors; to demanding that a thief be released so a private mob could crucify Heaven’s Son. Why, simply for not worshiping or publicly honoring selfish spoiled false prophets among us.

Question does not condemning Religious Freedom Restoration Acts like the one in Indiana, Texas, and other States promote mob rule injustices against business owners who do not wish to leave their religious values out of all their business decisions? Texas Drifter not a legal scholar, could be wrong, did not The United States Supreme Court, in 1819, provide (partial excerpt) legal description of a corporation: A corporation is an artificial being, (end excerpt).

Does not this “artificial being” reflect the moral ethical standards of its owners and managers who are living individuals? Explain why these living individuals can only extend their religious principles to their personal and social lives; and not their lives while engaged in commerce. Better still, show Texas Drifter where such a prohibition is protected in either Ten Commandments or Bill of Rights.

Observation restated different way: Does not condemning Religious Freedom Restoration Acts like the one in Indiana, Texas, and other States promote mob rule injustices against business owners who do not wish to leave their religious values out of all their business decisions? If it is not a very long journey from ruining or destroying: reputations, financial lives, physical health and well-being of Judeo-Christian citizens for not sacrificing their sacred honors in commerce. Why, for not worshiping or publicly honoring selfish spoiled false prophets among us; to demanding that a thief be released so a private mob could crucify Heaven’s Son.

How can Reader be sure that those wailing against Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act, would not also still support crucifixion of Heaven Son? Some of most outspoken have included: NASCAR; Walmart; NCAA; some Fox Radio Sports celebrities; others Reader might list. TRUE or FALSE

Not accusing, just asking.

Question, opponents of Religious Freedom Restoration Acts probably also oppose ethical capitalism. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question - Opening “Dateline” for this writing exercise: – Observation, judgment day is personal. Not being a religious scholar, just asking: Will Americans who still support Crucifixion of Heaven’s Son, be able to use "excuse" on their personal judgment days, “I did not know any better”?; is probably more right than wrong. TRUE or FALSE

Continue Plus 804

Texas Drifter: Different Ways to Die

Marshall’s Law Dateline – There is truth in old adage: Only when one’s time is up; is one’s time up. Clarification, one’s time can be hurried along by one’s own hand or other’s hands.

Different pathways to death or injury.
1. Natural causes – like getting old, wearing out, breaking down, dying; or illness from disease/s
2. Accidents – generally few and seldom, generally more likely negligence
3. Negligence – causing injury or harm by tending to forget or ignore responsibilities
4. Stupidity self-explanatory not necessarily negligence
5. Crazy different than just being stupid
6. Suicide
7. Criminal conduct which can be negligent or premeditated
8. Enemy conduct
9. Terrorism
10. Treason by traitor (perhaps most offensive)
11. Self Defense
12. Due Process
13. Righteous Revenge

Reader might reference following insert for above items “eight”, “nine”, "ten" Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 781 – “Unintended Consequences Overview” (Insert)
Following seems better national security process for dealing with terrorists; rather than Obama’s policy of releasing terrorist “to the battlefield to have second chances” too kill Americans and America’s allies. (Excerpt) Texas Drifter adheres to “old school” lessons, and believes that security forces jobs are not done when bad guys leave field of combat; assignment is complete once bad guys are tracked down and completely destroyed. Why, simple answer is so bad guys do not have opportunity to “re-group” to kill good guys or their allies and families on another day.

Reader can reference excerpt from Library Entry # 726 “Guide to Your Political Personality” - Patriot Security Conservatives, as well as most grownups understand that terrorists are not lawful combatants, and are not entitled to civilian constitutional due process legal systems; not entitled to Uniform Code of Military Justice legal processes; not entitled to Geneva Convention due processes for lawful combatant prisoners of war. Terrorists are only entitled to be interrogated for good intelligence, and eventually be summarily executed. (End excerpt)

Few observations, justice without due process is nothing more than mob rule lynching even when carried out by Obama’s Justice department. Citizen patience requires letting due process slowly attempt to achieve justice whether process be civilian or military trials; no how offensive the defendant.
Lynching the defendant make those in lynch mob worse than person being lynched.

Casualties’ numbers vary from civilian to military; hence need for separate due process legal systems. Civilian deaths may on average directly affect guestimate five hundred people. Since military members, consider themselves “brothers in arms”; death of one of their own by say “one deserter”, could affect hundreds of thousands of armed forces members. Hence different due process system with what seems like “harsher” sentences to civilians.

Items ""eleven" and "twelve" can be referenced at numerous Marshall's Law Texas Drifter Library Index Entry #’s.

Another observation, “righteous Revenge “is a shades of gray” concept which Reader might review at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 781 – “Unintended Consequences Overview”.

Moving on to other Obama policies besides Obama Care that are getting Americans killed without due process. First, America’s federal government is not realistically engaged in even a “proxy war effort” to secure America’s Southern porous border.

Security “101” teaches that any security strategy starts with establishing secure perimeter which involves not letting bad guys cross a specific “line in the sand” which might be controlled by a secure fence. How many military officers follow policy of allowing bad guys inside perimeter, and then try to round up bad guys? Seems more efficient way would start with keeping bad guys from crossing perimeter?

Texas should send Obama’s government “bill” for Texas having to use Texans tax dollars to fund Texas Department of Public Safety officers to secure international border which is America’s Federal Government’s U.S. Constitutional responsibility. Reader recall? Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

How many hundreds of thousands of cases of domestic violence have illegal immigrants committed against American citizens and legal residents? Those crimes do not even include hundreds of dollars of public tax dollars at all levels of government that illegal immigrants have stolen or defrauded from America’s citizens and legal residents.

Brutal truths question: Most of illegal immigrants’ victims are not American Anglo citizens; rather illegal immigrants largest group of victims are American Hispanic citizens and legal residents. Accessories to these crimes against America’s Hispanic citizens and legal residents include.
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats seeking to get illegal immigrants addicted to welfare in return for their votes.
2. Conservative politicians like former Texas Governor Rick Perry who supported policies to provide children on illegal immigrants less expensive costs for college educations ; while not extending same benefits to veterans of other states with children wanting to attend college in Texas.
3. Many Chamber types who have made and are making fortunes laundering cartel profits through retail sales. These same corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats like Jeb Bush, also support amnesty for cheap labor illegal immigrants to displace American citizens and legal residents from job markets on U.S. side of its southern Border.
4. Conservatives need to understand one almost “carved in stone” reality about Hispanic liberal voters: The Heavenly Father could run for any office as a Republican; while Satin itself, could run for any office as Liberal Democrat; and Liberal Hispanic voters would still vote for Satin itself.
TRUE or FALSE

Simple question - Back to some paths to death observation question: Texas Drifter is not a religious scholar and could be wrong; is not that one Commandment about “Thou Shall Not Murder”; not thou shall not kill in self- defense? TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question - As for self-defense against tyrants, reader might reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 742 “Sacred Origin Second Amendment” about Abjuration Act 1581. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Only reason most politicians need to use teleprompters; is to keep their propaganda lies straight.

Bonus question – Do some “Born-Again Christians” act like some recovering alcoholics in that some recovering alcoholics often act like superior snobs to those who never made free will choices that lead them down a road to alcoholism or drug addiction? Question explained, some “Born-Again Christians” act like superior snobs to “Not-Born Again Christians” for their not making free will decisions to live pre-meditated sinful lives? TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought question – Is it not hypocritical for some conservative celebrities to advocate ruining lives of some college kids for singing stupid offensive song about Blacks at O.U.; while ignoring Black kids making millions of dollars singing about raping and murdering White women and White children in contemporary “Rap music”? Started this writing exercise with adage; will end with adage: Two wrongs do not make a right; as ignoring one wrong for Nazi political correctness does not make it right. TRUE or FALSE

This writing exercise did not thoroughly review different ways for integrity / personal honor to die. Maybe another time; then again maybe not!