Continue Plus 646

Texas Drifter: Citizen Investigation Communications

Marshall’s Law Dateline – “Communications” is part of Texas Drifter series to assist the citizen investigator in gathering tips, leads, clues, and evidence for future American Domestic War Crimes Trials. Why, too provide justice for America’s unwashed and Americans with middle class attitudes victimized by Obama’s Marxist-fascist policies and Obama’s Republicans’ like (to name few) McConnell, Cornyn, and Boehner’s corporate fascist policies.

Perhaps the skill most taken for granted is the ability to communicate with other individuals. Citizen investigators need to be subtle as they cannot rely on the intimidating factor of law enforcement badges.

Use specific direct language to communicate and avoid glitter language. An example of glitter language is new car dealerships marketing used rental equipment as “program cars.”

Also avoid misusing word meanings in communication efforts. For example, killing feeder trained Whitetail Deer from a tower stand is shooting, not hunting.

Words have at least two common uses: convey specific meanings, or express ideas. Using words to convey concepts is great for creating theory, and since knowledge evolves from theory to accurate empirical descriptions; specific words meanings complete the process.

For example, the specific meaning of conscience is against science (con-science). When used as a concept word, conscience implies emotional choice based on learned guilt. Since governments operate by bureaucratic policies that prevent choice; governments have no consciences; hence conclusion that governments represent anti-Christ.

Assignments involve collecting empirical information for their clients; this is accomplished by making specific word meanings one of their primary tools.

Even though slang represents coarse or undereducated dialect, learn to be able to understand slang so as to communicate with those who cannot converse without slang.

One of the most vital tools is the ability of communication. Communication takes one of several shapes and is determined by strategy.

Communication can seek to gather information from a source, communication can seek to give information to a source, communication can seek to negotiate a settlement with a source, and communication can be used to measure the accuracy of a source’s information.

Approaches to dealing with possibly hostile or threatening contacts are (1) avoid contact, (2) negotiate (3) manipulate to avoid or reduce a threat, (4) warning, (5) neutralize with offensive defense.

The value of mutual understanding in client, staff, and information source relationships has been greatly undervalued in the information collection industry.

If observing from a distance is long distance surveillance, then interviewing should be considered short distance surveillance.

There are four steps to understanding or improving a communication process. The first is to establish rapport and control the level of communication between the two parties.

The second is to talk to not at other individuals. Part of taking to and not at also involves being direct, and expressing circumstances in a non-hostile or non-confrontational manner.

Third, listen to and read the expressions (eye and body movements) of the individual that one is being giving information to, or taking information from.

Fourth, it is important to develop the skill of directly or subtlety verifying the message which is being exchanged.

Conveying the exact message is a precision art and requires an extensive vocabulary and understanding of exactly what each word’s meaning is.

Constant consistent exercise will build and improve knowledge of and command of specific words for specific circumstances in order to improve the transfer of information.

Interviewing; negotiating; and interrogating are different tools.

Interrogation relies on isolation, humiliation, deprivation, and intimidation to obtain forced not voluntary information. Professionals never use inappropriate tools for situation.

Two rules about dealing with potential witnesses: first, never waste their time, and second never approach them with preconceived opinions about their personalities. Some of the most courteous and helpful witnesses are those portrayed as “uncooperative” by clients.

Learn to be an expert in managing relations with hostile, apathetic, dull or scared witnesses. The process starts with being a good listener.

Good interview skills bring out information from people who may be reluctant.
Always remain in control of the interview conversation, while thinking about what the subject is saying. It may be helpful to have the interviewee repeat what was said so that there are no misunderstandings.

Consent recording laws are tools that can facilitate study and review of interviews.

Preparing questions goes a long way in helping conduct a professional interview.
Generally it is better to have the client attorney design and approve a list of questions because attorneys tend to look at work from a different prospective; and questions that may be of interest to surveillance managers or agents may not be of interest to the attorney.

Again, try to get the attorney to provide you with a list of questions to use in your interviews. There are many interview skill classes available, but it is important to be knowledgeable and aware of body movements.

Subtle messages and eye contact, body movements and other things can help both student and scientist of the interview. Interviewing is a crucial tool because generally 90 percent of collateral information originates from personal interviews.

Since teaching requires repetition, this segment cannot be over stressed, learning to continually examine and improve interview techniques. Another component of interviewing is not interrupting the person being interviewed. The more people talk or ramble, the more likely one is to get useful information.

Another technique is to ask or repeat the question in different ways. This is necessary since most people do not know, or have not learned how to answer specific questions.

How many times do people ask a question, and get a totally unrelated answer. Sometimes the cause may be intentional evasiveness on part of the person being interviewed; but most times, it is the respondent’s lack of education of how to respond to direct questions.

Witness statements should be taken sooner, not later.

Times change and so do people’s memory or desire to get involved. Many solid cases have been trashed by neglected opportunity to take a statement and have it notarized. This work becomes routine if the citizen investigator is a state licensed notary public.

Recording voluntary statements helps preserve accurate duplication of witnesses’ comments. Voluntary witnesses should be shown the recorder, explained its use, and asked for permission to record their observations. When dealing with voluntary witnesses, good public relations will increase productivity.

Involuntary witnesses’ comments may be covertly recorded for impeachment purposes. (In “consent recording states”)The foundation of preserving witness testimony is essentially timely documentation be it by overt or covert means.

Unfortunately, many people take it for granted that they are great interviewers. Skills that are not continually updated, polished, examined, or tested tend to lose their sharpness. The productive interview is probably the field agent’s most important skill. TRUE or FALSE

Continue Plus 645

Texas Drifter: Petition for Domestic War Crimes Trials

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Following writing exercise written on eve of anniversary of fall of Alamo in 1836. Why should, America’s unwashed, and Americans with middle class attitudes demand Nuremburg type “American domestic war crimes trials.”

Answer, after:
1. I.R.S. abuses of conservatives
2. Fast and Furious
3. Benghazi
4. millions of assaults and killings of Americans by Obama Care
5. Other atrocities reader can list including millions of crimes against Americans and legal residents by illegal immigrants

Brutal fact, Obama and Obama’s Republican accessories like McConnell, Boehner, Cornyn, and others reader can list will have assaulted and killed more Americans than Nazis murdered before and during World War II.

This writing exercise premise: Heaven granted inalienable right of liberty; includes but is not limited too “Congress shall make no law … abridging ... the right of the people (to) peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Reader does not know sources of preceding insert; no need to continue reading following writing exercise.

Concept for this writing exercise; Texas Drifter will start a series of writing exercises to help citizen investigators conduct investigations for “redress of grievances” for future American Domestic War Crimes Trials.

America’s Domestic War crimes Trials will be legitimized by
1. Act of Abjuration 1581
2. Declaration of Independence
3. United States Constitution
4. Bill of Rights
5. Texas Constitutions of 1836 and 1876
6. Sacrifices of millions and millions of American patriots serving and defending above rights

Fact affirmed by Heaven’s Son Father: All unwashed Americans despised by corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats; and all Americans with middle class attitudes persecuted, abused, and killed by Obama’s Marxist-fascists are entitled to seek justice, in American Domestic War Crimes Trials; which may or may not be initiated by citizen investigator’s investigations.

These citizens are entitled to expect redress of their grievances also called justice based on following:
1. Due process indictments
2. Due process prosecutions
3. Due process defenses for accused
4. Due process punishments for convicted minus endless frivolous appeals

Reader can reference Texas Drifter: Citizen Investigation Ethics at Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 643 for initial principles for citizen investigation managers; or better still - All Right Magazine “Citizen Investigation Ethics”

Series will continue with next writing exercise Library Entry # 646: - Texas Drifter: Citizen Investigator Communications with other citizen investigator themes to follow.

Assignment question: readers not willing to step up to serve Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic; should stay home and be content to play with their wife and children. Why, to not distract or bother those serving America by honoring their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question, citizens who do not petition for domestic war crimes trials are contributing to death of America’s First Amendment; as inalienable rights like “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” not exercised like muscles can shrink, shrivel, and die if not used. TRUE or FALSE

Continue Plus 644

Texas Drifter: Putin’s Long Term Strategy

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Only thing more dangerous than a fool is a vain arrogant fool. “Wanting” accomplishes nothing; only “doing” accomplishes anything. Ignoring America’s cultural traitors in America’s cultural war is foolish.

Concepts re-affirming above premises include:
1. Cultural treasons exist in America’s cultural war, and
2. Obama’s hatreds of America’s traditions, values, principles, and history could one, cause Obama to start nuclear war to show what a “tough guy” Obama thinks he is; or two, start a nuclear war to protect his legacy of being Marxist-fascist failure of not totaling destroying America.

Objectives of America’s cultural war enemies are to destroy America’s: traditions, values, principles; including inalienable rights; due process constitution; ethical capitalism; middle class attitudes; plus putting America’s national security interest last.

Ways to verify above concepts:
1. First separate America’s patriots from America’s cultural war traitors and enemies.
2. Reader can list America’s domestic and foreign cultural war allies.
3. List of America’s cultural war enemies includes:
- Mexico
- Soviets by any other name
- Chinese
- Some middle East countries (reader can list)
- Reader can add to list
4. Reader can also develop preliminary list of America’s culture war traitors, starting with but limited too activist judges; minority race and ethnic haters; greedy seeking to steal other people’s property like Marxist-fascists for poor; and corporate fascists for internationalist Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats.

Simple obvious solutions to restoring America to Heaven’s favorite constitutional republic: unleash America’s natural energy resources through ethical capitalism by reducing taxes and elimination of most Marxist-fascist regulations. Second build America’s armed forces into being able to manage a three front war: Soviets by any other name; Chinese imperialists; and Islamic fascist terrorists and their collaborators like Mexico and other third world Spanish speaking countries that hate Americans.

Fact, above America last America haters seek to destroy American Hispanic citizens and American legal residents first. TRUE or FALSE

People ask what is Soviet by any other name Putin’s long term strategy. A very good guesstimate is to win Second Cold War. Putin seems to be driven to reclaim Soviet by any other name’s greatness before losing First Cold War. How, by using Obama’s vanities and in competencies to “transform” to quote Obama, America’s economic power base to a third word socialist country that Russia and China can “outspend” as President Reagan did to Soviets and China to win first Cold War. TRUE or FALSE

Translation: Putin and China are survival pragmatists and have learned they lost their first Cold War by not being able to “outspend” America on armed forces technologies in their first Cold war. TRUE or FALSE

Clue, Putin being knowledgeable of counter intelligence measures probably uses every contact with Obama “to teach” Obama that Cold War lessons were how evil Americans used capitalist greed to defeat socialist brothers Putin and Obama with their different Marxist fathers.

Talk has been spreading across America by conservative cult and clique leaders that only the truth is needed to keep Americans free. Brutal facts of real political world are: might may or may or not make right; truth without metaphorical swords is comparable to Obama’s foreign policy. Reference last writing exercise: “Citizen Investigation Ethics” Library Entry # 643 Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library “Obama’s national defense policy, we will urinate in our pants if we do not like what you do”. TRUE or FALSE

Seems some recently arrived in Texas, carpetbagger cult leader and his followers have been and are advocating same Obama self defense policy. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question – seems ironic that it took shiftless Texas drifter drifting in and out of part time dementia to explain Putin’s long term strategy. TRUE or FALSE

Final question not for points, rather reader’s own curiosity: what kind of patriot are you; if you ignore, tolerate or support either America's culture war traitors or American culture war enemies?

Continue Plus 643

Texas Drifter: Citizen Investigation Ethics

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Following reviews ethical principles not principals for managing investigations; art of managing investigations will be reviewed in another writing exercise. Who better to present following observations than author private sector Texas continuing education training manual “Spy As A Verb: Art ands Ethics of Surveillance?

Investigative process has one and only one sole objective: discover facts for truth. Citizen investigation managers must never let their personal likes or dislikes of investigation target corrupt integrity of investigation with prejudicial investigative process.

Clarification, citizen investigation managers can supervise one person investigation; them self; or be responsible for actions of eight or more team members. Specifics provided in art of managing investigations.

Translation: Texas Drifter’s introduction with potential clients always involved informing client: Professional standards’ include running only non-prejudicial investigations. Results of my efforts will be same: good, bad, indifferent, or nothing regardless of who pays for my time.

Moral courage for citizen investigator manager is measured by their ability to find answers to unspeakable questions. Ethics for citizen investigation managers starts with real world pragmatism not conclusions shadowed by vanity; lust for greed or power of fascist ideologies like Marxist-fascism, corporate fascism, or Islamic terrorism.

The citizen investigation manager believes that a no backup attitude is the difference between winners who never quit, and survivors who quit when they break even. Obvious truths: patriots ignoring national security threats or domestic tyranny always spend too much time at cemeteries.

Devotion to citizen investigation management teaches the following: intelligence is power; accurate information is intelligence and non-prejudicial investigations generate accurate information. Conclusion: covert investigative intelligence can provide an edge that when combined with appropriate timely resources can determine outcome.

Citizen investigation managers have two basic operation management styles to choose from: observer or participant. Mutual components for both operation management styles include: security; resource management; databases; contacts; experts; investigation; surveillance; and undercover activities.

It takes ability, experience, integrity, and attitude to make participant management style work. “Citizen Investigation Ethics” will hopefully start learning process that it takes integrity; ability; experience; and extreme duty attitude to make participant management style more successful than not.

Non-prejudicial investigations should be based on ethical industry standards, not relative industry standards. Basing investigations on innuendos, deceptions, frauds, or lies like governments acting like tyrants violates Commandment “You shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

Why would Obama’s Marxist-fascists or corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats have bureaucrats engage in such conduct? Answer can be found in another Commandment: You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his manservant, or his maidservant, or his ox, or his ass, or anything that is your neighbor’s.

Why should anyone be surprised that Marxist-socialists or corporate fascists who are motivated by lust for power and promiscuity or greed like Obama’s Republicans like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner, and others reader can list thrive on serving evil?

Point is no matter how much one seeks justice for America’s unwashed and Americans with middle class attitudes who have been; still are; and will continue to be victimized from crimes by Progressive Democrats and Obama’s Republicans also called RINOs. Due process legal prosecutions and due process punishments are necessary to distinguish good citizens from evil among us in U.S.

Otherwise vengeful conservatives will only be replacing one evil with another evil. Only exception being, self defense scenarios which can be divided into exigent and pre-emptive. Exigent by definition is requiring immediate action. Pre-emptive definition is to prevent something from happening.

Here is where exigent and pre-emptive can become blurred legal lines. Consider Texas Drifter’s “battered citizen syndrome” concept. Should new self defense statutes in States like Texas consider expanding citizens' self defense statutes to include “battered citizen’s syndrome”?

Reference excerpt about "battered citizen syndrome" from All Alright Magazine - Texas Drifter: Is Affluenza Why DC Elites Blanking Crazy? www.allrightmagazine published February 10, 2014.

(Start insert) Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:

Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.

*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?

Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.

To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.

What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt)

Battered citizen syndrome’s time may arrived since being exposed to too much wealth or too “easy” a life can be medically and legally determined to be a mental illness which rationalizes threatening, injuring, and even killing other inno0cents now called collateral damage. TRUE or FALSE (End excerpt)

Returning to investigation management ethics: Seems obvious, but starting investigations while crime is in progress is preferable, and gets more difficult as more time elapses from “end of crime”.

Compare synonyms tips, clues, and leads to evidence in civil cases, and probable cause for search warrants for evidence in criminal cases. Public sector has advantage of using extortion in criminal cases that do not exist is private sector. Anyone doubting this only need wait until Obama’s enforcement regulators come after you, your family, or friends.

Comparing “baiting” in civil cases to entrapment in criminal cases can be reviewed in “Art of Citizen Investigations”

Citizen investigators need to distinguish between different investigation standards among: civil; criminal; domestic war crimes; national security; and few others.

Perhaps good start for citizen investigators is to learn differences between “tips, clues, leads” and evidence.

Following are good sources of “tips, clues, leads”, and some cases evidence for citizen investigators to begin their collection processes for possible domestic war crimes trials.
1. Diaries recorded as soon after event as possible including basics like: who, what, when, where, and why
2. List of potential future witnesses
3. Copies or photos of papers or documents
4. Letters, tapes, photos, receipts
5. Forensic evidence indicated when and where taken using caution not to contaminate with “chain of command” list
6. Electronic (learn “bugging” and “wiretapping” statutes in relation to “consent recording”)
7. Internet items
8. Other
9. Information is to be collected for potential war crimes trials involving abusive, tyrannical, or treasonous politicians and their accessory allies; not to be “snooping old hag witch”

Future potential targets of possible domestic war crimes may include:
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat: politicians, appointees; allies, and public sector accomplices.
2. Corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats: politicians, appointees; allies, and public sector accomplices.
3. Public sector and private sector allies to above evil among us in U.S.
4. Others reader can list

Security issues for citizen investigation managers
1. No gossiping to inflate vanity; need to know only best rule
2. Keep copies and duplicates in different places
3. Share one set of materials with attorney when appropriate
4. Additional items provided when dealing with “Art of Citizen Investigations”

Question: In shades of gray worlds, citizen investigation managers may be required to maintain control while working wounded without backup. Regardless of special circumstances, citizen’s investigation management is not a career for self-destructive or those wanting to be remembered as heroes. Rather profession for those devoted to truth. TRUE or FALSE

Additional question: Perhaps the most neglected public relations tactic when dealing with witnesses, clients, staff, and the public is professional courtesy. Professional courtesy is one of those traits that separate amateurs from professionals. This important career trait represents a learned habit that comes from maturity.

It does not matter how vile or contemptible the person in question is, they are entitled to professional courtesy. Citizen investigation managers and their agents do not have to like or respect everyone, but they do need to exhibit professional courtesy to everyone. Personal respect and professional courtesy are different concepts. TRUE or FALSE

First bonus question: The citizen investigator should never work for or assist: liars, thieves, those who depend on employee “bullet catchers”, or those who always depend on others to do “dirty work”. TRUE or FALSE

Second bonus question: Obama by transforming America into impotent world economic power with approaching impotent armed forces due to budget reductions initiated by Republican Defense Secretary, and supported by corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elites are providing American citizens opportunities to watch pending genocide of America’s allies. Who will be next on destruction of America’s allies list? Texas Drifter will start list: Israel; Taiwan, South Korea, parts of Europe; perhaps Saudis and even Philippines?

Perhaps list can even include some American States due to twenty million plus illegal immigrants in America engaging in cultural genocide against America’s traditions, values, and principles? Reader can add to list.

Perhaps these times might be appropriate times for Americans to start considering becoming citizen investigation managers for potential domestic war crimes trials involving domestic crimes by Obama Care and other domestic policies; plus actions future juries might consider as being acts of national security treasons TRUE or FALSE?

Clue: Does anyone really believe that Obama’s “We will urinate in our pants if we do not like what you do” national defense policy; will protect America or any ally? Consider Obama’s only remaining “tough guy” option: peace through nuclear war.

Editor Marshall Disclaimer: Neither, Texas Drifter nor Editor Marshall, are attorneys and neither makes any pretense to be so. Information is provided for information only with all applicable disclaimers applying.