Texas Drifter: Increasing National Debt Without Increasing National Debt
Marshall Law Dateline – Following breaking news teaches conservatives about a deal making / deal breaking strategy for managing America’s national debt limits.
Texas Drifter’s plan allows Marxist-fascists to satisfy their addiction for private taxpayer dollars which increases America’s national debt limits. Texas Drifter’s strategy simultaneously allows conservatives not to increase America’s national debt limits. Read on probably confused reader.
Strategy players
1. Conservative can be verb originating from “conserve” which is “root” for conservative a noun.
2. Environmentalists are synonymous with Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats who are also known as feral pork barrel ideologues.
Definitions
1. feral not domesticated, wild, uncivilized
2. pork barrel is government project yielding patronage benefits
3. ideologues are impractical idealists with sociopathic personalities motivated by social violence
Available debt stabilization resources by one estimate includes: estimated direct ownership by America’s federal government of almost 650 million acres of land nearly thirty percent of its territory. These federal lands include military bases or testing grounds, nature parks, or other natural resources which can leased to the private sector for commercial exploitation (e.g. forestry, mining, agriculture, oil and natural gas related products).
Texas Drifter initial concept “one” is America’s has natural resources garage sale. Excerpts from Texas Drifter: America Needs Garage Sale All Right Magazine www.allrightmagazine.com published By: Texas Drifter on April 22, 2011 includes:
America needs to follow the example of working class Americans resolving their financial problems when their credit ratings are in jeopardy: cut expenses; have a garage sale; find part time jobs.
While Judas Obama continues betraying and destroying everything American, including private sector employment opportunities, all that remains is America having a garage sale.
America’s Constitutional-Republic-destroying debt can ethically ONLY be reduced by two ways: cutting non-essential expenses and holding America’s first and hopefully only necessary garage sale. Texas Drifter announces his full support for America’s Garage Sale process which is based on the Bill of Rights, Amendment X: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Moving onto raising money, not through taxes but rather America’s Garage Sale; the premise is that it is better to have two hundred sixty million acres of public national treasures that can be managed, preserved, and protected in an environment based on domestic tranquility and protected by effective military which deters foreign threats or to have six hundred fifty million, plus or minus few million, acres of public treasures destroyed by incompetent often corrupt bureaucrats, domestic environmental anarchists, drug growers, and invading foreign threats.
Part of America’s Garage Sale discussion shall start with following:
3. Federal treasures not being purchased by the States will be auctioned to private citizens, private businesses, and non-profit organizations.
4. All sales will be contingent on cash, municipal bonds, or pre-approved lines of credit.
5. Some Properties shall be sold by sections to provide middle class citizens opportunity to participate in America’s Garage Sale with deeded access easements guaranteed to prevent some unethical capitalists from denying middle class property owners access to their land.
6. Only American citizens can participate in America’s garage sale with attempted purchases by foreign nationals, foreign businesses, or foreign governments resulting in administrative forfeiture of funds used to perpetuate the scam.
7. All proceeds go ONLY to pay off America’s national debts: PROFITS CREATE JOBS; TAXES DESTROY JOBS. (End excerpts)
Texas drifter initial concept Two: Adopt and implement “Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation”. Why, to allow private citizens and private businesses to seek monetary damages from EPA and other appropriate federal administrators and federal employees causing damages resulting form federal administrators and employees enforcing regulations based on pseudo, counterfeit, fraudulent or incompetent science.
Bottom line, NO means NO increase of national debt limits until following terms are enacted not promised (Only fools believe Progressive Democrats and Obama Republicans):
1. Matching or equal revenues are raised from sale or lease of national properties or resources before national debt limit can be raised
2. Public Employees Civil Liability Legislation must be implemented and remain in force before national debt limit can be raised.
“Deal Maker /Deal Breaker” conservatives get above items one and two before credit issued from increasing debt limits.
Negotiation conversation might go as follows: I will give you your national debt limit increase; provided I get two things in return. What I want will not cost you anything; unless you are a lying incompetent, fascist bureaucrat; your public subsidy addict base could care less what happens to feral pork barrel clowns. Deal or no deal you Marxist-fascist want to be tyrant. Tell your lap licking rear kissing Obama Republicans; same offer applies to them.
While some conservatives spend their time trying not to elect Obama Republicans (RINOs); other conservatives are devoting their time to getting new constitutional Amendments. Both plans mean well; only problem is their plans would be comparable to those serving Col. Travis at Alamo in February planning their spring garden.
Texas Drifter’s two simple demands are intended to produce more expedient results.
Consider Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation; where does Constitution provide sovereign immunity for post constitution agencies or personally negligent or criminal acting federal employees? Also people dislike trial lawyers until they need their services. How much money could trial lawyers generate from Public Employee Civil Liability law suits?
Summary message to Marxist-fascist porker ideologues – want your national debt increase? All you have to do is (1) let America have its garage sale and (2) do not oppose American citizens implementing Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation. You object to both one and two; promise you that you will not like item three. TRUE or FALSE
Other reference sources for reader:
1. Citizens Passions search Conservative Environmental Standards Continue Plus 105
2. Texas Drifter: Update to Ranch Scouting Notes on the Border | All ... www.allrightmagazine.com/.../texas-drifter-update-to-ranch-scouting-not... published By: Texas Drifter on August 4, 2013
3. Citizens Passions search Press Release: Clammy Weed Butterflies Cancer Continue Plus 143
Other related experiences Texas Drifter has had for above writing exercise; spent years managing legal investigations in capital murder investigations; plus managed high dollar civil environmental investigations for both defendant attorneys and plaintiff attorneys. (Of course not at same time – though results of Texas Drifter investigations were non-prejudicial with results being same regardless of who paid for his services.)
Friday, September 27, 2013
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Continue Plus 585
Texas Drifter: Texas Senator Cornyn A Greek Tragedy?
Marshall Law Dateline – America patriots, first step in reviving Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic is casting out by elections politicians like Texas Senator John Cornyn. Why, Senator Cornyn seems to be internationalist imperialist corporate fascist Obama Republican (RINO) who has made a career masquerading as conservative. Question is Cornyn’s story comparable to Greek tragedy?
“English Dictionary” definition of Greek Tragedy: noun - (theatre) (in ancient Greek theatre) a play in which the protagonist, usually a man of importance and outstanding personal qualities, falls to disaster through the combination of a personal failing and circumstances with which he cannot deal
Initial evidence suggests that Cornyn has violated his public oath to Heaven and American public more times than most public sector slaves can count.
Cornyn’s most recent betrayals involve Texas other honorable Senator. Cornyn betrayal of Texas’ truly conservative Senator compares to betrayal by Brutus.
“Urban Dictionary” definition of Brutus: Someone who is a Brutus is a very good friend who gives you the screw job. This is derived from Julius Caesar's best friend. His best friend Brutus was the last person to stab the dictator Julius Caesar's last words were "Et Tu, Brute?" which means "You too Brutus?"
Cornyn has also betrayed American conservatives with supporting votes to keep Obama Care train rolling down track to destruction; while public voting to stop Obama Care train Cornyn earlier voted for technicality to keep Obama Care Train running.
Consider following excerpt for earlier Texas Drifter writing exercise: Texas Drifter: J. McCain, Boehner, Other Losers | All Right Magazine
www.allrightmagazine.com/.../texas-drifter-j-mccain-boehner-other-loser... Published By: Texas Drifter on September 10, 2013.
(Excerpt) Moving on to other losers, list would have to include Texas Senator Cornyn. Few examples reader can list more:
1. Non-fiction short story “Prosecutor For Constitution” Posted by Citizens Passions Continue Plus 584 - based on North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate); 108th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 2941 – “To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes. In the Senate of the United States: October 7, 2004. (Check it out to see if Cornyn is Bush type internationalist?
2. Cornyn only supports conservatives in public – check out Alaska election where Cornyn supported campaign of liberal Republican over conservative Republican.
3. Cornyn voted to start comprehensive immigration amnesty train running down tracks to destroy America; even though he would later proclaim his opposition to amnesty for illegal immigrants. Reference: Texas Drifter: Guide To Republican Partisan Adulterers and ... www.allrightmagazine.com/.../texas-drifter-guide-to-republican-partisan-... Published By: Texas Drifter on June 18, 2013.
Moving down loser list, “great Americans” do not need to keep reminding Americans they are great Americans. (End excerpt)
Only Cornyn knows when his voting record became “in-closet” betrayal of conservatives while being camouflaged by public votes pretending to be something Cornyn was and is not –conservative with principles.
Do Cornyn’s roots show Corny to be internationalist imperialist with America last interests? Only Corny and Heaven can truthfully decipher that question. Easier question for reader to answer is can Cornyn be parodied in words or by sketch or both as Obama Republican ruling elite cockroach?
Second thought, perhaps Texas Drifter should apologize to cockroaches by associating Cornyn with cockroaches. Just Asking, might a better description of Cornyn and Obama Republicans (Rinos) plus all their allies and associates be “cockroach excrement” masquerading as Republican Carpetbagger Scalawags? TRUE or FALSE
It seems likely Cornyn’s political roots can be traced as Bush clan, back to Reconstruction days in South following 1860’s Civil War when Yankee Republican Carpetbaggers coming into Texas were not so affectionately called “Scalawags”.
Some even suggest that tactics Obama is using to destroy America’s economy and punish Americans; are same tactics used by Republican Carpetbagger Scalawags on Southerners after Civil War. Still others believe economic rape and other crimes and abuses against Southerners by Republican Scalawags contributed to creation of KKK.
Seems ironic that Yankee Republicans enjoy criticizing Southern Democrats for joining groups Republican abuses caused to be created. Not defending what KKK became; only reminding reader that even self righteous Republican talk show celebrities substitute history with Yankee Carpetbagger Scalawag propaganda.
Following are facts: Yankee Republican Carpetbagger Scalawags terrorized Southerners with their “Ironclad Oath” and sadistic pleasure while “punishing” Southerners by abusing Republican police state powers. Reader needs to remember the “evil” carpetbaggers were all Republicans.
Republican Carpetbagger Scalawag government ended in Texas when Democrat Richard Coke defeated Republican Edmund Davis for Texas Governor in 1873. The Democrat Governor created a new State Constitution for Texas and returned Texas to its rightful role of leadership in America.
Lesson is both Republicans and Democrats can at their “right time” in history can be good for America; and both can be cockroach excrement at the “wrong time” in history can be bad for America.
Back to this writing exercise assignment title question: Senator Cornyn Greek Tragedy? TRUE or FALSE
Clue 1. Will Senator Cronyn be remembered as being more despicable with less integrity than those vile contemptible dregs Cornyn convicted while serving as prosecutor?
Clue 2. Will future historians record that the Cornyn tragedy, was Cornyn with experiences as professional prosecutor had prior knowledge of concepts like “beyond redemption” and “immune from salvation”?
Continue Plus 584
Texas Drifter History Revisited
Originally Published around 2002
"Prosecutor for Constitution"
Contemporary history tires this retired old farmer’s son turned
Texas drifter; chosen diversion is writing exercises of non
fiction future history. These lyrical visual prose short stories are
not fiction future history.
Prosecutor for Constitution: “play about United States Texas Senator’s trial for treason”
Author’s Disclaimer: Some write to teach while others write to entertain. Sometimes I write to teach by entertaining. Defendant’s name in Prosecutor For Constitution is John Bornyn. Whether others with similar sounding names are fools or traitors will be judged by future citizen historians.
Intro:
Truth is like bitter medicine for most Americans, and may be administered by sugarcoated entertainment in stories like Prosecutor for Constitution.
Marshall’s Law
Players:
Judge
Prosecutor
Defense Attorney
Defendant
Heavenly Angel Number Five
George Washington
Abraham Lincoln
Contents Note: Reference Documents verify Library Of Congress
Set: Spiritual Court Room
Judge Gabriel (to prosecutor): Why am I not surprised to see that defense attorney from TEXAS ON TRIAL is now working as a prosecutor for United States Constitution.
Prosecutor: Not wishing to waste time in convicting defendant of treason, the prosecution agrees to skip opening remarks and go straight to the evidence.
Prosecutor: Evidence that will prove that the defendant conspired and acted to replace America’s constitutional republic nation state with an internationalist moneylender oligarchy. Oligarchy is defined as a government in which a few exercises control for corrupt and selfish purposes. If the defendant’s treason prevails:
America the nation would cease to exist when national boundaries were replaced with something called the continental perimeter.
America’s Constitution would be replaced with something called North American Cooperative Security Act.
America’s executive, legislative and judicial institutions would become slaves to something called North American Parliamentary Group.
The United States of America would be renamed North American Community.
Prosecutor Continues: I would like to introduce and read a public document citing defendant U.S. Texas Senator John Bornyn’s own words. Prosecution Exhibit Number One, a public document.
Prosecutor walks over and stands behind defendant, and begins to read: North American Investment Act.
Defense Attorney: Objection, to prosecutor reading Exhibit One while standing behind my client.
Prosecutor: moving would only suggest that the defendant was ashamed of his words and guilty of treason, an action on my part that might prejudice the jury and deprive the defendant of due process.
Judge: Mr. Prosecutor, this court respects sincerity and holds cleverness in contempt. Proceed with caution.
Prosecutor: I will begin again.
North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate)
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2941
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 7, 2004
Mr. BORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
A BILL
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `North American Investment Fund Act'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR A NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENT FUND.
The President is authorized to negotiate with the Governments of Canada and Mexico to create a North American Investment Fund, as described in this Act (hereinafter referred to as the `Fund'), by--
SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of the Fund shall be--
(1) to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States;
(2) to promote education and economic development in Mexico; and
(3) to reduce the wealth gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States.
SEC. 4. PROJECTS FUNDED.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Fund shall make grants for projects to carry out the purposes described in section 3, including projects--
(1) to construct roads in Mexico to facilitate trade
SEC. 5. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.
(a) IN GENERAL- The terms of the agreement establishing the Fund shall, subject to the limitation in subsection (b), require the Governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States to contribute to the Fund.
Prosecutor: Article III Section3 of the Unites States Constitution declares: Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted or treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or on confession in open court.
Prosecutor continues: The defendant’s twice reading of the proposed law in public complies with the stipulation of “testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act”.
Before the defense attorney objects, I could subpoena every person on this planet who has seen or heard a tape of the defendant’s words.
Defense Attorney: No objection, defense agrees to the stipulation.
Prosecutor: I would now like to introduce and read excerpts from a public document containing testimony supporting the defendant’s treasonous efforts the defense has stipulated fulfills Constitutional standards for treason.
Judge Interrupts: The stipulation was to allow the twice readings to be witnesses not specific charges.
Prosecutor: You are correct Judge. The defendant’s words are witnesses to the specific act of attempting to replace the United States of America with a new political system known as “North American Community”.
(Prosecutor starts to read.): Prosecutor’s Exhibit Number Two: A public document.
American Community Approach to Security
June 9, 2005
(Edited) Testimony before a hearing of the Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. By vice President
and director of the Center for North American Studies.
As we approach the fourth anniversary of 9/11, it is time for us to step back from our trauma and the border and examine the problem in a broader context. The best way to assure security is not at our borders with Canada and Mexico and not by defining “security” in conventional and narrow terms. We need to think about these issues in the context of a continent that is integrating economically and socially at a rapid rate
What we need to do now is forge a North American Community, based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems.
In my statement, I will comment first on the emergence of North America, the next decade’s agenda, and the response by the three governments. Next, I will describe some of the recommendations of the Council Task Force Report and focus on the travel initiative and the security and border issues.
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian inter-parliamentary groups into a single “North American Parliamentary Group.” A third institution should be a “Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment.” A permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.
North American governments can learn from the EU’s efforts to establish EU Educational and Research Centers in the United States. Centers for North American Studies in the United States, Canada, and Mexico would help people in all three countries to understand the problems and the potential of an integrated North America— and to think of themselves as North Americans. Scholarships should encourage North American students to study in each other’s country. Until a new consciousness of North America’s promise takes root, many of these proposals will remain impractical.
Perimeter: Instead of creating new obstacles at the border, we should find ways to ease traffic and harmonize safety and transportation obtain a Border Pass, which would be accepted at all border points within North America as a complement to passports.
The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation’s leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision.
I hope this Committee will pursue the North American agenda beyond the travel initiative considered here. These should be reviewed together with Senator Richard Lugar’s far-sighted bill for a “North American Cooperative Security Act” and Senator Bornyn’s “North American Investment Fund.” The time has come for us to define a true North American Community. (end of document)
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution’s first witness is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Is there any entity or person who can confirm your identity?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: The Judge.
Judge: This is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Did the defendant take an oath to God and or make a spiritual contract with God to “uphold, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes.
Prosecutor: Is the spirit of the defendant’s oath and or contract consistent with the United States Constitution and Prosecution for Constitution Exhibit Number One?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: No.
Prosecutor: Is the defendant in violation of his oath with God and or has the defendant broken his contract with God.
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes
Prosecutor: Based on your spiritual experiences, are individuals who violate oaths or break contracts with God more likely or less likely to engage in treason against their country, their republic, and their republic’s constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: More Likely
Prosecutor: No more questions.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of one of Heaven’s Angels. I’m here to try and save your soul, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the U.S. Constitution calls George Washington as the next witness.
Prosecutor: Are you the George Washington who had occasion to be Commander and Chief of America’s Revolutionary forces who won America’s Independence from England, and are you the same George Washington who had occasion to serve as America’s first President?
George Washington: Yes to both questions.
Prosecutor: Mr. President, did you make the following statements in your Farwell Address. The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.
Did you also state in your Farwell Address: It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. There can be no greater error than to calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.
George Washington: Yes to both.
Prosecutor to George Washington: Based on your knowledge of original intent of the United Sates Constitution, and your many earthly experiences with international tyrants; would you testify under oath before God himself that Prosecution for Constitution Exhibits One and Two represents words, actions, and associations of a patriot or traitor.
George Washington: Traitor. Traitor.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of George Washington. I’m here to try and save your life, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution calls President Abraham Lincoln to the stand.
Prosecutor: President Lincoln, did you have occasion to serve the United States of America during the 1860’s?
President Lincoln: Yes.
Prosecutor: How many Americans died in your service during your administration trying to uphold, protect and defend America’s Constitution?
President Lincoln: Including civilian casualties, one million plus one.
Prosecutor: That’s right you also died in service of your sacred oath to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. How does it make you feel when you see elected officials who took the same oath as you died for, creating and supporting documents like Prosecution for the Constitution Exhibits One and Two?
President Lincoln: Breaks my heart to think that all the suffering and sacrifices during our nation’s Civil War, a war between brothers and neighbors was in vain.
Prosecutor: Mr. Lincoln would you consider the defendant’s words and actions to be helpful or harmful to the Constitution you served through death?
President Lincoln: Beyond harmful.
Defense Attorney: Judge, how many more past away witnesses does the Prosecutor intend to call?
Prosecutor: I am prepared to call every past away soul who died defending America’s Constitution. Probably over four million, as for the exact total, your Honor would know that better than me.
Continuing: As for the lying, probably over fifty million who have suffered because of the defendant’s treasonous policies; again, your Honor would better know the exact number better than me.
Judge To Prosecutor: I warned you about being clever.
Prosecutor: With all due respect your honor, my commitment to total due process for the Constitution is about sincerity not being clever.
Judge: Perhaps the Prosecutor and Defense Attorney can reach an agreement that does not involve calling millions and millions of both living and past away witnesses.
Prosecutor Looking At Defendant Then Defense Attorney: Here is your one and only two choice deal.
One, defendant publicly hangs for treason; eternal damnation for defendant’s soul; and perpetual condemnation for defendant’s reputation; or
Two, defendant will be asked for any last words of contrition before he is publicly hanged for treason; the defendant can save his soul from eternal damnation and his reputation from perpetual condemnation by giving Americans names they can curse, despise, and hate more than his.
Prosecutor Looks at Defendant: Your choice traitor.
Defendant Starts To Speak:
Originally Published around 2002
"Prosecutor for Constitution"
Contemporary history tires this retired old farmer’s son turned
Texas drifter; chosen diversion is writing exercises of non
fiction future history. These lyrical visual prose short stories are
not fiction future history.
Prosecutor for Constitution: “play about United States Texas Senator’s trial for treason”
Author’s Disclaimer: Some write to teach while others write to entertain. Sometimes I write to teach by entertaining. Defendant’s name in Prosecutor For Constitution is John Bornyn. Whether others with similar sounding names are fools or traitors will be judged by future citizen historians.
Intro:
Truth is like bitter medicine for most Americans, and may be administered by sugarcoated entertainment in stories like Prosecutor for Constitution.
Marshall’s Law
Players:
Judge
Prosecutor
Defense Attorney
Defendant
Heavenly Angel Number Five
George Washington
Abraham Lincoln
Contents Note: Reference Documents verify Library Of Congress
Set: Spiritual Court Room
Judge Gabriel (to prosecutor): Why am I not surprised to see that defense attorney from TEXAS ON TRIAL is now working as a prosecutor for United States Constitution.
Prosecutor: Not wishing to waste time in convicting defendant of treason, the prosecution agrees to skip opening remarks and go straight to the evidence.
Prosecutor: Evidence that will prove that the defendant conspired and acted to replace America’s constitutional republic nation state with an internationalist moneylender oligarchy. Oligarchy is defined as a government in which a few exercises control for corrupt and selfish purposes. If the defendant’s treason prevails:
America the nation would cease to exist when national boundaries were replaced with something called the continental perimeter.
America’s Constitution would be replaced with something called North American Cooperative Security Act.
America’s executive, legislative and judicial institutions would become slaves to something called North American Parliamentary Group.
The United States of America would be renamed North American Community.
Prosecutor Continues: I would like to introduce and read a public document citing defendant U.S. Texas Senator John Bornyn’s own words. Prosecution Exhibit Number One, a public document.
Prosecutor walks over and stands behind defendant, and begins to read: North American Investment Act.
Defense Attorney: Objection, to prosecutor reading Exhibit One while standing behind my client.
Prosecutor: moving would only suggest that the defendant was ashamed of his words and guilty of treason, an action on my part that might prejudice the jury and deprive the defendant of due process.
Judge: Mr. Prosecutor, this court respects sincerity and holds cleverness in contempt. Proceed with caution.
Prosecutor: I will begin again.
North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate)
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2941
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 7, 2004
Mr. BORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
A BILL
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `North American Investment Fund Act'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR A NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENT FUND.
The President is authorized to negotiate with the Governments of Canada and Mexico to create a North American Investment Fund, as described in this Act (hereinafter referred to as the `Fund'), by--
SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of the Fund shall be--
(1) to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States;
(2) to promote education and economic development in Mexico; and
(3) to reduce the wealth gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States.
SEC. 4. PROJECTS FUNDED.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Fund shall make grants for projects to carry out the purposes described in section 3, including projects--
(1) to construct roads in Mexico to facilitate trade
SEC. 5. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.
(a) IN GENERAL- The terms of the agreement establishing the Fund shall, subject to the limitation in subsection (b), require the Governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States to contribute to the Fund.
Prosecutor: Article III Section3 of the Unites States Constitution declares: Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted or treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or on confession in open court.
Prosecutor continues: The defendant’s twice reading of the proposed law in public complies with the stipulation of “testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act”.
Before the defense attorney objects, I could subpoena every person on this planet who has seen or heard a tape of the defendant’s words.
Defense Attorney: No objection, defense agrees to the stipulation.
Prosecutor: I would now like to introduce and read excerpts from a public document containing testimony supporting the defendant’s treasonous efforts the defense has stipulated fulfills Constitutional standards for treason.
Judge Interrupts: The stipulation was to allow the twice readings to be witnesses not specific charges.
Prosecutor: You are correct Judge. The defendant’s words are witnesses to the specific act of attempting to replace the United States of America with a new political system known as “North American Community”.
(Prosecutor starts to read.): Prosecutor’s Exhibit Number Two: A public document.
American Community Approach to Security
June 9, 2005
(Edited) Testimony before a hearing of the Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. By vice President
and director of the Center for North American Studies.
As we approach the fourth anniversary of 9/11, it is time for us to step back from our trauma and the border and examine the problem in a broader context. The best way to assure security is not at our borders with Canada and Mexico and not by defining “security” in conventional and narrow terms. We need to think about these issues in the context of a continent that is integrating economically and socially at a rapid rate
What we need to do now is forge a North American Community, based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems.
In my statement, I will comment first on the emergence of North America, the next decade’s agenda, and the response by the three governments. Next, I will describe some of the recommendations of the Council Task Force Report and focus on the travel initiative and the security and border issues.
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian inter-parliamentary groups into a single “North American Parliamentary Group.” A third institution should be a “Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment.” A permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.
North American governments can learn from the EU’s efforts to establish EU Educational and Research Centers in the United States. Centers for North American Studies in the United States, Canada, and Mexico would help people in all three countries to understand the problems and the potential of an integrated North America— and to think of themselves as North Americans. Scholarships should encourage North American students to study in each other’s country. Until a new consciousness of North America’s promise takes root, many of these proposals will remain impractical.
Perimeter: Instead of creating new obstacles at the border, we should find ways to ease traffic and harmonize safety and transportation obtain a Border Pass, which would be accepted at all border points within North America as a complement to passports.
The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation’s leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision.
I hope this Committee will pursue the North American agenda beyond the travel initiative considered here. These should be reviewed together with Senator Richard Lugar’s far-sighted bill for a “North American Cooperative Security Act” and Senator Bornyn’s “North American Investment Fund.” The time has come for us to define a true North American Community. (end of document)
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution’s first witness is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Is there any entity or person who can confirm your identity?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: The Judge.
Judge: This is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Did the defendant take an oath to God and or make a spiritual contract with God to “uphold, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes.
Prosecutor: Is the spirit of the defendant’s oath and or contract consistent with the United States Constitution and Prosecution for Constitution Exhibit Number One?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: No.
Prosecutor: Is the defendant in violation of his oath with God and or has the defendant broken his contract with God.
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes
Prosecutor: Based on your spiritual experiences, are individuals who violate oaths or break contracts with God more likely or less likely to engage in treason against their country, their republic, and their republic’s constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: More Likely
Prosecutor: No more questions.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of one of Heaven’s Angels. I’m here to try and save your soul, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the U.S. Constitution calls George Washington as the next witness.
Prosecutor: Are you the George Washington who had occasion to be Commander and Chief of America’s Revolutionary forces who won America’s Independence from England, and are you the same George Washington who had occasion to serve as America’s first President?
George Washington: Yes to both questions.
Prosecutor: Mr. President, did you make the following statements in your Farwell Address. The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.
Did you also state in your Farwell Address: It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. There can be no greater error than to calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.
George Washington: Yes to both.
Prosecutor to George Washington: Based on your knowledge of original intent of the United Sates Constitution, and your many earthly experiences with international tyrants; would you testify under oath before God himself that Prosecution for Constitution Exhibits One and Two represents words, actions, and associations of a patriot or traitor.
George Washington: Traitor. Traitor.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of George Washington. I’m here to try and save your life, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution calls President Abraham Lincoln to the stand.
Prosecutor: President Lincoln, did you have occasion to serve the United States of America during the 1860’s?
President Lincoln: Yes.
Prosecutor: How many Americans died in your service during your administration trying to uphold, protect and defend America’s Constitution?
President Lincoln: Including civilian casualties, one million plus one.
Prosecutor: That’s right you also died in service of your sacred oath to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. How does it make you feel when you see elected officials who took the same oath as you died for, creating and supporting documents like Prosecution for the Constitution Exhibits One and Two?
President Lincoln: Breaks my heart to think that all the suffering and sacrifices during our nation’s Civil War, a war between brothers and neighbors was in vain.
Prosecutor: Mr. Lincoln would you consider the defendant’s words and actions to be helpful or harmful to the Constitution you served through death?
President Lincoln: Beyond harmful.
Defense Attorney: Judge, how many more past away witnesses does the Prosecutor intend to call?
Prosecutor: I am prepared to call every past away soul who died defending America’s Constitution. Probably over four million, as for the exact total, your Honor would know that better than me.
Continuing: As for the lying, probably over fifty million who have suffered because of the defendant’s treasonous policies; again, your Honor would better know the exact number better than me.
Judge To Prosecutor: I warned you about being clever.
Prosecutor: With all due respect your honor, my commitment to total due process for the Constitution is about sincerity not being clever.
Judge: Perhaps the Prosecutor and Defense Attorney can reach an agreement that does not involve calling millions and millions of both living and past away witnesses.
Prosecutor Looking At Defendant Then Defense Attorney: Here is your one and only two choice deal.
One, defendant publicly hangs for treason; eternal damnation for defendant’s soul; and perpetual condemnation for defendant’s reputation; or
Two, defendant will be asked for any last words of contrition before he is publicly hanged for treason; the defendant can save his soul from eternal damnation and his reputation from perpetual condemnation by giving Americans names they can curse, despise, and hate more than his.
Prosecutor Looks at Defendant: Your choice traitor.
Defendant Starts To Speak:
Monday, September 23, 2013
Continue Plus 583
Texas Drifter: New Pop Culture Relationship Standards?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Trending for children of liberals, migration to conservative relationship standards. If this observation is accurate, could current pop culture generation modernize traditional conservative courtship values?
Assignment question alert: what does “O3P” stand for?
Following ideas reflect fading of lines between modern conservative relationships and more traditional courtships.
Re-polished mutual relationship standards
1. Do not lie to me
2. Do not steal from me
3. Do not cheat on me
4. Keep our secrets secret
5. No physical or mental abuse
Male starting values (from male perspective)
1. Make legal money to keep partner and or children fed
2. Make legal money for bed to keep partner and children out of bad weather
3. Accept reality of physical needs – do not facilitate wandering “lust” ideas
4. Remember “little things” and making partner smile “can be good medicine for hard times”
5. Never forget, hard part not getting along having sex; harder part getting along when not having sex
Female starting values (from male perspective better perspective might be female perspective)
1. Old adage: male does not beg and woman does not whine
2. Non-abusive loyalty is a virtue
3. Always live in domestic environment where “door un-locks from inside”; which means either person in relationship is always free to leave
4. Female companions are not pets, property, or slaves rather partners and friends
Compare above new pop culture mutual standards to contemporary liberal pop culture standards.
1. Relationships based on “promises in the dark”
2. Sharing is not virtue when one partner’s interests’ always comes first and second partner is always left with leftovers
3. Loyalty is limited to stay as long as you can continue to make me happy, or as long as I want which ever comes first
4. One partner’s personal vanities dominate partnership power structure which facilitates domesticated rape
5. Dominating partner is “smarter” and always knows what is best; like values exhibited by Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama, and Obama Republicans (RINOs)
Accept reality that even new pop culture relationships come with each side’s baggage.
1. Bad habits from “do it if it feels good for self” liberal values. Example it is ok to degrade and abuse your partner as strumpet if doing so make you feel powerful
2. Abusing recreational drugs
3. Shopping addict fixes on credit binges
4. Abusive jealously
5. Physical and or mental abuse to “get even” or teach partner a lesson
6. Annoying interfering nuisance in laws, relatives, best friends
7. Sneaking around to violate mutual standards
8. Excessive debts like student loans; heard two young pop culture friends talking about one of their new potential partners: One said I could love her; not sure if I want to start my family off with one-hundred fifty thousand dollar debt to Obama. Foolish debts probably destroy more relationships than outside sexual affairs.
9. Reader can list other baggage that can be brought to new relationships.
Some vanity type Obama personalities to avoid by partner on either side:
1. Professional subsidy addicts lack initiative to be self sufficient
2. World owes me hate merchants can never be made happy and always try to make those around them miserable
3. Recreation drug abusers
4. Those who “lose control”; and are always sorry they hurt you for the umpteenth time; and promise to never hurt you again
5. Spoiled “two year olds” in adult bodies
6. Chronic liars are not likely to be re-habilitated
Results of Obama above personality types can be illustrated by promises, misrepresentations, lies, frauds and other abuses perpetuated by Obama. Some suggest that Obama Care might result in future historians, referring to Obama as: Obama Peeper Pervert Pres.
Why, many examples, consider just one example. Americans participating in Obama Care will be required by law to inform their physician or health care worker while seeking treatment for any medical service, eventually names of every person and how often they are having sex. Failure to provide this information can result in possible fines and incarceration time.
Worse still, bounties are allegedly currently being offered for soft ware programs to hack into your government medical records of not only who, but also how many times you two are having sex. Soon not only you and your partner or partners; but every peeper pervert with access to internet on planet earth will know:
1. who
2. how many who’s
3. how many times doing
4. when doing
5. how doing; plus
6. what you are doing and maybe even to what
Can reader say thank you our master caretaker Obama Peeper Perv. Pres.?
What would reader like to wager that Obama Care will create a “cash black market” for what used to be known as right to privacy healthcare?
On the slightly more humorous side, next time a stranger passes you and smiles; ask yourself has that stranger accessed my government health care records and do they know not only who but what I am doing behind closed doors?
Perhaps this Texas Drifter writing exercise re-affirms that contemporary liberal pop culture relationships mostly end up as profiles for Halloween stories? TRUE not FALSE (free answer)
Reader can reference other Texas Drifter Halloween Stories like:
1. Texas Drifter's Halloween Love Story II: Good Night Kiss | All Right ... www.allrightmagazine.com/.../ Sep 18, 2012 - Marshall's Law Dateline – Reading instructions, best read as written alone in dark with flashlight. Halloween Love Story II: Goodnight Kiss
2. Texas Drifter's Halloween Love Story | All Right Magazine www.allrightmagazine.com/.../texas-drifters-halloween-love-story-5415/ Published By: Texas Drifter on October 20, 2010.
Perhaps scariest of all Halloween stories has yet to be written by unknown author: “Obama Peeper Perv. Pres. – He’s Peeping You” TRUE or FALSE
Assignment question: “Shacking up” for convenience is lust which is different than taking an oath to Heaven “for better or worse – good times and bad”. TRUE or FALSE
Clue: Reader might be asking what about love? Many mistake lust for love. Sometimes reader needs to honestly decide, are their personal motives love or lust; before judging their potential partner’s motives.
Bonus question with free answer: Future historians will record that “me first world owes me” make lust not love liberal relationship standards starts and ends between liberals’ legs.
The decline of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic only ended when America’s pop culture turned their backs on pop culture decadents and merchants of hate like “O3P” and others like him.
Why the change. New pop culture relationship standards like love, honor, respect, loyalty, and door un-locks from inside. Reader can improve list. TRUE not FALSE
(Another free answer)
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Trending for children of liberals, migration to conservative relationship standards. If this observation is accurate, could current pop culture generation modernize traditional conservative courtship values?
Assignment question alert: what does “O3P” stand for?
Following ideas reflect fading of lines between modern conservative relationships and more traditional courtships.
Re-polished mutual relationship standards
1. Do not lie to me
2. Do not steal from me
3. Do not cheat on me
4. Keep our secrets secret
5. No physical or mental abuse
Male starting values (from male perspective)
1. Make legal money to keep partner and or children fed
2. Make legal money for bed to keep partner and children out of bad weather
3. Accept reality of physical needs – do not facilitate wandering “lust” ideas
4. Remember “little things” and making partner smile “can be good medicine for hard times”
5. Never forget, hard part not getting along having sex; harder part getting along when not having sex
Female starting values (from male perspective better perspective might be female perspective)
1. Old adage: male does not beg and woman does not whine
2. Non-abusive loyalty is a virtue
3. Always live in domestic environment where “door un-locks from inside”; which means either person in relationship is always free to leave
4. Female companions are not pets, property, or slaves rather partners and friends
Compare above new pop culture mutual standards to contemporary liberal pop culture standards.
1. Relationships based on “promises in the dark”
2. Sharing is not virtue when one partner’s interests’ always comes first and second partner is always left with leftovers
3. Loyalty is limited to stay as long as you can continue to make me happy, or as long as I want which ever comes first
4. One partner’s personal vanities dominate partnership power structure which facilitates domesticated rape
5. Dominating partner is “smarter” and always knows what is best; like values exhibited by Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats like Obama, and Obama Republicans (RINOs)
Accept reality that even new pop culture relationships come with each side’s baggage.
1. Bad habits from “do it if it feels good for self” liberal values. Example it is ok to degrade and abuse your partner as strumpet if doing so make you feel powerful
2. Abusing recreational drugs
3. Shopping addict fixes on credit binges
4. Abusive jealously
5. Physical and or mental abuse to “get even” or teach partner a lesson
6. Annoying interfering nuisance in laws, relatives, best friends
7. Sneaking around to violate mutual standards
8. Excessive debts like student loans; heard two young pop culture friends talking about one of their new potential partners: One said I could love her; not sure if I want to start my family off with one-hundred fifty thousand dollar debt to Obama. Foolish debts probably destroy more relationships than outside sexual affairs.
9. Reader can list other baggage that can be brought to new relationships.
Some vanity type Obama personalities to avoid by partner on either side:
1. Professional subsidy addicts lack initiative to be self sufficient
2. World owes me hate merchants can never be made happy and always try to make those around them miserable
3. Recreation drug abusers
4. Those who “lose control”; and are always sorry they hurt you for the umpteenth time; and promise to never hurt you again
5. Spoiled “two year olds” in adult bodies
6. Chronic liars are not likely to be re-habilitated
Results of Obama above personality types can be illustrated by promises, misrepresentations, lies, frauds and other abuses perpetuated by Obama. Some suggest that Obama Care might result in future historians, referring to Obama as: Obama Peeper Pervert Pres.
Why, many examples, consider just one example. Americans participating in Obama Care will be required by law to inform their physician or health care worker while seeking treatment for any medical service, eventually names of every person and how often they are having sex. Failure to provide this information can result in possible fines and incarceration time.
Worse still, bounties are allegedly currently being offered for soft ware programs to hack into your government medical records of not only who, but also how many times you two are having sex. Soon not only you and your partner or partners; but every peeper pervert with access to internet on planet earth will know:
1. who
2. how many who’s
3. how many times doing
4. when doing
5. how doing; plus
6. what you are doing and maybe even to what
Can reader say thank you our master caretaker Obama Peeper Perv. Pres.?
What would reader like to wager that Obama Care will create a “cash black market” for what used to be known as right to privacy healthcare?
On the slightly more humorous side, next time a stranger passes you and smiles; ask yourself has that stranger accessed my government health care records and do they know not only who but what I am doing behind closed doors?
Perhaps this Texas Drifter writing exercise re-affirms that contemporary liberal pop culture relationships mostly end up as profiles for Halloween stories? TRUE not FALSE (free answer)
Reader can reference other Texas Drifter Halloween Stories like:
1. Texas Drifter's Halloween Love Story II: Good Night Kiss | All Right ... www.allrightmagazine.com/.../ Sep 18, 2012 - Marshall's Law Dateline – Reading instructions, best read as written alone in dark with flashlight. Halloween Love Story II: Goodnight Kiss
2. Texas Drifter's Halloween Love Story | All Right Magazine www.allrightmagazine.com/.../texas-drifters-halloween-love-story-5415/ Published By: Texas Drifter on October 20, 2010.
Perhaps scariest of all Halloween stories has yet to be written by unknown author: “Obama Peeper Perv. Pres. – He’s Peeping You” TRUE or FALSE
Assignment question: “Shacking up” for convenience is lust which is different than taking an oath to Heaven “for better or worse – good times and bad”. TRUE or FALSE
Clue: Reader might be asking what about love? Many mistake lust for love. Sometimes reader needs to honestly decide, are their personal motives love or lust; before judging their potential partner’s motives.
Bonus question with free answer: Future historians will record that “me first world owes me” make lust not love liberal relationship standards starts and ends between liberals’ legs.
The decline of Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process ethical capitalist republic only ended when America’s pop culture turned their backs on pop culture decadents and merchants of hate like “O3P” and others like him.
Why the change. New pop culture relationship standards like love, honor, respect, loyalty, and door un-locks from inside. Reader can improve list. TRUE not FALSE
(Another free answer)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)