Texas Drifter: Patriots Spiritual Law Briefing
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Perhaps this Maundy Thursday is appropriate time to remind reader about America’s traditional values and principles; some of which can be traced back to New Testament.
Synopsis of Maundy Thursday by Christianity.about.com: Maundy Thursday is observed during Holy Week on the Thursday before Easter. Also referred to as "Holy Thursday" or "Great Thursday" in some Christian denominations, Maundy Thursday commemorates the Last Supper when Jesus shared the Passover meal with his disciples on the night before he was crucified. In contrast to joyful Easter celebrations when Christians worship their resurrected Savior, Maundy Thursday services are typically more solemn occasions, marked by the shadow of Jesus' betrayal. (End synopsis)
Repetition is good training tool there are two types of laws: “spirit of law” also called natural law and sometimes scientific laws; and two, “word of law”.
Examples of “spirit of law” includes: Ten Commandments; 1581 Act of Abjuration, and Declaration of Independence. Examples of “word of law” includes: common law; U.S. Constitution; Bill of Rights.
Since “spirit of law” always has been, still is, and always will be; can one conclude that “spirit of law” supersedes “word of law” as final authority? Texas Drifter thinks answer is yes without a doubt.
How to prove Heaven, some call God, exists using math and logic for those without faith.
There are two ways to create: reproduction and fragmentation of “splitting off”.
Multiply zero times any entity represented by any numerical equation and results always equal zero.
Divide zero by any entity represented by any numerical equation and results are always equal zero.
Substitute words multiply for reproduction and divide for fragmentation; there would nothing or zero without Heaven in “beginning” to use biblical word. Again only those without “faith” to use another biblical word may need math or logic to verify origin and existence of natural law.
Valid premise, “mean spiritedness” is a spiritual law sin, and is not always a word of law crime. However, some mean spirited actions can be prosecuted and punished as earthy crimes.
Many times patriots can be blinded and misguided by loyalty to public servants acting like domestic war criminals. The Nuremberg Trials as well as future public sector crimes trials will be constant reminder for all future historians that “just following orders” is not a valid defense for committing unconstitutional atrocities against private citizens.
Judges and justices should also remember that they are elected or appointed servants of private citizens; despite many judges and justices rabid vanities, they are public bureaucrats not God. Judges and justices who believe in “welfare court” system where respect is free, not earned may have some very “rude awakenings”.
All public servants need to never forget following spiritual or natural law: stand with tyrants be judged with tyrants. Good reference point for this observation is 1581 Act of Abjuration.
Other mean spirited sins occur during “bad economic times” which can bring out worst in weak principled among us. Example, medical providers who try to exploit unnecessary profits from their patients with implementation of Obama Care’s which is and will torture and murder millions of old, sick, and injured among us in U.S.
Recall America’s inalienable rights: life, liberty, pursuit of free will, and justice for all which is defined in 1581 Act of Abjuration? Many citizens proudly defend pursuit of free will; while denouncing America’s Judeo-Christian traditional values and principles.
Valid argument can be made that spiritual law inalienable right pursuit of free will is first referenced in New Testament. Jude 4 warns Christians to paraphrase: about “travelling preachers with distorted gospel”.
In contemporary times those with “distorted” conservative principles might be represented by corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats; plus many vanity motivated conservative cult leaders reader can list like …
Texas Drifter’s fading memory seems to recall that Paul in Galatians 5:13 suggest that Christians are free to do anything they like including sins; but Paul warns “do not use your freedom for self indulgence.”
Above two observations suggest New Testament’s role in inspiring America’s Founders to consider pursuit of free will. Next question is how can citizens have free will without second inalienable right liberty? As for inalienable right life, again, Texas Drifter seems to recall distinctions between killing and murder in Ten Commandments.
Again process seems: no pursuit of free will; without liberty; no liberty without life; no continued life without justice for all defined by 1581 Act of Abjuration.
Some Texas Drifter critics whine why did America’s Founding Fathers not include fourth inalienable right and justice for all? Perhaps same reasons all Christ’s disciples did not all include total detail references to Maundy Thursday in their inspired writings – perhaps they thought every one just knew? A question better answered by Biblical scholars not Texas Drifter.
Few closing thought inserts from The Gospel of St. Matthew (biblescripture.net).
31 "When the Son of man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, 33 and he will place the sheep at his right hand, but the goats at the left. 34 Then the King will say to those at his right hand, `Come, O blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you …
41 Then he will say to those at his left hand, `Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels;' 44 Then they also will answer, `Lord, when did we see thee hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to thee?' 45 Then he will answer them, `Truly, I say to you, as you did it not to one of the least of these, you did it not to me.' 46 And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
(End excerpts)
Questions, if conservatives represent the right; are they more likely to be at Heaven’s Son’s right hand? While liberals representing the left; are more likely to be at Heaven’s Son’s left hand? Seems that should be New Testament reason enough to defend third inalienable right pursuit of free will?
Final spiritual law thought; is not there a New Testament verse: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.”? Is not national security one of “Caesar’s things”? That being a correct observation, then is not illegal immigration threat to national security?
Could question be phrased another way: “Render to America’s Constitution the things that are America’s Constitution, and to God the things that are God's.”? Is not national security one of “Constitution’s things”?
That being a correct observation, illegal immigration is still a threat to national security which U.S. Constitution addresses in Article IV Section 4 (Excerpt) The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; … (End excerpt) – Again how ignorant does one have to be to not recognize that twenty million plus illegal immigrants in America is not an invasion?
Since there is a difference between holidays and celebrations:
Definition of holiday is period of relaxation in which one is generally exempt from work. Definition of celebrate is to perform sacrament or solemn ceremony with appropriate rites to honor person, day, or event. Only one bonus question for this writing exercise:
Seems those advocating amnesty for tens of million invaders are violating not only Constitution’s word of law; but also many spiritual laws? Perhaps their personal judgment days will place them at His at left hand, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.’
It is ironic that the inalienable right, “pursuit of free will”; that leftist evil among us in U.S. are trying to destroy was offered by Heaven’s Son for their spiritual salvation. TRUE not FALSE
Thursday, April 17, 2014
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Continue Plus 670
Texas Drifter: Commie Greenies Endangered Species?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Marxist-fascists radical environmentalists better known as “commie greenies” should go curl up in some out of way corner. Why, U.S. Constitution makes you ignorant, willingly stupid, mean spirited, or just plain evil people America’s new endangered species.
Needed brutal truth for commie greenies; there is an undeniable difference between empirical notes about naturalist studies which involve in to scientific conclusions; and Marxist-fascist- propaganda based on scientific fraud to promote unconstitutional crimes and other tyrannies which violate all laws.
Repetition is good training tool there are two types of laws: “spirit of law” also called natural law and sometimes scientific laws; and two, “word of law”.
Examples of “spirit of law” includes: Ten Commandments; 1581 Act of Abjuration, and Declaration of Independence. Examples of “word of law” includes: common law; U.S. Constitution; Bill of Rights.
Since “spirit of law” always has been, still is, and always will be; can one conclude that “spirit of law” supersedes “word of law” as final authority? Texas Drifter thinks answer is yes without a doubt.
People react to law in several ways
1. Those who abide by law
2. Those who try to abide by law
3. Those who do not abide by the law because of ignorance, moral laziness, or rabid vices
4. Those with rabid souls who are just plain evil much like evil among us in U.S.
Preliminary examples of “commie greenie” global warming or climate change law breakers:
1. Ignorant because they “know” no better
2. Willingly stupid who are too lazy to learn truth
3. Mean spirited who are motivated by vanity, hatred, and greed, or lust for power
4. Purely evil, who may be genetically defined as Satan’s spiritual children
Excerpt: Article I Section 8 United States Constitution - To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And … (end excerpt)
Constitution was written by citizen “Framers” representing all types of careers using a writing style that could be understood by all citizens not “legalize” that only lawyers and judges could understand. Both America’s “Founders and Framers” knew what grazing land and parks were.
Reader is asked to show Texas Drifter the constitutional amendment that includes grazing lands and parks in above list from Constitution’s “word of law” specifics: … to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; …
One can make valid argument that “other needful buildings” does not include grazing lands or federal parks. Seems that one can also present an argument that properties not listed in above specifics; are unconstitutional acquisitions plus, it is an unlawful act for federal government to possess such properties. Consequently all such properties should be returned to States and private citizens.
Since re-cycling is current fad in America, Texas Drifter will re-cycle excerpt of Citizens Passions Entry # 328 Texas Drifter: America Needs Garage Sale – April 21, 2011.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – America needs to follow example of working class Americans resolving their financial problems when their credit ratings are in jeopardy: cut expenses; have garage sale; find part time jobs.
America’s Garage Sale discussion shall start with following
1. Return all unconstitutionally held property by federal government to States
2. Lease off shore mineral rights for extraction with bonds to cover extraction damages and insure environment returned to original state.
3. “Illegal” lands still possessed by federal government shall be returned by auctions to original stewards of land private property owners
4. Al sales will be contingent on cash, municipal bonds, or pre-approved lines of credit.
5. Some Properties shall be sold by sections to provide middle class citizens opportunity to participate in America’s Garage Sale with deeded access easements guaranteed to prevent some unethical capitalists from denying middle class property owners access to their land.
6. Only American citizens can participate in America’s garage sale with attempted purchases by foreign nationals, foreign businesses, or foreign governments resulting in administrative forfeiture of funds used to perpetuate scam.
7. All proceeds go ONLY to pay off America’s national debts.
8. Since Marxist-fascist non-profits have no problem with IRS going after conservatives and conservative organizations; “greenie” non-profits and corporate fascist “invisible legal individuals” representing corporations will all be excluded from participating in “America’s Garage Sale” of lands forfeited by federal government for engaging in criminal conduct against U.S. Constitution and American citizens.
Best part of America’s Garage sale, after federal government returns illegally possessed properties to States and new owners. Services of bureaucrats at agencies like BLM, Interior, EPA, Agriculture, and related agencies reader can list; will have opportunities to pursue careers in fast food restaurants.
Brief brutal truth: America’s federal courts have become Gestapo like enforcers for non-legislated bureaucrat regulations not federal courts honoring their oaths to uphold, protect and defend. Be not surprised when federal public bureaucrats who are not elected unaccountable tyrants receive aid and comfort from federal courts.
Time has arrived for Americans to start discussions about conservation basics like those penned by Texas Drifter – Written years before published during 2008 at Citizens Passions Continue Plus Entry # 105 “Conservative Environmental Standards”.
Reader should thank, not express dislike for Texas Drifter suggesting that the time has arrived; for America’s federal government to get out of, and away from unconstitutional land stealing policies and practices. Also “commie greenies” should not expect much sympathy for their worshiping and following false prophets like Gore and Obama.
Reader should spread message that “word of law” always prevails over actions of law breakers like:
1. Ignorant because they “know” no better
2. Willingly stupid who are too lazy to learn truth
3. Mean spirited who are motivated by vanity, hatred, and greed, or lust for power
4. Purely evil, who are probably genetically Satan’s spiritual children
TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Why, remember adage: As it is written in Constitution and Bill of Rights; so shall it be enforced.
Bonus question - Commie Greenies Endangered Species; depends on loyalty of Americans to “spiritual law” and “word of law” – TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Marxist-fascists radical environmentalists better known as “commie greenies” should go curl up in some out of way corner. Why, U.S. Constitution makes you ignorant, willingly stupid, mean spirited, or just plain evil people America’s new endangered species.
Needed brutal truth for commie greenies; there is an undeniable difference between empirical notes about naturalist studies which involve in to scientific conclusions; and Marxist-fascist- propaganda based on scientific fraud to promote unconstitutional crimes and other tyrannies which violate all laws.
Repetition is good training tool there are two types of laws: “spirit of law” also called natural law and sometimes scientific laws; and two, “word of law”.
Examples of “spirit of law” includes: Ten Commandments; 1581 Act of Abjuration, and Declaration of Independence. Examples of “word of law” includes: common law; U.S. Constitution; Bill of Rights.
Since “spirit of law” always has been, still is, and always will be; can one conclude that “spirit of law” supersedes “word of law” as final authority? Texas Drifter thinks answer is yes without a doubt.
People react to law in several ways
1. Those who abide by law
2. Those who try to abide by law
3. Those who do not abide by the law because of ignorance, moral laziness, or rabid vices
4. Those with rabid souls who are just plain evil much like evil among us in U.S.
Preliminary examples of “commie greenie” global warming or climate change law breakers:
1. Ignorant because they “know” no better
2. Willingly stupid who are too lazy to learn truth
3. Mean spirited who are motivated by vanity, hatred, and greed, or lust for power
4. Purely evil, who may be genetically defined as Satan’s spiritual children
Excerpt: Article I Section 8 United States Constitution - To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And … (end excerpt)
Constitution was written by citizen “Framers” representing all types of careers using a writing style that could be understood by all citizens not “legalize” that only lawyers and judges could understand. Both America’s “Founders and Framers” knew what grazing land and parks were.
Reader is asked to show Texas Drifter the constitutional amendment that includes grazing lands and parks in above list from Constitution’s “word of law” specifics: … to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; …
One can make valid argument that “other needful buildings” does not include grazing lands or federal parks. Seems that one can also present an argument that properties not listed in above specifics; are unconstitutional acquisitions plus, it is an unlawful act for federal government to possess such properties. Consequently all such properties should be returned to States and private citizens.
Since re-cycling is current fad in America, Texas Drifter will re-cycle excerpt of Citizens Passions Entry # 328 Texas Drifter: America Needs Garage Sale – April 21, 2011.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – America needs to follow example of working class Americans resolving their financial problems when their credit ratings are in jeopardy: cut expenses; have garage sale; find part time jobs.
America’s Garage Sale discussion shall start with following
1. Return all unconstitutionally held property by federal government to States
2. Lease off shore mineral rights for extraction with bonds to cover extraction damages and insure environment returned to original state.
3. “Illegal” lands still possessed by federal government shall be returned by auctions to original stewards of land private property owners
4. Al sales will be contingent on cash, municipal bonds, or pre-approved lines of credit.
5. Some Properties shall be sold by sections to provide middle class citizens opportunity to participate in America’s Garage Sale with deeded access easements guaranteed to prevent some unethical capitalists from denying middle class property owners access to their land.
6. Only American citizens can participate in America’s garage sale with attempted purchases by foreign nationals, foreign businesses, or foreign governments resulting in administrative forfeiture of funds used to perpetuate scam.
7. All proceeds go ONLY to pay off America’s national debts.
8. Since Marxist-fascist non-profits have no problem with IRS going after conservatives and conservative organizations; “greenie” non-profits and corporate fascist “invisible legal individuals” representing corporations will all be excluded from participating in “America’s Garage Sale” of lands forfeited by federal government for engaging in criminal conduct against U.S. Constitution and American citizens.
Best part of America’s Garage sale, after federal government returns illegally possessed properties to States and new owners. Services of bureaucrats at agencies like BLM, Interior, EPA, Agriculture, and related agencies reader can list; will have opportunities to pursue careers in fast food restaurants.
Brief brutal truth: America’s federal courts have become Gestapo like enforcers for non-legislated bureaucrat regulations not federal courts honoring their oaths to uphold, protect and defend. Be not surprised when federal public bureaucrats who are not elected unaccountable tyrants receive aid and comfort from federal courts.
Time has arrived for Americans to start discussions about conservation basics like those penned by Texas Drifter – Written years before published during 2008 at Citizens Passions Continue Plus Entry # 105 “Conservative Environmental Standards”.
Reader should thank, not express dislike for Texas Drifter suggesting that the time has arrived; for America’s federal government to get out of, and away from unconstitutional land stealing policies and practices. Also “commie greenies” should not expect much sympathy for their worshiping and following false prophets like Gore and Obama.
Reader should spread message that “word of law” always prevails over actions of law breakers like:
1. Ignorant because they “know” no better
2. Willingly stupid who are too lazy to learn truth
3. Mean spirited who are motivated by vanity, hatred, and greed, or lust for power
4. Purely evil, who are probably genetically Satan’s spiritual children
TRUE or FALSE
Clue – Why, remember adage: As it is written in Constitution and Bill of Rights; so shall it be enforced.
Bonus question - Commie Greenies Endangered Species; depends on loyalty of Americans to “spiritual law” and “word of law” – TRUE or FALSE
Monday, April 14, 2014
Continue Plus 669
Texas Drifter: All Americans Now On Jury Duty
Marshall’s Law Dateline – If events described in “Texas Drifter: Idaho Ranchers Then What BLM?” short story “Just Another Dream” had occurred and were actual events; if all Americans are now on jury duty should Travis James be found guilty or not guilty?
Court room scenario might be as follows
Judge (points at defense attorney and says: I remember you as prosecutor from “Texas Drifter: Premonition Senator’ Cornyn’s Treason Trial” (Library Entry # 657). You may make your opening remarks – nothing clever!
Defense Attorney (walks over to railing in front of jury and lays a Bible on railing in front of all Americans now on jury duty – he then places on hand on Bible, then raises his other hand and swears) I will tell whole truth and nothing but whole truth so help me God.
Defense Attorney Continues: Truth is that the defendant Travis James was influenced by PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) resulting from unlawful unconstitutional viciously sadistic actions of your federal government’s bureaucrats until now unaccountable crimes which caused my innocent client to evolve into “battered citizen syndrome”.
Continuing: Little about battered citizen syndrome which we will review in much greater detain in this trial to acquit my innocent client (Defense attorney’s notes)
Here is where exigent and pre-emptive can become blurred legal lines. Consider Texas Drifter’s “battered citizen syndrome” concept. Should new self defense statutes in States like Texas consider expanding citizens' self defense statutes to include “battered citizen’s syndrome”?
Reference excerpt about "battered citizen syndrome" from All Alright Magazine - Texas Drifter: Is Affluenza Why DC Elites Blanking Crazy? www.allrightmagazine published February 10, 2014.
(Start insert) Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.
*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt notes)
Defense Attorney Continues: Prosecution will plead for verdict of guilty based on revenge for what future historians will describe as American public sector domestic war criminals.
Continuing: Defense will show that defendant was acting on following principles of self defense based on
1. Generic Judeo-Christian principles in Ten Commandments differences between “thou shall not kill and thou shall not murder” using example of David as my client and Goliath as your federal Leviathan.
2. Act of Abjuration 1581
3. Common Law “Castle Doctrine”
4. Declaration of Independence
Still Continuing: Defense will also show who were responsible and accessories to putting my innocent client in a life threatening self defense situation.
Continuing: My clients’ defense which has sworn to tell whole truth and nothing but truth will illustrate roles of following who put my innocent client in life threatening self defense situation to be
1. Out of control federal bureaucrats with rabid attitudes towards law abiding citizens entitled to inconvenient constitutional due process rights
2. Their accessories who are elected and appointed public officials including legal referees from judges to justices (defense attorney pauses – looks at trial judge and remarks) Not including you Your Honor
Judge: Quips you are getting close to being facetious; Go on.
Defense Attorney Continues: Number three accessories are “toleraters” who condoned with their silence and tolerated above guilty parties who deserve to be brought before Nuremberg type trials in America for public sector domestic war criminals
Final elements of accessories to domestic war criminals genocide and atrocities includes main stream media and main stream media “light” who mostly represent corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Both of these media strumpets have traded in their First Amendment freedom of press rights to be propagandists for domestic war criminals attempting to destroy all Americans who believe in America’s traditions, values, and principles – you the jury know which beliefs I reference.
Before the defense for my innocent client closes my opening remarks; defense ask all you Americans serving on this jury: Where was the prosecution after: Malibu, Ruby Ridge; Waco? Where was the prosecution after any of following
1. Federal public sector environmentalist terrorism on ranches in States like Idaho
2. Illegal immigrants’ crimes against millions
3. Fast and Furious I
4. Fast and Furious II (Benghazi)
5. IRS war on conservatives and conservative organizations free speech and voting rights
6. Obama Care
7. Greedy corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats
8. Each of you on the jury can add to list?
Where was the prosecution, after government agents murdered and covered up their crime of murdering Travis James’ wife and child? Where was the prosecution after federal agents murdered and covered up Sunrise Massacre of three hundred eight totally innocent children, women, and men?
Let us never forget what Travis James witnessed by his own words:
Total firepower from two helicopter gun ships quickly turned the pre Easter services into what later became known as the “Sunrise Massacre.” Male members of the community had left their weapons at home to teach the children about the virtues of peace.
Shadow rumors suggest that Travis has told confidants that the children were reciting “Our Father who art in Heaven” as the gun ships suddenly appeared out of the sun and began firing.
What would you have done you as jury members? Had you experienced what my innocent client has experienced? Would you have just said – oh well another day in America; or would you have tried to keep the future from being like the present and recent past?
Recall when I started my opening remarks in defense of my innocent client; remember I laid one hand on this Bible and raised my other hand and took an oath to tell the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God. Let us now see if Mr. Prosecutor has same faith in Integrity I offered you about my self?
Prosecutor (vainly rises and starts to strut over to put his hand on Holiest of all Books – as he lowers his hand to the Bible his hands are covered in flames and Prosecutor yells” – “No opening remarks!”
Jury members were amazed to witness not even tiniest damages to Holiest of all Books.
Judge – Ten minute recess to get that pathetic prosecution whiner some medical attention.
Judge looks at Defense attorney who smiles and asks: Miracle outside intervention?
Editor Marshall will put trial on hold for now. Texas Drifter asked me to inform Reader that America last citizen haters can write their own propaganda to tamper with American jury’s future verdict. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – justice thing about American due process system; American jurors not Defense or Prosecution decides innocent or guilt – WHAT DECIDE YOU?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – If events described in “Texas Drifter: Idaho Ranchers Then What BLM?” short story “Just Another Dream” had occurred and were actual events; if all Americans are now on jury duty should Travis James be found guilty or not guilty?
Court room scenario might be as follows
Judge (points at defense attorney and says: I remember you as prosecutor from “Texas Drifter: Premonition Senator’ Cornyn’s Treason Trial” (Library Entry # 657). You may make your opening remarks – nothing clever!
Defense Attorney (walks over to railing in front of jury and lays a Bible on railing in front of all Americans now on jury duty – he then places on hand on Bible, then raises his other hand and swears) I will tell whole truth and nothing but whole truth so help me God.
Defense Attorney Continues: Truth is that the defendant Travis James was influenced by PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) resulting from unlawful unconstitutional viciously sadistic actions of your federal government’s bureaucrats until now unaccountable crimes which caused my innocent client to evolve into “battered citizen syndrome”.
Continuing: Little about battered citizen syndrome which we will review in much greater detain in this trial to acquit my innocent client (Defense attorney’s notes)
Here is where exigent and pre-emptive can become blurred legal lines. Consider Texas Drifter’s “battered citizen syndrome” concept. Should new self defense statutes in States like Texas consider expanding citizens' self defense statutes to include “battered citizen’s syndrome”?
Reference excerpt about "battered citizen syndrome" from All Alright Magazine - Texas Drifter: Is Affluenza Why DC Elites Blanking Crazy? www.allrightmagazine published February 10, 2014.
(Start insert) Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.
*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt notes)
Defense Attorney Continues: Prosecution will plead for verdict of guilty based on revenge for what future historians will describe as American public sector domestic war criminals.
Continuing: Defense will show that defendant was acting on following principles of self defense based on
1. Generic Judeo-Christian principles in Ten Commandments differences between “thou shall not kill and thou shall not murder” using example of David as my client and Goliath as your federal Leviathan.
2. Act of Abjuration 1581
3. Common Law “Castle Doctrine”
4. Declaration of Independence
Still Continuing: Defense will also show who were responsible and accessories to putting my innocent client in a life threatening self defense situation.
Continuing: My clients’ defense which has sworn to tell whole truth and nothing but truth will illustrate roles of following who put my innocent client in life threatening self defense situation to be
1. Out of control federal bureaucrats with rabid attitudes towards law abiding citizens entitled to inconvenient constitutional due process rights
2. Their accessories who are elected and appointed public officials including legal referees from judges to justices (defense attorney pauses – looks at trial judge and remarks) Not including you Your Honor
Judge: Quips you are getting close to being facetious; Go on.
Defense Attorney Continues: Number three accessories are “toleraters” who condoned with their silence and tolerated above guilty parties who deserve to be brought before Nuremberg type trials in America for public sector domestic war criminals
Final elements of accessories to domestic war criminals genocide and atrocities includes main stream media and main stream media “light” who mostly represent corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Both of these media strumpets have traded in their First Amendment freedom of press rights to be propagandists for domestic war criminals attempting to destroy all Americans who believe in America’s traditions, values, and principles – you the jury know which beliefs I reference.
Before the defense for my innocent client closes my opening remarks; defense ask all you Americans serving on this jury: Where was the prosecution after: Malibu, Ruby Ridge; Waco? Where was the prosecution after any of following
1. Federal public sector environmentalist terrorism on ranches in States like Idaho
2. Illegal immigrants’ crimes against millions
3. Fast and Furious I
4. Fast and Furious II (Benghazi)
5. IRS war on conservatives and conservative organizations free speech and voting rights
6. Obama Care
7. Greedy corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats
8. Each of you on the jury can add to list?
Where was the prosecution, after government agents murdered and covered up their crime of murdering Travis James’ wife and child? Where was the prosecution after federal agents murdered and covered up Sunrise Massacre of three hundred eight totally innocent children, women, and men?
Let us never forget what Travis James witnessed by his own words:
Total firepower from two helicopter gun ships quickly turned the pre Easter services into what later became known as the “Sunrise Massacre.” Male members of the community had left their weapons at home to teach the children about the virtues of peace.
Shadow rumors suggest that Travis has told confidants that the children were reciting “Our Father who art in Heaven” as the gun ships suddenly appeared out of the sun and began firing.
What would you have done you as jury members? Had you experienced what my innocent client has experienced? Would you have just said – oh well another day in America; or would you have tried to keep the future from being like the present and recent past?
Recall when I started my opening remarks in defense of my innocent client; remember I laid one hand on this Bible and raised my other hand and took an oath to tell the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God. Let us now see if Mr. Prosecutor has same faith in Integrity I offered you about my self?
Prosecutor (vainly rises and starts to strut over to put his hand on Holiest of all Books – as he lowers his hand to the Bible his hands are covered in flames and Prosecutor yells” – “No opening remarks!”
Jury members were amazed to witness not even tiniest damages to Holiest of all Books.
Judge – Ten minute recess to get that pathetic prosecution whiner some medical attention.
Judge looks at Defense attorney who smiles and asks: Miracle outside intervention?
Editor Marshall will put trial on hold for now. Texas Drifter asked me to inform Reader that America last citizen haters can write their own propaganda to tamper with American jury’s future verdict. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – justice thing about American due process system; American jurors not Defense or Prosecution decides innocent or guilt – WHAT DECIDE YOU?
Continue Plus 668
Texas Drifter: Governor Perry and Obama Allies?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – History often repeats itself, case in point Mexico stealing Americans’ water to manufacture “drought crisis “ in South Texas around 2001 and again now in 2014.
Do not recall whether it was Bush II or Perry that flippantly quipped, “Those people in South Texas need to pray for rain”. No what people on America’s Southern porous border needed and still need is an American President and Texas Governor who took or will take action against Mexico stealing water from Americans who also happened to be Texans.
Practically only changes to following published advertisement in 2002 were American political facilitators Internationalist Republican Bush II and Texas Governor Perry. Only changes in contemporary times are political facilitators’ Internationalist Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat Obama and still Texas Governor Perry.
There are only two people on planet earth currently responsible for the current South Texas water crisis: Obama and Perry (then Governor Perry and President Bush II). The problem started while President Bush was Governor of Texas, and has re-occurred under Obama Administration. If a thief breaks into your home; who does reader hold responsible, the thief or the security guard that did not do their job?
The South Texas water issue is simple: Mexico steals treaty promised water; Mexico refuses to return stolen water; while President Bush then and Obama now takes not even half hearted measures to protect American citizens from Mexican economic terrorism.
Economic terrorism which cost the Rio Grande Valley economy more than: two billion dollars and thirty thousand jobs while Bush II was President. Not to mention, destroying the Valley’s agriculture industry, and eventually costing tens of thousands of more South Texas residents their homes when school, city, and county property taxes doubled or tripled.
Citizens of South Texas should be inflamed that Mexican oil seems to be more important to American politicians than the financial well being and civil rights of South Texas farmers, ranchers, their employees, and all the businesses they support.
South Texas’ current Mexico fabricated water crisis involves more than Mexico simply returning stolen water. Other issues are compensation by Mexico for actual damages could exceed estimated to be one billion dollars under Obama and Perry alliance; not counting yet to be determined punitive damages,
Not including actual damages and punitive damages in resolving first a Republican and now Progressive Democrat manufactured water crisis in South Texas, equates to crime without punishment for economic terrorism.
Studies report that Mexico could be the eleventh wealthiest nation in the world, while average Mexican citizens could rank between: one hundred forty to one hundred fifty in per capita income.
People of South Texas seeking actual and punitive monetary damages against Mexico by resorting to any of the following would be seeking just compensation from one of the world’s richest nations, not some of the world’s poorest citizens:
1. The First Amendments guarantees citizens the right to petition the government for grievances. File a class action civil suit against Obama’s State Department for both criminal negligence for falling to stop Mexico from engaging and continuing to engage in economic terrorism, and two not forcing Mexico to return water stolen from the United States.
2. American courts have ruled that private American citizens have a right to sue foreign governments for damages resulting from acts of terrorism.
3. Petition the U.S. Senate and Congress to pass legislation that prohibits the importation from Mexico all products directly or indirectly grown, raised, produced, or manufactured from illegal gains (water stolen by Mexico).
Eighty to ninety percent of those affected by first Bush’s now Obama’s “America Last” water policy are American Hispanics.
Only time will tell if South Texas American Hispanics will send Obama and Governor Perry the message that it takes more than speaking in condescending child like remedial Spanish to get their votes.
The time has arrived for all Americans to start warning federal and state Republican candidates that it will take action not promises to get their votes. So get on your phones; get on the Internet; tell everyone you know to spread the word: NO WATER NO VOTE; NO WATER NO VOTE; NO WATER NO VOTE.
Again, do not recall whether it was Bush II or Perry that flippantly quipped, “Those people in South Texas need to pray for rain”. No what people on America’s Southern porous border needed and still need is an American President and Texas Governor who took or will take action against Mexico stealing water from Americans who also happened to be Texans. TRUE or FALSE
Emerging fact, Mexico could have stolen over million acre feet of water during Mexico’s latest stealing cycle by 2015. TRUE or FALSE
Reader might ask, why anyone should care if Mexico steals water and bankrupts Texans living along America’s Southern porous border. Consider anecdotes as being examples of what happens to others. Regional political issues might predict politician’s loyalties to voters if politician gets elected to national office. TRUE or FALSE
Question, wonder if Texas’ new Governor and new Lt. Governor will continue to serve Mexico’s interests; or will stand up for Americans who also happen to be Texans? Or should question be stand up for Texans who also happen to be Americans. Sometimes Texas Drifter gets easily confused as he gets older. TRUE or FALSE
If politicians are not loyal to their geo-regional voters; why would they be loyal to voters in federal elections? Good candidate question for Texas Governor Perry who might seek national Office. TRUE or FALSE
BONUS QUESTION: Bush II, Obama, Governor Perry policies toward South Texas farming and ranching interests seem similar to Obama’s BLM attitudes and policies towards America’s agriculture interests in Western United States? TRUE or FALSE
Clue: Both geo-regional policies’ objectives:
1. Deprive American private sector interests of natural resources needed for ethical capitalists to make honest livings
2. Steal private citizens homes when not able to pay inflationary local property taxes
3. Arrest to deny Second Amendment Rights if convicted when private citizens are peacefully assembled to petition government for bureaucrats’ fascist policies
4. Seems about only inalienable right not threatened or endangered is inalienable right to life; which Obama Care should resolve with its withholding medical treatment death panels
Extra bonus question, explain in seven words or less why America’s employed, retired, and unemployed should pay higher prices for farm and ranch products; could it be simply be because Bush II, Obama, and Governor Perry chose to side with Mexican aristocrats; not Southern Border Texans who also happen to be Americans? TRUE or FALSE
Clue: How many acres of both farming and ranching ventures could benefit from million plus acre feet of water stolen by Mexico from South Texas agriculture entrepreneurs?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – History often repeats itself, case in point Mexico stealing Americans’ water to manufacture “drought crisis “ in South Texas around 2001 and again now in 2014.
Do not recall whether it was Bush II or Perry that flippantly quipped, “Those people in South Texas need to pray for rain”. No what people on America’s Southern porous border needed and still need is an American President and Texas Governor who took or will take action against Mexico stealing water from Americans who also happened to be Texans.
Practically only changes to following published advertisement in 2002 were American political facilitators Internationalist Republican Bush II and Texas Governor Perry. Only changes in contemporary times are political facilitators’ Internationalist Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat Obama and still Texas Governor Perry.
There are only two people on planet earth currently responsible for the current South Texas water crisis: Obama and Perry (then Governor Perry and President Bush II). The problem started while President Bush was Governor of Texas, and has re-occurred under Obama Administration. If a thief breaks into your home; who does reader hold responsible, the thief or the security guard that did not do their job?
The South Texas water issue is simple: Mexico steals treaty promised water; Mexico refuses to return stolen water; while President Bush then and Obama now takes not even half hearted measures to protect American citizens from Mexican economic terrorism.
Economic terrorism which cost the Rio Grande Valley economy more than: two billion dollars and thirty thousand jobs while Bush II was President. Not to mention, destroying the Valley’s agriculture industry, and eventually costing tens of thousands of more South Texas residents their homes when school, city, and county property taxes doubled or tripled.
Citizens of South Texas should be inflamed that Mexican oil seems to be more important to American politicians than the financial well being and civil rights of South Texas farmers, ranchers, their employees, and all the businesses they support.
South Texas’ current Mexico fabricated water crisis involves more than Mexico simply returning stolen water. Other issues are compensation by Mexico for actual damages could exceed estimated to be one billion dollars under Obama and Perry alliance; not counting yet to be determined punitive damages,
Not including actual damages and punitive damages in resolving first a Republican and now Progressive Democrat manufactured water crisis in South Texas, equates to crime without punishment for economic terrorism.
Studies report that Mexico could be the eleventh wealthiest nation in the world, while average Mexican citizens could rank between: one hundred forty to one hundred fifty in per capita income.
People of South Texas seeking actual and punitive monetary damages against Mexico by resorting to any of the following would be seeking just compensation from one of the world’s richest nations, not some of the world’s poorest citizens:
1. The First Amendments guarantees citizens the right to petition the government for grievances. File a class action civil suit against Obama’s State Department for both criminal negligence for falling to stop Mexico from engaging and continuing to engage in economic terrorism, and two not forcing Mexico to return water stolen from the United States.
2. American courts have ruled that private American citizens have a right to sue foreign governments for damages resulting from acts of terrorism.
3. Petition the U.S. Senate and Congress to pass legislation that prohibits the importation from Mexico all products directly or indirectly grown, raised, produced, or manufactured from illegal gains (water stolen by Mexico).
Eighty to ninety percent of those affected by first Bush’s now Obama’s “America Last” water policy are American Hispanics.
Only time will tell if South Texas American Hispanics will send Obama and Governor Perry the message that it takes more than speaking in condescending child like remedial Spanish to get their votes.
The time has arrived for all Americans to start warning federal and state Republican candidates that it will take action not promises to get their votes. So get on your phones; get on the Internet; tell everyone you know to spread the word: NO WATER NO VOTE; NO WATER NO VOTE; NO WATER NO VOTE.
Again, do not recall whether it was Bush II or Perry that flippantly quipped, “Those people in South Texas need to pray for rain”. No what people on America’s Southern porous border needed and still need is an American President and Texas Governor who took or will take action against Mexico stealing water from Americans who also happened to be Texans. TRUE or FALSE
Emerging fact, Mexico could have stolen over million acre feet of water during Mexico’s latest stealing cycle by 2015. TRUE or FALSE
Reader might ask, why anyone should care if Mexico steals water and bankrupts Texans living along America’s Southern porous border. Consider anecdotes as being examples of what happens to others. Regional political issues might predict politician’s loyalties to voters if politician gets elected to national office. TRUE or FALSE
Question, wonder if Texas’ new Governor and new Lt. Governor will continue to serve Mexico’s interests; or will stand up for Americans who also happen to be Texans? Or should question be stand up for Texans who also happen to be Americans. Sometimes Texas Drifter gets easily confused as he gets older. TRUE or FALSE
If politicians are not loyal to their geo-regional voters; why would they be loyal to voters in federal elections? Good candidate question for Texas Governor Perry who might seek national Office. TRUE or FALSE
BONUS QUESTION: Bush II, Obama, Governor Perry policies toward South Texas farming and ranching interests seem similar to Obama’s BLM attitudes and policies towards America’s agriculture interests in Western United States? TRUE or FALSE
Clue: Both geo-regional policies’ objectives:
1. Deprive American private sector interests of natural resources needed for ethical capitalists to make honest livings
2. Steal private citizens homes when not able to pay inflationary local property taxes
3. Arrest to deny Second Amendment Rights if convicted when private citizens are peacefully assembled to petition government for bureaucrats’ fascist policies
4. Seems about only inalienable right not threatened or endangered is inalienable right to life; which Obama Care should resolve with its withholding medical treatment death panels
Extra bonus question, explain in seven words or less why America’s employed, retired, and unemployed should pay higher prices for farm and ranch products; could it be simply be because Bush II, Obama, and Governor Perry chose to side with Mexican aristocrats; not Southern Border Texans who also happen to be Americans? TRUE or FALSE
Clue: How many acres of both farming and ranching ventures could benefit from million plus acre feet of water stolen by Mexico from South Texas agriculture entrepreneurs?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)