Continue Plus 770

Texas Drifter: Parameters of Isolationism

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Parameter decisions are generally based on one of four thought processes: ideological hatreds; lust for greed; "me first" selfish vanities, or Judeo-Christian values.

Definitions:
1. Parameters are opposite points of continuous sequence.
2. Parameters for “isolation” are "total" to "none".

Classes of parameters can include: physical security (political) and commercial trade (economic).

Parameter personality types in contemporary America include political / economic:
1. Libertarians – “total” political isolation and “none” economic isolation based on me first selfish vanities.
2. LBGA (liberal big government advocates) / CBGA (conservative big government advocates) – none political isolation and none economic isolation based on LBGA ideological hatreds and CBGA lust for greed.
3. PSC (patriot security conservatives) – pragmatic political isolation for national security and domestic tranquility / pragmatic economic isolation for national security and domestic tranquility based on Judeo-Christian values.

Reader might reference Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library # 580 insert:

Definition of pragmatism is process of thought to guide actions by consequences.

Definition of ideology is set of beliefs and or opinions that shapes the way an individual or group thinks, acts, or understands the world.

Types of foreign policy strategies:
1. “Hide behind walls of a fort” until enemy goes away, like contemporary Libertarians.
2. Imperialist ideology based on boundary free nations to acquire internationalist corporate fascist profits - like Obama Republicans also known as RINOs or Bush Clan loyalists like their “free trade” policies in China, Iraq, and Mexico
3. Imperialist ideology based on internationalist anti-America Marxist-Fascists like Obama and his Progressive Liberal Democrat allies.
4. Pragmatism with objectives of national security and domestic tranquility. Best example is President Washington’s “Farwell Address”. Reference some excerpts from America’s greatest President.

It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it …

Taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences …

Constantly keeping in view, that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another nation …

There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion which a just pride ought to discard.

I warn against the mischief’s of foreign intrigue to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism … our country, under all circumstances of the case, has a right to take, and is bound in duty and interest to take a neutral position.

End of excerpts, reader might review Washington’s entire speech for more education on what should be America’s foreign policy strategies.

Some PSC ideals to measure pragmatic decisions based on following Judeo-Christian values.
1. Self defense for life, health, liberty, property
2. 1581 Act of Abjuration
3. Inalienable rights defined in Declaration of Independence
4. Letter of law due process rights defined in U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights
5. Ethical capitalism

Parameter categories can include: personal; national; international.

Reader’s first assignment, compare three “lessons of history” (Reader’s choice) to each of above parameter categories.

Three “parameter opposite points” examples. First opposite points are good / bad. Consider: Sex with a loving faithful spouse is good; while sex with a child is bad.

Second, parameter opposite points are still good / bad. Consider: nationalism / internationalism. Citizen-patriots opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants which threatens domestic tranquility are GOOD nationalists; plus also opposing porous borders which threaten national security makes citizens BETTER nationalists.

On the other side, internationalists motivated strictly by lust for greed using “fair trade” masqueraded by NAFTA, GATT, and other “free trade’ deals to help America’s enemies like China build up China’s military to threaten both America’s national security and domestic tranquility are BAD internationalists.

Third Obama’s air strikes in Iraq and other places are comparable to carnival goers playing “Whac-A-Mole”. Air strikes without inserting troops on ground to hold “bombed out” territory by keeping bad guys from returning is; little more than wasteful feel good propaganda strategy.

Back to game Whac-A-Mole, way to win the game is to place cover over hole of last mole wacked. Why, to eventually prevent mole from having any holes left to exit and taunt game player. Two examples of air strikes without inserting troops to hold bombed out territory are “carpet" fire-bombing as was used in places like Dresden, Germany during World War II. Or second, use nuclear weapons as were used in Japan during World War II.

Observation, air strikes parameters; excluding drones for specific targets; include one side point of reference, air strikes followed by inserting troops to pacify and hold territory; and other side point of reference, with variations in between use final option which is using “doomsday” weapons on enemy. TRUE or FALSE

Brutal observation, wasting resources, American troops, plus collateral damages of civilians just to make Obama look; like Obama knows what Obama is doing, is getting close to being too blanked up, to know, one is blanked up. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question one, there is negligible difference between 1960’s hippies’ “make love not war” and one contemporary media driven cult leader’s mantra “understanding” everyone will protect America from crazies and other haters? TRUE or FALSE

Clue, does reader really believe that racist rioting haters screaming “kill the cops”; are going to change their feral human conduct by “understanding” with sensitivity for their irrational hatreds? Translation, will kissing bad guys rears; cause, bad guys to start kissing “understanding” rears”?

Bonus question two – factual mature concept, majority of America’s contemporary political and economic parameter problems; are caused by 1960’s promiscuous world owes us spoiled brats now known as Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats; whose best accessories allies are lust for greed driven corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus thought – If Republican establishment leaders like McConnell, Cornyn, Boehner, and others Reader can list, had been in charge of Texas' future after Houston defeated Mexican dictator Santa Anna at San Jacinto? Would these anything to get along with Obama Republican leaders have apologized to Mexico's butcher of the Alamo and Goliad, Santa Anna, and said winning the Texas Revolution was just a misunderstanding; and that we Americans would be good little indentured servants to Massa Obama if he would just give us naughty conservatives another chance? Sometimes older people confuse observations between then and now!