Texas Drifter: Amnesty for Illegals Punishes Law Abiding
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Amnesty for illegal immigrants’ rewards law breakers and punishes law abiding citizens. Americans who support due process legal immigration are patriots. Americans who support amnesty which encourages illegal immigrants to invade America are candidates for being unpatriotic traitors.
Translation, America is my castle; America is not illegal immigrants’ castle. Spanish language translation is: America es mi casa; America no es tu casa.
Article IV Section 4 of Unites States Constitution: the text - The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature can-not be convened) against domestic Violence.
How stupid does one have to be to not understand that twenty million plus illegal immigrants illegally entering into the Unites States is an invasion?
Often stated non-negotiable conservative comprehensive immigration policies should start with following.
1. Use American military forces to close America’s Southern border.
2. Use Border Patrol to apprehend illegal border crossers on American soil.
3. Use Immigration Services to apprehend visa jumpers on American soil.
4. Use Customs to secure legitimate ports and points of entry.
5. Use volunteer deportation policy, which is give illegal immigrants sixty days to take their ill gotten gains and return to where ever they want outside of America. Any illegal immigrant apprehended after sixty days, will administratively have all (all means all) their assets seized and they will deported; with no opportunity to ever return to America again.
6. Any illegal immigrant caught defrauding public services will be banned from ever returning to America.
7. Any illegal immigrant engaged in organized crime will be treated according to provisions dealing with terrorists.
8. Zero public benefits like “Dream Act” will be provided as rewards for criminal activities.
9. Provisions relating to anchor babies will be changed according to original intent of law; citizenship will only be conferred when parents are American citizens or legal residents; “chain link” immigration will not be permitted to anchor babies or others legal citizens except through regular immigration processes.
10. All vehicles entering America from Mexico must provide proof of registration, insurance, and meet all safety standards applying to American vehicles.
11. No so called cartel blood money can be used for investments into America’s commercial of private sectors.
12. American citizens will be allowed to seek civil damages in civil judicial process from those aiding or helping illegal immigrants. Example you allow illegal immigrant to live in your residence, and illegal immigrant kills someone in vehicle you allowed illegal to operate – offending party is subject to civil damages.
13. Victims of illegal immigrant crimes can set up non-profit organizations which offer bounties for turning in illegal immigrants “on the run” from the law.
14. Reader can offer additional suggestions.
Question, who will benefit from above policies:
1. legal immigrants;
2. law abiding hard working American Hispanic citizens;
3. All other American citizens.
Americans are entitled to protect their traditions, values, principles, constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic on Judeo-Christian beliefs, common law, and Article IV Section 4 of United States Constitution.
Reader can do their own research into castle law doctrine of the inviolability of the home which was known in both Roman Republic and English common law.
Simple question those most likely to whine about not using amnesty to reward criminal behavior while punishing law abiding citizens are:
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats for votes;
2. corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elites for greed;
3. ethnic and race haters who feels world owes them a living;
4. special interest groups;
5. Others reader can list.
TRUE or FALSE
Another question, is one who supports any form of amnesty which is used as bait to encourage illegal immigrants to invade America which is prohibited by Article IV Section 4 subjecting them to charge of treason?
Clue Article III, Section 3 - Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
End excerpt. Let the debate begin, providing of Aid and Comfort to twenty plus million illegal invaders many whom have engaged in: public fraud, property and violent crimes against private citizens, rises to what level of crime?
Politicians and public servants who provide Aid and Comfort are guilty of what level of crimes? Violating their oaths to Heaven and American people seems more than moral bankruptcy. Their oath to uphold, protect, and defend did not include making an exemption for Article IV Section 4. Question is not did they provide Aid and Comfort; question is did Aid and Comfort they provided rise to treason?
Are there sufficient numbers of Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and Republican corporate fascist ruling establishment aristocrat elites, who have traded their oaths to Heaven and American people for lust for power like Progressive Democrats and or lust for greed as Obama Republicans like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner plus others reader can list?
Does America now need a third political party called “Traders” which sounds similar to traitors? Could Traders logo be a capital letter “T” on their foreheads? Or perhaps more appropriate logos would be left half of swastika over lapped with capital “T”; or perhaps capital “T” over lapping sickle of Soviet Union Days? Who knows, only time will provide answer?
Perhaps answer will be provided by “Traders Party” allies like main stream news media, organizations like Chamber of Corporate Fascist Commerce; some public sector unions; reader can offer their suggestions. TRUE or FALSE
Perhaps Texas Drifter is offering America’s entrepreneurs potential profitable marketing concept? America’s new Traders Party will probably need marketing trinkets to let beneficiaries of their America last policies successes know who to keep bribing with votes, services, and dollars. TRUE or FALSE.
Texas Drifter starting to “feel” good liberal word, all writ out; offers following slogan for Traders Party: We steal for you; then share our crumbs. Surely reader has better idea.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Monday, January 13, 2014
Continue Plus 622
Texas Drifter: Compassion Now A Bad Word?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – First propaganda technique used by evil among us in U.S. is diluting then changing meanings of often used words to promote their evil ways. Restating ignored obvious, some words can have different meanings to different people.
Two examples, first case involves teenage boy telling his young girlfriend: “I love you”. Translation “because when you are high you are promiscuous and believe my lies.” What young intoxicated girl hears: He loves me because of my fabulous body and great personality.”
Second example what Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites mean when they use “contemporary word” compassion to conservatives and what conservatives think traditional word compassion means. Can argument be made that most conservatives are like naïve drunk teenage girls who like being abused by Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites with morals of teenage boys full of lust?
Perhaps few definitions will help reader better understand above question? Definition of bad is; if you my reader do not know definition of bad? Reader must have gone to public school where bad is good and good is bad. Suggestion, do not waste your time reading this writing exercise.
Conservative traditional definition of compassion is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with desire to alleviate their distress.
Contemporary Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ definition of compassion is possessing imaginary guilt for others’ distress, together with desire not to be blamed by liberals for “not caring” by not stealing enough other peoples’ money through excessive taxes to reward lazy public subsidy welfare addicts; professional poor also called government plantation slaves.
Some examples of Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ contemporary word compassion benefits:
1. Marxist-fascists and their insatiable lust for social, economic, and political power;
2. Corporate fascists and their insatiable lust for greed funded though special government regulations and funding deals;
3. Others’ greed and selfishness like professional welfare addicts, some public unions, and illegal immigrants;
4. Ignorant and uneducated;
5. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites economic and political power;
6. Others reader can list.
Consequences of these Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites propaganda will be:
1. government plantation slaves who are mostly useless in that they have to steal others’ property to survive;
2. Marxist-fascist regulations and policies which are not only destructive to America’s traditions, values, and principles; but also self destructive to bad guys themselves;
3. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ polices and political deeds which will also be self destructive for Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites who future historians will be described, in America, with as much animosity as Judas is describes among Christians;
4. Near fatal collateral damage to America’s traditions, values, principles, and constitutional ethical capitalist republic.
To re-emphasize earlier point, seems sad that Obama Republicans also known as Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites have turned compassion a word describing a once noble trait into an evil concept which benefits evil among us in U.S.
Much like Progressive Liberal Democrats have turned word “love” into synonym for promiscuous. Or conservatives have cheapened by over use concept “great American”. Two points, “great Americans” do not have to keep reminding others they are great Americans. Reducing concept “great American” to insignificant greeting is disrespectful to truly “Great Americans”. TRUE or FALSE
Another question: capitalism without integrity is unethical and violates “Thou shall Not Steal” Commandment. Translation ethical capitalism produces most assets available for compassion by traditional definition. While unethical capitalism and or corporate fascism are based on stealing and only produce unholy compassion based on contemporary definition.
This concept is ignored by most free market advocates who believe that it is alright to steal from others with unethical capitalism or corporate fascism; and that governments should not be able to tax their ill-gotten gains. TRUE or FALSE
First Bonus question – Is compassion now a bad word? Answer - yes when it is used with contemporary meaning by Marxist-fascists, Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites, and their allies. TRUE or FALSE.
Extra Three Bonus Point question: The first rule of Marxist- Fascists like Obama and his inner circle is to carry out purges of all 1) political opponents called “political or ideological traitors”, including 2) imaginary “scapegoats” like conservatives and Tea Party Members at all costs using any purely wicked tactic necessary. TRUE or FALSE – one point
Why, Obamaization of all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies only tolerates those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: like Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. TRUE or FALSE – second point
Texas Drifter hopes that I am around long enough to hear reported that Obamaization has started “eating their own” like Biden, Reid, and Clintons. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.
Have no fear my reader, Conservative celebrities like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Beck, plus others reader can list can, to use their vanities to talk enough compassionate words, to cause Marxist-fascists to become sensitive caring political leaders. Doubt this observation reader can channel Trotsky’s atheist Marxist spirit to make your self feel better. TRUE or FALSE – third point
Again Texas Drifter is not advocating non-self defense violence; just asking reader to consider that just talking should not be only option left on metaphorical table. TRUE not FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – First propaganda technique used by evil among us in U.S. is diluting then changing meanings of often used words to promote their evil ways. Restating ignored obvious, some words can have different meanings to different people.
Two examples, first case involves teenage boy telling his young girlfriend: “I love you”. Translation “because when you are high you are promiscuous and believe my lies.” What young intoxicated girl hears: He loves me because of my fabulous body and great personality.”
Second example what Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites mean when they use “contemporary word” compassion to conservatives and what conservatives think traditional word compassion means. Can argument be made that most conservatives are like naïve drunk teenage girls who like being abused by Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites with morals of teenage boys full of lust?
Perhaps few definitions will help reader better understand above question? Definition of bad is; if you my reader do not know definition of bad? Reader must have gone to public school where bad is good and good is bad. Suggestion, do not waste your time reading this writing exercise.
Conservative traditional definition of compassion is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with desire to alleviate their distress.
Contemporary Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ definition of compassion is possessing imaginary guilt for others’ distress, together with desire not to be blamed by liberals for “not caring” by not stealing enough other peoples’ money through excessive taxes to reward lazy public subsidy welfare addicts; professional poor also called government plantation slaves.
Some examples of Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ contemporary word compassion benefits:
1. Marxist-fascists and their insatiable lust for social, economic, and political power;
2. Corporate fascists and their insatiable lust for greed funded though special government regulations and funding deals;
3. Others’ greed and selfishness like professional welfare addicts, some public unions, and illegal immigrants;
4. Ignorant and uneducated;
5. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites economic and political power;
6. Others reader can list.
Consequences of these Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites propaganda will be:
1. government plantation slaves who are mostly useless in that they have to steal others’ property to survive;
2. Marxist-fascist regulations and policies which are not only destructive to America’s traditions, values, and principles; but also self destructive to bad guys themselves;
3. Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites’ polices and political deeds which will also be self destructive for Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites who future historians will be described, in America, with as much animosity as Judas is describes among Christians;
4. Near fatal collateral damage to America’s traditions, values, principles, and constitutional ethical capitalist republic.
To re-emphasize earlier point, seems sad that Obama Republicans also known as Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites have turned compassion a word describing a once noble trait into an evil concept which benefits evil among us in U.S.
Much like Progressive Liberal Democrats have turned word “love” into synonym for promiscuous. Or conservatives have cheapened by over use concept “great American”. Two points, “great Americans” do not have to keep reminding others they are great Americans. Reducing concept “great American” to insignificant greeting is disrespectful to truly “Great Americans”. TRUE or FALSE
Another question: capitalism without integrity is unethical and violates “Thou shall Not Steal” Commandment. Translation ethical capitalism produces most assets available for compassion by traditional definition. While unethical capitalism and or corporate fascism are based on stealing and only produce unholy compassion based on contemporary definition.
This concept is ignored by most free market advocates who believe that it is alright to steal from others with unethical capitalism or corporate fascism; and that governments should not be able to tax their ill-gotten gains. TRUE or FALSE
First Bonus question – Is compassion now a bad word? Answer - yes when it is used with contemporary meaning by Marxist-fascists, Republican aristocrat establishment ruling elites, and their allies. TRUE or FALSE.
Extra Three Bonus Point question: The first rule of Marxist- Fascists like Obama and his inner circle is to carry out purges of all 1) political opponents called “political or ideological traitors”, including 2) imaginary “scapegoats” like conservatives and Tea Party Members at all costs using any purely wicked tactic necessary. TRUE or FALSE – one point
Why, Obamaization of all Obama’s social, economic, and political policies only tolerates those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. Reader can compare Obamaization to all other Marxist-fascists, just one example: like Stalinization of Stain’s social, economic and political policies which also only tolerated those totally devoted without doubts to their “revolution” as being trustworthy. TRUE or FALSE – second point
Texas Drifter hopes that I am around long enough to hear reported that Obamaization has started “eating their own” like Biden, Reid, and Clintons. Reader doubt’s this possible observation, research who was responsible for murdering Trotsky about 5:30 PM on august 20, 1940.
Have no fear my reader, Conservative celebrities like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Beck, plus others reader can list can, to use their vanities to talk enough compassionate words, to cause Marxist-fascists to become sensitive caring political leaders. Doubt this observation reader can channel Trotsky’s atheist Marxist spirit to make your self feel better. TRUE or FALSE – third point
Again Texas Drifter is not advocating non-self defense violence; just asking reader to consider that just talking should not be only option left on metaphorical table. TRUE not FALSE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)