Thursday, January 15, 2015
Continue Plus 776
Texas Drifter: Is Obama’s Net Neutrality Segregation?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – “Obama’s net neutrality” might become America’s most infamous civil rights domestic war crime of twenty-first century.
Background references for Reader:
1. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 760 – “N.R. Internet Is Capitalist Best Friend Plus”
2. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 769 –“Obama Entertainment Hypocrite?”
Continuing after reviewing above two references. One can presuppose that using segregation of internet to try and start America’s Second Civil War seems to be beyond really ignorant vanity. Following is impartial P.S.C. (patriot security conservative) analysis of internet segregation threats to America’s domestic tranquility and national security.
Federal and State governments do not have sufficient resources to “out compete” private sector domestic internet reactions of civil disobediences by hackers, protesters; and rebels. “Obama’s Nazi Net” could impact more lives of computer literate young people, than lives of old people affected by Obama Care. Natural alliances between Obama Nazi Net victims and Obama Care victims; will probably result in domestic war crimes trials like Nuremberg Trials against Obama and Obama’s Nazi Net allies, collaborators, and defenders.
Domestic war crimes charges could be based on following:
1. Commission of Domestic War Crimes
2. Accessories to Domestic War Crimes
3. Obstruction of Justice to Domestic War crimes
4. Conspiracy should not be included as “thought crimes”, as most American citizen-patriots are likely too at one time or another have bad thoughts about anti-Christ governments.
Question, it would be hypocritical for Americans to prosecute war crimes on foreign soils; and not prosecute domestic war crimes against Americans and legal residents on American soil, by domestic politicians, public bureaucrats, and their allies like financial donors. Propagandists masquerading as journalists might also be charged with either being accessories or obstruction. TRUE or FALSE
Premise, nationalist refers to one nation; while internationalist based on prefix refers to “among equal nations”. Question, internationalist economic policies seem to construct entangling economic markets “among equal nations”. These entangling internationalist market place entanglements can contribute to military conflicts. Especially if one side feels there is no justice for being taken advantage of, by one or more of other trading partners. TRUE or FALSE
Three clues: first, above seemingly creates exaggerated opposite parameter points which create imperialist policies like those of Japan and Germany leading to World War II. Next contemporary example could include China using its military, the one funded by American internationalist free market traders, to enforce policies on America that Americans will not tolerate. Third Obama’s efforts to turn control of America’s internet over to United Nations.
Another example of how internationalist policies motivated by greed or lust for power can threaten America’s domestic tranquility and or national security. How, by Progressive Democrats or Progressive Republican establishment supporting porous borders and de facto amnesty for criminals called illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – It is not necessary to deport illegal immigrants if illegal immigrants do not cross America’s border onto American soil.
One purpose of domestic war crimes trials is to remind political leaders and bureaucrats with rabid souls that engage in feral human conduct; that they could face two separate judgment days for ignoring Abjuration Act 1581. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question, Hitler will always be remembered for his gas chambers. Obama’s eternal legacy could easily be Obama’s re-instituting segregation in America with Obama’s Nazi Net Neutrality civil rights violating domestic war crimes. TRUE or FALSE – Just asking not accusing!
Bonus question two, civil rights struggles do not necessarily predict consequences of “unknown variables” which can cause civil unrest scenarios being decided by best or even “most armed” sides. Something domestic tyrants should remember trying to enslave starting with segregation a nation like America founded on Second of Ten Amendments. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus thought question, governments may not be able to “translate” encrypted transmissions; tyrants’ solution is to “spy” on received messages files. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Translation solution: individual abilities to encrypt stored received messages! Not being disrespectful, if you are a computer geek gamer tired of living in mom and pop’s basement or garage; now you know how to make real mega bucks. Think about it; that is unless Obama’s Nazi net neutrality segregation becomes a reality.
Refresher Courtesy Dateline – Reader should feel free to download Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library to their personal files; so long as downloads are not edited and or used for commercial purposes. One example, free gifts for Reader to enjoy and distribute; from Texas Drifter and Editor Marshall - reference Library Entry # 732 – “Marketing Memo for Editor Marshall” and M.LT.D. Library Index #759A.