Continue Plus 783

Texas Drifter: Obama Feigning Draw?

Marshall’s Law Dateline - Question for you my Reader, is Obama trying to provoke conservative patriotic Christians into a scenario which will Allow Obama to “justify” suspending those parts of Constitution Obama has not already suspended with unconstitutional executive orders to establish a Stalinist type police state in America?

Reader should consider following; starting with definition of feign, which is to induce as false impression: pretend.

Example, in “wild west days”, hired guns would feign a draw by slightly moving opposite shoulder of holstered gun; causing amateur to grab for their pistol. Why to have witnesses testify that amateur “drew first” which meant pistolero was only reacting in self-defense.

Why might Obama be “intentionally” insulting conservative patriotic Christians most sacred beliefs? Reader might review question asked in above Marshall’s Law Dateline; after reviewing Obama’s most recent comments at National Prayer Breakfast.

Reader can consider following February 5, 2015 WASHINGTON POST excerpts By Juliet Eilperin about comments by Obama at “National Prayer Breakfast”.
President Obama has never been one to go easy on America.
As a new president, he dismissed the idea of American exceptionalism, noting that Greeks think their country is special, too. He labeled the Bush-era interrogation practices, euphemistically called “harsh” for years, as torture. America, he has suggested, has much to answer given its history in Latin America and the Middle East.
His latest challenge came Thursday at the National Prayer Breakfast. At a time of global anxiety over Islamist terrorism, Obama noted pointedly that his fellow Christians, who make up a vast majority of Americans, should perhaps not be the ones who cast the first stone.
“Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history,” he told the group, speaking of the tension between the compassionate and murderous acts religion can inspire. “And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.” (End excerpt)

Advice is generally worth what Reader pays for it; never the less, Reader might consider following: Do not act like an amateur and let your emotions lead or draw you into a scenario Reader can’t win.

Also beware “run off at the mouth” conservative talk show hosts who will also try to provoke Reader into acting the fool to improve the cult leader talk show host or hosts’ media ratings. Why would these media strumpets do such a thing? Simple, higher their ratings; more they line their pockets with higher charges for their advertising rates.

Perhaps best option would be using Constitutional due processes like both Republican controlled House and Senate “drawing” purse strings on Obama’s Administration during Constitutional due process impeachment of Obama.

Above process seems simple enough; Texas Drifter must apologize to Reader. As increasing years take their toll on this old farmer’s son’s memory; I forgot that Republican establishment House and Senate leaders are political eunuchs. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question – definition of eunuch is man or boy whose testicles have been removed or do not work. TRUE or FALSE

Clues – McConnell; Cornyn; McCain; Graham; Boehner; Bushies; plus others reader can list.

Final bonus thought question, Obama feigning draw? Answer can be one of two words.

Continue Plus 782

Texas Drifter: Obama Providing Cover for 911 Terrorists?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Truth is one of most important foundations for survival of constitutional due process republics. Free Americans have an inalienable right for truthful answers to following questions!

Foundation for truth to determine if Obama is providing cover for 911 terrorists starts with following observations.

1) World News Daily – Information Clearing House (Excerpt) "Saudi Arabia May Be Tied to 9/11, 2 Ex-Senators Say" By ERIC LICHTBLAU March 01, 2012 "NY Times" --WASHINGTON — For more than a decade, questions have lingered about the possible role of the Saudi government in the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, even as the royal kingdom has made itself a crucial counterterrorism partner in the eyes of American diplomats.

Now, in sworn statements that seem likely to reignite the debate, two former senators who were privy to top secret information on the Saudis’ activities say they believe that the Saudi government might have played a direct role in the terrorist attacks.

“I am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia,” former Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida, said in an affidavit filed as part of a lawsuit brought against the Saudi government and dozens of institutions in the country by families of Sept. 11 victims and others. Mr. Graham led a joint 2002 Congressional inquiry into the attacks.

His former Senate colleague, Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, a Democrat who served on the separate 9/11 Commission, said in a sworn affidavit of his own in the case that “significant questions remain unanswered” about the role of Saudi institutions. “Evidence relating to the plausible involvement of possible Saudi government agents in the September 11th attacks has never been fully pursued,” Mr. Kerrey said. (End excerpt)

2) Other Public Information
Former Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) co-led the official Congressional inquiry into the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks, known as the “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001. “

The Congressional investigation supplemented the “National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States,” also known simply as the 9/11 Commission.

For years Graham has been pushing to declassify a 28-page section of the 9/11 Commission Report which was omitted from the public eye. The 28 pages may only be read by members of Congress in a secure location, one person at a time, and the specific contents cannot be revealed to anyone. It is not clear how many members have read them.

Those who have read the 28 pages have made assurances that national security would not be harmed if they were released to the public. It would, however, impact our national security and foreign policy strategies.

3) Recent Mossaou comments in Business Insider February 4, 2014. (Excerpt) “Jailed al Qaeda operative makes explosive claims about Saudi royals funding pre-9/11 terror”

A convicted al-Qaeda operative has claimed that members of the terrorist network received extensive financial support from members of the Saudi royal family throughout the late 1990's and into 2000, the New York Times reported Wednesday.

Zacarias Moussaou, a 46-year-old French native serving life in prison for his role in the 9/11 attacks, said he was instructed by Qaeda leaders in Afghanistan to create a database of all of the donors to the group.

Among those who donated, Moussaou alleges, were the Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal and the longtime Saudi ambassador to the US Prince Bandar Bin Sultan.

Moussaou also claims that he discussed plans to shoot down Air Force One with a staff member at the Saudi Embassy in Washington.

In the wake of Moussaou's testimony, the Saudi Embassy released a statement calling Moussaou a "deranged criminal" and denying that the Saudi government had ever funded Al Qaeda.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/jailed-al-qaeda-operative-makes-explosive-claims-about-saudi-royals-funding-pre-911-terror-2015-2#ixzz3QtiQeUOS (End excerpt)

4) New York Times February 02, 2015 (Excerpt) “Moussaoui Calls Saudi Princes Patrons of Al Qaeda”

WASHINGTON — In highly unusual testimony inside the federal supermax prison, a former operative for Al Qaeda has described prominent members of Saudi Arabia’s royal family as major donors to the terrorist network in the late 1990s and claimed that he discussed a plan to shoot down Air Force One with a Stinger missile with a staff member at the Saudi Embassy in Washington.

The Qaeda member, Zacarias Moussaoui, wrote last year to Judge George B. Daniels of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, who is presiding over a lawsuit filed against Saudi Arabia by relatives of those killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He said he wanted to testify in the case, and after lengthy negotiations with Justice Department officials and the federal Bureau of Prisons, a team of lawyers was permitted to enter the prison and question him for two days last October.

In a statement Monday night, the Saudi Embassy said that the national Sept. 11 commission had rejected allegations that the Saudi government or Saudi officials had funded Al Qaeda. “Moussaoui is a deranged criminal whose own lawyers presented evidence that he was mentally incompetent,” the statement said. “His words have no credibility.”

Mr. Moussaoui received a diagnosis of mental illness by a psychologist who testified on his behalf, but he was found competent to stand trial on terrorism charges. He was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 and is held in the most secure prison in the federal system, in Florence, Colo. Mr. Moussaoui’s accusations could not be verified.

The allegations from Mr. Moussaoui come at a sensitive time in Saudi-American relations, less than two weeks after the death of the country’s longtime monarch, King Abdullah, and the succession of a half-brother, King Salman.

There has often been tension between Saudi leaders and the Obama administration since the Arab uprisings of 2011 and the efforts to manage the region’s resulting turmoil. Mr. Moussaoui describes meeting in Saudi Arabia with Salman, then a prince, and other Saudi royals while delivering them letters from Osama bin Laden.

There has long been evidence that wealthy Saudis provided support for bin Laden, the son of a Saudi construction magnate, and Al Qaeda before the 2001 attacks. Saudi Arabia had worked closely with the United States to finance Islamic militants fighting the Soviet Army in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and Al Qaeda drew its members from those militant fighters.

But the extent and nature of Saudi involvement in Al Qaeda, and whether it extended to the planning and financing of the Sept. 11 attacks, has long been a subject of dispute.

Mr. Moussaoui’s testimony, if judged credible, provides new details of the extent and nature of that support in the pre-9/11 period. In more than 100 pages of testimony, filed in federal court in New York on Monday, he comes across as calm and largely coherent, though the plaintiffs’ lawyers questioning him do not challenge his statements. (End excerpt)


Question one, Would President Bush II’s redacted 28 pages of “28-page section of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001”; inform the American people that Saudis not only provided financial support, but that Saudis also, provided logistical and technical support for 911 terrorists?

“Proof or lack of proof” of Saudis involvement in 911 terrorist attack is easy enough to verify; Obama simply releases 28 redacted pages so American people can reach their own conclusions. Then again, if Obama refuses to release the report classified by Bush II; one can consider whether Obama is providing cover for 911 terrorists, and their collaborators at minimum or accessories and participants for worst case scenario. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question – There would be little difference between Republican establishment politicians and or Obama “covering” Saudi’s anti-American policies and actions for oil profits from international trade; and the same American internationalists engaging in economic trade with China. Why, so China could use their manufacturing and financial profits from doing business with America to build China’s military. Why, so China could threaten both America’s national security and domestic tranquility. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Exception to title “Obama Providing Cover for 911 Terrorists?” - and releasing redacted pages, it could be the very first and perhaps very last time Obama ever did anything that was in the best interest of America’s national security and domestic tranquility. Good question for Republicans next 2016 Presidential candidate: Will your very first act as President be to release twenty-eight pages of 911 truths to the American people?

Continue Plus 781

Texas Drifter: Unintended Consequences Overview

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Some concepts like “unintended consequences” exist whether ignored by Reader or not.

Some Definitions
1. Unintended consequences means what concept sounds like, when syllables are slowly pronounced out loud
2. Self-defense can be the act of protecting oneself, one’s pack, one’s herd, and or protecting one’s private or political property including territory from threats
3. Revenge is to avenge oneself for wrongs from another by retaliating in kind or degree
4. Justice, one definition is fair compensation for wrongs committed by another’s guilt or sins
5. Guilt is political legal concept created by tyrant/s arbitrary whims, or constitutional due processes
6. Sin is natural law concept created by Heaven
7. Righteous is state of being free from guilt or sin
8. Righteous self-defense is being free from guilt or sin
9. Righteous revenge is being free from guilt or sin; when there are no constitutional due processes to provide victimized citizens with justice (righteous revenge like righteous self-defense, as a sin can only be determined on an individual’s personal judgment day before Heaven)

Righteous revenge is not guilty conduct and probably not a sin when tyrant or mob rule does not provide fair compensation for wrongs committed by another’s or others’ guilty conduct or sins, including government’s crimes. Hence the importance of domestic war crimes trials like Nuremberg Trials, to provide justice for citizen victims.

List of spiritual concepts defining guilty conduct and sins by individuals and governments (excerpt from Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Number 779) Evolution of America’s traditions, values, principles.
1. Ten Commandments
2. Judeo-Christian Beliefs
3. Common Law after Norman Conquest 1066
4. Magna Carta 1215
5. Abjuration Act 1581
6. Declaration of Independence
7. U.S. Constitution
8. Bill of Rights
9. U.S. Constitutional Statutory Law
10. Side note - Perhaps, item five above, is the least appreciated - Abjuration Act 1581. Reader can reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 742 – “Sacred Origin Second Amendment”. (End excerpt)

Distinctions between righteous killing and unrighteous murder are resolved in Ten Commandments cited above. Reference can be used when trying to distinguish between sins and righteous self-defense or righteous revenge. One example, generally man made guilt is determined by use of appropriate force and justified deadly force.

This writing exercise, proceeds with scenarios involving guilt and sin issues; plus questions. First contemporary issue of guilt and sin involves primary bad actors and their accessories (implementers, administrators, and regulators) to murdering innocents with 1) Obama’s Health Care, facetiously called Obama Care; 2) amnesty for illegal immigrants; 3) domestic tranquility and international security failures that have and will result in murders of eventually hundreds of thousands of American citizens and legal residents - not counting billions of dollars in property damage losses. Do three prior examples of Obama’s tyrannical abuses, suggest a possible future need for domestic war crimes trials in America?

Other issues concerning Obama’s actions, are based on Obama’s alliance with Muslim Brotherhood; an organization, that some describe as internationalist terrorist organization. This argument seems enhanced by Obama not want to identify Muslin NAZI Terrorists as terrorists engaged in threating America.

Following seems better national security process for dealing with terrorists; rather than Obama’s policy of releasing terrorist “to the battlefield to have second chances” too kill Americans and America’s allies. (Excerpt) Texas Drifter adheres to “old school” lessons, and believes that security forces jobs are not done when bad guys leave field of combat; assignment is complete once bad guys are tracked down and completely destroyed. Why, simple answer is so bad guys do not have opportunity to “re-group” to kill good guys or their allies and families on another day.

Reader can reference excerpt from Library Entry # 726 “Guide to Your Political Personality” - Patriot Security Conservatives, as well as most grownups understand that terrorists are not lawful combatants, and are not entitled to civilian constitutional due process legal systems; not entitled to Uniform Code of Military Justice legal processes; not entitled to Geneva Convention due processes for lawful combatant prisoners of war. Terrorists are only entitled to be interrogated for good intelligence, and eventually be summarily executed. (End excerpt)

Where is justice for American citizens when Obama, his Administration, and Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats’, pursue passive reactive anti-terrorist policies which encourage terrorists to continue threating America? Both Obama and Republican establishment always seemingly wait too long to honor their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend.

Scenario: terrorists or illegal immigrant criminals enter America through Southern porous border; breaks into Reader’s home; cuts conservative’s throat and throws him to floor. While conservative’s life sustaining blood is spreading across floor, conservative increasingly faintly sees and hears his wife and children being sexually assaulted and brutally murdered. Why, simple because there are some domestic tranquility and national security problems, that can never be resolved just with words or broken promises.

Another example of possible domestic war crime policies by Obama which also includes his allies including corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats; involves their efforts to destroy cliché phrase “America’s Middle Class”. When Obama refers to “helping” America’s middle class; Obama means, America’s public sector middle class, not America’s private sector middle class.

America’s public sector middle class are government employees who receive estimated twice the salary, and job benefits for doing same work as America’s private sector middle class. Doubt this observation, America’s public sector middle class does not have to participate in Obama Care.

In reality America’s private sector middle class has been re-classified as lumpen-proletariat under Obama’s Marxist-fascist economic system. Reader can find definition of lumpen-proletariat on their own; so their sensibilities can be offended longer. Former Marxists references to lumpen-proletariat were too America’s contemporary public sector lower welfare indigent unemployable class; whose status was upgraded to public sector lower middle class in return for their always voting for their benefactors – Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats. Doubt this observation, public subsidy addicted public sector welfare beneficiaries average thirty thousand to fifty thousand cash value dollars a year. TRUE or FALSE

More questions: Bad guy points a pistol at Reader, it does not matter why, does it? Obama seems aligned with Muslim Brotherhood, a group classified as terrorist by many security sources; plus, Obama refuses to call Islamic NAZI Terrorists what they are, terrorists; why Obama does what Obama does, does not really matter, does it? TRUE or FALSE

Question, one unintended consequence of engaging in righteous self-defense or righteous revenge could be not being able to “live with walking away”. TRUE or FALSE

Question, if Heaven’s Son was to return to contemporary America; the “money lenders” he might cast from America’s political temple could very well be corporate fascist internationalist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. TRUE or FALSE.

Bonus question, in response to choosing 2016 patriot conservative Presidential candidate; expressed another way – one cannot restart building Reader’s house, business, or country; until the fire has been put out. TRUE or FALSE

Clue, Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 761 - “Texas Drifter: America's 2016 Fantasy President”.

Bonus thought essay question – Explain comparable similarities between ivory tower liberal intellectuals and ivory tower conservative intellectuals.

Second bonus thought question, Texas Drifter can easily teach a monkey how to first point, then pull a trigger; then again, it is never easy to teach a conservative patriot with a conscience when to pull a trigger. Translation, what are parameters of guilt and sin unintended consequences, when issues are righteous self-defense and righteous revenge?

Clue or not a clue, was not the Battle of San Jacinto during 1836 which won Texas War for Independence, an example of righteous revenge? Texas Drifter will never be too old to learn; what say you my Reader?