Continue Plus 735

Texas Drifter: What Then Levin?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question for America’s smartest constitutional “legal minds” who are supporting Article V. of Constitution's due processes by States’ Conventions. What if Article V. and Constitutional rule of law are not to enough to stem tide becoming tsunami of tyranny? What then supporters and FOAVC (Friends Of the Article V Convention)?

Which of following options will you exercise: one, going passively to Obama’s Marxist-fascist concentration camps, or exercising your Second Amendment Rights?

Repetition is good training tool – some clues before you answer above “what then” question.
1) Will American history repeat itself? Consider following historical event. Peter Muhlenberg was born in 1746 his father was one of the chief founders of the Lutheran church in America. Early in life Peter entered the ministry, and was a pastor of a church at Woodstock, in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia.

When the war clouds began to gather, this minister, not satisfied with a written protest, informed the members of his church of his intentions to resign. The news attracted hearers near and far as Muhlenberg was one of the most popular ministers in Virginia. In his forceful sermon he spoke of the duties citizens owe their country. In closing he said, “There is a time for preaching and for praying. But there is also a time for fighting. Now this time has come!”

In the same moment he threw off his clerical garment and stood in the pulpit in the uniform of a Colonel of the Continental army. Muhlenberg for his excellent services to the Continental army was rewarded with the title of major-general. George Washington counted him among his confidential friends.
(Excerpt “Security Conservative’s Primer” Marshall’s Law Texas Drifter Library Entry # 686)
2) Reference - Texas Drifter: America’s Lost Second Tradition Found – All Right Magazine
3) Reference – Texas Drifter: One Tactic Strategist Is Naïve

Observation, sacred oath taken by American Patriots to uphold, protect, and defend from all enemies domestic and foreign must have secret message missed by Texas Drifter about only allowing only passive defenses for domestic threats; while more violent tactics can be used against foreign threats? Does it follow that some conservatives are politically correct closet hippie pacifists when issue involves domestic threats to America’s spirit of liberty?

Perhaps these politically correct closet hippie pacifists should re-read Declaration of Independence to better understand limits of patience in defending domestic threats to Americans inalienable rights?
Still being confirmed observation, perhaps only vain arrogant media ratings clowns, or want to be false prophets are to cowardly to admit that they might be wrong about guaranteeing success for their one and only strategy to restoring Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic? Just asking what then, if all their eggs in one basket Article V tactic is not successful – what then?

Observation question – Texas Drifter is not suggesting, recommending, promoting, advocating, or inciting senseless violence; rather asking only that self-defense social power be left on the invisible table everyone references as a viable last option. TRUE not FALSE

Clue – again repetition is good training tool: There is no “second place” ribbon, trophy, or medal in self-defense scenarios; so Reader needs to stay: ready, willing, and ruthlessly efficient. Translation, beat them before they clear leather. Well intentioned conservatives who only rely on “reasonable words”, and ineffective rule of law to manage genocidal political rulers and genocidal tyrants; will if and when the following event possibly occurs; have no one to blame for their family’s horrors but themselves.

Scenario: terrorists or rabid feral government SWAT team members; cuts conservative’s throat and throws him to floor. While conservative’s life sustaining blood is spreading across floor, conservative increasingly faintly sees and hears his wife and children being sexually assaulted and brutally murdered. Why, simple because there are some domestic tranquility and national security problems than can never be resolved with words or rule of ineffective due process laws.

Bonus question – where is Heaven permitted justice for Veterans Administration clients tortured, permanently crippled, and negligently murdered by incompetent and or negligent V.A. staff? Just asking, perhaps Pledge of Allegiance should end with “liberty and justice” only for feral civil servants? Just asking TRUE or FALSE

Will close this writing exercise with what say you about what then?