Texas Drifter: America’s Stranger than Science Fiction Future
Marshall’s Law Dateline – America only has one of two futures: one, change and return to Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic; or two, continue current transformation to society admired by Beelzebub.
Few concepts to help America return to country envisioned by both America’s “founders” and “framers”; and those who worked, suffered, and sacrificed to make America best of histories best.
Recall repetition is good training tool. Remember original goals of just two of Bill of Rights.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. (Editor Marshall’s Note – like replacing private health care choices with Marxist-fascist Obama Care)
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people
Both federal and States’ new amendments might establish according to law changes that might return America to “founders” and “framers” original plans, hopes, and devotions.
Many may correctly ask why would State and federal activist judges, like Justice Judas Roberts as well as most other federal judges abide by future constitutional amendments when they ignore current constitution’s laws. Good question, they probably will not, but will be adding more evidence for any future domestic war crime trials in America.
Samples of changes that will immediately impact average citizens’ “pocket book” or health issues:
1. Abolish Obama Care before hundreds of thousands or more Americas become what Obama and Obama Republicans will describe as necessary collateral homicides to benefit professional poor and aristocrats.
2. No primary payer health care system prohibited from ever existing in America;
3. Limit citizens not financially contributing to social programs like food stamps, unlimited unemployment benefits, and “welfare to ten percent of total States’ and federal budgets.
4. Public welfare addicts shall not be allowed to vote. Why, why give professional subsidy addicts right to vote to steal from others? Consider Aristotle’s comments.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes {like Progressive Democrats} the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich {Republican Establishment} get the better of the poor, or the poor {Progressive Democrats} of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert)
5. Disaster relief should be separate budget item for social services.
6. Social Security and Medicare should over one to two generations be funded into tax exempt savings accounts with both programs returning to “safety net” for its investors.
7. “Gay” relationships can be structured by civil contracts. People can live as they choose as long as they harm no one but themselves. Constitution does not allow any individual, group, organization, ethnic group, or race to use government to dilute other peoples’ religious principles to “legitimize” minority’s individual or social conduct (example gay marriages).
8. Most problems threatening America by evil among us in U.S. can be solved by enforcing constitutional law. Examples Big Brother’s spying; and porous border resulting in millions of violent and property crimes against American citizens and legal residents by illegal immigrants.
9. After above processes effect common folks immediate “pocket book” needs; Levin’s more structural amendments might be considered. Problem with addressing structural changes first, is time frame dangers from immediate threats. Volunteers at Alamo in San Antonio did not waste time planning a spring garden when they had less than weeks to live.
10. Reader can add their suggestions to above list.
Key component or strategy for marketing above tactics is child like simple. Answer win the propaganda war with the truth not lies. Process starts with asking politically incorrect questions.
Process should never be contaminated with lies, lies, and more lies like Obama, Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats, Obama Republicans, and some pretender conservative celebrities. Remember all future historians will describe words by the evil among us in U.S. as excrement out of mouths of (reader can fill in blank). TRUE or FALSE
Another example, of more evil by Obama’s and his Administration tolerated by Obama Republicans, who represent Republican ruling elite establishment aristocrats.
Following excerpts reference “knock out game” which has by past accounts involved mostly Blacks on Whites and religious minority attacks. Does following re-affirm that Obama Administration provides Blacks, Socialists, illegal immigrants pass on attacking Whites, Christians and Jewish people?
Excerpts from NEWSMAX December 27, 2013
Feds Charge Texas Man With Hate Crime in 'Knockout Game' Attack
Thursday, 26 Dec 2013 09:47 PM
By Cathy Burke
Eric Holder's Justice Department has charged a white suburban Houston man with a federal hate crime for sucker-punching a 79-year-old black man in a "knockout game," a violent trend that has been sweeping the nation.
“The plan is to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?” Conrad Barrett, 27, allegedly said in a cell phone call that was recorded, the Houston Chronicle reported Thursday, citing court documents.
The sick game is played when one or more youths decide to knock down a stranger, preferably with one punch, as they pass by. The event often is recorded so the proof can be posted on the Internet.
It's the first time the Obama administration has taken action on the distressing trend, The Washington Times reported, although unlike most reported "knockout" cases, in this instance the accused is white and the victim black.
Many of the victims in news accounts have been white and their assailants black, but hate-crimes charges have been rare, The Washington Times reported.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hate-crime-knockout-Barrett/2013/12/26/id/543969#ixzz2ohkOcqnB
(End excerpt)
Is above incident another example of Obama Administration condoning racist violence by Blacks against Whites and others Obama despises? TRUE or FALSE
Does Obama’s other actions and policies in addition to being a racist; also make Obama a Marxist and fascist? TRUE or FALSE
Are Obama Republicans accessories to Obama’s racist, Marxist, and fascist policies by condoning Obama’s crimes against Whites, Christians and other conservatives Republican leaders Boehner and McConnell detest? TRUE or FALSE
Might a fair and balanced headline be: Massa Obama Might Be Racist, Marxist, Fascist; But Is Really Cool Nice Half White President? TRUE or FALSE
Clue One –reference All Right Magazine - Texas Drifter: First Amendment Protects Asking Questions published December 17, 2013
Clue Two – when contemporary events suggest America’s future is going to be stranger than science fiction; does that provide reader with something to consider or think about?
Bonus Question One – Reader should enjoy their 2014 New Year’s celebration as title suggests “America’s Stranger than Science Fiction Future” is being transformed by Beelzebub’s:
1. racism
2. Marxism
3. corporate fascism
4. greed
5. vanities
All which form a pentagram hoisted and worshiped by Obama, his Administration, Progressive Democrats, Obama Republicans, and other evils among us in U.S. Reader’s choice. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus Question Two (less intense than bonus question one) – Largest deterrent to America’s private sector future housing construction industry is diverting private dollars to government student serfdom loan payments. TRUE or FALSE
Friday, December 27, 2013
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Continue Plus 614
Texas Drifter: 2014 New Year’s Resolution
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Most New Year’s resolutions are motivated by vanity or vanities; very few are based on devotion. Perhaps an explanation of why most New Year’s resolutions last only weeks?
One definition of resolution is act or process of reducing to simpler form.
One definition of devotion is ardent love or affection – synonym fidelity.
Stated again, repetition is good teaching tool. Reader can recall America’s four inalienable rights.
1. Life;
2. Liberty to pursue free will;
3. Ownership of private property through ethical capitalism;
4. Self defense.
Perhaps America’s “founders” did not include self defense in inalienable rights in America’s Declaration of Independence as “founders” not “framers” of constitution presumed citizens accepted the obvious?
Still it is very likely that “framers” also understood concept of inalienable right of self defense; reference two of three words in oath taken to preserve U.S. Constitution: uphold, protect, and defend?
Words to “protect and defend” by “framers” of Constitution could have originated from following:
1. Holy Bible which distinguishes between “kill” and “murder” in Ten Commandments. Did David “kill” or “murder” Goliath?
2. Act of Abjuration July 1581. The Act of Abjuration which many of America’s “founders” had drafts of document which started exposing myth of divine rights of kings. (Reference All Right Magazine -Texas Drifter: America's Lost Second Tradition Found. Published 2013)
3. America’s Declaration of Independence which reader might consider re-reading.
4. Second Amendment of Bill of Rights: Amendment II - A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
5. More contemporary example is Article I of Texas Bill of Rights in Texas’ 1876 Constitution; after dealing with revenge and vengeance following America’s First Civil War by Yankee Republican Carpetbagger Scalawags. Excerpts Article I from Texas Bill of Rights. (Start excerpt)
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:
SEC. 2. All political power is inherent in the people and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.
SEC. 23. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power by law to regulate the wearing of arms with a view to prevent crime.
SEC. 24. The military shall at all times be subordinate to the civil authority.
SEC. 29. To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void.
(Transcription, errors in original preserved) (End excerpts)
Nearing closing assignment question for reader: Perhaps good 2014 New Year’s resolution being reduced to simplest form; might be honoring oath to uphold, protect, and defend America’s Bill of Rights.? TRUE or FALSE
Clue, in case reader has forgotten what are or will be promising to uphold, protect, and defend. Follows is full text of America’s Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. (Editor Marshall’s Note – like replacing private health care choices with Marxist-fascist Obama Care)
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. (End text Bill of Rights)
Another clue to One “founder’s” attitude, to protecting and defending America’s inalienable rights; can be provided by one of America’s most respected founders.
Peter Muhlenberg was born in 1746 his father was one of the chief founders of the Lutheran church in America. Early in life Peter entered the ministry, and was a pastor of a church at Woodstock, in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia.
When the war clouds began to gather, this minister, not satisfied with a written protest, informed the members of his church of his intentions to resign. The news attracted hearers near and far as Muhlenberg was one of the most popular ministers in Virginia. In his forceful sermon he spoke of the duties citizens owe their country. In closing he said, “There is a time for preaching and for praying. But there is also a time for fighting. Now this time has come!”
In the same moment he threw off his clerical garment and stood in the pulpit in the uniform of a Colonel of the Continental army. Muhlenberg for his excellent services to the Continental army was rewarded with the title of major-general. George Washington counted him among his confidential friends.
Two moral questions should close this writing exercise.
1. Not leaving all options like self defense on table is either fool’s or coward’s strategy? TRUE or FALSE
2. Good public opinion survey question: will there ever be justice for the tens of thousands and very possibly hundreds of thousands murdered by Obama Care? YES or NO
Clue: Would all those who needlessly died and will needlessly die from Obama Care have been murdered; if Obama, Progressive Democrats, and Obama Republicans serving Republican establishment elites and their alliances with other guilty parties; not interfered with private citizens’ private sector health care? Let us see how Fox News spins all those deaths as fair and balanced.
Clue to clue: truth is not fair and balanced; truth is truth, no more no less.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Most New Year’s resolutions are motivated by vanity or vanities; very few are based on devotion. Perhaps an explanation of why most New Year’s resolutions last only weeks?
One definition of resolution is act or process of reducing to simpler form.
One definition of devotion is ardent love or affection – synonym fidelity.
Stated again, repetition is good teaching tool. Reader can recall America’s four inalienable rights.
1. Life;
2. Liberty to pursue free will;
3. Ownership of private property through ethical capitalism;
4. Self defense.
Perhaps America’s “founders” did not include self defense in inalienable rights in America’s Declaration of Independence as “founders” not “framers” of constitution presumed citizens accepted the obvious?
Still it is very likely that “framers” also understood concept of inalienable right of self defense; reference two of three words in oath taken to preserve U.S. Constitution: uphold, protect, and defend?
Words to “protect and defend” by “framers” of Constitution could have originated from following:
1. Holy Bible which distinguishes between “kill” and “murder” in Ten Commandments. Did David “kill” or “murder” Goliath?
2. Act of Abjuration July 1581. The Act of Abjuration which many of America’s “founders” had drafts of document which started exposing myth of divine rights of kings. (Reference All Right Magazine -Texas Drifter: America's Lost Second Tradition Found. Published 2013)
3. America’s Declaration of Independence which reader might consider re-reading.
4. Second Amendment of Bill of Rights: Amendment II - A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
5. More contemporary example is Article I of Texas Bill of Rights in Texas’ 1876 Constitution; after dealing with revenge and vengeance following America’s First Civil War by Yankee Republican Carpetbagger Scalawags. Excerpts Article I from Texas Bill of Rights. (Start excerpt)
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:
SEC. 2. All political power is inherent in the people and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.
SEC. 23. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power by law to regulate the wearing of arms with a view to prevent crime.
SEC. 24. The military shall at all times be subordinate to the civil authority.
SEC. 29. To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void.
(Transcription, errors in original preserved) (End excerpts)
Nearing closing assignment question for reader: Perhaps good 2014 New Year’s resolution being reduced to simplest form; might be honoring oath to uphold, protect, and defend America’s Bill of Rights.? TRUE or FALSE
Clue, in case reader has forgotten what are or will be promising to uphold, protect, and defend. Follows is full text of America’s Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. (Editor Marshall’s Note – like replacing private health care choices with Marxist-fascist Obama Care)
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. (End text Bill of Rights)
Another clue to One “founder’s” attitude, to protecting and defending America’s inalienable rights; can be provided by one of America’s most respected founders.
Peter Muhlenberg was born in 1746 his father was one of the chief founders of the Lutheran church in America. Early in life Peter entered the ministry, and was a pastor of a church at Woodstock, in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia.
When the war clouds began to gather, this minister, not satisfied with a written protest, informed the members of his church of his intentions to resign. The news attracted hearers near and far as Muhlenberg was one of the most popular ministers in Virginia. In his forceful sermon he spoke of the duties citizens owe their country. In closing he said, “There is a time for preaching and for praying. But there is also a time for fighting. Now this time has come!”
In the same moment he threw off his clerical garment and stood in the pulpit in the uniform of a Colonel of the Continental army. Muhlenberg for his excellent services to the Continental army was rewarded with the title of major-general. George Washington counted him among his confidential friends.
Two moral questions should close this writing exercise.
1. Not leaving all options like self defense on table is either fool’s or coward’s strategy? TRUE or FALSE
2. Good public opinion survey question: will there ever be justice for the tens of thousands and very possibly hundreds of thousands murdered by Obama Care? YES or NO
Clue: Would all those who needlessly died and will needlessly die from Obama Care have been murdered; if Obama, Progressive Democrats, and Obama Republicans serving Republican establishment elites and their alliances with other guilty parties; not interfered with private citizens’ private sector health care? Let us see how Fox News spins all those deaths as fair and balanced.
Clue to clue: truth is not fair and balanced; truth is truth, no more no less.
Monday, December 23, 2013
Continue Plus 613
Texas Drifter: Questions for Religious Leaders And?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Original title was, Questions for Religious Leaders and Readers Smarter than Texas Drifter.
Definition of incarnate is invested with human nature and form.
Definition of evil is, one definition is, cosmic satanic force.
Definition of satanic is relating to adversary of God, and lord of extreme cruelty and viciousness in Judaism and Christianity.
Fair observation seems that all humans can, will, and do, have lapses of faith in Heaven. Consider even Heavenly Father’s Son as reported in Mark 15:34 English Standard Version: “And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” which means, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”
Heavenly Father’s Son temporally lapse of human faith evolved. Consider, Luke 23:34 English Standard Version and Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” And they cast lots to divide his garments.
First question for religious scholars and others smarter than Texas Drifter: are not temporary lapses in faith meant to teach mercy of Heaven’s compassion; plus remind those pursuing free will, one of Americans inalienable rights, that vanity is not virtuous behavior?
Second question of others to follow does reverse hold true: Father should not forgive them for they know what they do?
Please explain to Texas Drifter, does not free will “muddy up” spiritual waters? Compare confessing sins and trying not to repeat same sins in future; to one knowing that they are intentionally committing sins believing that they will be forgiven at next confessions?
As repetition is good training tool, short excerpt follows from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 251: Texas Drifter: Was James’ Brother Jude Right?
Texas Drifter knew a father who gave his heroin addicted daughter money so she did not have to prostitute herself or steal to get money to buy her heroin. Her father asked me what I thought, told him he and his daughter were going down a road without a happy ending. He said I did not know what it was like to have a heroin addicted daughter. With that I agreed, but said I knew what it was like to be blinded by bad decisions. We have never spoken since.
Following government and private sector partnerships: mortgage industry, student loans, health care services, public education, social services, financial industries, automobile industries, and other public bureaucrat and private citizens’ partnerships always travel down roads without happy endings.
Government should do what it does best: foreign security, domestic border security, civil law enforcement, fire suppression, emergency medical transport services, and few regulatory services to travel down roads with better endings.
Possible partial answers for problems which do not have easy or pleasant solutions confronting America, enacting and staying committed to solutions requires mature adults not adults with personalities of two year old children.
Time has arrived for Americans to cease and desist, acting like the father who gave his daughter money to buy her heroin so as to protect his reputation and keep her out of trouble.
Translation free will private sector ethical capitalism is good. Another truth: public sector Marxist-fascism advocated by Obama, Progressive Democrats their allies and corporate fascist Obama Republicans is taking America down a road with no different an ending than the one for the father who gave his daughter money to buy her heroin.
Moving on to moral of this writing exercise: Texas Drifter not being a religious scholar, wonders was not Jude, brother of James, concerned with early teachings by some Christian leaders that Christians can sin without risking salvation; because Heaven’s Son had already died for their sins? Jude’s own words from THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF JUDE:
Jude: 3 - … it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that you should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the Saints.
Jude: 5 – I will therefore put you in remembrance, though you once knew this, how the Lord, having saved the people out of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
Jude: 21 – Keep your selves in the love of God …
Was Paul (Galatians 5:13) also concerned with same issue troubling Jude?
Reader needs to be patience as above Judeo-Christian teachings tie into contemporary American history. Perhaps reader can help Texas Drifter seeking questions from religious scholars and others smarter than Texas Drifter, a non-religious scholar understand.
Question: Would Heaven allow his only Son to be crucified so perpetual sinners could be given immunity for free will sins committed with advance expectation of Heaven’s Salvation? Back to question in title: Was James' Brother Jude Right?
Question translation: Does Heaven overturn his Son’s spiritual Salvation judgments?
Texas Drifter is just asking a questions that might also be of interest, to Progressive Democrats and Obama Republicans who apparently believe they are entitled to passes for all their premeditated free will sins involving breaking their oaths to Heaven to uphold, protect, and defend America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Texas Drifter is still seeking answer: Was James' Brother Jude Right?
Follow up question, would answer to Was James Brother to Jude Right, also apply Americans intentionally engaging in behavior to destroy America’s constitutional due process ethical capitalist system out of hatred like Marxist-fascist-Progressive Democrats; out of greed by corporate fascist Obama Republicans; or best of intentions” by those motivated by greed like many contemporary conservative celebrities.
One example, trouble with some recovering alcoholics or sex and or drug addicts is they over react by becoming mean conniving Robespierre cult leaders to show everyone how “well” they are. TRUE or FALSE
Question what might be judgment day for those who were accessories, to abolishing constitutional due processes, when their cowardice ignores inalienable right of self defense as potential option?
Is it proper to throw a life jacket to a drowning man, who you know will try to murder your family after you save their life?
Closing questions for religious leaders and readers smarter than Texas Drifter:
1. Does one need to have a soul to be saved, do evil incarnate satanic among us in U.S. have souls?
2. After accepting salvation, is one expected to try and to not repeat sins; or is salvation a pass to commit sins until next confession?
3. Does salvation apply to individuals only; or is salvation available for groups of souls collectively known as gangs, mobs, groups, organizations, political parties that are knowingly violating Heaven’s Ten Commandments and or Americans’ inalienable rights defined in Bill of Rights?
Clue, reader might review above definitions one for incarnate, evil, and satanic.
Texas Drifter is hoping that religious leaders and others smarter than Texas Drifter will publicly express their answers that might help others as well.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Original title was, Questions for Religious Leaders and Readers Smarter than Texas Drifter.
Definition of incarnate is invested with human nature and form.
Definition of evil is, one definition is, cosmic satanic force.
Definition of satanic is relating to adversary of God, and lord of extreme cruelty and viciousness in Judaism and Christianity.
Fair observation seems that all humans can, will, and do, have lapses of faith in Heaven. Consider even Heavenly Father’s Son as reported in Mark 15:34 English Standard Version: “And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” which means, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”
Heavenly Father’s Son temporally lapse of human faith evolved. Consider, Luke 23:34 English Standard Version and Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” And they cast lots to divide his garments.
First question for religious scholars and others smarter than Texas Drifter: are not temporary lapses in faith meant to teach mercy of Heaven’s compassion; plus remind those pursuing free will, one of Americans inalienable rights, that vanity is not virtuous behavior?
Second question of others to follow does reverse hold true: Father should not forgive them for they know what they do?
Please explain to Texas Drifter, does not free will “muddy up” spiritual waters? Compare confessing sins and trying not to repeat same sins in future; to one knowing that they are intentionally committing sins believing that they will be forgiven at next confessions?
As repetition is good training tool, short excerpt follows from Citizens Passions Continue Plus 251: Texas Drifter: Was James’ Brother Jude Right?
Texas Drifter knew a father who gave his heroin addicted daughter money so she did not have to prostitute herself or steal to get money to buy her heroin. Her father asked me what I thought, told him he and his daughter were going down a road without a happy ending. He said I did not know what it was like to have a heroin addicted daughter. With that I agreed, but said I knew what it was like to be blinded by bad decisions. We have never spoken since.
Following government and private sector partnerships: mortgage industry, student loans, health care services, public education, social services, financial industries, automobile industries, and other public bureaucrat and private citizens’ partnerships always travel down roads without happy endings.
Government should do what it does best: foreign security, domestic border security, civil law enforcement, fire suppression, emergency medical transport services, and few regulatory services to travel down roads with better endings.
Possible partial answers for problems which do not have easy or pleasant solutions confronting America, enacting and staying committed to solutions requires mature adults not adults with personalities of two year old children.
Time has arrived for Americans to cease and desist, acting like the father who gave his daughter money to buy her heroin so as to protect his reputation and keep her out of trouble.
Translation free will private sector ethical capitalism is good. Another truth: public sector Marxist-fascism advocated by Obama, Progressive Democrats their allies and corporate fascist Obama Republicans is taking America down a road with no different an ending than the one for the father who gave his daughter money to buy her heroin.
Moving on to moral of this writing exercise: Texas Drifter not being a religious scholar, wonders was not Jude, brother of James, concerned with early teachings by some Christian leaders that Christians can sin without risking salvation; because Heaven’s Son had already died for their sins? Jude’s own words from THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF JUDE:
Jude: 3 - … it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that you should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the Saints.
Jude: 5 – I will therefore put you in remembrance, though you once knew this, how the Lord, having saved the people out of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
Jude: 21 – Keep your selves in the love of God …
Was Paul (Galatians 5:13) also concerned with same issue troubling Jude?
Reader needs to be patience as above Judeo-Christian teachings tie into contemporary American history. Perhaps reader can help Texas Drifter seeking questions from religious scholars and others smarter than Texas Drifter, a non-religious scholar understand.
Question: Would Heaven allow his only Son to be crucified so perpetual sinners could be given immunity for free will sins committed with advance expectation of Heaven’s Salvation? Back to question in title: Was James' Brother Jude Right?
Question translation: Does Heaven overturn his Son’s spiritual Salvation judgments?
Texas Drifter is just asking a questions that might also be of interest, to Progressive Democrats and Obama Republicans who apparently believe they are entitled to passes for all their premeditated free will sins involving breaking their oaths to Heaven to uphold, protect, and defend America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Texas Drifter is still seeking answer: Was James' Brother Jude Right?
Follow up question, would answer to Was James Brother to Jude Right, also apply Americans intentionally engaging in behavior to destroy America’s constitutional due process ethical capitalist system out of hatred like Marxist-fascist-Progressive Democrats; out of greed by corporate fascist Obama Republicans; or best of intentions” by those motivated by greed like many contemporary conservative celebrities.
One example, trouble with some recovering alcoholics or sex and or drug addicts is they over react by becoming mean conniving Robespierre cult leaders to show everyone how “well” they are. TRUE or FALSE
Question what might be judgment day for those who were accessories, to abolishing constitutional due processes, when their cowardice ignores inalienable right of self defense as potential option?
Is it proper to throw a life jacket to a drowning man, who you know will try to murder your family after you save their life?
Closing questions for religious leaders and readers smarter than Texas Drifter:
1. Does one need to have a soul to be saved, do evil incarnate satanic among us in U.S. have souls?
2. After accepting salvation, is one expected to try and to not repeat sins; or is salvation a pass to commit sins until next confession?
3. Does salvation apply to individuals only; or is salvation available for groups of souls collectively known as gangs, mobs, groups, organizations, political parties that are knowingly violating Heaven’s Ten Commandments and or Americans’ inalienable rights defined in Bill of Rights?
Clue, reader might review above definitions one for incarnate, evil, and satanic.
Texas Drifter is hoping that religious leaders and others smarter than Texas Drifter will publicly express their answers that might help others as well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)