Texas Drifter: Writing Tips For Tea Party
Marshall's Law Dateline - Some writing tips for Tea Party Members.
(Reader might consider sharing following with conservatives and other patriots.)
Heard it said that you are an individual that appreciates right word at right time concept.
You may or may not be interested in considering using “visual prose” as writing warm up exercise for your written or spoken words projects like public speeches.
Working definition of “visual prose” according to Editor Marshall: Texas Drifter uses “visual prose” (process of using few words as possible to inform and entertain) as warm up writing exercises. Example, consider following warm up exercise for Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 636 “Obama Planning On Third Term?” or All Right Magazine Texas Drifter: Obama Planning on Third Term? Published February 18, 2014
You might test your writing skills by taking: All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test. You can reference directions below.
References:
1. All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter: Freedom Defender Writing Test - Published February 18, 2014. - Marshall’s Law Dateline – Continuously re-arranging serious words can become boring. Reader can test their painting with words like artists use colors skills. How by inserting title plus finishing last half of following visual prose without music writing exercise.
2. Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry 638 – Texas Drifter: Some Sensitivity Training Torture? Published February 20, 2014 – sample visual prose writing warm up exercise preceding writing exercise project.
3. All Right Magazine – Texas Drifter Right to Write - Published Nov 9, 2011 – Texas Drifter has the inalienable right to write what he writes. Learn how you can be better writer.
Old adage still seems true advice is what you pay for it.
Closing thought, conservatives and other patriots should win “war of words” against Obama’s Marxist-fascists, and Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats. Why you ask, bad guys are just spewing forth excrement based propaganda to appeal to selfish, lazy, and America last crowd. Compared to conservatives and other patriots documenting timeless truths with words reflecting heart felt emotions.
Your time and interest are appreciated;
(Sign you name)
Friday, February 21, 2014
Thursday, February 20, 2014
Continue Plus 638
Texas Drifter: Some Sensitivity Training Torture?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed.
One definition of sensitivity is being sympathetic to bad peoples’ emotional problems.
Visual prose warm up writing exercise:
Heaven in mercy business
Funerals for the living
Hatred wasted emotion
Self defense necessary action
Unwashed deserve justice
No security for guilty
Opportunity without privilege
Due process for cheaters
Definition of cheater is one who breaks rules for special privileges.
Example of better known cheaters include:
1. Marxist-fascists
2. corporate fascists
3. oath breakers
4. illegal immigrants
5. some public sector unions
6. public subsidy addicts not truly indigent
7. Haters like minorities hating others for race, ethnic heritage, reader knows list
8. frauds like environmentalists and pretenders like Republican Senate and House leaders
9. internationalists who place America’s financial interest on equal basis among other nations, who also rely on Federal Reserve to serve corporate fascists at expense of America’s national financial interests
10. cult leaders masquerading as false prophets for conservatives or worse
Circling back to this writing exercise concept: Some Sensitivity Training Torture?
Using lethal force in self defense situations is in reality combat scenario whether it is for personal protection; “protect castle doctrine”; general security for others; major wars; or other situations.
Political correct sensitivity seems about making survivor of self defense scenario feel guilty about having to do what “had to be done”. How, by making survivor feel attacker was true victim. Was David supposed to feel bad about slaying Goliath because Goliath was over sized child from a broken home?
How much sympathy do people trying to kill you, your, family, neighbors or other law abiders deserve? None objective in combat scenarios is to manage threat as quickly and efficiently as possible. Why, to manage follow up threat if one occurs.
Some examples of when managing threat might seem necessary:
1. methamphetamine addict attacks you with ax
2. illegal immigrants throwing rocks which are lethal projectiles at Border Patrol agents
3. arsonist is trying to start fie to burn down nursing home full of elderly invalids
4. terrorists in process of setting up I.E.D.
5. enemy combatants shooting at American military personnel
6. child running towards client with grenade in flower basket
7. spy in route to deliver battle changing intelligence to enemy
8. racist teen trying to use his fists to beat another person to death
9. could continue, perhaps reader would like to add their own examples to list?
Restating obvious, not every life threatening scenario requires lethal force. Sometime scenario avoidance; not being in scenario; sometimes retreat works; other times display of force might be appropriate.
Warning shots are for movies not real life, as warning shots can defender killed.
Further discussion can include in another writing exercise about steps from recognizing threat to responding which are fractions of seconds’ non-reversible decisions.
Translation once line has been crossed and lethal force is final option; goal should be to instill physical and mental reflexes to survive self defense scenario. Primary teaching should also include how to live with final decision by not making survivor feel guilty with political correct sensitivity counseling.
Living with reality and accepting consequences of actions necessary to survive; plus real world memories will be tough enough, without desk pilot feel good social worker type counselors trying to spike their speaking fees.
Spectators, liberal columnists and reporters will always be “outsiders looking in”. Reader might consider decades and decades ago Texas Drifter undercover-surveillance assignment.
Assignment involved being pulled off another case for low profile surveillance of recent rape scene in case bad guy returned for more victims.
Surprisingly first and thus far only rape victim was standing near same dark alley where her assault had occurred just two nights earlier.
When discretely asked as this “passer by” if she felt safe? Her response, “Look at me. No one desires me because of my looks; bad social life is better than no social life.”
Reported incident to supervisor, who stated: We are short on resources as it is; go back to original assignment target area.”
Feel good liberals will probably never understand supervisor’s orders, but then again liberals live in fantasy politically correct worlds; not world with choices being made with limited options. TRUE or FALSE
Recall Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: Above or following is not intended as legal or anything else good disclaimers’ are required to include; just subject matter for passing thoughts.
Texas Drifter was and may still be certified in Texas to teach in private sector: “Spy As A Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance”. TRUE or FALSE
Question, reader’s guesstimate politically correct sensitivity counseling benefits attacker more than survivor of self defense scenarios. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Questions– Texas Republican ruling elite establishment aristocrats also known as Obama’s Republicans are “warning” conservatives in Texas elections not to speak poorly of illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE
Why, solely because Obama’s Texas Republicans are not having their friends and loved ones murdered; raped; kidnapped; robbed; killed and maimed in DUI accidents by illegal immigrants as are rest of law abiding residents of Texas. Illegal immigrants represent estimated ten percent of population in Texas and commit more than thirty percent of crimes in Texas. TRUE or FALSE
Cornyn and rest of Obama’s Texas Republicans can best be remembered by their motto: Be nice to illegals even when they destroy your working class families; because “us rich folks” like them working for less money than we used to pay you unwashed conservatives and other patriots. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed.
One definition of sensitivity is being sympathetic to bad peoples’ emotional problems.
Visual prose warm up writing exercise:
Heaven in mercy business
Funerals for the living
Hatred wasted emotion
Self defense necessary action
Unwashed deserve justice
No security for guilty
Opportunity without privilege
Due process for cheaters
Definition of cheater is one who breaks rules for special privileges.
Example of better known cheaters include:
1. Marxist-fascists
2. corporate fascists
3. oath breakers
4. illegal immigrants
5. some public sector unions
6. public subsidy addicts not truly indigent
7. Haters like minorities hating others for race, ethnic heritage, reader knows list
8. frauds like environmentalists and pretenders like Republican Senate and House leaders
9. internationalists who place America’s financial interest on equal basis among other nations, who also rely on Federal Reserve to serve corporate fascists at expense of America’s national financial interests
10. cult leaders masquerading as false prophets for conservatives or worse
Circling back to this writing exercise concept: Some Sensitivity Training Torture?
Using lethal force in self defense situations is in reality combat scenario whether it is for personal protection; “protect castle doctrine”; general security for others; major wars; or other situations.
Political correct sensitivity seems about making survivor of self defense scenario feel guilty about having to do what “had to be done”. How, by making survivor feel attacker was true victim. Was David supposed to feel bad about slaying Goliath because Goliath was over sized child from a broken home?
How much sympathy do people trying to kill you, your, family, neighbors or other law abiders deserve? None objective in combat scenarios is to manage threat as quickly and efficiently as possible. Why, to manage follow up threat if one occurs.
Some examples of when managing threat might seem necessary:
1. methamphetamine addict attacks you with ax
2. illegal immigrants throwing rocks which are lethal projectiles at Border Patrol agents
3. arsonist is trying to start fie to burn down nursing home full of elderly invalids
4. terrorists in process of setting up I.E.D.
5. enemy combatants shooting at American military personnel
6. child running towards client with grenade in flower basket
7. spy in route to deliver battle changing intelligence to enemy
8. racist teen trying to use his fists to beat another person to death
9. could continue, perhaps reader would like to add their own examples to list?
Restating obvious, not every life threatening scenario requires lethal force. Sometime scenario avoidance; not being in scenario; sometimes retreat works; other times display of force might be appropriate.
Warning shots are for movies not real life, as warning shots can defender killed.
Further discussion can include in another writing exercise about steps from recognizing threat to responding which are fractions of seconds’ non-reversible decisions.
Translation once line has been crossed and lethal force is final option; goal should be to instill physical and mental reflexes to survive self defense scenario. Primary teaching should also include how to live with final decision by not making survivor feel guilty with political correct sensitivity counseling.
Living with reality and accepting consequences of actions necessary to survive; plus real world memories will be tough enough, without desk pilot feel good social worker type counselors trying to spike their speaking fees.
Spectators, liberal columnists and reporters will always be “outsiders looking in”. Reader might consider decades and decades ago Texas Drifter undercover-surveillance assignment.
Assignment involved being pulled off another case for low profile surveillance of recent rape scene in case bad guy returned for more victims.
Surprisingly first and thus far only rape victim was standing near same dark alley where her assault had occurred just two nights earlier.
When discretely asked as this “passer by” if she felt safe? Her response, “Look at me. No one desires me because of my looks; bad social life is better than no social life.”
Reported incident to supervisor, who stated: We are short on resources as it is; go back to original assignment target area.”
Feel good liberals will probably never understand supervisor’s orders, but then again liberals live in fantasy politically correct worlds; not world with choices being made with limited options. TRUE or FALSE
Recall Sensitivity counseling for combat force scenarios can be torture. Or worse, cause defender to hesitate, in future self defense scenarios and get them or others needlessly killed. TRUE or FALSE
Editor Marshall’s Note: Above or following is not intended as legal or anything else good disclaimers’ are required to include; just subject matter for passing thoughts.
Texas Drifter was and may still be certified in Texas to teach in private sector: “Spy As A Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance”. TRUE or FALSE
Question, reader’s guesstimate politically correct sensitivity counseling benefits attacker more than survivor of self defense scenarios. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Questions– Texas Republican ruling elite establishment aristocrats also known as Obama’s Republicans are “warning” conservatives in Texas elections not to speak poorly of illegal immigrants. TRUE or FALSE
Why, solely because Obama’s Texas Republicans are not having their friends and loved ones murdered; raped; kidnapped; robbed; killed and maimed in DUI accidents by illegal immigrants as are rest of law abiding residents of Texas. Illegal immigrants represent estimated ten percent of population in Texas and commit more than thirty percent of crimes in Texas. TRUE or FALSE
Cornyn and rest of Obama’s Texas Republicans can best be remembered by their motto: Be nice to illegals even when they destroy your working class families; because “us rich folks” like them working for less money than we used to pay you unwashed conservatives and other patriots. TRUE or FALSE
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Continue Plus 637
Texas Drifter: Explain Differences Between?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Explain differences between Obama Care bureaucrats administratively murdering millions of Americans; and what federal government did to dozens of people at Waco.
Obvious answer Obama Care murdered millions of Americans not dozens like at Waco. Extended answer, murders by federal government at Waco were more humane as victims died “quicker”; as opposed to months and months of suffering before death by Obama Care.
Side note Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats are accessories to Obama Care murders with their tolerate Obama care genocide until Americas tire are seeing their loved ones being administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats.
Explain differences between Obama’s role in murdering “grandmother” to your grandchildren; and Republican leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner plus others reader can list, in same Obama Care murder of same loved one to your grandchildren.
Writing theme for this writing exercise is one never gets too old to learn. Three examples provided in my younger years of how to never quit learning.
1. Old man told me he only read one page from Holy Bible and one page from dictionary every day. Texas Drifter is still fortunate enough to possess that old man’s dictionary.
2. Another old man told me that he never met a person that could not teach him at least one thing either good or bad.
3. Old field instructor taught me that good investigators are made by knowing how and when to ask right questions.
Explaining differences between spiritual religions and secular religions starts with referencing Marshall’s law Texas Drifter Library – Library Entry # 633 “Texas Drifter: Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms” – February 2014
Unaddressed issue was: is not toleration a two way street? Seems that asking for respect when the one asking for respect has no intention of returning respect is offering fool’s plan?
Circling back to title theme: “Explain Distinctions Between”: Reader is asked to explain to Texas Drifter what is difference between protecting all your family and protecting only some of your family; to protecting all America’s traditions, values, principles and only protecting few of America’s traditions, values, and principles?
Translation, your house is on fire and you decide to only save some of your family members like your wife and some of your children; but not your wife’s mother and the rest of your children.
Compare translation to America is self destructing from increasing national debt; less inalienable rights for majority members; national security is being decimated by porous borders with continuing invasion by twenty million plus illegal immigrants, plus smaller and smaller defense budgets.
Reader decides to only defend some of America’s traditions, values, and principles like part of First Amendment and Second Amendment; but none of U.S. Constitution’s mandates defining Executive Branch’s limited powers, or provisions of Ninth or Tenth Amendments.
Explain distinctions between choosing to save only some of your family members from the fire; and defending a few of your inalienable rights being vanquished by Obama and Obama’s Republicans like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, and others reader can list.
Texas Drifter would also appreciate it, if you explained to me how you choose which family members and which inalienable rights to save.
Before explaining your compromising answer, recall following compromise measurements: Compromise half of your principles today; half tomorrow; half next day; half following day; half day after; by the time one reaches end of week, one has no more principles to compromise. Reader doubts this Texas Drifter observation reader can run their own numbers for compromising half your principles a day during seven day week.
Seems final destiny of political correctness and affirmative action can be previewed with Obama Care, and eventual predictions of Stalin like re-education camps and Hitler’s not worth re-education camps. TRUE or FALSE
Explain differences between: deciding when too many citizens, neighbors, friends, and loved ones have been administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats; or have been transported to have attitude transformations at Obama re-education camps?
One similarity will be that Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list will no doubt tolerate Obama’s domestic political crimes until voters have had enough abuse from Obama tolerated by Obama’s Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
Following scenario could be future American history with Obama’s crimes being tolerated by Republican Senate and House leaders. TRUE or FALSE
“Last Letter”
Act I
Ranch Owner: Drifter, postmaster gave me a letter he said might be for one of my workers. Envelope is addressed to Richard Blake (hands letter to Texas Drifter).
Drifter: (takes letter and quips) Thanks.
Rancher Owner: Did not know your name was Richard Blake.
Drifter: Did not say it was. (Dog growls at Ranch Owner as Drifter turns to walk away.)
Ranch Owner: Never did like that dog; Drifter, know why I keep you around?
Drifter (stops and turns half way around): Then things are even, Dog never liked you either. Why you keep me around, good work for ten dollars a day; plus food, shelter, and expenses.
Ranch Owner: That too, mostly cause trespassing, vandalism to, stealing from, and poaching on this ranch has completely stopped since you signed on as security scout.
Texas Drifter: If I told you how I do my job, you would cut my meager wages, or run me and Dog off. I half way like working here; so do not change that by bringing me any more mail.
Ranch Owner: Go read your mail; that is last letter I will ever bring you.
Texas Drifter: Sounds fair enough, here is a list of some supplies Dog and I need.
Sundown next day: Drifter sets pot of coffee and metal bowl full of beer on small camp fire, and opens letter.
Dearest Friend,
Just a few words to dispel your anxieties about man made natural disaster camps; there are probably forty thousand to fifty thousand citizens here. Camp is fenced in to protect us from outsiders wanting in to escape worsening conditions in this part of America. We are truly lucky ones despite less than perfect conditions. We at least have security, and solace knowing our federal government is doing everything it can to provide for us.
Sanitary conditions are an open ditch. Food is served once a day and consists of liquid powdered milk over uncooked rice. Obama Care is limited to barbiturates. Healthy camp residents are engaged in constructing red brick buildings to be used as showers. Rumors abound that our Emperor, will visit to dedicate new showers we are all looking forward to enjoying.
I bribed one of guards with my wedding rings to mail you this letter to let you know even though times may be hard, government is doing everything it can to help us rebuild ours’ and America’s future.
(Texas Drifter crumbles letter and envelope and gently drops into camp fire.)
Texas Drifter whispers: You know Dog, tears still never change anything.
(Picks up coffee pot and asks Dog): Want some coffee in your beer?
Dog (smiles by bearing teeth with soft growl):
Drifter: Just asking, I finish my coffee; you finish your beer; be time to go earn our meager wages.
End “Last Letter”
Closing thought, Bill Rights First Amendment is specific: “government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion …” for either spiritual or secular religions.
Secular religions are:
1. Marxist-fascists lust for power for greed
2. corporate fascists lust for power for greed
3. environmentalism lust for power for pseudo science
4. hatreds by heterophobes seeking societal “happy face” endorsements
5. minorities racial /ethnic hatreds of majorities
6. Islamic terrorists lust for sadistic power
Explain differences between those with spiritual based religions who respect First Amendment; and those with secular based religions who have total contempt for anything Constitution; most vocal secular based religious followers also have no problem persecuting and destroying - reader should already know list: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and other American patriots reader can list.
First negotiating point between spiritual religions and secular religions is that mutual respect must be verifiable. Second point is secular religions are not entitled to privilege of having government respect establishment of their secular religious beliefs. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Explain differences between Obama Care bureaucrats administratively murdering millions of Americans; and what federal government did to dozens of people at Waco.
Obvious answer Obama Care murdered millions of Americans not dozens like at Waco. Extended answer, murders by federal government at Waco were more humane as victims died “quicker”; as opposed to months and months of suffering before death by Obama Care.
Side note Republican establishment ruling class elite aristocrats are accessories to Obama Care murders with their tolerate Obama care genocide until Americas tire are seeing their loved ones being administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats.
Explain differences between Obama’s role in murdering “grandmother” to your grandchildren; and Republican leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner plus others reader can list, in same Obama Care murder of same loved one to your grandchildren.
Writing theme for this writing exercise is one never gets too old to learn. Three examples provided in my younger years of how to never quit learning.
1. Old man told me he only read one page from Holy Bible and one page from dictionary every day. Texas Drifter is still fortunate enough to possess that old man’s dictionary.
2. Another old man told me that he never met a person that could not teach him at least one thing either good or bad.
3. Old field instructor taught me that good investigators are made by knowing how and when to ask right questions.
Explaining differences between spiritual religions and secular religions starts with referencing Marshall’s law Texas Drifter Library – Library Entry # 633 “Texas Drifter: Tolerate - Celebrate Not Synonyms” – February 2014
Unaddressed issue was: is not toleration a two way street? Seems that asking for respect when the one asking for respect has no intention of returning respect is offering fool’s plan?
Circling back to title theme: “Explain Distinctions Between”: Reader is asked to explain to Texas Drifter what is difference between protecting all your family and protecting only some of your family; to protecting all America’s traditions, values, principles and only protecting few of America’s traditions, values, and principles?
Translation, your house is on fire and you decide to only save some of your family members like your wife and some of your children; but not your wife’s mother and the rest of your children.
Compare translation to America is self destructing from increasing national debt; less inalienable rights for majority members; national security is being decimated by porous borders with continuing invasion by twenty million plus illegal immigrants, plus smaller and smaller defense budgets.
Reader decides to only defend some of America’s traditions, values, and principles like part of First Amendment and Second Amendment; but none of U.S. Constitution’s mandates defining Executive Branch’s limited powers, or provisions of Ninth or Tenth Amendments.
Explain distinctions between choosing to save only some of your family members from the fire; and defending a few of your inalienable rights being vanquished by Obama and Obama’s Republicans like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, and others reader can list.
Texas Drifter would also appreciate it, if you explained to me how you choose which family members and which inalienable rights to save.
Before explaining your compromising answer, recall following compromise measurements: Compromise half of your principles today; half tomorrow; half next day; half following day; half day after; by the time one reaches end of week, one has no more principles to compromise. Reader doubts this Texas Drifter observation reader can run their own numbers for compromising half your principles a day during seven day week.
Seems final destiny of political correctness and affirmative action can be previewed with Obama Care, and eventual predictions of Stalin like re-education camps and Hitler’s not worth re-education camps. TRUE or FALSE
Explain differences between: deciding when too many citizens, neighbors, friends, and loved ones have been administratively murdered by Obama Care bureaucrats; or have been transported to have attitude transformations at Obama re-education camps?
One similarity will be that Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list will no doubt tolerate Obama’s domestic political crimes until voters have had enough abuse from Obama tolerated by Obama’s Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
Following scenario could be future American history with Obama’s crimes being tolerated by Republican Senate and House leaders. TRUE or FALSE
“Last Letter”
Act I
Ranch Owner: Drifter, postmaster gave me a letter he said might be for one of my workers. Envelope is addressed to Richard Blake (hands letter to Texas Drifter).
Drifter: (takes letter and quips) Thanks.
Rancher Owner: Did not know your name was Richard Blake.
Drifter: Did not say it was. (Dog growls at Ranch Owner as Drifter turns to walk away.)
Ranch Owner: Never did like that dog; Drifter, know why I keep you around?
Drifter (stops and turns half way around): Then things are even, Dog never liked you either. Why you keep me around, good work for ten dollars a day; plus food, shelter, and expenses.
Ranch Owner: That too, mostly cause trespassing, vandalism to, stealing from, and poaching on this ranch has completely stopped since you signed on as security scout.
Texas Drifter: If I told you how I do my job, you would cut my meager wages, or run me and Dog off. I half way like working here; so do not change that by bringing me any more mail.
Ranch Owner: Go read your mail; that is last letter I will ever bring you.
Texas Drifter: Sounds fair enough, here is a list of some supplies Dog and I need.
Sundown next day: Drifter sets pot of coffee and metal bowl full of beer on small camp fire, and opens letter.
Dearest Friend,
Just a few words to dispel your anxieties about man made natural disaster camps; there are probably forty thousand to fifty thousand citizens here. Camp is fenced in to protect us from outsiders wanting in to escape worsening conditions in this part of America. We are truly lucky ones despite less than perfect conditions. We at least have security, and solace knowing our federal government is doing everything it can to provide for us.
Sanitary conditions are an open ditch. Food is served once a day and consists of liquid powdered milk over uncooked rice. Obama Care is limited to barbiturates. Healthy camp residents are engaged in constructing red brick buildings to be used as showers. Rumors abound that our Emperor, will visit to dedicate new showers we are all looking forward to enjoying.
I bribed one of guards with my wedding rings to mail you this letter to let you know even though times may be hard, government is doing everything it can to help us rebuild ours’ and America’s future.
(Texas Drifter crumbles letter and envelope and gently drops into camp fire.)
Texas Drifter whispers: You know Dog, tears still never change anything.
(Picks up coffee pot and asks Dog): Want some coffee in your beer?
Dog (smiles by bearing teeth with soft growl):
Drifter: Just asking, I finish my coffee; you finish your beer; be time to go earn our meager wages.
End “Last Letter”
Closing thought, Bill Rights First Amendment is specific: “government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion …” for either spiritual or secular religions.
Secular religions are:
1. Marxist-fascists lust for power for greed
2. corporate fascists lust for power for greed
3. environmentalism lust for power for pseudo science
4. hatreds by heterophobes seeking societal “happy face” endorsements
5. minorities racial /ethnic hatreds of majorities
6. Islamic terrorists lust for sadistic power
Explain differences between those with spiritual based religions who respect First Amendment; and those with secular based religions who have total contempt for anything Constitution; most vocal secular based religious followers also have no problem persecuting and destroying - reader should already know list: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and other American patriots reader can list.
First negotiating point between spiritual religions and secular religions is that mutual respect must be verifiable. Second point is secular religions are not entitled to privilege of having government respect establishment of their secular religious beliefs. TRUE or FALSE
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Continue Plus 636
Texas Drifter: Obama Planning on Third Term?
Marshall’s Law Dateline - Any reader who believes Obama and his enforcers with passive support from Bush and Romney type Republicans, are not depending on a third executive branch term are just too blanking stupid to survive as a free American.
Writing exercise premise question: do Obama and his enforcers like Holder and others reader can list; have plans of ever leaving America’s highest political office?
Initial premise observation: provide any example of those abusing political powers voluntarily surrendering their political offices to face possible domestic war crimes trials. Especially when Marxist-fascist engaging in unconstitutional acts which could be classified as domestic war crimes, know that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will never force their Marxist-fascists allies to cease their dictatorial actions.
Policy examples shared between Obama and Bush-Romney type Republicans.
1. Both thrive as ruling elite aristocrats.
2. Both are fascists, Obama and Progressive Democrats are Marxist-fascists; while Obama’s Republicans are corporate fascists.
3. Both are internationalists and sworn opponents of anything serving America’s national economic interests; both rely on Federal Reserve to manage international financial interests with America last attitude.
4. Both desire to replace America’s middle class attitude and middle class with cheap imported labor from places like India; and cheap illegal immigrant labor from places like Mexico and other third world countries.
5. Both depend on public subsidy addicts and some public sector unions which are all paid through eventually destructive national debt.
6. Both use and or rely on domestic terrorist acting bureaucrats to keep majority of Americans living in fear of federal government. Example Obama used IRS to engage in political genocide against Tea Party in 2012 election cycle with re-assuring support from Bush and Romney type Republicans.
7. Both say or do or pretend to be anything to stay in power; good examples include Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, Biden, Reid, plus others reader can list. Example Republican Senate leaders like Cornyn voting to allow Senate to vote on issues he knows Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats have enough votes to win. Perhaps someone should tell Cornyn and other conservative leaders that selling out conservatives behind closed doors is not made right by saying right lies in public.
8. Both support and promote hatred by minorities against different majorities like: races, ethnic groups, including heterosexuals, traditional gender roles, private sector groups, and Judeo-Christians and other “not politically correct” groups.
9. Both rely on public education programs to program future American children into public subsidy citizen zombies.
10. Reader can add other comparisons to above list.
Political elites who build their careers on unconstitutional conduct can be expected with enough polite talk from conservative talk show hosts to voluntarily abandon their political powers to law abiding citizens. FALSE not TRUE
Brutal facts: one side are known supporters of post natal abortions, and will have no problems massacring your families in cold blood in front of you; while other side has no problem looking you eye to eye while promising to be your friend, before stabbing you in the back. Which side is which?
Some see glass as half full; other see glass as half empty; Texas Drifter does not see any glass.
Clue of some kind, evil has been force tempting and influencing human behavior since The Garden of Eden.
Evil among us in U.S. is nothing new; only different faces with different names promoting same human vices. Reader not sure of what vices are, perhaps reader should review Ten Commandments?
Another clue as question: Modern Obama Marxist-fascist and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats and their allies could be compared to Egypt’s Pharaoh and the “Golden Calf Builders” of Moses days. TRUE or FALSE
Additional comparison Rome had all the physical force that comes with absolute political power; while all Heaven’s Son had were his Father’s words. TRUE or FALSE
Consider following, America’s patriots have following words to consider
1. Act of Abjuration 1581
2. America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights
3. Declaration of Independence
4. U.S. Constitution
5. Bill of Rights
6. Ethical capitalism
7. Middle class attitudes
8. Abilities to form temporary verbal coalitions to manage evil among us in U.S.
America’s future may seem dark, but still offers hope since what is old adage; something about “pen is mightier than the sword” especially for those believing in self defense. TRUE or FALSE
Assignment question, recall repetition is good teaching tool. Balancing act for America’s future is not replacing Marxist-fascist like Stalin type (reader knows who), with corporate fascist Mussolini type (reader knows who), with conservative cult leader who becomes comparable to Hitler type.
Reader should never forget that there are many vain conservatives who have already formed cliques and cults who would have no problem managing “a rein of terror” as their closet mentor Robespierre. Reader might reference some truly evil accomplishments by Robespierre during French Revolution, if you doubt this Texas Drifter observation.
First of three bonus questions, wagering odds are fifty-fifty that Obama will decide to issue “just another uncontested” executive order to allow Obama to serve a third unelected Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Second, wagering odds are ninety-ten that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will tell Republican Senate and House leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list not to challenge Obama’s third unconstitutional Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Three, why would corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats support and defend such a policy? Answer simple, they do not want minorities to think they are racists; plus primary strategy of all cowards and traitors is live to never fight another day. TRUE not FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline - Any reader who believes Obama and his enforcers with passive support from Bush and Romney type Republicans, are not depending on a third executive branch term are just too blanking stupid to survive as a free American.
Writing exercise premise question: do Obama and his enforcers like Holder and others reader can list; have plans of ever leaving America’s highest political office?
Initial premise observation: provide any example of those abusing political powers voluntarily surrendering their political offices to face possible domestic war crimes trials. Especially when Marxist-fascist engaging in unconstitutional acts which could be classified as domestic war crimes, know that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will never force their Marxist-fascists allies to cease their dictatorial actions.
Policy examples shared between Obama and Bush-Romney type Republicans.
1. Both thrive as ruling elite aristocrats.
2. Both are fascists, Obama and Progressive Democrats are Marxist-fascists; while Obama’s Republicans are corporate fascists.
3. Both are internationalists and sworn opponents of anything serving America’s national economic interests; both rely on Federal Reserve to manage international financial interests with America last attitude.
4. Both desire to replace America’s middle class attitude and middle class with cheap imported labor from places like India; and cheap illegal immigrant labor from places like Mexico and other third world countries.
5. Both depend on public subsidy addicts and some public sector unions which are all paid through eventually destructive national debt.
6. Both use and or rely on domestic terrorist acting bureaucrats to keep majority of Americans living in fear of federal government. Example Obama used IRS to engage in political genocide against Tea Party in 2012 election cycle with re-assuring support from Bush and Romney type Republicans.
7. Both say or do or pretend to be anything to stay in power; good examples include Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner, Biden, Reid, plus others reader can list. Example Republican Senate leaders like Cornyn voting to allow Senate to vote on issues he knows Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats have enough votes to win. Perhaps someone should tell Cornyn and other conservative leaders that selling out conservatives behind closed doors is not made right by saying right lies in public.
8. Both support and promote hatred by minorities against different majorities like: races, ethnic groups, including heterosexuals, traditional gender roles, private sector groups, and Judeo-Christians and other “not politically correct” groups.
9. Both rely on public education programs to program future American children into public subsidy citizen zombies.
10. Reader can add other comparisons to above list.
Political elites who build their careers on unconstitutional conduct can be expected with enough polite talk from conservative talk show hosts to voluntarily abandon their political powers to law abiding citizens. FALSE not TRUE
Brutal facts: one side are known supporters of post natal abortions, and will have no problems massacring your families in cold blood in front of you; while other side has no problem looking you eye to eye while promising to be your friend, before stabbing you in the back. Which side is which?
Some see glass as half full; other see glass as half empty; Texas Drifter does not see any glass.
Clue of some kind, evil has been force tempting and influencing human behavior since The Garden of Eden.
Evil among us in U.S. is nothing new; only different faces with different names promoting same human vices. Reader not sure of what vices are, perhaps reader should review Ten Commandments?
Another clue as question: Modern Obama Marxist-fascist and corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats and their allies could be compared to Egypt’s Pharaoh and the “Golden Calf Builders” of Moses days. TRUE or FALSE
Additional comparison Rome had all the physical force that comes with absolute political power; while all Heaven’s Son had were his Father’s words. TRUE or FALSE
Consider following, America’s patriots have following words to consider
1. Act of Abjuration 1581
2. America’s traditions, values, and principles like inalienable rights
3. Declaration of Independence
4. U.S. Constitution
5. Bill of Rights
6. Ethical capitalism
7. Middle class attitudes
8. Abilities to form temporary verbal coalitions to manage evil among us in U.S.
America’s future may seem dark, but still offers hope since what is old adage; something about “pen is mightier than the sword” especially for those believing in self defense. TRUE or FALSE
Assignment question, recall repetition is good teaching tool. Balancing act for America’s future is not replacing Marxist-fascist like Stalin type (reader knows who), with corporate fascist Mussolini type (reader knows who), with conservative cult leader who becomes comparable to Hitler type.
Reader should never forget that there are many vain conservatives who have already formed cliques and cults who would have no problem managing “a rein of terror” as their closet mentor Robespierre. Reader might reference some truly evil accomplishments by Robespierre during French Revolution, if you doubt this Texas Drifter observation.
First of three bonus questions, wagering odds are fifty-fifty that Obama will decide to issue “just another uncontested” executive order to allow Obama to serve a third unelected Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Second, wagering odds are ninety-ten that corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats will tell Republican Senate and House leaders like Cornyn, McConnell, McCain, Boehner and others reader can list not to challenge Obama’s third unconstitutional Presidential term? TRUE or FALSE
Three, why would corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats support and defend such a policy? Answer simple, they do not want minorities to think they are racists; plus primary strategy of all cowards and traitors is live to never fight another day. TRUE not FALSE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)