Continue Plus 775

Texas Drifter: Conservation Basics Revisited

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Following writing exercise was first published about fifteen years ago.

Definitions:
1. Environmentalist – Marxist-fascist ideologues addicted to re-distribution private resources using both public and private Brown Shirts called “greenies” and other things.
2. Polluters or trash people – corporate fascist ideologues, generally Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats motivated by lust for greed, or others who were influenced by their third world upbringings.
3. Conservationist – one who believes in conserving natural resources based on Garden of Eden concept. Brief references:
A) King James Version Genesis 2:15: And the LORD God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
B) Revised Standard Version Set Forth 1611 A.D. Genesis 2:15: The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to till it and keep it.
C) Living Bible Genesis 2:15: The Lord God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for it.

Revisiting conservative environment standards lesson starts with a few more definitions. First: conserve, process of preserving in safe or sound state. Second: conservative, philosophy to process of conserving. Third: conservation: careful preservation and protection of something like environment. Antonym: environmentalists “green” campaign subtlety advocating Marxist-fascism intended to redistribute private property.

Standards are determined to be in compliance by non-prejudicial investigations. Following writing exercise offers techniques conservationists can use to determine environment conservation standards.

Ideals of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are directly related to quality of environment. It is hard to live with contaminated air, land, or water. It is difficult to pursue happiness when a polluted environment forces citizens to remain indoors all the time.

It is also unlikely that freedom can be achieved when nature's classrooms are lost due to greed or incompetence. To paraphrase Moses: God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for heaven’s garden.

Conserving and preserving a nation's natural resources for future generations is next to freedom, the greatest gift citizens can provide future generations. This objective can be achieved with proper management of private and public parks and reserves.

Success can be measured by amount of time one has to appreciate; enjoy; and learn from natures' resources, processes, and marvelous wonders. After all, a house is simply a tent with too much starch.

Some suggest that anti-species or anti-social behavior rates are partially determined by population density to territory per unit ratios. Due to increased population pressures, natural heritage and resources can only be preserved with private and public regulated areas.

Greatest threats to America's natural heritage and resources are: 1)government neglect; 2)government abuse; 3)government sanctioned pollution or exploitation by special interest groups; 4)government abuse of private citizen's property rights for single species management programs; 5) environmental socialists (environmentalists); and 6) private sector citizens or businesses which neglect, abuse, exploit, or steal any natural resources.

People wishing to further study public sector environmental terrorism at state level, need only examine existing management practices of Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four. These public sector environmental terrorist organizations are masters at promoting insignificant volunteer projects while taking bribes which facilitate and protect corporate polluting for corporate fascists.

Space; atmosphere; bodies of water; native wildlife (plants and critters); unique terrain and natural wonders are public resources. Private or public actions which mismanage, abuse, damage, or destroy public resources are criminal behavior.

A zoo preserves shell not spirit of natural heritage; zoos are good sources of confined research and public entertainment. Beyond zoos, other environmental management components include public and private sector
1)"reserves" for the endangered;
2 "preserves" for pre-endangered;
3) refuges and parks;
4) wildlife ranches/farms for reintroduction of plants or animals; and
5) wildlife gardens.

Single species management is a technique suited for farming or ranching (agriculture) not natural resource conservation management. Public management of pre-endangered or endangered species should resemble management practices of game animals. Since private owners can only shoot deer during regulated periods, endangered species would be protected from property owners year round. If private land owners' property is critical for survival of species, land should be purchased by government for a public park, or set aside as a private trust.

Public sector bureaucrats and uninformed non-profit organizations are hurting conservation of natural resources movements by using unconstitutional forces against private citizens and their properties. Government excessive force always offends general public.

It is a myth that only governments and non-profit activists are capable of managing a country's natural resources. Private sector individuals should be included in natural resource management plans.

Good management strategy includes developing conservation environments where surrounding populations benefit financially from co-existence with regulated area.

Additional policy concerns should include prohibiting public sector from selling or leasing non-renewable resources. Contemporary greed which deprives future generations of options to access non-renewable resources is comparable to using children in animal porn films. Renewable resources should only be sold or leased at fair market prices.

Sufficient public funds should be allocated to provide sufficient security for public natural resources. Private funds could be raised to provide security for natural resources in other countries.

Conservative conservationists who do not desire to work and live in a landfill type environment; need to appreciate, that adequate environmental resource percentages will always be a topic of debate.

One example, developers in Texas have access to about 98 percent of Texas's natural resources. If developers cannot make a living on 98 percent of a region's land mass, is remaining 2 percent of undeveloped land going to make these people smarter?

Single species management disrupts natural processes of component bio-tropes or specific ecological systems. Components of specific ecology systems include
1) geology from the center of earth;
2) surface soils and surrounding water systems;
3) climate and weather;
4) atmosphere;
5) all living plants/creatures (resident and migratory);
6) impacts from surrounding ecological systems.

Specific bio-tropes from million acre plus parks to backyards, should abandon single species management systems for comprehensive component plans based on premise that bio-tropes are evolving not static.

Consider results of following single species plan: Traps, poisons, and bounties were used to eliminate all predators of young game animals. This activity resulted in a population explosion of rabbits which destroyed native forage for game animals. Game animals eventually became weak, diseased and dead from starvation. Over populated rabbits eventually suffered the same fate as game animals. Foliage barren land washed away in next rainy season.

Many contemporary "weekend environmentalists" are ignorant of nature's processes and natural history. For example, coastal plains along the Gulf of Mexico were covered by prairie grasses and thickets of brush. So why are groups telling public that area's forests need to be replanted, when there hasn't been a "real forest" in this area for thousands of years, if ever?

It also needs to be understood that contemporary concepts surrounding "native habitants" are based on fraud. Key issue is definition of native. Does "native" refer to environmental conditions a hundred years ago; a thousand years ago; or a million years ago?

All habitats are evolutionary, and were only native during their era of conception. Habitats can be defined by their location on an evolutionary time line which excludes human interference. To clarify, one can say that a specific habitat would look like this and contain these components if humans had never interfered in the natural evolutionary process.

Using wood, metal or concrete to build stick forests connected by wires; electric companies have destroyed more miles of American horizons than any other single industry. Perhaps legislation should be enacted requiring these government protected monopolies to continually modernize energy delivery systems. Better still, electric companies which are the best example of government protected dinosaurs; should be forced to compete with private sector alternatives.

Ever wondered why you have never met an unfriendly con artist? The answer is simple, it is easier to con friends; friends tend to give friends the benefit of the doubt; and friends are reluctant to turn friends in to authorities.

These three human conditions give corporate con artists opportunity to start scam; perpetuate scam; and have time to "get away" after scam has run its course. It should be noted that not all corporations operate with criminal mentalities; but sufficient numbers do to justify the following.

Groups generally manipulated by corporate con artists include: poor (unemployed), greedy (local businesses), self-serving (local politicians and bureaucrats), and vain (community leaders and local news media).

Community leaders and politicians tend to be vain self-admiring publicity seekers who make easy targets for corporate con artists. Careers of these self-proclaimed citizen heroes are built on media coverage.

Members of local news media are targeted because these people represent special interest journalists. In reality, small town newspapers generally do not report news that offends "life support" advertisers or fellow chamber members. Consequently, ongoing corporate environmental abuses are never reported unless outside independent journalists take an interest.
Corporate scam, complete with support from local journalists tends to work as follows
1) Corporate representatives contact local community leaders with exaggerated promises of jobs and economic development.
2) The corporation sponsors a series of "getting acquainted" parties involving food, liquor, and in some cases, prostitutes. Purpose of these functions is to show people what a friendly neighbor the corporation will be.
3) Corporation makes token contributions and pledges to area charities. One common technique is for the corporation to force employees to sign up for payroll deductions to support area charities. Corporation collects payroll deductions for a year, keeps the money in an interest bearing account; then takes part of interest accrued from employee deductions and gets media credit for corporate gifts.
4) Corporation makes contributions to area municipal, county, state, and federal politicians. This effectively buys influence which keeps city, county, state, and federal regulatory agencies from interfering with ongoing corporate pollution. Corporate trick is not to buy government agencies, only lease their indifference for limited amounts of time. This is viable because after the corporation has left area, tax payers will get to clean up mess.
5) Corporation seeks and gets special price considerations from local utility companies. Since corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that regular utility customers should subsidize corporation by paying higher utility rates.
6) Corporation seeks and gets special property and sales tax exemptions. Again, since the corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that tax payers should subsidize corporation by paying higher taxes.
7) Pays employees lowest possible wages and provide employees with lowest possible benefit packages. Corporate attitude is that communities should be glad somebody cared enough to exploit unemployed.
8) Buys surrounding property damaged by corporation production practices so offended parties think that corporation is "fair" to its neighbors.
9) Continue rewarding community leaders with token community service gifts so community support for corporation does not diminish, and
10) Continues leeching off community resources until environmental damage is so severe that community leaders who have essentially become corporate prostitutes are no longer believable.

Generally by time offended region figures out it have been had; corporation has already found another group of community leaders who can't wait to invite corporation into their neighborhood.

Citizens and communities need to understand that money is not a zero response asset when exchanged in political process. Special interest groups expect policy considerations in return for property. Four standards for evaluating transfer of assets in political process are:
1) impact on national security;
2) impact on constitutional integrity;
3) impact on ethical capitalism; and
4) impact on natural resources.

Penalties imposed of those engaging in environmental terrorism can include: criminal fines; prison time; civil suit damages; or claims against insurance policies or bonds. Any company engaged in actives which impact natural resources that refuses to carry insurance or post bonds, is probably engaging in environmental terrorist activities.

Some ways that communities can protect themselves from transitory marauding corporations are as follows:
1) run complete criminal and financial background checks on inquiring corporation and all of its officers and executives;
2) physically go to last place the corporation left and check following: compare corporate promises to that community; find out if corporation delivered on promises to that community; find out why corporation left that community; and find out if corporation damaged environment of that community;
3) require corporation to maintain a reasonable environmental damage restoration bond. A one hundred million dollar bond should cost corporation about a million dollars a year; the amount of bond should be based on potential risk to potentially affected environmental components (if citizens can be required to have automobile insurance, why cannot corporations be required to carry environmental impact insurance), and
4) inform community leaders who collaborate with offending corporations that they will personally make up any financial differences between the corporate environmental damage bond and costs of restoring environment to its original condition from their own resources.

Community leaders, politicians, bureaucrats, and local media currently have no incentive to keep transitory corporations from ruining their surrounding environment. Making these people responsible for letting themselves be conned, will go a long way in protecting the environment. Citizens need to understand that corporations come and go, but communities only have one environment.

Complaints that these accountability policies will drive corporations to other countries are nonsense. Political instability and political corruption will deter any significant corporate flight into third world countries.

Beside that who cares if these corporations take their business elsewhere; transitory corporations who trash environment are collections of human garbage and should not be welcome in any decent neighborhoods.

Corporations often abuse natural resources in following ways:
1) OVER-UTILIZATION: strip mining, over cutting public forests, or commercial aquaculture companies who do not use bed liners which raises the water table in flood prone areas;
2) DUMPING: hazardous liquids, solids, or gases: dumping chemical pollutants from commercial fish, shrimp, or eel ponds into public waters;
3) CHANGING NATURAL PROCESSES: introducing foreign species, and or foreign species diseases into native habitants causing the release of exotic shrimp and eels into pristine public waters when pond banks break during a hurricane;
4) DESTRUCTION OF RESOURCES: killing black bears for their gall bladders, or public agencies selling out to special interests.

Some types of specific pollutants include:
- viruses
- virus anti-biotics
- genetically altered anti-biotic viruses
- non-native parasites
- suspended solids
- non-suspended solids
- dissolved materials
- liquids
- chemicals
- minerals
- non-native animal or plant species
- other substances yet to be identified

Some effected elements of pollution on public waters can include:
- purity (compare to H2o)
- salinity
- turbidity/visibility
- temperature
- erosion
- silting
- oxygen density
- system self-flushing capabilities
- native marine\shore plant and animal life
- migratory marine\shore animal life

Laws need to be enacted requiring truth in labeling of public agencies. Perhaps some natural resources conservation commissions should be renamed natural resources vandalism commissions. Such policies would facilitate environmental investigations for conservative conservationists.

This policy would identify agencies like natural resources conservation commissions which: 1)consistently violate private citizens' property rights; 2)implement policies which damage the environment to justify federal "clean up" grants; and 3) take bribes allowing special interest groups to destroy public's natural resources.

Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four are comparable to incompetent and very corrupt government agencies in 1800's which used to exploit Native Americans and mismanage Indian reservations. Conservative conservationists would be prudent to never blindly trust government agencies.

Integrity for public sector bureaucrats tends to be guided by loyalty to taxes and grants which pay their salaries; not what is best for America's natural resources.

A great many university "research studies" are propaganda position papers for special interest groups. In many cases, these exercises in fraudulent science threaten domestic wellbeing and national security.

Conservative conservationists who fail to verify or collaborate public sector research studies with independent monitors or independent studies are asking to be victims of scientific fraud.

Conservative conservationists need to understand that many "reputable" environmental groups are fronts for big business interests, “green” groups which take inconsistent stands, or who avoid public positions are likely candidates for being fraudulent community service groups.

Primary clue is always money trail. Community, state, or national conservation groups which oppose low impact environmental threats; but consistently refrain from taking a position on high dollar natural resource destruction projects, are generally covert fronts serving the interests of developers or big business.

Conservative conservationists should be very wary of trusting any elected or appointed official. Most elected officials at every level of government are only loyal to their traditional "fee" driven special interest legislative system; the reality is that integrity is a myth in America's special interest democracies.

Easiest way to stop these types of abuses is to make financial costs of the offending action greater than the financial rewards.

For example, some public natural resources can have "undetermined value" and should be managed as a public trust. If this is not so, why is restoring "diverted" natural resources to their original condition a legitimate tax deductible business expense for private sector profit motivated businesses?

Consequently, both private and public sector organizations which divert natural resources, but who do not pay cost of restoring natural resources to their original condition should be required to report "savings" as income.

Just think how many companies who have engaged in environmental terrorism may owe the government back taxes; or how many municipal, county, or state governing bodies will be required to reimburse federal grant monies.

Conservative conservationists’ best ally in protecting natural resources is private sector civil legal process. Should the civil legal system eventually collapse as the last "by the rules" conservation protection process, final alternative may become civil disobedience.

Conservative conservationists need to understand that using reason or emotional appeal will never stop private and public sector environmental terrorists. Second, private or public justice based on mob rule is always shameless and immoral.

Greatest threats to America’s environment are epidemics introduced by illegal immigrants from third world countries. Even if Americans had never heard word terrorism, southern border would still need to be securely closed to prevent third world epidemics being introduced into America.

Doubters need only review impact of importing foreign flora and fauna on native American plants and animals. Nature is nature and people are influenced by laws of nature.

Many third world infections like tuberculosis are less responsive to treatments for first world tuberculosis. Illegal immigrants do not have reliable histories of completing American treatment programs, actions that produces a third world strain of more lethal and less treatable viruses that produces greater public health threats to Americans.

American politicians, bureaucrats, fools, and special interest hate groups that support a southern porous border will eventually be signing death warrants for millions of American citizens. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, justice is a two sided sword. First side is used for resolving intentional or negligent public health threats by terrorists or illegal immigrants. Second side is for bringing Americans too account for unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and deaths. TRUE or FALSE

Additional references about “Conservation Basics”
1. Google – Citizens Passions Index to “Continue Plus 564 –Update Ranch Scout Notes”
2. Google – Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 713 – “Two Tales For Same Dog”