Texas Drifter: All Americans Now On Jury Duty
Marshall’s Law Dateline – If events described in “Texas Drifter: Idaho Ranchers Then What BLM?” short story “Just Another Dream” had occurred and were actual events; if all Americans are now on jury duty should Travis James be found guilty or not guilty?
Court room scenario might be as follows
Judge (points at defense attorney and says: I remember you as prosecutor from “Texas Drifter: Premonition Senator’ Cornyn’s Treason Trial” (Library Entry # 657). You may make your opening remarks – nothing clever!
Defense Attorney (walks over to railing in front of jury and lays a Bible on railing in front of all Americans now on jury duty – he then places on hand on Bible, then raises his other hand and swears) I will tell whole truth and nothing but whole truth so help me God.
Defense Attorney Continues: Truth is that the defendant Travis James was influenced by PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) resulting from unlawful unconstitutional viciously sadistic actions of your federal government’s bureaucrats until now unaccountable crimes which caused my innocent client to evolve into “battered citizen syndrome”.
Continuing: Little about battered citizen syndrome which we will review in much greater detain in this trial to acquit my innocent client (Defense attorney’s notes)
Here is where exigent and pre-emptive can become blurred legal lines. Consider Texas Drifter’s “battered citizen syndrome” concept. Should new self defense statutes in States like Texas consider expanding citizens' self defense statutes to include “battered citizen’s syndrome”?
Reference excerpt about "battered citizen syndrome" from All Alright Magazine - Texas Drifter: Is Affluenza Why DC Elites Blanking Crazy? www.allrightmagazine published February 10, 2014.
(Start insert) Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.
*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt notes)
Defense Attorney Continues: Prosecution will plead for verdict of guilty based on revenge for what future historians will describe as American public sector domestic war criminals.
Continuing: Defense will show that defendant was acting on following principles of self defense based on
1. Generic Judeo-Christian principles in Ten Commandments differences between “thou shall not kill and thou shall not murder” using example of David as my client and Goliath as your federal Leviathan.
2. Act of Abjuration 1581
3. Common Law “Castle Doctrine”
4. Declaration of Independence
Still Continuing: Defense will also show who were responsible and accessories to putting my innocent client in a life threatening self defense situation.
Continuing: My clients’ defense which has sworn to tell whole truth and nothing but truth will illustrate roles of following who put my innocent client in life threatening self defense situation to be
1. Out of control federal bureaucrats with rabid attitudes towards law abiding citizens entitled to inconvenient constitutional due process rights
2. Their accessories who are elected and appointed public officials including legal referees from judges to justices (defense attorney pauses – looks at trial judge and remarks) Not including you Your Honor
Judge: Quips you are getting close to being facetious; Go on.
Defense Attorney Continues: Number three accessories are “toleraters” who condoned with their silence and tolerated above guilty parties who deserve to be brought before Nuremberg type trials in America for public sector domestic war criminals
Final elements of accessories to domestic war criminals genocide and atrocities includes main stream media and main stream media “light” who mostly represent corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats. Both of these media strumpets have traded in their First Amendment freedom of press rights to be propagandists for domestic war criminals attempting to destroy all Americans who believe in America’s traditions, values, and principles – you the jury know which beliefs I reference.
Before the defense for my innocent client closes my opening remarks; defense ask all you Americans serving on this jury: Where was the prosecution after: Malibu, Ruby Ridge; Waco? Where was the prosecution after any of following
1. Federal public sector environmentalist terrorism on ranches in States like Idaho
2. Illegal immigrants’ crimes against millions
3. Fast and Furious I
4. Fast and Furious II (Benghazi)
5. IRS war on conservatives and conservative organizations free speech and voting rights
6. Obama Care
7. Greedy corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling class aristocrats
8. Each of you on the jury can add to list?
Where was the prosecution, after government agents murdered and covered up their crime of murdering Travis James’ wife and child? Where was the prosecution after federal agents murdered and covered up Sunrise Massacre of three hundred eight totally innocent children, women, and men?
Let us never forget what Travis James witnessed by his own words:
Total firepower from two helicopter gun ships quickly turned the pre Easter services into what later became known as the “Sunrise Massacre.” Male members of the community had left their weapons at home to teach the children about the virtues of peace.
Shadow rumors suggest that Travis has told confidants that the children were reciting “Our Father who art in Heaven” as the gun ships suddenly appeared out of the sun and began firing.
What would you have done you as jury members? Had you experienced what my innocent client has experienced? Would you have just said – oh well another day in America; or would you have tried to keep the future from being like the present and recent past?
Recall when I started my opening remarks in defense of my innocent client; remember I laid one hand on this Bible and raised my other hand and took an oath to tell the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God. Let us now see if Mr. Prosecutor has same faith in Integrity I offered you about my self?
Prosecutor (vainly rises and starts to strut over to put his hand on Holiest of all Books – as he lowers his hand to the Bible his hands are covered in flames and Prosecutor yells” – “No opening remarks!”
Jury members were amazed to witness not even tiniest damages to Holiest of all Books.
Judge – Ten minute recess to get that pathetic prosecution whiner some medical attention.
Judge looks at Defense attorney who smiles and asks: Miracle outside intervention?
Editor Marshall will put trial on hold for now. Texas Drifter asked me to inform Reader that America last citizen haters can write their own propaganda to tamper with American jury’s future verdict. TRUE or FALSE
Clue – justice thing about American due process system; American jurors not Defense or Prosecution decides innocent or guilt – WHAT DECIDE YOU?
