Texas Drifter: Ironies Of Obama’s Hatreds
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Old adage suggest that irony of hate is becoming what one hates. Ironies of Obama hatreds are that his hate for fools, racists, and imperialists is that Obama has evolved into what Obama hates.
This writing exercise also asks do you know any anti-American fools, racists, and or imperialists like Obama.
Definitions:
1. Anti - opposing or hostile in opinion, sympathy, or in practice
2. America – Heaven’s favorite constitutional due process republic
3. Imperialist – policy, practice, or advocacy by one to extend by physical power and dominion of a nation by direct territorial acquisition, or by gaining indirect control over political or economic life of other areas to serve imperial
4. Imperial – relating to benefitting an emperor or empire
5. Texas Drifter is guessing that reader already knows definitions of fool and racists
Examples of imperialists:
1. Obama and his allies - hate motivated Marxist-fascist anti-America policies and practices
2. Obama Republicans (RINOs) - greed motivated corporate fascist anti-American traditions, values, principles, policies and practices
3. Islamic-fascists - hate motivated theology terrorists
4. Republican Hippies by relying on only talk to get bad guys to make nice; perhaps reader can identify their motives
5. Others reader can list
Three examples of how imperialists compromise America’s national security with violence or corrupt policies:
1. Obama’s alliances with and help for Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya, and seemingly now in Syria (reader can list other examples);
2. Obama Republicans (RINOs) exporting American “values” and “cutting edge” technology to China at expense of America’s national security in return for billions in profits for corporate fascists; plus efforts to “rebuild Iraq” after unnecessary war in return of billions in profits for corporate fascists (reader can list other examples like myth of free trade);
3. Islamic-fascist terrorists’ attacks all across world;
4. Again, reader can list more examples.
Some bad guy players serving anti-America imperialists in America: Executive Branch; most members of House and Senate; most members of federal court system; most public sector bureaucracies; most public sector unions; non-indigent professional public subsidy addicts; mainstream news media; liberal celebrities; illegal immigrants; breeders (those too stupid to do anything other than produce welfare offspring); race/ethnic/gender hate merchants who believe world owes them because they are perpetual victims.
Reader assignment: list any American traditions, values, and principles which are consistent with above imperialist policies and practices.
Bonus question one: as for question expressed in title: “Ironies Of Obama’s Hatreds”. Obama’s answer may fool others; Obama’s answer may even fool himself; since judgment day is personal not even Obama is good enough liar to con his way to paradise then. TRUE or FALSE
Bonus question two: Closing concept thought for reader, Texas Drifter has recently been re-visiting commonly ignored issue: Have bad guys expanded imperialism to include “domestic imperialism” with objectives to establish “ideological nations without territorial boundaries”?
Seems Obama’s Marxist-fascists, Obama Republicans (RINOs), Islamic-Fascists, and all their allies serve under one America last umbrella or “big tent” Republicans like to promote. What might be good name for all these both foreign and domestic anti-America imperialists? Perhaps word reader has heard before might be appropriate; could that word be internationalists? Just something to consider.
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Continue Plus 576
Texas Drifter: Obama Lynching Rule Of Law?
Marshall Law Dateline – Evolution of “rule of law” seems a concept forgotten by governments. When governments ignore rule of law and engage in mob rule; societies become lawless environments.
Physical laws as well as other laws, exist regardless how described by science based on deduction and naturalist laws based on induction.
Definition of deduction is reasoning inference in which conclusion follows necessarily from premises.
Definition if induction is reasoning inference in which conclusion follows necessarily from a part to a whole.
Both processes can have deficiencies. Examples
1. Deduction (premises): Some priests molest boys; all priests are males; all males molest boys.
2. Induction (from part to whole): some Blacks are racists, all Blacks are racists.
Reader should never forget that some reasoning produces inaccurate conclusions.
Natural rules include but are not limited too: self defense (flight or fight); acquire food; protect territory; protect family (pack or herd).
Spiritual rules started with Ten Commandments due to incident at Garden of Eden. These rules were followed by King’s law and eventually “common law”.
What then followed were inalienable rights inspired by spiritual inspiration. Some examples include:
1. Act of Abjuration 1581; specifically: The States General of the United Provinces of the Low Countries Act of Abjuration (Plakkaat van Verlatinghe 1581 July 26). Definition of abjuration: to revoke oath, vow, or promise. More about America’s lost second tradition ... The Act of Abjuration of 1581 which was very well known with many drafts floating among America’s drafters of Declaration of Independence. Act of Abjuration was created to inform king of Spain that he had forfeited sovereignty and right to govern affected provinces by his persistent tyranny. This document was first nail in ideological concept for “divine rights of earthly kings”.
2. Declaration of Independence which defined inalienable rights.
3. U.S. Constitution which defined political process for governments in America.
4. Bill of Rights which further defined specific inalienable political rights and rules for government in America.
5. Republic of Texas 1836 Constitution’s Declaration of Rights: (excerpts)
This Declaration of Rights is declared to be a part of this Constitution, and shall never be violated on any pretence whatever. And in order to guard against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that every thing in this bill of rights contained, and every other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the People.
Fourteenth. Every citizen shall have the right to bear arms in defence of himself and the Republic. The military shall at all times and in all cases be subordinate to the civil power.
Fifteenth. The sure and certain defence of a free people is a well-regulated militia; and it shall be the duty of the Legislature to enact such laws as may be necessary to the organizing of the militia of this Republic.
The foregoing Constitution was unanimously adopted by the Delegates of Texas, in Convention assembled, at the town of Washington, on the seventeenth day of March, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and thirty-six, and of the Independence of the Republic, the first year. (End excerpt)
Why this is important? If American citizens abandon principles of their Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights; because of either stupidity or cowardice; Texans will still have their Declaration of Rights to defend. That reader is just one old Texas drifter’s observation.
Natural rules, spiritual rules, spiritual inspired rules; next on list is constitutional due process rules often called legislation laws. When government enacts or enforces unconstitutional laws or policies the society is known to be existing under public sector mob rule which is no more acceptable than private sector mob rule.
Next level of social rules involves following natural observation: might may or may not make right, but always determines final outcome. Starting with Act of Abjuration 1581 and other spiritually inspired inalienable rights; solution might be Marshall’s Theory of Social Power represented as SP= Q1 + Q2 over T. (reader might reference Press Release: Marshall's Weapons Systems Posted by Marshall's Law Entry # 048)
Reader might be thinking why review “evolution” of rules also known as laws? Eternal peace will never exist for the living so long as there are evil among us even in U.S. Remember what seems to be natural order of things:
Back to few basic theories:
1. positive - negative
2. light - darkness
3. right - wrong
4. good - evil
Common theme from natural law, spiritual law, laws based on inalienable rights, and citizens common laws: citizens have right to repel force with force when other citizens engage in malice of forethought and or felonious intent to threaten bodily harm or murder; offended citizens can prudently secure their own self preservation with force.
Side reference, even though Texas Drifter is not an attorney, I have managed legal investigations for attorneys in multi-million dollar civil suits, and legal investigations in capital murder defense investigations. One of my principles was; it did not matter who I worked for or which side paid my wages and expenses. Why, results of my investigations would always provide same results.
Many times, justice is like sausage, one would not eat sausage; if they saw how sausage was made. Most people tend to like due process justice when it serves their interests, and dislike due process justice when their interests are not served. Same with attorneys: many people dislike “mean” attorneys; until they need an attorney, then they want the “meanest” lawyer they can afford.
Professional investigators always conduct non-prejudicial investigations to protect not only their reputations, but also sacred integrity of intelligence due process system. Governments like Obama’s, which are motivated by lust for power; prejudices; revenge; greed; and or ignorance; will not only threaten national security but also domestic tranquility. How so, by their, corrupting all due process intelligence and justice systems.
Back to title observation question “Obama Lynching Rule of Law?” Obama being a chronic liar is Obama’s own worst enemy. How is anyone expected to believe any chronic liar, even when they rarely do speak truth?
As for Obama’s proclamations about Syria gassing innocent civilians; only existing fact is innocents died for exposure to lethal gas, by whom; only impartial investigation may or may not ever determine truth. Obama evolves from long line of lying Democrat Presidents. Reader recall, Gulf of Tonkin August 1964? How many beloved Americans eventually died or were maimed from that Democrat President blatant lie?
Speaking only for Texas Drifter: putting any American in harms way; based on Obama’s lies for Obama’s pride; and or to feed Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham’s media seeking propaganda: violates every natural, constitutional, civil, and spiritual law ever recorded. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall Law Dateline – Evolution of “rule of law” seems a concept forgotten by governments. When governments ignore rule of law and engage in mob rule; societies become lawless environments.
Physical laws as well as other laws, exist regardless how described by science based on deduction and naturalist laws based on induction.
Definition of deduction is reasoning inference in which conclusion follows necessarily from premises.
Definition if induction is reasoning inference in which conclusion follows necessarily from a part to a whole.
Both processes can have deficiencies. Examples
1. Deduction (premises): Some priests molest boys; all priests are males; all males molest boys.
2. Induction (from part to whole): some Blacks are racists, all Blacks are racists.
Reader should never forget that some reasoning produces inaccurate conclusions.
Natural rules include but are not limited too: self defense (flight or fight); acquire food; protect territory; protect family (pack or herd).
Spiritual rules started with Ten Commandments due to incident at Garden of Eden. These rules were followed by King’s law and eventually “common law”.
What then followed were inalienable rights inspired by spiritual inspiration. Some examples include:
1. Act of Abjuration 1581; specifically: The States General of the United Provinces of the Low Countries Act of Abjuration (Plakkaat van Verlatinghe 1581 July 26). Definition of abjuration: to revoke oath, vow, or promise. More about America’s lost second tradition ... The Act of Abjuration of 1581 which was very well known with many drafts floating among America’s drafters of Declaration of Independence. Act of Abjuration was created to inform king of Spain that he had forfeited sovereignty and right to govern affected provinces by his persistent tyranny. This document was first nail in ideological concept for “divine rights of earthly kings”.
2. Declaration of Independence which defined inalienable rights.
3. U.S. Constitution which defined political process for governments in America.
4. Bill of Rights which further defined specific inalienable political rights and rules for government in America.
5. Republic of Texas 1836 Constitution’s Declaration of Rights: (excerpts)
This Declaration of Rights is declared to be a part of this Constitution, and shall never be violated on any pretence whatever. And in order to guard against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that every thing in this bill of rights contained, and every other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the People.
Fourteenth. Every citizen shall have the right to bear arms in defence of himself and the Republic. The military shall at all times and in all cases be subordinate to the civil power.
Fifteenth. The sure and certain defence of a free people is a well-regulated militia; and it shall be the duty of the Legislature to enact such laws as may be necessary to the organizing of the militia of this Republic.
The foregoing Constitution was unanimously adopted by the Delegates of Texas, in Convention assembled, at the town of Washington, on the seventeenth day of March, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and thirty-six, and of the Independence of the Republic, the first year. (End excerpt)
Why this is important? If American citizens abandon principles of their Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights; because of either stupidity or cowardice; Texans will still have their Declaration of Rights to defend. That reader is just one old Texas drifter’s observation.
Natural rules, spiritual rules, spiritual inspired rules; next on list is constitutional due process rules often called legislation laws. When government enacts or enforces unconstitutional laws or policies the society is known to be existing under public sector mob rule which is no more acceptable than private sector mob rule.
Next level of social rules involves following natural observation: might may or may not make right, but always determines final outcome. Starting with Act of Abjuration 1581 and other spiritually inspired inalienable rights; solution might be Marshall’s Theory of Social Power represented as SP= Q1 + Q2 over T. (reader might reference Press Release: Marshall's Weapons Systems Posted by Marshall's Law Entry # 048)
Reader might be thinking why review “evolution” of rules also known as laws? Eternal peace will never exist for the living so long as there are evil among us even in U.S. Remember what seems to be natural order of things:
Back to few basic theories:
1. positive - negative
2. light - darkness
3. right - wrong
4. good - evil
Common theme from natural law, spiritual law, laws based on inalienable rights, and citizens common laws: citizens have right to repel force with force when other citizens engage in malice of forethought and or felonious intent to threaten bodily harm or murder; offended citizens can prudently secure their own self preservation with force.
Side reference, even though Texas Drifter is not an attorney, I have managed legal investigations for attorneys in multi-million dollar civil suits, and legal investigations in capital murder defense investigations. One of my principles was; it did not matter who I worked for or which side paid my wages and expenses. Why, results of my investigations would always provide same results.
Many times, justice is like sausage, one would not eat sausage; if they saw how sausage was made. Most people tend to like due process justice when it serves their interests, and dislike due process justice when their interests are not served. Same with attorneys: many people dislike “mean” attorneys; until they need an attorney, then they want the “meanest” lawyer they can afford.
Professional investigators always conduct non-prejudicial investigations to protect not only their reputations, but also sacred integrity of intelligence due process system. Governments like Obama’s, which are motivated by lust for power; prejudices; revenge; greed; and or ignorance; will not only threaten national security but also domestic tranquility. How so, by their, corrupting all due process intelligence and justice systems.
Back to title observation question “Obama Lynching Rule of Law?” Obama being a chronic liar is Obama’s own worst enemy. How is anyone expected to believe any chronic liar, even when they rarely do speak truth?
As for Obama’s proclamations about Syria gassing innocent civilians; only existing fact is innocents died for exposure to lethal gas, by whom; only impartial investigation may or may not ever determine truth. Obama evolves from long line of lying Democrat Presidents. Reader recall, Gulf of Tonkin August 1964? How many beloved Americans eventually died or were maimed from that Democrat President blatant lie?
Speaking only for Texas Drifter: putting any American in harms way; based on Obama’s lies for Obama’s pride; and or to feed Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham’s media seeking propaganda: violates every natural, constitutional, civil, and spiritual law ever recorded. TRUE or FALSE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)