Continue Plus 777

Texas Drifter: Is James’ Brother Jude Still Right?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Since some problems do not have easy or pleasant solutions; some Judeo-Christians lessons like following writing exercise first published about five years ago and only slightly re-edited, is still worthy of consideration by America’s citizen-patriots.

Examples

1. Texas Drifter knew a father who gave his heroin addicted daughter money so she did not have to prostitute herself of steal to get money to buy her heroin. Her father asked me what I thought, told him he and his daughter were going down a road without a happy ending. He said I did not know what it was like to have a heroin addicted daughter. With that I agreed, but said I knew what it was like to be blinded by bad decisions. We have never spoken since.

2. Following government and private sector partnerships: Obama’s Nazi net neutrality net proposals, public mortgage industry guidelines, student loans, Obama Care services, socialist public education, subsidy addicted social services; over regulation of financial and automobile industries, plus all other public bureaucrat and private citizens’ partnerships always travel down roads without happy endings.

3. Government should do what it does best: foreign national security, domestic border security, civil law enforcement, fire suppression, emergency medical transport services, and few regulatory services to travel down roads with better endings.

Possible partial answers for problems which do not have easy or pleasant solutions confronting America, enacting and staying committed to solutions requires mature adults not adults with personalities of two year old children. Specifics can be found throughout Marshall’s Law Texas drifter Library entry numbers reviewable at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Index 5679A.

1. Create private sector jobs by cutting taxes, remember rule: profits create jobs, taxes destroy jobs.
2. Phase out Social Security into private sector retirement accounts over twenty years.
3. Replace tax payer supported public subsidy addiction with re-built charitable services from families, churches, and non-profit organizations.
4. Secure border by constructing secure perimeter fence; check all (no exceptions) traffic entering U.S, and start voluntary deportation of illegal immigrants, followed by physical deportation of remaining illegal immigrants.
5. Establish Armed Forces and intelligence service assets capable of insuring national defense.
6. Reduce national debt with percentage payment settlements with proceeds raised by "America’s Garage Sale” of some public lands. Awful shame America has to sell some of it national treasures; blame Democrats, Moderate Republicans, and socialist environmentalists for their wasteful bankrupting policies.
7. Re-teach American history, values, principles, and traditions in public schools to replace liberals' public education dummy anti-patriotic parents only smart enough to breed even dumber citizens.
8. Stop cowering to political correct fascists and acting like wimp ashamed of being an American citizen.
9. Never forget America’s renaissance cannot begin until leaders are chosen who must first stop decline of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic.
10. Reader can add own additional solutions to list.

Time has arrived for Americans to cease and desist, acting like the father who gave his daughter money to buy her heroin so as to protect his reputation and keep her out of trouble.

Translation “free will” private sector ethical capitalism is good. Another truth: public sector Marxist-fascists like Progressive Democrat Party, and internationalist corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats are both worshipers or taking America down a road with no different an ending than the one for the father who gave his daughter money to buy her heroin.

Moving on to moral of this writing exercise: Texas Drifter not being a religious scholar, wonders was not Jude, brother of James, concerned with early teachings by some Christian leaders that Christians can sin without risking salvation; because Heaven’s Son had already died for their sins? Jude’s own words from THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF JUDE:

Jude: 3 - … it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that you should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the Saints.
Jude: 5 – I will therefore put you in remembrance, though you once knew this, how the Lord, having saved the people out of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
Jude: 21 – Keep your selves in the love of God …

Was Paul (Galatians 5:13) also concerned with same issue troubling Jude?

Reader needs to be patience as above Judeo-Christian teachings tie into contemporary American history. Perhaps reader can help Texas Drifter non-religious scholar understand: Would Heaven allow his only Son to be crucified so perpetual sinners could be given immunity for free will sins committed with advance expectation of Heaven’s Salvation. Back to question in title: Was James' Brother Jude Right?

Question translation: Does Heaven overturn his Son’s spiritual Salvation judgments? Texas Drifter is just asking a question that might also be of interest more too American conservatives. Why, it seems Progressive Democrats and Progressive Republicans who apparently believe they are entitled to passes on all their premeditated free will sins involving breaking their oaths to Heaven to uphold, protect, and defend America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights. TRUE or FALSE

BONUS QUESTION, Texas Drifter is still seeking answer: Was and IS James' Brother Jude Right? TRUE or FALSE

Continue Plus 776

Texas Drifter: Is Obama’s Net Neutrality Segregation?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – “Obama’s net neutrality” might become America’s most infamous civil rights domestic war crime of twenty-first century.

Background references for Reader:
1. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 760 – “N.R. Internet Is Capitalist Best Friend Plus”
2. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 769 –“Obama Entertainment Hypocrite?”

Continuing after reviewing above two references. One can presuppose that using segregation of internet to try and start America’s Second Civil War seems to be beyond really ignorant vanity. Following is impartial P.S.C. (patriot security conservative) analysis of internet segregation threats to America’s domestic tranquility and national security.

Federal and State governments do not have sufficient resources to “out compete” private sector domestic internet reactions of civil disobediences by hackers, protesters; and rebels. “Obama’s Nazi Net” could impact more lives of computer literate young people, than lives of old people affected by Obama Care. Natural alliances between Obama Nazi Net victims and Obama Care victims; will probably result in domestic war crimes trials like Nuremberg Trials against Obama and Obama’s Nazi Net allies, collaborators, and defenders.

Domestic war crimes charges could be based on following:
1. Commission of Domestic War Crimes
2. Accessories to Domestic War Crimes
3. Obstruction of Justice to Domestic War crimes
4. Conspiracy should not be included as “thought crimes”, as most American citizen-patriots are likely too at one time or another have bad thoughts about anti-Christ governments.

Question, it would be hypocritical for Americans to prosecute war crimes on foreign soils; and not prosecute domestic war crimes against Americans and legal residents on American soil, by domestic politicians, public bureaucrats, and their allies like financial donors. Propagandists masquerading as journalists might also be charged with either being accessories or obstruction. TRUE or FALSE

Premise, nationalist refers to one nation; while internationalist based on prefix refers to “among equal nations”. Question, internationalist economic policies seem to construct entangling economic markets “among equal nations”. These entangling internationalist market place entanglements can contribute to military conflicts. Especially if one side feels there is no justice for being taken advantage of, by one or more of other trading partners. TRUE or FALSE

Three clues: first, above seemingly creates exaggerated opposite parameter points which create imperialist policies like those of Japan and Germany leading to World War II. Next contemporary example could include China using its military, the one funded by American internationalist free market traders, to enforce policies on America that Americans will not tolerate. Third Obama’s efforts to turn control of America’s internet over to United Nations.

Another example of how internationalist policies motivated by greed or lust for power can threaten America’s domestic tranquility and or national security. How, by Progressive Democrats or Progressive Republican establishment supporting porous borders and de facto amnesty for criminals called illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – It is not necessary to deport illegal immigrants if illegal immigrants do not cross America’s border onto American soil.

One purpose of domestic war crimes trials is to remind political leaders and bureaucrats with rabid souls that engage in feral human conduct; that they could face two separate judgment days for ignoring Abjuration Act 1581. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, Hitler will always be remembered for his gas chambers. Obama’s eternal legacy could easily be Obama’s re-instituting segregation in America with Obama’s Nazi Net Neutrality civil rights violating domestic war crimes. TRUE or FALSE – Just asking not accusing!

Bonus question two, civil rights struggles do not necessarily predict consequences of “unknown variables” which can cause civil unrest scenarios being decided by best or even “most armed” sides. Something domestic tyrants should remember trying to enslave starting with segregation a nation like America founded on Second of Ten Amendments. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought question, governments may not be able to “translate” encrypted transmissions; tyrants’ solution is to “spy” on received messages files. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – Translation solution: individual abilities to encrypt stored received messages! Not being disrespectful, if you are a computer geek gamer tired of living in mom and pop’s basement or garage; now you know how to make real mega bucks. Think about it; that is unless Obama’s Nazi net neutrality segregation becomes a reality.

Refresher Courtesy Dateline – Reader should feel free to download Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library to their personal files; so long as downloads are not edited and or used for commercial purposes. One example, free gifts for Reader to enjoy and distribute; from Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall - reference Library Entry # 732 – “Marketing Memo for Editor Marshall” and M.LT.D. Library Index #759A.

Continue Plus 775

Texas Drifter: Conservation Basics Revisited

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Following writing exercise was first published about fifteen years ago.

Definitions:
1. Environmentalist – Marxist-fascist ideologues addicted to re-distribution private resources using both public and private Brown Shirts called “greenies” and other things.
2. Polluters or trash people – corporate fascist ideologues, generally Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats motivated by lust for greed, or others who were influenced by their third world upbringings.
3. Conservationist – one who believes in conserving natural resources based on Garden of Eden concept. Brief references:
A) King James Version Genesis 2:15: And the LORD God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
B) Revised Standard Version Set Forth 1611 A.D. Genesis 2:15: The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to till it and keep it.
C) Living Bible Genesis 2:15: The Lord God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for it.

Revisiting conservative environment standards lesson starts with a few more definitions. First: conserve, process of preserving in safe or sound state. Second: conservative, philosophy to process of conserving. Third: conservation: careful preservation and protection of something like environment. Antonym: environmentalists “green” campaign subtlety advocating Marxist-fascism intended to redistribute private property.

Standards are determined to be in compliance by non-prejudicial investigations. Following writing exercise offers techniques conservationists can use to determine environment conservation standards.

Ideals of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are directly related to quality of environment. It is hard to live with contaminated air, land, or water. It is difficult to pursue happiness when a polluted environment forces citizens to remain indoors all the time.

It is also unlikely that freedom can be achieved when nature's classrooms are lost due to greed or incompetence. To paraphrase Moses: God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for heaven’s garden.

Conserving and preserving a nation's natural resources for future generations is next to freedom, the greatest gift citizens can provide future generations. This objective can be achieved with proper management of private and public parks and reserves.

Success can be measured by amount of time one has to appreciate; enjoy; and learn from natures' resources, processes, and marvelous wonders. After all, a house is simply a tent with too much starch.

Some suggest that anti-species or anti-social behavior rates are partially determined by population density to territory per unit ratios. Due to increased population pressures, natural heritage and resources can only be preserved with private and public regulated areas.

Greatest threats to America's natural heritage and resources are: 1)government neglect; 2)government abuse; 3)government sanctioned pollution or exploitation by special interest groups; 4)government abuse of private citizen's property rights for single species management programs; 5) environmental socialists (environmentalists); and 6) private sector citizens or businesses which neglect, abuse, exploit, or steal any natural resources.

People wishing to further study public sector environmental terrorism at state level, need only examine existing management practices of Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four. These public sector environmental terrorist organizations are masters at promoting insignificant volunteer projects while taking bribes which facilitate and protect corporate polluting for corporate fascists.

Space; atmosphere; bodies of water; native wildlife (plants and critters); unique terrain and natural wonders are public resources. Private or public actions which mismanage, abuse, damage, or destroy public resources are criminal behavior.

A zoo preserves shell not spirit of natural heritage; zoos are good sources of confined research and public entertainment. Beyond zoos, other environmental management components include public and private sector
1)"reserves" for the endangered;
2 "preserves" for pre-endangered;
3) refuges and parks;
4) wildlife ranches/farms for reintroduction of plants or animals; and
5) wildlife gardens.

Single species management is a technique suited for farming or ranching (agriculture) not natural resource conservation management. Public management of pre-endangered or endangered species should resemble management practices of game animals. Since private owners can only shoot deer during regulated periods, endangered species would be protected from property owners year round. If private land owners' property is critical for survival of species, land should be purchased by government for a public park, or set aside as a private trust.

Public sector bureaucrats and uninformed non-profit organizations are hurting conservation of natural resources movements by using unconstitutional forces against private citizens and their properties. Government excessive force always offends general public.

It is a myth that only governments and non-profit activists are capable of managing a country's natural resources. Private sector individuals should be included in natural resource management plans.

Good management strategy includes developing conservation environments where surrounding populations benefit financially from co-existence with regulated area.

Additional policy concerns should include prohibiting public sector from selling or leasing non-renewable resources. Contemporary greed which deprives future generations of options to access non-renewable resources is comparable to using children in animal porn films. Renewable resources should only be sold or leased at fair market prices.

Sufficient public funds should be allocated to provide sufficient security for public natural resources. Private funds could be raised to provide security for natural resources in other countries.

Conservative conservationists who do not desire to work and live in a landfill type environment; need to appreciate, that adequate environmental resource percentages will always be a topic of debate.

One example, developers in Texas have access to about 98 percent of Texas's natural resources. If developers cannot make a living on 98 percent of a region's land mass, is remaining 2 percent of undeveloped land going to make these people smarter?

Single species management disrupts natural processes of component bio-tropes or specific ecological systems. Components of specific ecology systems include
1) geology from the center of earth;
2) surface soils and surrounding water systems;
3) climate and weather;
4) atmosphere;
5) all living plants/creatures (resident and migratory);
6) impacts from surrounding ecological systems.

Specific bio-tropes from million acre plus parks to backyards, should abandon single species management systems for comprehensive component plans based on premise that bio-tropes are evolving not static.

Consider results of following single species plan: Traps, poisons, and bounties were used to eliminate all predators of young game animals. This activity resulted in a population explosion of rabbits which destroyed native forage for game animals. Game animals eventually became weak, diseased and dead from starvation. Over populated rabbits eventually suffered the same fate as game animals. Foliage barren land washed away in next rainy season.

Many contemporary "weekend environmentalists" are ignorant of nature's processes and natural history. For example, coastal plains along the Gulf of Mexico were covered by prairie grasses and thickets of brush. So why are groups telling public that area's forests need to be replanted, when there hasn't been a "real forest" in this area for thousands of years, if ever?

It also needs to be understood that contemporary concepts surrounding "native habitants" are based on fraud. Key issue is definition of native. Does "native" refer to environmental conditions a hundred years ago; a thousand years ago; or a million years ago?

All habitats are evolutionary, and were only native during their era of conception. Habitats can be defined by their location on an evolutionary time line which excludes human interference. To clarify, one can say that a specific habitat would look like this and contain these components if humans had never interfered in the natural evolutionary process.

Using wood, metal or concrete to build stick forests connected by wires; electric companies have destroyed more miles of American horizons than any other single industry. Perhaps legislation should be enacted requiring these government protected monopolies to continually modernize energy delivery systems. Better still, electric companies which are the best example of government protected dinosaurs; should be forced to compete with private sector alternatives.

Ever wondered why you have never met an unfriendly con artist? The answer is simple, it is easier to con friends; friends tend to give friends the benefit of the doubt; and friends are reluctant to turn friends in to authorities.

These three human conditions give corporate con artists opportunity to start scam; perpetuate scam; and have time to "get away" after scam has run its course. It should be noted that not all corporations operate with criminal mentalities; but sufficient numbers do to justify the following.

Groups generally manipulated by corporate con artists include: poor (unemployed), greedy (local businesses), self-serving (local politicians and bureaucrats), and vain (community leaders and local news media).

Community leaders and politicians tend to be vain self-admiring publicity seekers who make easy targets for corporate con artists. Careers of these self-proclaimed citizen heroes are built on media coverage.

Members of local news media are targeted because these people represent special interest journalists. In reality, small town newspapers generally do not report news that offends "life support" advertisers or fellow chamber members. Consequently, ongoing corporate environmental abuses are never reported unless outside independent journalists take an interest.
Corporate scam, complete with support from local journalists tends to work as follows
1) Corporate representatives contact local community leaders with exaggerated promises of jobs and economic development.
2) The corporation sponsors a series of "getting acquainted" parties involving food, liquor, and in some cases, prostitutes. Purpose of these functions is to show people what a friendly neighbor the corporation will be.
3) Corporation makes token contributions and pledges to area charities. One common technique is for the corporation to force employees to sign up for payroll deductions to support area charities. Corporation collects payroll deductions for a year, keeps the money in an interest bearing account; then takes part of interest accrued from employee deductions and gets media credit for corporate gifts.
4) Corporation makes contributions to area municipal, county, state, and federal politicians. This effectively buys influence which keeps city, county, state, and federal regulatory agencies from interfering with ongoing corporate pollution. Corporate trick is not to buy government agencies, only lease their indifference for limited amounts of time. This is viable because after the corporation has left area, tax payers will get to clean up mess.
5) Corporation seeks and gets special price considerations from local utility companies. Since corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that regular utility customers should subsidize corporation by paying higher utility rates.
6) Corporation seeks and gets special property and sales tax exemptions. Again, since the corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that tax payers should subsidize corporation by paying higher taxes.
7) Pays employees lowest possible wages and provide employees with lowest possible benefit packages. Corporate attitude is that communities should be glad somebody cared enough to exploit unemployed.
8) Buys surrounding property damaged by corporation production practices so offended parties think that corporation is "fair" to its neighbors.
9) Continue rewarding community leaders with token community service gifts so community support for corporation does not diminish, and
10) Continues leeching off community resources until environmental damage is so severe that community leaders who have essentially become corporate prostitutes are no longer believable.

Generally by time offended region figures out it have been had; corporation has already found another group of community leaders who can't wait to invite corporation into their neighborhood.

Citizens and communities need to understand that money is not a zero response asset when exchanged in political process. Special interest groups expect policy considerations in return for property. Four standards for evaluating transfer of assets in political process are:
1) impact on national security;
2) impact on constitutional integrity;
3) impact on ethical capitalism; and
4) impact on natural resources.

Penalties imposed of those engaging in environmental terrorism can include: criminal fines; prison time; civil suit damages; or claims against insurance policies or bonds. Any company engaged in actives which impact natural resources that refuses to carry insurance or post bonds, is probably engaging in environmental terrorist activities.

Some ways that communities can protect themselves from transitory marauding corporations are as follows:
1) run complete criminal and financial background checks on inquiring corporation and all of its officers and executives;
2) physically go to last place the corporation left and check following: compare corporate promises to that community; find out if corporation delivered on promises to that community; find out why corporation left that community; and find out if corporation damaged environment of that community;
3) require corporation to maintain a reasonable environmental damage restoration bond. A one hundred million dollar bond should cost corporation about a million dollars a year; the amount of bond should be based on potential risk to potentially affected environmental components (if citizens can be required to have automobile insurance, why cannot corporations be required to carry environmental impact insurance), and
4) inform community leaders who collaborate with offending corporations that they will personally make up any financial differences between the corporate environmental damage bond and costs of restoring environment to its original condition from their own resources.

Community leaders, politicians, bureaucrats, and local media currently have no incentive to keep transitory corporations from ruining their surrounding environment. Making these people responsible for letting themselves be conned, will go a long way in protecting the environment. Citizens need to understand that corporations come and go, but communities only have one environment.

Complaints that these accountability policies will drive corporations to other countries are nonsense. Political instability and political corruption will deter any significant corporate flight into third world countries.

Beside that who cares if these corporations take their business elsewhere; transitory corporations who trash environment are collections of human garbage and should not be welcome in any decent neighborhoods.

Corporations often abuse natural resources in following ways:
1) OVER-UTILIZATION: strip mining, over cutting public forests, or commercial aquaculture companies who do not use bed liners which raises the water table in flood prone areas;
2) DUMPING: hazardous liquids, solids, or gases: dumping chemical pollutants from commercial fish, shrimp, or eel ponds into public waters;
3) CHANGING NATURAL PROCESSES: introducing foreign species, and or foreign species diseases into native habitants causing the release of exotic shrimp and eels into pristine public waters when pond banks break during a hurricane;
4) DESTRUCTION OF RESOURCES: killing black bears for their gall bladders, or public agencies selling out to special interests.

Some types of specific pollutants include:
- viruses
- virus anti-biotics
- genetically altered anti-biotic viruses
- non-native parasites
- suspended solids
- non-suspended solids
- dissolved materials
- liquids
- chemicals
- minerals
- non-native animal or plant species
- other substances yet to be identified

Some effected elements of pollution on public waters can include:
- purity (compare to H2o)
- salinity
- turbidity/visibility
- temperature
- erosion
- silting
- oxygen density
- system self-flushing capabilities
- native marine\shore plant and animal life
- migratory marine\shore animal life

Laws need to be enacted requiring truth in labeling of public agencies. Perhaps some natural resources conservation commissions should be renamed natural resources vandalism commissions. Such policies would facilitate environmental investigations for conservative conservationists.

This policy would identify agencies like natural resources conservation commissions which: 1)consistently violate private citizens' property rights; 2)implement policies which damage the environment to justify federal "clean up" grants; and 3) take bribes allowing special interest groups to destroy public's natural resources.

Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four are comparable to incompetent and very corrupt government agencies in 1800's which used to exploit Native Americans and mismanage Indian reservations. Conservative conservationists would be prudent to never blindly trust government agencies.

Integrity for public sector bureaucrats tends to be guided by loyalty to taxes and grants which pay their salaries; not what is best for America's natural resources.

A great many university "research studies" are propaganda position papers for special interest groups. In many cases, these exercises in fraudulent science threaten domestic wellbeing and national security.

Conservative conservationists who fail to verify or collaborate public sector research studies with independent monitors or independent studies are asking to be victims of scientific fraud.

Conservative conservationists need to understand that many "reputable" environmental groups are fronts for big business interests, “green” groups which take inconsistent stands, or who avoid public positions are likely candidates for being fraudulent community service groups.

Primary clue is always money trail. Community, state, or national conservation groups which oppose low impact environmental threats; but consistently refrain from taking a position on high dollar natural resource destruction projects, are generally covert fronts serving the interests of developers or big business.

Conservative conservationists should be very wary of trusting any elected or appointed official. Most elected officials at every level of government are only loyal to their traditional "fee" driven special interest legislative system; the reality is that integrity is a myth in America's special interest democracies.

Easiest way to stop these types of abuses is to make financial costs of the offending action greater than the financial rewards.

For example, some public natural resources can have "undetermined value" and should be managed as a public trust. If this is not so, why is restoring "diverted" natural resources to their original condition a legitimate tax deductible business expense for private sector profit motivated businesses?

Consequently, both private and public sector organizations which divert natural resources, but who do not pay cost of restoring natural resources to their original condition should be required to report "savings" as income.

Just think how many companies who have engaged in environmental terrorism may owe the government back taxes; or how many municipal, county, or state governing bodies will be required to reimburse federal grant monies.

Conservative conservationists’ best ally in protecting natural resources is private sector civil legal process. Should the civil legal system eventually collapse as the last "by the rules" conservation protection process, final alternative may become civil disobedience.

Conservative conservationists need to understand that using reason or emotional appeal will never stop private and public sector environmental terrorists. Second, private or public justice based on mob rule is always shameless and immoral.

Greatest threats to America’s environment are epidemics introduced by illegal immigrants from third world countries. Even if Americans had never heard word terrorism, southern border would still need to be securely closed to prevent third world epidemics being introduced into America.

Doubters need only review impact of importing foreign flora and fauna on native American plants and animals. Nature is nature and people are influenced by laws of nature.

Many third world infections like tuberculosis are less responsive to treatments for first world tuberculosis. Illegal immigrants do not have reliable histories of completing American treatment programs, actions that produces a third world strain of more lethal and less treatable viruses that produces greater public health threats to Americans.

American politicians, bureaucrats, fools, and special interest hate groups that support a southern porous border will eventually be signing death warrants for millions of American citizens. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, justice is a two sided sword. First side is used for resolving intentional or negligent public health threats by terrorists or illegal immigrants. Second side is for bringing Americans too account for unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and deaths. TRUE or FALSE

Additional references about “Conservation Basics”
1. Google – Citizens Passions Index to “Continue Plus 564 –Update Ranch Scout Notes”
2. Google – Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 713 – “Two Tales For Same Dog”

Continue Plus 774

Texas Drifter: Are Progressive Democrats / Progressive Republicans Concubines?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Obama, McConnell, Boehner, will compromise on Marxist-fascist and corporate fascist shared beliefs. Why, to destroy all conservative principles like Keystone Pipeline; secure borders and no amnesty for illegal immigrants; plus other traditional American values Reader can list.

One definition of concubines, is persons cohabitating not legally married as in “just shacking up” like female canines in heat.

This writing exercise can be updated as Progressive Democrats and Progressive Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats, continue consummating their governing in sin, as shameless political strumpets. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus Question, why should Reader not expect such an unholy alliance between Progressive Democrats and Progressive Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats to last? Obvious simple answer, both despise and seek to destroy Judeo-Christian citizen-patriot conservatives; should be no surprise about their un-American unholy union, both also share faith in internationalist fascism.

Clue – Judge concubines’ by their actions not by concubines’ words.

ContinuePlus 773

Texas Drifter: Truth Is Not Propaganda

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Seems that the origin of propaganda can be traced to personal relationships; “flattery” facilitates romance.

Purpose of propaganda is to destroy truth with emotional passions. Contemporary example could include Dallas Cowboys’ recent playoff game loss to Green Bay Packers. Three observations:
1. To paraphrase former Dallas coach, Dallas did not score enough to take referees out of game;
2. If one does not like certain rules; one should change the rules;
3. Only complaining when “bad calls” do not go your team’s way is whining.

Definition of propaganda is promoting exaggerated or deceptive "truths", and or outright lies as advertisement to gain favor with specific interests of specific targeted social, political, economic, ideological groups and their beliefs.

Types of propaganda include positive and negative. Positive propaganda includes how beneficial Obama Care will be for middle class citizens; like being able to keep you doctor and saving lots of money. Negative propaganda is how Judeo-Christian conservative are greater threat to America’s traditions, values, and principles than Islamic NAZI terrorists.

Other examples of negative propaganda include:
1. Politically Correct NAZI (P.C.) word restrictions and attacks on First of Ten Amendments constitutional due process rights
2. Lying about never keeping public promises
3. “Hate speak” used by Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment to destroy all types of Judeo-Christian conservatives
4. Name calling / character assassinations
Note: name calling or character assassinations are not propaganda if descriptions are true.

Standards in private sector extend to libel and or slander if presented as public facts. Close to, but not over line exemptions include: presenting information as questions; opinions; or references to public officials. Example, above information was not presented by an attorney or intended to be legal advice.

Some specific propaganda players in contemporary America include; and standard propaganda premise applies to them as it did and does for Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro brothers, Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats, corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats; plus pretender cult leaders Reader can list. Premise is, propaganda repeated enough times, tends to become virtual truth for clone followers and other fools.

Simplistic American politics profile of propagandists and truth reporters include following adjectives:
1. Bad guys / good guys
2. America last advocates / America first advocates
3. Internationalists / nationalists
4. Isolationists parameters personalities (reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 770 “Texas Drifter: Parameters of Isolationism”

Simplistic American politics profile of specific groups – starting with bad guys:
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and their allies
2. Corporate fascist establishment Republicans and their allies
3. Special interest world owes me haters (race, ethnic background, gender, Reader can name others)
4. Ideological haters like Islamic Nazi Terrorists
5. Pretender conservative cults

Good guys include “blended” conservatives:
1. Judeo-Christians
2. Constitutionalists
3. Ethical capitalists
4. Libertarians
5. Reagan Democrats
6. Patriot Security Conservatives
7. Others Reader can list

Some contemporary propaganda themes include following:

Part I
Evolution of Hate Crimes from: Race, ethnicity, gender identity, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, sexual orientation, age, public employees, judges, and will eventually include: police officers, Marxist-fascist Democrats, corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats, welfare recipients, illegal immigrants, physically challenged, Islamic NAZI terrorists.
Evolution of hate crimes will never include: Judeo-Christians; conservatives; patriots.

Another side note: most killings of law enforcement personnel are already capital offenses. Citizen-patriots should not “cheapen” murders of law enforcement personnel by associating their murders with whining perpetual victims’ who feel the world owes them special favors.
TRUTH or PROPAGANDA

Part II
Black market reality, taking money or favors from a pimp; makes the recipient bluntly stated, the pimp‘s strumpet. Political market reality, recently elected Republican officials who take money or favors from Boehner; makes them a political pimp’s strumpet. TRUTH or PROPAGANDA

Part III
(Excerpt from raymondibrahim.com) Egypt’s New President Blasts Islamic Extremists by Raymond Ibrahim on January 11, 2015 in In the Media - Newsmax By Todd Beamon In a bold yet little-reported speech, The President of Egypt has directly confronted Islamic leaders in his country and challenged them to stand against extremism in their religion. “We are in need of a religious revolution,” President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi told imams on New Years Day at al-Azhar University in Cairo. The [...] (End excerpt)

Does above report suggest that there might be a glimmer of hope for Islamic “reformation” which might moderate majority of Islam’s citizens’ toleration of Islamic NAZI terrorists’ crimes against humanity? Citizen-patriots need to recall that it took Luther’s reformation of Christianity to convert Christianity into less “Crusades” motivated doctrine.

As Obama’s loyalties seem to be closer to Islamic NAZI terrorists and similar groups like Muslim Brotherhood; it seems that Judeo-Christian conservative citizen-patriots must speak up in defense of Egypt’s President. Why, better to support moderate individual than an American President and Marxist-fascist American President whose loyalties are with America’s sworn enemies. TRUTH or PROPAGANDA

Time to gradually end this writing exercise with usual series of questions. Boehner is an ethical clone of Yankee conservative carpetbaggers who urinated on President Lincoln’s desire to rebuild the “vanquished” Southern States without malice or revenge following America’s First Civil War. TRUTH or PROPAGANDA

Clue – Boehner treats Tea Party conservatives like Yankee conservative carpetbaggers treated South’s vanquished during South’s Reconstruction years.

Question, seems that citizen-patriots have two options when dealing with Islamic NAZI terrorist threats to America and America’s allies.
1. Neutralize them before they murder and or enslave citizen-patriots families, friends, neighbors, countrymen, and foreign allies.
2. Neutralize them after they murder and or enslave citizen-patriots families, friends, neighbors, countrymen, and foreign allies.
TRUTH or PROPAGANDA

Undisputable fact, illegal immigrants would not be murdering, raping, extorting, kidnapping, robbing, killing in DUI accidents and all the other crimes illegal immigrants commit against hundreds of thousands of American citizens and U.S. legal residents on American soil if illegal immigrants could not cross America’s Southern porous border.

Questions do actions like those by Brownsville Mayor, Tony Martinez, who has filed an amicus “friend of the court” brief in federal court on behalf of U.S. Representative Filemon Vela (D-Brownsville, Texas) in the congressman’s official capacity, supporting recent actions taken by President Barack Obama regarding the country’s immigration policies make these two and all other politicians ACCESSORIES to every single crime committed by illegal immigrants against American citizens and legal U.S. residents? Answer could be definite yes since enticing illegal immigrants with de facto amnesty seems to be bribery perhaps by another name. TRUTH or PPROPAGANDA

Clue perhaps Americans victimized by illegal immigrants should send U.S. Representative Vela and Brownsville Mayor Martinez “heart felt “thank you notes” for enticing illegal immigrants to illegally enter America and destroy lives of law abiding Americans and legal residents?

Bonus question, Texas new Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick Republican, is not an accessory to illegal immigrants murdering, raping, extorting, kidnapping, robbing, killing in DUI accidents, and all the other crimes illegal immigrants commit. TRUTH or PROPAGANDA

Second bonus question, Conservatives worst nightmare could be America’s “second in line” to be President; who could conceivably be America’s next Hitler. Think about it, who has more, vile contemptible hated of America’s citizen conservative citizen-patriots than Boehner? TRUTH or PPROPAGANDA

Clue – Who would benefit more from Boehner’s hatred of Judeo-Christian citizen-patriot conservatives than Boehner’s donor handlers? Answer corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Maybe it is true, that timeless truths about soulless propagandists creates enemies; especially when propagandists’ actions expose truths that propagandists’ words are simply blatant lies!

Hopefully you my Reader better understand title: “Truth Is Not Propaganda.”