Continue Plus 799

Texas Drifter: America’s Jury System Fascist?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Is title truth in form of question? If free citizens do not have enough respect for their government to voluntarily serve as impartial juror for meager compensation; how can any justice ever be achieved using government juror slaves?

Definition of fascism is political-economic system where property and means of production are owned by private sector; but are so regulated by governments to either support public subsidy addicts for votes to stay in power (like Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats); or generate excessive profits for corporate fascists to stay in power (like Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats).

Reader might compare history of America’s slave jurors; to America’s Armed Forces which more cost efficient since relying on volunteers and abandoning drafted slaves.

Few examples of America’s “spill-over” to other levels of governments fascist jury policies.
1. Seems Texas has followed America’s devotion to utilizing fascist juries to serve public sector interests. How, Texas use of public sector terrorism dependent on fear of intimidation.
2. Message sent: potential citizen juror should be cheerful state government slave! Or, lose your Texas property; lose your liberty by being sent to jail; resist and Texas state government might murder you, because you are nothing.

Some “fair jury “foundations
1. Ten Commandments like one which clearly states, Thou shall not steal …
2. Abjuration Act 1581 – Reader will remember longer if Reader does own research
3. Declaration of Independence – inalienable rights to …
4. U.S. Constitution Article III Section 2 - The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
5. Bill of Rights VII - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
6. U.S. Constitution Amendment XIII - Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Could involuntary servitude forced by government threats of citizen’s loss of property, loss of liberty, loss of life for jury duty be considered an unjust tax on law abiding citizen not convicted of any crime; and specifically be an unjust tax on citizen’s labor?

Where it is stated in above citations that jury duty slavery through involuntary servitude is consistent with America’s traditions, values, and or principles?

How can “innocent to proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt” citizen with Heaven granted inalienable rights ever expect to get “fair trial”; from government intimidated volunteer slaves serving on government juries? Juries which also happen to be manipulated by many malicious bureaucrat prosecutors loyal only to their lusts for their conviction ratios. They can’t. TRUE or FALSE

Many above describe prosecutors are Marxist-fascist since their sense of justice only includes only prosecuting private sector middle class citizens who often cannot afford adequate defense against malicious public sector prosecutors with unlimited government budgets. This view is re-enforced by prosecutors offering deals like “plead guilty on government’s terms; or I will put your wife in jail and your children in permanent foster care.” Many prosecutors care about their conviction ratios, not facts of case.

All the while, prosecutors never seem to prosecute professional welfare frauds; or hate crimes by minorities against private sector middle class citizens. Why simple, District Attorneys do not want to lose votes for being perceived as being “mean to the poor” or being “closet racists” against minorities or being “insensitive” to other special interest hate groups. Doubt this observations, how many Muslim Islamic terrorists have ever been prosecuted for hate crimes against Anglo Judeo-Christians? Answer is very, very, few to none. TRUE or FALSE

Texas Drifter could be wrong, do not think America was envisioned as a due process constitutional republic; so Marxist-fascist prosecutors and some accessory judges could use slave jurors to prosecute. Who, “guilty until proven innocent” in public mob lynchings masquerading as due process trials. Two examples: 1) Obama’s Justice Department and 2) Texas verdict still out – will be identified later. Just asking, not accusing TRUE or FALSE

Bonus Question (with three clues) – Pretending that Reader is in time capsule and could re-visit America’s Founding Fathers during America’s beginning decades. How does Reader think America’s Founders would react, if telling America’s Founders that in little more than two hundred years; following would be reality? Forced government servitude prior to due process conviction of a crime was lawful tax on citizen’s labor. Plus stealing citizen’s property; rescinding citizen’s liberty; or even government killing a citizen who too strenuously objected to serving as government slave on a jury; was common place in Founding Fathers great constitutional experiment. Just a guess, Founding Fathers would not have been amused? TRUE or FALSE

Clue 1 - It has been written many times that road to Hades is paved with good intentions. Could it also be true that tolerating inconveniences of “seedling” tyrannies are road to same Hades?

Clue 2 – Seems that any judge at any level of government that bases their rulings on popular opinion are ruling in favor of mob rule; and that that same judge is also a traitor to their oath to: Heaven, America the country, and America’s people.

Clue 3 – As there is no apparent distinctions in Ten Commandments between the souls of an earthly king and individual subjects. There are also no distinctions among oaths to uphold, protect, and defend from all enemies domestic and foreign; and between “inferior court” judges ordering local citizens to become temporary government slaves for a jury, or Supreme / Superior court members ordering that unconstitutional laws like Obama Care be treated as constitutional law.

Why, local inferior court fascism is no different than superior court national fascism. Translation, fascism by any other name is still fascism; as treason by any other name is still treason (when defined as “adhering to their enemies”).

Bonus question, do you my Reader, know what makes America a great constitutional republic? Think about following answer: Texas Drifter an unknown farmer’s son who is not a legal scholar, knows more about judicial integrity; than four liberal Supreme Court members; seemingly more than two moderate court members; maybe not nearly as much as the three conservative court members. How could this be? Perhaps because America’s founding documents were written by average Americans and for average Americans; and not just Judges, prosecutors, and lawyers. TRUE or FALSE

Back to title, what is righteous about any prospective juror taking any oath from any judge who violates their own oath while serving on the bench? The answer: that is why judgment day is personal. On one side, in non-spiritual reality; being a martyr for slaves who volunteer to be slaves; seems and exercise in vanity; have still not figured out other side.

Seems following observation is valid, those defending fascist jury systems including judges, prosecutors, and other haters defined by their actions; who all defend fascist jury systems are RENOUNCING all “fair jury” foundations cited above. May not want to hang out with evil too much; so reader does not have to explain their actions on their very own personal judgment day.

Final thought question, where’s hope for America’s future when political ruling class seems to be ruled by people who are: too ignorant, too vain, too cowardly, or just too evil to admit that they are acting like fascists? Reader might just think about their answer for personal security reasons; at least for now?