Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Continue Plus 780


Texas Drifter: Texas Lt. Gov. Patrick Texas’ Harry Reid?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Based on recent public statement by Texas new Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick: “Second Amendment rights are very important, but open carry does not reach to the level of prioritizing at this point,” Patrick said at TEXAS TRIBUNE event Tuesday. “I don’t think the votes are there.” Has Patrick started breaking his campaign promises to Texas voters less than thirty days after taking office?

Texas Drifter has never been a strong advocate of “open carry” laws in Texas without certain requirements. Reader can reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry #765 – “Down Sides Texas Open Carry” published December 22, 2014. What Texas Drifter is strong advocate of is how to treat un-repenting politicians lying to voters to achieve public office using fraud and deception.

Perhaps some solution responses by offended Texas voters could include:
1. Do not “socially” speak to un-repentant offending politician
2. Do not volunteer to help un-repentant offending politician
3. Do not donate money to unrepentant offending politician
4. Stand up and turn back on un-repentant offending politician when that un-repentant offending politician is speaking in public

Why consider above solutions; send Texas next new Lieutenant Governor in next election a not subtle message. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, perhaps some might remind Patrick that all his billionaire, and millionaire supporters combined financial support will not buy Patrick; one cent’s worth of grace on judgment day for breaking his campaign promises to Texas voters. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought for preceding question: Who among us has not learned from our mistakes? Perhaps Patrick will publicly simply admit, that he made a mistake; then get back on the right path of honoring his campaign promises?

Reader might ask, why give Patrick another chance? It is kind of a Judeo-Christian thing; if Reader has to ask for explanation, they probably would not understand anyway.


Question, the reason Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas politicians, media propagandist outlets, plus many “community leaders” oppose a border fence to close America’s Southern porous border; is because of their loyalties supporting laundering drug cartel profits through local retail sales and investments on Texas side of border. TRUE or FALSE

Observation clue – Estimated ninety-nine percent (99%) of negative and bad impacts that illegal immigrants have on America’s society and people, could be avoided by having a secure fence with boots on ground filling in security gaps. If Readers listens hard enough, they can hear security fools screeching about advantages of their “technology fences”. TRUE or FALSE

Question, technology fences in addition to being only reactive tactics; should be considered as “only supplemental” assets at best. Technology fences only work until power sources are disrupted (like dead batteries); warning or data signals are jammed; or software is damaged by hackers or viruses. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, what do Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas pretender conservative media outlets and Obama share in common? Obama is in process of “doing away with” or murdering concept term “Islamic NAZI Terrorists”. While Rio Grande Valley North Mexico, Texas pretender conservative media outlets are trying to do away with or murder concept term “cross border violence”. TRUE or FALSE

Clue - What is that old misinterpreted adage of not “suffering fools gladly”? Correct expression suggests that Reader should suffer fools gladly, because Heaven blessed Reader by Reader not being one of the fools.

Second example of foolish conduct can be reference at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 696 – “Security Issues SpaceX Launch Site?” TRUE or FALSE