Continue Plus 643

Texas Drifter: Citizen Investigation Ethics

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Following reviews ethical principles not principals for managing investigations; art of managing investigations will be reviewed in another writing exercise. Who better to present following observations than author private sector Texas continuing education training manual “Spy As A Verb: Art ands Ethics of Surveillance?

Investigative process has one and only one sole objective: discover facts for truth. Citizen investigation managers must never let their personal likes or dislikes of investigation target corrupt integrity of investigation with prejudicial investigative process.

Clarification, citizen investigation managers can supervise one person investigation; them self; or be responsible for actions of eight or more team members. Specifics provided in art of managing investigations.

Translation: Texas Drifter’s introduction with potential clients always involved informing client: Professional standards’ include running only non-prejudicial investigations. Results of my efforts will be same: good, bad, indifferent, or nothing regardless of who pays for my time.

Moral courage for citizen investigator manager is measured by their ability to find answers to unspeakable questions. Ethics for citizen investigation managers starts with real world pragmatism not conclusions shadowed by vanity; lust for greed or power of fascist ideologies like Marxist-fascism, corporate fascism, or Islamic terrorism.

The citizen investigation manager believes that a no backup attitude is the difference between winners who never quit, and survivors who quit when they break even. Obvious truths: patriots ignoring national security threats or domestic tyranny always spend too much time at cemeteries.

Devotion to citizen investigation management teaches the following: intelligence is power; accurate information is intelligence and non-prejudicial investigations generate accurate information. Conclusion: covert investigative intelligence can provide an edge that when combined with appropriate timely resources can determine outcome.

Citizen investigation managers have two basic operation management styles to choose from: observer or participant. Mutual components for both operation management styles include: security; resource management; databases; contacts; experts; investigation; surveillance; and undercover activities.

It takes ability, experience, integrity, and attitude to make participant management style work. “Citizen Investigation Ethics” will hopefully start learning process that it takes integrity; ability; experience; and extreme duty attitude to make participant management style more successful than not.

Non-prejudicial investigations should be based on ethical industry standards, not relative industry standards. Basing investigations on innuendos, deceptions, frauds, or lies like governments acting like tyrants violates Commandment “You shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

Why would Obama’s Marxist-fascists or corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats have bureaucrats engage in such conduct? Answer can be found in another Commandment: You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his manservant, or his maidservant, or his ox, or his ass, or anything that is your neighbor’s.

Why should anyone be surprised that Marxist-socialists or corporate fascists who are motivated by lust for power and promiscuity or greed like Obama’s Republicans like McConnell, McCain, Cornyn, Boehner, and others reader can list thrive on serving evil?

Point is no matter how much one seeks justice for America’s unwashed and Americans with middle class attitudes who have been; still are; and will continue to be victimized from crimes by Progressive Democrats and Obama’s Republicans also called RINOs. Due process legal prosecutions and due process punishments are necessary to distinguish good citizens from evil among us in U.S.

Otherwise vengeful conservatives will only be replacing one evil with another evil. Only exception being, self defense scenarios which can be divided into exigent and pre-emptive. Exigent by definition is requiring immediate action. Pre-emptive definition is to prevent something from happening.

Here is where exigent and pre-emptive can become blurred legal lines. Consider Texas Drifter’s “battered citizen syndrome” concept. Should new self defense statutes in States like Texas consider expanding citizens' self defense statutes to include “battered citizen’s syndrome”?

Reference excerpt about "battered citizen syndrome" from All Alright Magazine - Texas Drifter: Is Affluenza Why DC Elites Blanking Crazy? www.allrightmagazine published February 10, 2014.

(Start insert) Allow “battered citizen syndrome” as valid defense when affluenza victims threaten law abiding citizens’ personal security and property as defined by “castle laws”. For more information on “battered citizen syndrome” reader can reference:

Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 by Editor Marshall - page 150, item “068”.

*068* - One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?

Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.

To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.

What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated. (End excerpt)

Battered citizen syndrome’s time may arrived since being exposed to too much wealth or too “easy” a life can be medically and legally determined to be a mental illness which rationalizes threatening, injuring, and even killing other inno0cents now called collateral damage. TRUE or FALSE (End excerpt)

Returning to investigation management ethics: Seems obvious, but starting investigations while crime is in progress is preferable, and gets more difficult as more time elapses from “end of crime”.

Compare synonyms tips, clues, and leads to evidence in civil cases, and probable cause for search warrants for evidence in criminal cases. Public sector has advantage of using extortion in criminal cases that do not exist is private sector. Anyone doubting this only need wait until Obama’s enforcement regulators come after you, your family, or friends.

Comparing “baiting” in civil cases to entrapment in criminal cases can be reviewed in “Art of Citizen Investigations”

Citizen investigators need to distinguish between different investigation standards among: civil; criminal; domestic war crimes; national security; and few others.

Perhaps good start for citizen investigators is to learn differences between “tips, clues, leads” and evidence.

Following are good sources of “tips, clues, leads”, and some cases evidence for citizen investigators to begin their collection processes for possible domestic war crimes trials.
1. Diaries recorded as soon after event as possible including basics like: who, what, when, where, and why
2. List of potential future witnesses
3. Copies or photos of papers or documents
4. Letters, tapes, photos, receipts
5. Forensic evidence indicated when and where taken using caution not to contaminate with “chain of command” list
6. Electronic (learn “bugging” and “wiretapping” statutes in relation to “consent recording”)
7. Internet items
8. Other
9. Information is to be collected for potential war crimes trials involving abusive, tyrannical, or treasonous politicians and their accessory allies; not to be “snooping old hag witch”

Future potential targets of possible domestic war crimes may include:
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat: politicians, appointees; allies, and public sector accomplices.
2. Corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elite aristocrats: politicians, appointees; allies, and public sector accomplices.
3. Public sector and private sector allies to above evil among us in U.S.
4. Others reader can list

Security issues for citizen investigation managers
1. No gossiping to inflate vanity; need to know only best rule
2. Keep copies and duplicates in different places
3. Share one set of materials with attorney when appropriate
4. Additional items provided when dealing with “Art of Citizen Investigations”

Question: In shades of gray worlds, citizen investigation managers may be required to maintain control while working wounded without backup. Regardless of special circumstances, citizen’s investigation management is not a career for self-destructive or those wanting to be remembered as heroes. Rather profession for those devoted to truth. TRUE or FALSE

Additional question: Perhaps the most neglected public relations tactic when dealing with witnesses, clients, staff, and the public is professional courtesy. Professional courtesy is one of those traits that separate amateurs from professionals. This important career trait represents a learned habit that comes from maturity.

It does not matter how vile or contemptible the person in question is, they are entitled to professional courtesy. Citizen investigation managers and their agents do not have to like or respect everyone, but they do need to exhibit professional courtesy to everyone. Personal respect and professional courtesy are different concepts. TRUE or FALSE

First bonus question: The citizen investigator should never work for or assist: liars, thieves, those who depend on employee “bullet catchers”, or those who always depend on others to do “dirty work”. TRUE or FALSE

Second bonus question: Obama by transforming America into impotent world economic power with approaching impotent armed forces due to budget reductions initiated by Republican Defense Secretary, and supported by corporate fascist Republican establishment ruling elites are providing American citizens opportunities to watch pending genocide of America’s allies. Who will be next on destruction of America’s allies list? Texas Drifter will start list: Israel; Taiwan, South Korea, parts of Europe; perhaps Saudis and even Philippines?

Perhaps list can even include some American States due to twenty million plus illegal immigrants in America engaging in cultural genocide against America’s traditions, values, and principles? Reader can add to list.

Perhaps these times might be appropriate times for Americans to start considering becoming citizen investigation managers for potential domestic war crimes trials involving domestic crimes by Obama Care and other domestic policies; plus actions future juries might consider as being acts of national security treasons TRUE or FALSE?

Clue: Does anyone really believe that Obama’s “We will urinate in our pants if we do not like what you do” national defense policy; will protect America or any ally? Consider Obama’s only remaining “tough guy” option: peace through nuclear war.

Editor Marshall Disclaimer: Neither, Texas Drifter nor Editor Marshall, are attorneys and neither makes any pretense to be so. Information is provided for information only with all applicable disclaimers applying.