Continue Plus 626

Texas Drifter: Ten Bad Words to Describe Evil Politicians

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Will FCC eventually ban ten bad words in America used to describe evil politicians and their evil allies? Precedent exist, did FCC set precedent by banning “seven” really profane words?

Definition of evil is sinful, wicked, or morally reprehensible.

Definitions for concepts like evil politicians and evil allies; reader cannot discern their meanings? Perhaps reader should not waste their time reading this Texas Drifter writing exercise?

There are two types of politicians and their allies:
1. Good politicians who are believers in America’s traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights; who have integrity with courage to honor their oaths to uphold, protect and defend to Heaven and the American people.
2. Bad politicians and their allies who are not believers or just pretend to be believers in America’s traditions, values, principles, like inalienable rights; who lack integrity and are motivated by cowardice to violate their oaths to uphold, protect and defend to Heaven and the American people.

Ten bad words in America which describe evil politicians and their evil allies:

1. Hater/s – racist or ethnic haters; hates America’s traditions, values, principles like inalienable rights represented by citizens like: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, those with middle class attitudes, and other patriots reader can list; heterophobes and their supporters; Yankee Republican scalawags who “look down” on Southerners; others reader can list.
2. Luster – one motivated by rabid animal like desires for sex thrills, greed of property, or lust for political power;
3. Vainer (vainers plural of vainer) – those who believe world owes them privileged lives because they are special self appointed royalty; or those who believe world owes them special privileges like affirmative action because they are perpetual victims. Side question, how large a step for those with “addictive personalities” to make transition from being addicted to drug like alcohol to being addicted to their vanities? Also could one way to identify these vanity addicts, be by how often they use personal pronouns like me, myself, I, my, mine, and others reader can list. Could this observation question be applied to an Obama or a Beck? What would be advantages between Stalin type cult and Robespierre type cult?
4. Robber – lazy person who would rather steal others properties than earn their own;
5. Liar – one stating falsehoods; making false statements like against their neighbor/s for Obama's justice department; breaking promises like oaths;
6. Pretender – faker or one who deceives to obtain selfish personal objectives, selfish social or selfish political goals. Seems pretenders can be identified by other Bad word characteristics in American politics like: hater, luster, vainer, robber, liar, coveter, hurter, excuser, purger, or words reader can add.
7. Coveter one who obsesses or is jealous over another’s love/s, properties, or successes. Did not one of Ten Commandments delivered by Moses include not coveting?
8. Hurter/s – one who gets satisfaction from inflicting pain on others? Believe synonym is sadist? Is person who inflicts pain on millions like Marxist-fascist by way of Obama Care a mass hurter, or genocidal sadist?
9. Excuser – one who is responsible for their actions, but never seems to know what was happening when things were going wrong, or people were being abused.
10. Purger – one who uses purges to get rid of undesirable persons like excrement.
11. Reader can add to list.

Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form
Instructions: answer yes or no plus cite brief reason/s

Sample Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form
Name: Obama

1. Hater – yes – racist and hates those defending America’s traditions, values, and principles
2. Luster – yes – motivated by greed and lust for power
3. Vainer – yes – one clue is excessive use of personal pronouns
4. Robber – yes – public devotion to Marxist-fascist ideologies
5. Liar – yes- to many examples to list
6. Pretender – yes – obvious personal conduct
7. Coveter – yes – attitude of jealous dislikes of Tea Party Members
8. Hurter – yes – Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Obama Care, , EPA destroying private sector jobs, preceding is brief list
9. Excuser – yes – most quoted line “ did not know”
10. Purger – yes – IRS; Justice Department; and purges of America’s top military officers
11. Reader might add to list

Conclusion: Seems to be a perfect score for Obama.

Reader might like to show bi-partisanship by using “Bad Words In American Politics Check List Form” for Republican Senators McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, and Republican House Members Boehner, and Ryan; plus private sector "conservatives" like Rove and Beck. TRUE or FALSE

Bonus question: FCC like tyrant thugs and goons will eventually ban ten bad words in America to describe evil politicians and their evil allies. TRUE or FALSE

Continue Plus 625

Texas Drifter: Reasons to Distrust Governments?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Americans do not trust governments in general and NSA in particular, because governments and NSA do not trust Americans.

Definition of reasons - thoughts resulting from thinking in logical or rational manners extinct from emotions.

Definition of distrust - feeling that someone or something is dishonest or unreliable.

Definition of “Obama Republican” is member of Republican Party usually corporate fascist or Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrat lacking middle class attitudes, who is ally of Obama Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats.

Few synonyms for Obama Republicans include: hypocrites; traitors, Judas club boys; evil among us in U.S.; others reader can add to list.

How to identify Obama Republicans, who are what they are:

Republican Senators (reader can reference):
1. Texas Drifter: Guide To Republican Partisan Adulterers and Republican Patriots - www.allrightmagazine.com published June 18, 2013
2. Texas Drifter: Senator Cornyn A Greek Tragedy?| All Right Magazine -
www.allrightmagazine.com September 25, 2013 ...Question is Cornyn’s story comparable to Greek tragedy?
3. Texas Drifter: Are Moderate Republicans America’s Lepers?
www.allrightmagazine.com Nov 20, 2013

Republican House Members: simple, identify Speaker Boehner’s and Ryan’s allies

Other Obama Republican allies and collaborators include consultants and lobbyists that reader can list starting with Rove and Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce.

Reasons why honorable Americans like: Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, libertarians, Reagan Democrats; plus others reader can list; may choose to identify Obama Republicans:
1. to not have to associate with
2. to not vote for
3. to not contribute to
4. to not volunteer for
5. to not do business with
6. to not socialize with
7. to not feel guilty about not providing “aid and comfort to” during Obama’s purge “number two” especially since Obama Republicans led Obama’s purge “number one” against honorable Americans and patriots
8. reader can add to list

Distrust begets distrust – perhaps Obama Republicans do not trust America’s honorable Americans and patriots; because Obama Republicans like McConnell and Boehner know they have broken campaign promises to their conservative base.

Plus McConnell and Boehner along with other Obama Republicans know they have violated their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend to both Heaven and honorable Americans and patriots?

Based on Obama Republicans’ both dishonest and unreliable integrities; why would they trust American citizens they betrayed like Judas betrayed Heaven’s Son? Perhaps evil among us in U.S. distrusts conservative types is because evil among us in U.S. are not trustworthy and fear getting caught?

If first wages of sins by governments in U.S. can be loss of trust by their employers; believe concept is known by “government by the people”. What could additional wages of sins be by bureaucrats trying not be caught so as to avoid their just punishments? Reader can speculate on that answer.

America’s Bill of Rights, do not define immunity for those who enact random interpretations which violate due process laws of America’s land. Seems those guilty could be bureaucrats; who eventually have unpleasant experiences as public sector law breakers. TRUE or FALSE

Clue: That one “law of land is as follows: The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Are following NSA definitions?
1. “Pretext” another word for lie or falsehood
2. “Intel Leverage” is blackmail or extortion
3. Data base mining procedures are illegal wiretaps which provide “tips” to be used as “leads” to get “sanitized warrants” to be used as evidence in “due process” trials guided by “prosecutorial misconduct” for the security of Americans too stupid to understand that we (NSA) know what is best for them.

How long before NSA uses above definitions in EX PARTE trials to convict and sentence Americans to “special prisons” or national security termination practices? Before reader answers question; ask to see cost-benefit ratios for NSA operations. Translations – how many terrorist operations has NSA prevented? Then divide that number into NSA total budget expenditures. Then ask how many Americans Fourth Amendment Rights has NSA violated?

Answer should be this many Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights violated to disrupt this many terrorist operations for this many tax payer dollars. Should produce cost benefit ratio number.

More like truth, only way NSA can reduce their cost benefit ratio is by expanding their data base mining to provide scapegoats for Obama’s three purges: “number one”, “number two”, “number three”.

Background reference of Law.Com for EX PARTE (ex par-tay, but popularly, ex party) adj. Latin meaning "for one party," referring to motions, hearings or orders granted on the request of and for the benefit of one party only. This is an exception to the basic rule of court procedure that both parties must be present at any argument before a judge, and to the otherwise strict rule that an attorney may not notify a judge without previously notifying the opposition. Ex parte matters are usually temporary orders (like a restraining order or temporary custody) pending a formal hearing or an emergency request for a continuance. Most jurisdictions require at least a diligent attempt to contact the other party's lawyer of the time and place of any ex parte hearing.

Bonus question: Americans do not trust governments in general and NSA in particular, because governments and NSA do not trust Americans. What say you my reader, TRUE or TRUE.

Continue Plus 624

Texas Drifter: Which Obama Purge Includes You?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Original title was “Just Anther Dream, Which Obama Purge Includes You?” All soul less tyrants share two identical personality traits: first is psychotic obsession to purge scapegoats tyrants blame for tyrants’ failed policies. Marxist-fascists live to purge and bury their imaginary scapegoats.

Second personality trait will be revealed towards end of this writing exercise.

Definitions:
1. Purge is to get rid of undesirable persons like excrement.
2. Marxist economic system is when all private property and means of production are owned by government or governments.
3. Fascist economic system is when all property and means of production are owned by private citizens, but are so regulated by government or government agencies like EPA that fascism eventually evolves into Marxist economic system.
4. Marxist-fascist economic system is when Marxist like Obama and corporate fascists like Republican establishment ruling aristocrats form temporary alliance.

Will purges result from Obamaization which is Obama only tolerating only those, who support all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies? Future history based on passed history suggests Obama will only tolerate those totally devoted without doubts to Obama’s “transformation” called “revolution” by other tyrants; as being trustworthy.

Can Obama’s intellectual psyche be compared to Lenin and Stalin of 1900’s in Russia? Excerpts from A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THEORY (Third edition) George H. Sabine publisher Holt, Rinehart, Winston copyrighted 1937, 1950, 1961 might provide some answers. Start excerpts:

1. “Marx always ‘really” meant what Lenin had decided what he (Lenin) ought to mean at the case at hand”

2. “It is government by a self chosen and self perpetuating elite that comprises the best qualified part of the people”

3. “As it is rule without constitutional limitations, or indeed without any limitation of method except those imposed by success and by its own professional good intentions”

4. “Not surprisingly, therefore the elite (dictatorship) can decide not only questions of policy but also ‘correctness’ of opinions.” (End excerpts)

Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to Stalin’s “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.

Some examples of tyrants who lived to purge and bury their scapegoats: Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Castro of Cuba; plus other reader can list. Question, will Obama someday be added to preceding infamous list?

Also, will the contemporary alliance between Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites; workout better than the alliance formed before World War II between Stalin and Hitler?

Does the contemporary alliance between Obama’s Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites define targets of Obama’s first purge (“purge one”)?

Reasonable conclusion could be yes, and the targets of Obama’s “purge one” are: Judeo-Christians; conservatives; constitutionalists; ethical capitalists; libertarians; Reagan Democrats; Americans with middle class attitudes (which includes many wealthy Americans); and other American patriots. Reader can add to this list of Obama “purge one” targets.

Moving on to Obama’s second purge targets (“purge two”). Targets of “purge two” will be corporate fascist Republican establishment aristocrat ruling elites. Reader is probably thinking Texas Drifter knows not of what Texas Drifter writes. Two points who does Obama publicly denounce more than “purge one” targets?

Simple answer is decadent not paying their fair share wealthiest of wealthy. As history is prone to repeat and repeat; since Obama will have no more need of bi-partisan moderate Republicans, their future could be similar to – name following ruling elite aristocrats.

Public history: Late on the night of July 16, Nicholas, Alexandra, their five children and four servants were ordered to dress quickly and go down to the cellar of the house in which they were being held. There, the family and servants were arranged in two rows for a photograph they were told was being taken to quell rumors that they had escaped. Suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire. Those who were still breathing when the smoked cleared were stabbed to death.

One question for reader: would administration that has no conscience problems letting perhaps millions die from Obama Care; have any conscience problem treating mostly white folk like above aristocrat family was treated by what some call Obama mentor?

All those who think such brutal activities could never happen in America; simple example tyrants are not known for their loyalties to anyone. Consider how North Korean leader allegedly fed his uncle to wild dogs.

Now to Obama targets in Obama’s third purge (“purge three”). More likely than not, white Marxist-Fascist Progressive Democrats like Clintons, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, other Obama political allies reader can list.

List could also include White Hollywood elites that Obama could easily include as lump proletariat.

There will probably be many members of lump proletariat class really surprised when they discover what Obama really thinks of their social status. Enforcers for Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats’ government plantations which are intended to “store” all worth nothing Americans who in ancient Rome would have had lowest social class status, that Marx later called lump proletariat which includes: Professional poor also called public subsidy addicts described by Marx as lump proletariat (permanent under class low life’s like promiscuous, criminals, homeless, and permanently unemployed).

Other issues, on the bright side, those most likely to survive Obama’s purges will be those in “purge one” and those with middle class attitudes which support America’s Second Amendment. Why they are used to “working class ethics” and surviving bad times unlike “purge two” targets who are generally spoiled rich brats; while “purge three” targets are mostly professional welfare beggars and bureaucrats.

First purge victim survivors may seem conflicted when second purge victims turn to them for help. Texas Drifter, speaking only for myself; will have to decide on case by case basis. Why, compassion for those who spear headed Obama’s “purge one” may not be deserving of blind sympathy from their victims?

Side note, Texas Drifter was recruited in late sixties to infiltrate for intelligence radical anti-war groups. Assignment target groups turned out to be mostly funded, assisted, and managed by Soviets, Chinese, and Cuban Marxist governments. Pure fact which only fools can dispute.

One of first lessons learned in security for intelligence operations is: agent may not like, respect, or have any use for those on other side. Their personality traits along with their strengths and weaknesses not their ideology are what matters. Translation nothing about analysis is personal.

That is correct, determining security formula for success involves comparing strengths and weakness on both sides yours and theirs. Reader can reference other Texas Drifter writing exercises about learning how to manage bad guys.

Two mini-side notes: hate is wasted emotion which affects security analysis and performance. Two, scouts known as intelligence agents get paid to provide best non-prejudicial information they can; not baby sit stupid people or client fools.

Winding down questions, first, reader needs to consider that NSA data sweeps are not intended to identify terrorists; rather identify scapegoat targets for future Obama purges: one, two, and three. TRUE or FALSE

Question – Is Boehner betraying and selling out his conservative base to help Obama destroy America because Obama has “leverage information” on Boehner? TRUE or FALSE

Question - Odds are that “purge one” survivors will emerge as perhaps: leaner, smarter, tougher, and most effective patriots since glorious days of America’s founders? TRUE or FALSE

Perhaps next time some Republican Obama ally like McConnell or Boehner suggests conservatives should let Obama Care implode from its own in competencies; corruptions; and kill and injure millions of Americans? Should conservatives respond, perhaps conservatives should let Obama’s second purge follow its course since you will be one of “purge two” targets? TRUE or FALSE

Question, which one of Obama’s three purges: one; two; or three will target you my reader?

Second point, all tyrants share in common from Marshall’s Law Dateline – simple answer, all tyrants are mortals.

Editor Marshall asked Texas Drifter, why do you write such seeming brutally truthful words?

Texas Drifter’s response: First, my harsh words as you describe them are negligible in comparison to realities of real world horrors experienced by innocents during purges by any evil tyrant.

Second, If American patriots do not have courage to honor millions and millions of Americans who have died or were maimed defending Americans’ inalienable rights? How can any American expect to leave future Americans a republic worth defending?

Editor Marshall’s Note: I ask you reader the same Texas Drifter question. What say you?

Update Editor Marshall’s Note: No need for reader to answer above Editor’s Note question. Why this writing exercise was based on a dream. Remember original title: “Just Anther Dream, Which Obama Purge Includes You?”

Bonus question for fun – Despite constant bleating by conservative celebrities like (reader can list); word concepts “could of, would of, should of” never has and never will change past events. TRUE or FALSE