Friday, May 30, 2014

Continue Plus 696


Texas Drifter: Security Issues SpaceX Launch Site?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Perhaps some security issues' questions, concerning Space Exploration Technologies Corp. proposed commercial rocket launch site near Boca Chica are worthy of answers?

Questions that one “patriot security conservative” (PSC) would like answers to include following.

1. Who builds rocket launch sites “within striking” ranges of an international border next to a country drowning in domestic violence problems like Mexico?

2. What are shortest range distances in meters from access/exit road; from control center; and from launch pad to center of Rio Grande River?

3. What security measures need to be taken to harden SpaceX fixed physical assets including rockets on launch pad; and rockets seconds after being launched?

4. Are above measures necessary to protect lives, private properties, and America’s national security interests including orbiting assets?

5. Could potential threat scenarios based on existing cross border violence include following bad guys?
- Creates opportunity for one cartel to demand extortion money to let rocket be launched without sabotage by cartel sniper?
- Creates opportunity for one cartel to blame attack on rocket being launched on another cartel?
- Creates opportunity for one of many Islamic-fascist terrorist groups training and operating in Mexico “to see” vulnerable target?
- Creates opportunity for internationalist Islamic-fascist terrorist group with ties to one of cartels in Mexico “to see” potential high profile media target?
- Creates opportunity for generally corrupt anti-America Mexican government faction to “ignore” threats originating from Mexico side of border?
- Creates opportunity for Russian “black operation” to maintain their monopoly on providing human taxi services to and from space shuttle?
- Creates opportunity for China to distract America from China’s “on the move” imperialism in Pacific?
- Creates opportunity for other America hating groups to inflict damage on what they perceive to be “world’s great Satan”?

6. Is rocket launch site just another “economic development project” generating potential greed euphoria; blinding Rio Grande Valley community leaders to potential security threats that should be considered? Might be since some have suggested that RGV had no problems taking millions in Spring Break revenues no matter how many “partying non-local kids” were killed or injured; or were victims in reported and non-reported sexual assaults. Many South Texans still remember shrimp farms potential greed euphoria; as well as Kenaf plant farming potential greed euphoria.

7. Would SpaceX insurance premiums be “cheaper” by expanding security perimeter around launch pad operations? How can any American private business expect dependable effective security perimeter defenses south of Rio Grande?

8. Is simple solution to launch site security threats: moving site to private property north of South Padre Island; or private property west of Laguna Madre adjacent to Laguna Atascosa Refuge?

9. Would such moves eliminate “sniper” and or other “short range” threats facilitated by proximity to international border with Mexico?

10. Should security principles seeking to save lives, protect property, and preserve America’s national security, be traded for euphoric greed for a few regardless the cost in lives, property damages, and national security dangers ?

11. If reader can find address to submit their public comments to FAA; reader might consider answers to above questions?

Assignment question: Even though there are three undeniable facts: there are no perfect people, there are no perfect crimes, and there are no perfect security strategies; where is the good sense in making bad guys’ work easier; by be being blinded to threats while lusting for euphoric greed? (Reader can limit answer to seven words.)

Bonus question – Generally those offended by questions, already know the answers will be more offensive. TRUE or FALSE

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Continue Plus 695

Texas Drifter: Socialism Predestined To Fail

Marshall’s Law Dateline – What happens to life forms dependent on oxygen for their very existence; when demand for oxygen increases as supply for oxygen decreases? Reader not capable of deciphering above question should not waste their time reading this Texas Drifter writing exercise.

Socialist economic bubbles only expand with public sector dollars taken by threat of force from private sector producers. Private sector producers supply of dollars decreases with expanding public sector regulations. Seems socialists try to destroy their source of private sector dollars' that public sector socialists need to expand their socialist economics.

Definition of socialist for this writing exercise refers to Marxist-fascists as well as corporate fascists.

Evolutionary Phases of Economic Systems

Phase I
- Plundering
- Bartering
Phase II
- Feudalism: legal and social system that existed in medieval times

Phase III
- Fascism: economic system in which property and means of production are owned by private citizens that is so regulated by government as to resemble Marxism
- Non-ethical capitalism: amoral market place economic system guided by “buyer beware”
- Marxism: economic system in which all property and means of production are owned by government
- Variations of Phase III economic systems include: Marxist-fascism; corporate fascism; crony capitalism; and unethical capitalism

Phase IV
- Ethical capitalism: economic market system in which all involved parties perceive mutual benefit – based on Commandment “thou shall not steal” – example, giving a starving man ten dollars for a hundred dollar horse is not ethical capitalism.

Translation, economies based on threat of force, actual force, deception, or stealing; not free will mutual parties benefits always collapse. Sometimes civil due processes may be necessary to resolve disputes. Where does it say in New Testament that it is alright to violate “thou shall not steal” Commandment” with extortion, to give bribes to professional welfare public subsidy addict?

As money used by bad people is root of all evil; money used by ethical capitalists can be root of good deeds.

Examples of socialist yet to burst bubbles caused by excessive public sector revenue demands from private sector in specific industries.
1. Government mandated housing mortgages to bad credit risks
2. Increasing costs of college educations requiring indentured like loans yet to burst bubble
3. Increasing costs of yet to burst medical services bubble
4. Reader can list other industry bubbles yet to burst

Examples of socialist mandated regulations by fascist bureaucrats which destroy private sector enterprises: Justice Department; IRS; EPA; Interior; BLM; Education; plus estimated other fifty federal agencies reader can choose from.

Examples from one specific geo-regional economic system with an economic foundation where demands for public sector revenues exceeds same area’s economic producers – Rio Grande Valley, Texas.
1. Non-stop increasing job markets for local, state, and federal governments
2. Ever expanding public health care public subsidies benefits population
3. Ever expanding social service welfare benefits population
4. Ever expanding education costs for lesser quality educated population
5. Laundering imported cartel monies through retail profits sales
6. Corporate fascist ventures using public monies for wind power projects; agriculture subsidies; investments from foreign companies for visas; tax breaks from corporate investors; plus others reader can list
7. Economic propaganda reports about what great place area is to invest
8. Crime pays for special interests with special deals with public sector like "put every one in jail" prisons
9. Recruits new subsidy addicts by supporting programs with attract illegal immigrants to area

Reader can total up revenue demands to fund above socialist programs, and compare that number to needed supply of revenues from area producers. Conclusion should show that above geo-regional could be considered parasite by other state and national areas just to keep RGV, Texas socialist economy "afloat".

Local economies like RGV, Texas are becoming dumping grounds for State of Texas regulations which are destroying many local property owners with unjust confiscatory property taxes.

America’s socialist economies serving following segments of America's society are leeching to point of total destruction America’s society.
1. Public education bureaucrats
2. Public welfare system beneficiaries and bureaucracies
3. Non-competitive public health care system services
4. Criminal justice system facilities

In theory it costs as much money to take care of; and serve non-producers as it does society’s producers. When the unskilled permanently unemployed and uneducated have one opportunity for financial gain, and that is to have more children, they have more children; which increases government’s continuing demand for more private sector money.

What are future options for America’s traditions, values, and principled society if Obama’s Marxist-fascist and Republican establishments’ corporate fascist policies continue? All reader has to do is look around world: Europe; Russia; China; Middle East; Venezuela; Cuba.

Reader might also wish to review “Massa Obama’s Ant Society” reference at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library – Library Entry # 685.

Reader might study Roman History to surmise if America might have alternate future as constitutional empire governed by Judeo-Christian due process constitution in ethical capitalist economy? Some suggest that Heaven’s powers can always over whelm Beelzebub’s evil forces. TRUE or FALSE

Clue – what has reader learned; hopefully:
1. Socialist programs will never stop increasing demands for private sector dollars stolen from private sector producers.
2. Socialist bureaucrats’ regulations will never stop decreasing supply of private sector dollars available to be stolen from private sector producers by public sector socialists.

Bonus question, Patriot Security Conservatives (PSC) have a two strategy domestic war against American socialists to manage. First strategy, reduce number of socialist programs which will reduce demand for dollars that public sector needs to steal from private sector producers. Second reduce number of socialist regulations by reducing number of public sector agencies and bureaucrats creating and enforcing fascist regulations. Why, allow private sector producers using ethical capitalism to create more opportunities for (hopefully reader knows who). TRUE or FALSE

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Continue Plus 694

Texas Drifter: Conservatives Lies About Amnesty

Marshall’s Law Dateline - Conservatives biggest lie – many conservatives would rather promote a lie that threatens Heaven’s favorite due process republic; than surrender their vanity by admitting apolitical truths about number of illegal immigrants on U.S. Soil. Truth be known, conservatives who allow their vanities to promote lies are greater threat to America’s future than Obama or corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats..

Background information standards for Texas Drifter, money does not make people smart; if it did there would be no successful con artists. Money does not create integrity, if it did there would be no rich Republican establishment ruling elites in Hades.

Security consulting is one mistake business; hence security consultants get paid to provide accurate reports, not be popular. Inaccurate security consultant reports can and often cost clients their lives, their health, their liberties, and their properties. Security consultants are not likely to get “second chance” paying assignments.

Obvious reality is security consultants do not get paid to be client’s babysitter. Brutal reality, security consultants do not get paid to care one way or the other about clients who are too blanked up to know they are blanked up – sounds like what Texas Drifter calls a “Gone With The Wind Moment.”

Question is not how many illegal immigrants President Reagan expected to provide amnesty too; proper question is how many illegal immigrants actually benefitted from President Reagan’s amnesty?

Three Background sources of Information:

1) Excerpts: Ronald Reagan's Biggest Mistake - According to Reagan Himself, (Conservative Heritage Times, January 2nd, 2012)
According to Ronald Reagan himself, as told to his trusted long-time friend and U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, the biggest mistake of his presidency was signing the 1986 amnesty …
According to a 1997 report by the Center for Immigration Studies, the cost of amnesty for 2.7 million illegal immigrants had accumulated to $156.7 billion (in 1986 dollars!) by 1997… This amounts to a subsidy per amnestied illegal of $29,148 in 1986 dollars, which is an important indirect subsidy for the employers of illegal workers. But U.S. workers paid the highest price. The 1986 amnesty displaced 1,872,000 American workers over the next decade. This and downward pressure on American wages are not adequately accounted for in the report. In fact, downward pressure on U.S. worker income may be the largest cost to the American economy of amnesty and excess immigration levels.
For the first six months after the amnesty there was a modest fall in illegal immigration, but within 12 months illegal immigration was breaking all previous records, rising to 800,000 per year. Friends and relatives of the newly legalized immigrants began to pour into the United States. They were followed by more illegal job seekers who saw continued opportunities for more amnesties
Only 36 percent of the 1986 amnesty recipients spoke English well, and only 28 percent of those over age 24 had graduated from high school.

2) Public information: Seven Amnesties Passed by Congress: Since passing of Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA), 6 million illegal aliens have received amnesty in the United States. The IRCA Amnesty was supposed to "wipe the slate clean" and instead it's lead to the current situation of 12-20 million illegal aliens living in the country.
1. Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA), 1986: A blanket amnesty for some 2.7 million illegal aliens
2. Section 245(i) Amnesty, 1994: A temporary rolling amnesty for 578,000 illegal aliens
3. Section 245(i) Extension Amnesty, 1997: An extension of the rolling amnesty created in 1994
4. Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) Amnesty, 1997: An amnesty for close to one million illegal aliens from Central America
5. Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act Amnesty (HRIFA), 1998: An amnesty for 125,000 illegal aliens from Haiti
6. Late Amnesty, 2000: An amnesty for some illegal aliens who claim they should have been amnestied under the 1986 IRCA amnesty, an estimated 400,000 illegal aliens
7. LIFE Act Amnesty, 2000: A reinstatement of the rolling Section 245(i) amnesty, an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens
8. How many other amnesties by executive orders of amnesty do Americans not know about?

3) Marxist-Fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats are lying about number of illegal immigrants who will receive amnesty by referencing three million under Reagan; when total results of Reagan’s amnesty are closer to six million and probably double that since Obama’s government lies about everything.

Lies like benefits of Obama Care; lies like we are not guilty of being accessories to murders at Benghazi or U.S. federal agents by Fast and Furious; we are only suspending citizens’ Fourth Amendment Rights by spying on them to protect them: IRS only harassed Tea Party members and Christians for their own good.

Point is, if Marxist-Fascist Democrats and RINO corporate fascists want amnesty for ten million to twelve million illegal immigrants (illegal border crossers and visa jumpers) the actual number will probably be closer to twenty-five million to thirty-five million which does not include amnesty beneficiaries’ relatives and new illegals entering America “for next round” of amnesties.

Make no mistake amnesty for twenty-five million to thirty-five million mostly uneducated, unskilled, third world people who have no intention of assimilating into American culture, will be equal to assassinating America’s culture, constitutional republic, ethical capitalism, and all other American traditions values and principles.

Reader can prove Texas Drifter’s third reference point wrong with independently verifiable study of how many illegal immigrants (illegal border crossers and visa jumpers) are currently on U.S. soil. Trying to solve a problem without knowing what problem is, borders on total stupidity. Trying to create comprehensive immigration policy without knowing how many illegal immigrants American public policy needs to manage; borders on treasonous stupidity.

One might profile conservatives approaching border line treasonous stupidity as which of following: McCain, McConnell, Rubio, Paul, Ryan, Boehner, Bush and Romney clan types; plus conservatives like: some Fox News celebrities and others reader can list.

Questions for those above and others reader list:
1. How many actually benefitted from Reagan’s amnesty?
2. How many illegal immigrants (illegal border crossers and visa jumpers) based on independently verifiable numbers would benefit from Obama and corporate fascist Republican establish amnesty? Is number closer to thirty million or forty million?
3. How many future illegal immigrants would enter America for future amnesty programs like those that followed Regan’s initial amnesty program?
4. What is total dollar cost of illegal immigrants in 2014 dollars? Clue multiply thirty million amnesties by $29,148 (1986 dollars) then convert total to 2014 dollars for total.
5. Is anyone who believes Rubio and Ryan when they promise that amnesty beneficiaries will not receive welfare or public subsidies a total fool? All the amnesty beneficiaries will need is one federal district judge to rule amnesty cannot be exclusive. Has reader ever heard about federal courts ruling that illegal immigrant children on U.S. soil are entitled to free public educations at tax payers’ expense?

Assignment question: following would be good immigration policy for conservatives? First quit lying about Reagan’s amnesty number totals, and second quit lying about currently unknown number of potential amnesty beneficiaries. Third, use military to secure America’s porous Southern border; then and only then, review independently verifiable numbers of how many illegal immigrants (illegal border crossers and visa jumpers) are on American soil.

As for conservatives who continue allowing their vanities to force them to keep lying; same brutal future history prediction as when conservative celebrities acting like partisan adulterers McConnell, Boehner, and their fellow political strumpets’ allies plead: “What will the mob do to me (us)?”

Some questions for conservatives to ask advocates for amnesty like Texas Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat U.S Representatives: Cuellar, Vela, and Hinojosa.

1. How much illegally obtained billions do illegals send back to their homelands?
2. How many American citizens and legal residents have lost jobs to illegals?
3. How many billions of tax payer dollars are required to cover illegals stresses to America’s physical infrastructure?
4. How many billions do illegals cost America’s public school system?
5. How many billions do illegals cost America’s criminal justice system?
6. How many billions do illegals cost America’s medical care system?
7. How many billions do illegals cost America’s welfare system?
8. How many billions total do illegals cost American tax dollars?
9. What are cultural and societal coast to America’s traditions values and principles by illegals who have no intention of assimilating?
10. What will be cost to America’s constitutional due process political system and ethical capitalist economic system; by illegals who based on their birthing habits will become Marxist-fascist largest voting block of non-producing social parasites?
11. What will be national security risks of illegals receiving amnesty bring as many of their relatives in foreign lands to become more non-productive welfare parasites?
12. How many millions of Americans will eventually die from pandemics introduced onto American soil by illegals illegally entering America form every third world county on planet earth?
13. Will another national security risk include illegals setting up Sharia law islands across America to spread Islamic Nazi’s terrorism which will also threaten America’s domestic tranquility?
14. How many tens of thousands of Texas American Hispanics and Hispanic U.S. legal residents have been murdered, raped, kidnapped, robbed, killed in DUI accidents by illegal immigrants your supporting amnesty invited into America. How many Texas American Hispanics and Hispanic U.S. legal residents; who obey America's laws, work hard to provide their children better futures than they had now have to subsidize illegal immigrants and their children with higher taxes which results in Hispanic Americans "legal" children doing without what their parents worked their entire lives for.
15. Reader can add to above list.

Future historians and future American generations could rightfully consider those who advocated for and worked for amnesty for illegal immigrants, to be genetic descendants of Judas? TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, as for accessories to amnesty movement for illegal immigrants, hopefully future Americans will also hold Judas’s accomplices accountable. TRUE or FALSE

Editor Marshall’s Note – additional Texas Drifter references to managing threats to Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic are cited in numerous writing exercise at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Continue Plus 693

Texas Drifter: After Obama Then What?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Answer to title question is simple: justice. Only issue to be decided, is what kind of justice?

Replacing Obama’s Marxist-fascist government with either Bush / Romney corporate fascism; or some cult leader with Robespierre personality is totally unacceptable.

Following historical lessons should validate above observation
1. Robespierre’s psychotic sociopathic Reign of Terror policies during French Revolution.
2. Yankee conservative Republicans hate motivated economic and police state genocide against Southerners (against Lincoln’s wishes) following America’s First Civil War. How by using Northern troops in conjunction with carpetbaggers and Scalawags.

Contemporary examples which affirm observation that premeditated as well as negligent murders are crimes deserving nothing less than justice. Some Obama Administration examples
1. Fast and Furious I
2. Fast and Furious II (Benghazi)
3. Tolerating illegal immigrants’ violent and property crimes against American citizens and legal residents
4. Veterans Administration’s abuses and possible murders of veterans in V.A. health care system
5. Physical casualties and loss of heath care services coverage during first phases of Obama Care
6. Deaths due to downsizing America’s Armed Forces resources and reserves
7. Promoting hate crimes between different races, ethnic groups, and non-Judeo-Christians against Judeo Christians
8. Eventual Bureau of Land Management “land grab” murders of civilians
9. Deaths due to pandemics brought onto American soil by illegal immigrants
10. Other atrocities reader can list

All public sector and their accessories allies responsible for either premeditated or negligent murders of civilians in above scenarios and related scenarios; must for justice to prevail be subjected to Nuremberg type criminal trials; plus also be subjected to civil financial damage trials.

Recall the obvious, in America: spiritual laws, constitutional laws, domestic laws based on common law, and for what it is worth international laws; all distinguish between killing in Self Defense and murder. Also recall, being an accessory to murder is a punishable crime.

After Obama, then what? Simple there is no statute of limitations on murder or being an accessory to murder. TRUE or FALSE

Question – When governments do not prosecute their own for civilian justice; then citizens engaging in Self Defense are engaging in Self Defense, not crimes by any standards in America: spiritual laws like Ten Commandments; Act of abjuration 1581, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution including Bill of Rights; or domestic laws based on common laws like castle doctrine. TRUE or FALSE

Clue: Problem with reader not caring about government murdering innocent civilians in places like Malibu, Ruby Ridge, and Waco; is that government inevitably starts murdering their own in scenarios like Fast and Furious I, Fast and Furious II (Benghazi), and veterans in V.A. hospitals.

Tyrants will try to insulate themselves from their agencies' murders like Obama will denounce knowing anything about Fast and Furious I, Fast and Furious II, V.A. hospital murders; eventual B.L.M murders in government's land grab; plus hundreds of thousands who will be murdered by Obama Care Death Panels. Perhaps adage is true: reader deserves government reader tolerates?

Bonus questions: After Obama then what - two likely choices: One, little due process justice much street justice. Two, much due process justice little street justice. TRUE or FALSE

Observation clue, "perception is reality" street justice is non-discriminatory like Oklahoma City; where as due process justice tends to only discriminate against those judged by due process to be guilty.

Side Note - Contemporary Veteran Administration health care scandal involving deaths of veterans in V.A. care; creates two legal issues which should only be resolved by due process jury trials.

First legal issue is were veterans premeditatedly murdered or negligently murdered.

Second issue involves accessories to above murders; issue is being an accessory before murders or being an accessory after murders. One example is destroying records to cover up either pre-meditated or negligent murder makes one guilty of being accessory after the fact. (Guess that is right as Texas Drifter is not an attorney)

Another after the fact accessory includes those who discourage, intimidate, threaten, or even in some cases advocate that families or friends of murdered veteran/s should not be entitled to their "day in court" to seek justice for their murdered loved one or friend. TRUE or FALSE

Seems appropriate for Texas Drifter to close this writing exercise with title question: "After Obama Then What?" - Due Process Justice or Street Justice? - Reader's choice.