Texas Drifter: Letter To Rubio About Amnesty Compromise
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Political reality in contemporary America: Obama, RINOs, their allies and collaborators do not compromise with their “enemies”. Poliopathic bad guys treatment of their enemies is to enslave, destroy, or eliminate with post natal abortions.
Reader needs to have courage to accept that above bad guys’ enemies includes all those individuals believing or serving America’s traditions, values, principles, and defining documents.
Again re-stating obvious, America’s First Bill of Right allows U.S. citizens to try and disprove or re-affirm this Texas Drifter writing exercise. Read on reader.
Reader needs to distinguish between “compromise among” and “compromise with”.
Three related definitions
1. Compromise has two equal first meanings: mutual concessions and shameful concessions
2. “Among” refers to mutual concessions within company or associations
3. “With” refers to shameful concessions with opposition
Translation:
1. Conservatives compromising with conservatives result in mutual concessions;
2. Conservatives compromising with those in opposition to conservative principles are shameful or dishonorable concessions.
Real world compromise scenarios:
1. Texas Drifter a Southern Conservative, might be able to compromise with Yankee Conservatives some who are celebrity talk show hosts. Point being both are conservatives.
2. Texas Drifter could never compromise with a Boehner or J. McCain because they are political strumpet collaborators.
3. Senator Rubio should not compromise with Democrats on amnesty for illegal immigrants because Progressive Liberals are Marxist-fascist soul less creatures serving Satan itself. Some observations reflect political reality not hyperbole.
Texas Drifter could add more and even more words to this writing exercise, though if reader does not grasp differences between compromising among and compromising with; less than four hundred words into this writing exercise. Would more words really make a difference?
Reader’s assignment: list five real world acceptable political compromises among; and five shameful or dishonorable compromises with. Clue: acceptable compromises among conservatives, and dishonorable compromises by conservatives with enemies.
Three historical examples involving conservatives compromising or not compromising: President Jefferson and President Adams; Ben Franklin not compromising with his son; and Colonel Travis and Colonel Bowie of Alamo fame.
Texas Drifter can attest to truism that two unpleasant conditions about getting old, first one not remembering where something worth remembering was heard or read. Second getting confused about things heard or read, example getting confused about following words:
1. Forgiving virtuous conservatives who learn from their mistakes is virtuous behavior;
2. Being old enough to be ones grandfather, does not mean one is not rich enough to be one’s husband.
Texas Drifter is confused about which above adage was supposed to be tag for this writing exercise; my problem is my problem, not reader’s problem. Enjoy your life it is only one you have.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Continue Plus 518
Texas Drifter: Is Senator Rubio’s Amnesty Bribery?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Word meanings can be changed or cheapened by over use or misuse. Some words cheapened by over use include: friend, love, patriotism or phrases like “great American”. One word changed by misuse is amnesty.
Definition of amnesty – an act by government to forgive crimes of a large group of individuals; act of forgiveness does not include allowing those forgiven to benefit or profit from their crimes.
Definition of bribery is offering money or other incentives to persuade some individual or group to generally do something illegal like “selling their votes”.
Senator Rubio’s misuse of word amnesty seems synonymous with bribery. Rubio’s subtle implied offer to illegal immigrants, we will forgive your crimes, let you keep most of your ill-gotten gains, in return for your votes for Republicans.
Being more specific, crimes refer to following
1. violating America’s national security laws;
2. committing violent and property crimes which threaten domestic tranquility (illegals lead top five violent crimes categories in Texas);
3. committing fraud to obtain taxpayer public “welfare” subsidies;
4. threaten public health by introducing pandemics into America;
5. reader can add to list.
Silly question for Senator Rubio and other Republican bribery not amnesty for illegal immigrants; what about justice for American citizens, whose day to day jobs and investments which fuels America’s economy are victimized by illegal immigrants?
What about illegal immigrants effects on America’s ethical capitalist economic system? Reader can consider following cycle:
- U.S. workers through jobs and managed investments generate private assets;
- U.S. workers and investors have their private assets extorted by Marxist-fascist politicians and public employees;
- U.S. government re-distributes extorted private sector wealth to public subsidy addicts including illegals;
- Welfare recipients and others buy illegal drugs;
- Drug dealers profit;
- Money works way back to Mexican narco cartels;
- Narco cartels launder their money by investing in U.S.: 1) high dollar retail products, 2) buying citizenship for their families at 500K, 3) investing in American businesses and companies, 4) investing in American politicians, and 5) other ways;
- U.S. workers through jobs and managed investments generate private assets;
- Cycle starts over
Reader seeking more examples of damages by illegals to America’s: national security, domestic tranquility, economy, constitutional political system, families, and cultural traditions, values and principles need only review other Texas Drifter writing exercises at Marshall’s Law Townhall.
Winding down this writing exercise with fact, “really not amnesty rather bribery" truth ignored by defenders of comprehensive immigration legislation: illegals will not receive public subsidies.
Truth, illegals are only one federal district court judge, one liberal Appellate Court, and one vote from Justice “Judas” Roberts from receiving more taxpayer financed welfare benefits than they will have time to apply for. Senator Rubio, are you aware of “free” public education benefits available to illegal immigrants?
Destroying another myth with truth: Aztecs unlike Mayans and Incas were not “great builders”; Aztecs were great cultural thieves from earlier Mexican tribes. Only thing Aztecs were truly great at was building history’s largest culture based on cannibalism.
Closing assignment question: only fools, drug addicts, and politicians advocate solutions to problems before defining specific problem in realistic terms. Conservatives should not talk to any politicians about really not amnesty rather bribery for illegal immigrants until; reviewing independently verifiable numbers of illegals currently on American soil. There is big different between bribery supporters’ big lie number of eleven million, and more accurate thirty million number that is closer to truth. TRUE or FALSE
Question for Senator Rubio, does ignoring truth of actual number of illegal immigrants on U.S. soil make truth any less true? What is Texas Drifter asking? Answer, depends on what "is" really "is"; now this old man is confusing himself. Or is correct word his self?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Word meanings can be changed or cheapened by over use or misuse. Some words cheapened by over use include: friend, love, patriotism or phrases like “great American”. One word changed by misuse is amnesty.
Definition of amnesty – an act by government to forgive crimes of a large group of individuals; act of forgiveness does not include allowing those forgiven to benefit or profit from their crimes.
Definition of bribery is offering money or other incentives to persuade some individual or group to generally do something illegal like “selling their votes”.
Senator Rubio’s misuse of word amnesty seems synonymous with bribery. Rubio’s subtle implied offer to illegal immigrants, we will forgive your crimes, let you keep most of your ill-gotten gains, in return for your votes for Republicans.
Being more specific, crimes refer to following
1. violating America’s national security laws;
2. committing violent and property crimes which threaten domestic tranquility (illegals lead top five violent crimes categories in Texas);
3. committing fraud to obtain taxpayer public “welfare” subsidies;
4. threaten public health by introducing pandemics into America;
5. reader can add to list.
Silly question for Senator Rubio and other Republican bribery not amnesty for illegal immigrants; what about justice for American citizens, whose day to day jobs and investments which fuels America’s economy are victimized by illegal immigrants?
What about illegal immigrants effects on America’s ethical capitalist economic system? Reader can consider following cycle:
- U.S. workers through jobs and managed investments generate private assets;
- U.S. workers and investors have their private assets extorted by Marxist-fascist politicians and public employees;
- U.S. government re-distributes extorted private sector wealth to public subsidy addicts including illegals;
- Welfare recipients and others buy illegal drugs;
- Drug dealers profit;
- Money works way back to Mexican narco cartels;
- Narco cartels launder their money by investing in U.S.: 1) high dollar retail products, 2) buying citizenship for their families at 500K, 3) investing in American businesses and companies, 4) investing in American politicians, and 5) other ways;
- U.S. workers through jobs and managed investments generate private assets;
- Cycle starts over
Reader seeking more examples of damages by illegals to America’s: national security, domestic tranquility, economy, constitutional political system, families, and cultural traditions, values and principles need only review other Texas Drifter writing exercises at Marshall’s Law Townhall.
Winding down this writing exercise with fact, “really not amnesty rather bribery" truth ignored by defenders of comprehensive immigration legislation: illegals will not receive public subsidies.
Truth, illegals are only one federal district court judge, one liberal Appellate Court, and one vote from Justice “Judas” Roberts from receiving more taxpayer financed welfare benefits than they will have time to apply for. Senator Rubio, are you aware of “free” public education benefits available to illegal immigrants?
Destroying another myth with truth: Aztecs unlike Mayans and Incas were not “great builders”; Aztecs were great cultural thieves from earlier Mexican tribes. Only thing Aztecs were truly great at was building history’s largest culture based on cannibalism.
Closing assignment question: only fools, drug addicts, and politicians advocate solutions to problems before defining specific problem in realistic terms. Conservatives should not talk to any politicians about really not amnesty rather bribery for illegal immigrants until; reviewing independently verifiable numbers of illegals currently on American soil. There is big different between bribery supporters’ big lie number of eleven million, and more accurate thirty million number that is closer to truth. TRUE or FALSE
Question for Senator Rubio, does ignoring truth of actual number of illegal immigrants on U.S. soil make truth any less true? What is Texas Drifter asking? Answer, depends on what "is" really "is"; now this old man is confusing himself. Or is correct word his self?
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Continue Plus 517
Texas Drifter: Understanding Terrorism Basics
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Citizens who better understand how to profile terrorist attacks can better manage problem.
Definition of terrorism, strategy used to coerce or manipulate individual or community behavior using threats or violence.
Distinctions exist between terrorism and sabotage. Terrorism intends to generate human casualties and fatalities. Sabotage seeks to damage infrastructure with human casualties or fatalities being collateral damage.
One impending sabotage exception will be losses suffered when terrorists use weapons generating nuclear electro magnetic pluses. Perhaps most devastating terrorist weapon will be use of bio-weapons which cause pandemics.
Types of terrorists include foreign and domestic. Foreign terrorists include nations like Iran and North Korea; theological fascist organizations or groups like Islamic-fascists; and those motivated by ideological ethnic or race hatreds.
Domestic terrorists are divided into two distinct groups: private sector and public sector.
Private sector terrorists include individuals and groups. Individuals include “impulsive individuals” (like those massacring people at schools, malls, and movie theatres). Second group includes “compulsive individuals” like The Unabomber.
Early “foot prints” terrorists might leave include type of target, number of explosives, types of explosives. Right wing terrorist generally strike government buildings; while Middle East terrorists generally strike civilians with multiple exploding devices.
Private sector groups generally include citizens seeking revenge against what they perceive to be abusive governments. Some have even suggested that some of these group members could be suffering from what Texas Drifter has described as “battered citizen syndrome” which generates same conduct as battered spouse syndrome (issue for another writing exercise).
Second group of terrorists are generated by and for public sector. Such examples include: Ruby Ridge; Waco; extortion by IRS to allow excessive theft of private property by governments; theft of freedom by excessive government regulations; sabotage of cultural principles like destroying, the integrity of U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Another example is federal government allowing invasion of illegal immigrants into America which results in following criminal threat profile. Top six criminal threats in Texas alone are: Mexico drug cartels; Mexican drug cartel prison gangs in Texas prisons; illegal immigrant individuals committing property and violent crimes against Texas residents; trafficking sex crimes against women, and children; Mexico smugglers smuggling Middle East terrorists into U.S.; potential health epidemic introduced into America by illegal immigrants.
If reader has courage to confront “eye awakening” truth; take statistics from Texas DPS March 2013 report. Use report ratio multipled by fifteen to represent America’s other forty-seven states learn how many crimes are being committed by illegals against Americans. These numbers does not even represent frauds committed by illegals for stealing public sector subsidies they are not entitled to have.
Undeniable truth, greatest perpetrators of terrorism against American people involves Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats with help from RINO collaborators and all allies and collaborators providing aid and comfort to first two groups named.
Following excerpt entry # 029 with more general information from training manual used by Texas Drifter - Spy As a Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance. Reader can review for no fee reference Marshall’s Law Townhall Index.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, black mall, coup d’état and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d’état; and other methods.
III) Non-Participation …
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since the goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results. However, an “ambush” is the use of violence against players or collaborators. The ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as the threat of or use of non-offensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved.
The goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of the population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or 3) revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Lincoln only freeing slaves in South to create terrorists to attack Southern women, children, and old people, Sherman’s March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious corrupt prosecutions.
Reader should never forget that the odds are more than fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents. Two motives for civil servants to frame the bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which give governments additional power at the expense of constitutional liberties, and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
When it comes to domestic terrorism, domestic governments clearly have the motives; the resources; the opportunities; the mentality; and most important of all, access to the criminal justice system which facilitates framing likely suspects.
One technique for investigating arson cases is to look for items that were on the property before and after the fire started. One case the instructor worked produced the guilty party when it was determined that the suspect had removed a rare coin collection shortly before the fire started.
Another investigative technique is casualty analysis which is used to provide clues regarding prior knowledge and or selective evacuation. When the scenario involves terrorists bombing office buildings during regular office hours; if there are members of a specific agency who “just” happen to be out of the building when the attack occurs, questions should be asked.
One needs to understand that in many cases, civil servant loyalty is confined to the employing agency, and does not extend to other public sector employees. (End excerpt)
Assignment questions
First - five greatest terrorist threats to American citizens are “camouflaged” terrorists. List includes in order of threat risk. (Clue very, very, bottom of lists “right wing” anything)
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrat Politicians;
2. All illegal immigrant facilitators using amnesty as bait through their tolerated porous borders;
3. Aristocratic ruling elite fascists like RINOs;
4. Children over drugged by public education systems which contribute to creating domestic impulsive terrorists attacking schools, theatres, and malls;
5. Public sector employees and public subsidy addicts who are both willing to defend benefits provided by Marxist-fascist political system.
TRUE or FALSE
Second - first thing security consultants called “scouts” in past decades get paid to do, is to objectively assess threats and offer possible defenses if asked. Two things scouts never get paid to do is be client’s friend or babysitter. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Citizens who better understand how to profile terrorist attacks can better manage problem.
Definition of terrorism, strategy used to coerce or manipulate individual or community behavior using threats or violence.
Distinctions exist between terrorism and sabotage. Terrorism intends to generate human casualties and fatalities. Sabotage seeks to damage infrastructure with human casualties or fatalities being collateral damage.
One impending sabotage exception will be losses suffered when terrorists use weapons generating nuclear electro magnetic pluses. Perhaps most devastating terrorist weapon will be use of bio-weapons which cause pandemics.
Types of terrorists include foreign and domestic. Foreign terrorists include nations like Iran and North Korea; theological fascist organizations or groups like Islamic-fascists; and those motivated by ideological ethnic or race hatreds.
Domestic terrorists are divided into two distinct groups: private sector and public sector.
Private sector terrorists include individuals and groups. Individuals include “impulsive individuals” (like those massacring people at schools, malls, and movie theatres). Second group includes “compulsive individuals” like The Unabomber.
Early “foot prints” terrorists might leave include type of target, number of explosives, types of explosives. Right wing terrorist generally strike government buildings; while Middle East terrorists generally strike civilians with multiple exploding devices.
Private sector groups generally include citizens seeking revenge against what they perceive to be abusive governments. Some have even suggested that some of these group members could be suffering from what Texas Drifter has described as “battered citizen syndrome” which generates same conduct as battered spouse syndrome (issue for another writing exercise).
Second group of terrorists are generated by and for public sector. Such examples include: Ruby Ridge; Waco; extortion by IRS to allow excessive theft of private property by governments; theft of freedom by excessive government regulations; sabotage of cultural principles like destroying, the integrity of U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Another example is federal government allowing invasion of illegal immigrants into America which results in following criminal threat profile. Top six criminal threats in Texas alone are: Mexico drug cartels; Mexican drug cartel prison gangs in Texas prisons; illegal immigrant individuals committing property and violent crimes against Texas residents; trafficking sex crimes against women, and children; Mexico smugglers smuggling Middle East terrorists into U.S.; potential health epidemic introduced into America by illegal immigrants.
If reader has courage to confront “eye awakening” truth; take statistics from Texas DPS March 2013 report. Use report ratio multipled by fifteen to represent America’s other forty-seven states learn how many crimes are being committed by illegals against Americans. These numbers does not even represent frauds committed by illegals for stealing public sector subsidies they are not entitled to have.
Undeniable truth, greatest perpetrators of terrorism against American people involves Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats with help from RINO collaborators and all allies and collaborators providing aid and comfort to first two groups named.
Following excerpt entry # 029 with more general information from training manual used by Texas Drifter - Spy As a Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance. Reader can review for no fee reference Marshall’s Law Townhall Index.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, black mall, coup d’état and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d’état; and other methods.
III) Non-Participation …
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since the goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results. However, an “ambush” is the use of violence against players or collaborators. The ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as the threat of or use of non-offensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved.
The goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of the population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or 3) revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Lincoln only freeing slaves in South to create terrorists to attack Southern women, children, and old people, Sherman’s March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious corrupt prosecutions.
Reader should never forget that the odds are more than fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents. Two motives for civil servants to frame the bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which give governments additional power at the expense of constitutional liberties, and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
When it comes to domestic terrorism, domestic governments clearly have the motives; the resources; the opportunities; the mentality; and most important of all, access to the criminal justice system which facilitates framing likely suspects.
One technique for investigating arson cases is to look for items that were on the property before and after the fire started. One case the instructor worked produced the guilty party when it was determined that the suspect had removed a rare coin collection shortly before the fire started.
Another investigative technique is casualty analysis which is used to provide clues regarding prior knowledge and or selective evacuation. When the scenario involves terrorists bombing office buildings during regular office hours; if there are members of a specific agency who “just” happen to be out of the building when the attack occurs, questions should be asked.
One needs to understand that in many cases, civil servant loyalty is confined to the employing agency, and does not extend to other public sector employees. (End excerpt)
Assignment questions
First - five greatest terrorist threats to American citizens are “camouflaged” terrorists. List includes in order of threat risk. (Clue very, very, bottom of lists “right wing” anything)
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrat Politicians;
2. All illegal immigrant facilitators using amnesty as bait through their tolerated porous borders;
3. Aristocratic ruling elite fascists like RINOs;
4. Children over drugged by public education systems which contribute to creating domestic impulsive terrorists attacking schools, theatres, and malls;
5. Public sector employees and public subsidy addicts who are both willing to defend benefits provided by Marxist-fascist political system.
TRUE or FALSE
Second - first thing security consultants called “scouts” in past decades get paid to do, is to objectively assess threats and offer possible defenses if asked. Two things scouts never get paid to do is be client’s friend or babysitter. TRUE or FALSE
Monday, April 15, 2013
Continue Plus 516
Texas Drifter: RINOs Occupy America With Foreign Ideas
Breaking Marshall’s Law Dateline – “Open Letter Four Questions For Senator Rubio”
1. Why are you making promises to conservatives you can not keep about illegals not getting welfare benefits from your comprehensive amnesty legislation”?
2. Illegals are only one federal district court judge, one liberal Appellate Court, and one vote from Justice “Judas” Roberts from receiving more taxpayer financed welfare benefits than they will have time to apply for. Senator Rubio, are you aware of “free” public education benefits available to illegal immigrants?
3. Are American citizens murdered by illegals on U.S. soil any less dead than Americans murdered on U.S. soil by Islamic-fascist terrorists?
4. What is next for Republicans, offering amnesty for Islamic-fascist terrorists to try and get them to vote for Republican candidates? Republicans have been doing stranger things.
Senator, conservatives have been lied too by Democrats and RINOs for decades and decades. Seems you have two choices, stop making promises you cannot keep or learn to lie better from RINOs and Democrats. Your personal choice not mine, Texas Drifter.
Back to this writing exercise theme: “RINOs Occupy America with Foreign Ideas”.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Part II Are Rino Collaborators Traitors; some might be asking, how can domestic political regimes be foreign forces occupying America?
Starting with basics, definitions of both collaborate and amnesty:
1. Amnesty – an act by government to forgive crimes of a large group of individuals; amnesty does not include allowing group of criminals to benefit or profit from their crimes. Understand when amnesty is not amnesty - providing illegal immigrants with any temporary residency or path to citizenship is not amnesty; it is rewarding criminal conduct.
2. Collaborate: to co-operate or willingly assist an enemy of one’s country especially occupying force. Example of occupying force, Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats ruling America; example provided by Texas Drifter.
Reader is probably familiar with concept cultural wars. Cultures are defined by traditions, values, and principles which are all guided by culture’s core beliefs.
America’s unique culture was, until decline started about hundred years ago, used to be founded on core beliefs based on “individuals” sanctioned not state sanctioned Judeo-Christian traditions, values, principles which produced documents like Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Monroe Doctrine, Texas 1836 Constitution Declaration of Rights, Manifest Destiny, ethical capitalism, and other beliefs reader can cite. (Reader can reference Texas Declaration of Rights 1836 at Texas Drifter: Best Hyphenated Americans Are ... Marshall's Law Townhall Entry # 367)
Foreign invading ideas and their domestic occupiers include:
1. “Divine Rights of Kings” fascism advocated by RINOs and ruling Republican aristocrat ruling elites like Bush clan, Karl Rove and others reader can list;
2. Marxist fascism advocated by Obama, his allies, and most Democrats;
3. Islamic terrorist fascism advocated by reader knows who;
4. Illegal immigrant non-assimilation fascism also known as ethnic or racist fascism advocated by groups like La Raza, LULAC, and other hate groups reader can list.
Good guys’ heroes include America’s Founding fathers. Bay guys’ heroes include fascist English royalty supported by American Tories during America’s struggle for Independence (known as RINOs in contemporary times); Hitler, Marxist like Stalin, Mao, and Castro, who Obama and his Allies only wish they could emulate.
What has made America great, answer immigrants who came to America to assimilate into America’s culture to contribute to building a better America? Side note, minor detail liberals always forget; even America’s “native Americans” migrated into America early in North American history.
Immigrants who do not become good Americans are immigrants who avoid assimilating into America’s culture, and try to re-colonize America into nation they left. Good example, by some estimates as many as forty to fifty percent of illegal immigrants from Mexico do not want to become American citizens if it meant having to relinquish their Mexican citizenship.
It should be no surprise that these re-colonize America not become assimilated into American culture immigrants are going to support fascist doctrines like they left in their old homelands. Now reader knows why these anti-American immigrants will always vote for Marxist-fascists like Obama.
Republicans are so stupid believing that their supporting amnesty for illegals will cause them to vote for Republicans. Brutal truth most Mexican illegals claim to be Catholic; reality is the Pope could run as a Republican and Satan itself could run as Democrat and most illegals would still vote for Satan. Why reader asks, RINOs advocate wrong type of fascism – royalty fascism; while Democrats advocate Marxist fascism which is more appealing to Mexico’s illegal immigrants.
Preceding observation should be obvious, recall repetition is good teaching tool. Let me try Aristotle example one more time.
Words written over two thousand years ago by Aristotle are amazingly perceptive descriptions of contemporary Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and Republican aristocrat ruling elites. (Reference Marshall’s Law Townhall Entry # 024)
Pericles was denounced by Plato, Aristotle, and Plutarch who all agreed that Pericles’s policies “injured the Athenian character.” Pericles conduct was comparable to modern day Bush clan and Clinton and Obama’s conduct.
All failed to understand that there always have been, still are, and probably always will be four political groups: middle class, rich, poor, and bureaucrats. Bureaucrats tend to be amoral and enthusiastically commit crimes against any citizen/s for who ever is in power.
All ignored Aristotle’s teachings that the best states are those “wherein the middle classes are a more formidable part than either the rich or poor” {America's conservatives}. Aristotle correctly observed that: an aristocratic state may be beneficial for a time, but aristocrats tend to deteriorate, and become the worst form of government {like RINOs}. Aristotle correctly observed two thousand years in advance of America’s internationalist aristocrats: noble character is seldom found among those of noble birth, most who are good for nothing … highly gifted families often degenerate into maniacs.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes {like Democrats} the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich {RINOs} get the better of the poor, or the poor {Democrats} of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert)
Future historians will write both republics, Athens and America, were eventually broken by frivolous wars and squandering public funds.
If anti-Christ is big government; then are not those supporting big government policies and actions serving anti-Christ?
Reader’s homework thought assignment not test, list five tactics used by both groups occupying America with foreign ideas: Obama and RINOS. Plus list five tactics good guys could use to relegate those occupying America with foreign ideas to insignificant political roles.
Two clues for above homework thought assignment by Texas Drifter
1. Greatest threats to good guys trying to save Haven’s favorite republic are security risks from RINOs who are those “closest” within “dagger range” to good guys. Fools claim RINOs are such nice people. How often is reader likely to meet unfriendly con artist?
2. Why should conservatives not reach out to RINOs? No general ever won a war by converting enemy to fight for their side. Wars are won by motivating one’s own side; converting few of not involved for intelligence; and de-motivating enemy with victory without compassion.
Breaking Marshall’s Law Dateline – “Open Letter Four Questions For Senator Rubio”
1. Why are you making promises to conservatives you can not keep about illegals not getting welfare benefits from your comprehensive amnesty legislation”?
2. Illegals are only one federal district court judge, one liberal Appellate Court, and one vote from Justice “Judas” Roberts from receiving more taxpayer financed welfare benefits than they will have time to apply for. Senator Rubio, are you aware of “free” public education benefits available to illegal immigrants?
3. Are American citizens murdered by illegals on U.S. soil any less dead than Americans murdered on U.S. soil by Islamic-fascist terrorists?
4. What is next for Republicans, offering amnesty for Islamic-fascist terrorists to try and get them to vote for Republican candidates? Republicans have been doing stranger things.
Senator, conservatives have been lied too by Democrats and RINOs for decades and decades. Seems you have two choices, stop making promises you cannot keep or learn to lie better from RINOs and Democrats. Your personal choice not mine, Texas Drifter.
Back to this writing exercise theme: “RINOs Occupy America with Foreign Ideas”.
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Part II Are Rino Collaborators Traitors; some might be asking, how can domestic political regimes be foreign forces occupying America?
Starting with basics, definitions of both collaborate and amnesty:
1. Amnesty – an act by government to forgive crimes of a large group of individuals; amnesty does not include allowing group of criminals to benefit or profit from their crimes. Understand when amnesty is not amnesty - providing illegal immigrants with any temporary residency or path to citizenship is not amnesty; it is rewarding criminal conduct.
2. Collaborate: to co-operate or willingly assist an enemy of one’s country especially occupying force. Example of occupying force, Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats ruling America; example provided by Texas Drifter.
Reader is probably familiar with concept cultural wars. Cultures are defined by traditions, values, and principles which are all guided by culture’s core beliefs.
America’s unique culture was, until decline started about hundred years ago, used to be founded on core beliefs based on “individuals” sanctioned not state sanctioned Judeo-Christian traditions, values, principles which produced documents like Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Monroe Doctrine, Texas 1836 Constitution Declaration of Rights, Manifest Destiny, ethical capitalism, and other beliefs reader can cite. (Reader can reference Texas Declaration of Rights 1836 at Texas Drifter: Best Hyphenated Americans Are ... Marshall's Law Townhall Entry # 367)
Foreign invading ideas and their domestic occupiers include:
1. “Divine Rights of Kings” fascism advocated by RINOs and ruling Republican aristocrat ruling elites like Bush clan, Karl Rove and others reader can list;
2. Marxist fascism advocated by Obama, his allies, and most Democrats;
3. Islamic terrorist fascism advocated by reader knows who;
4. Illegal immigrant non-assimilation fascism also known as ethnic or racist fascism advocated by groups like La Raza, LULAC, and other hate groups reader can list.
Good guys’ heroes include America’s Founding fathers. Bay guys’ heroes include fascist English royalty supported by American Tories during America’s struggle for Independence (known as RINOs in contemporary times); Hitler, Marxist like Stalin, Mao, and Castro, who Obama and his Allies only wish they could emulate.
What has made America great, answer immigrants who came to America to assimilate into America’s culture to contribute to building a better America? Side note, minor detail liberals always forget; even America’s “native Americans” migrated into America early in North American history.
Immigrants who do not become good Americans are immigrants who avoid assimilating into America’s culture, and try to re-colonize America into nation they left. Good example, by some estimates as many as forty to fifty percent of illegal immigrants from Mexico do not want to become American citizens if it meant having to relinquish their Mexican citizenship.
It should be no surprise that these re-colonize America not become assimilated into American culture immigrants are going to support fascist doctrines like they left in their old homelands. Now reader knows why these anti-American immigrants will always vote for Marxist-fascists like Obama.
Republicans are so stupid believing that their supporting amnesty for illegals will cause them to vote for Republicans. Brutal truth most Mexican illegals claim to be Catholic; reality is the Pope could run as a Republican and Satan itself could run as Democrat and most illegals would still vote for Satan. Why reader asks, RINOs advocate wrong type of fascism – royalty fascism; while Democrats advocate Marxist fascism which is more appealing to Mexico’s illegal immigrants.
Preceding observation should be obvious, recall repetition is good teaching tool. Let me try Aristotle example one more time.
Words written over two thousand years ago by Aristotle are amazingly perceptive descriptions of contemporary Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrats and Republican aristocrat ruling elites. (Reference Marshall’s Law Townhall Entry # 024)
Pericles was denounced by Plato, Aristotle, and Plutarch who all agreed that Pericles’s policies “injured the Athenian character.” Pericles conduct was comparable to modern day Bush clan and Clinton and Obama’s conduct.
All failed to understand that there always have been, still are, and probably always will be four political groups: middle class, rich, poor, and bureaucrats. Bureaucrats tend to be amoral and enthusiastically commit crimes against any citizen/s for who ever is in power.
All ignored Aristotle’s teachings that the best states are those “wherein the middle classes are a more formidable part than either the rich or poor” {America's conservatives}. Aristotle correctly observed that: an aristocratic state may be beneficial for a time, but aristocrats tend to deteriorate, and become the worst form of government {like RINOs}. Aristotle correctly observed two thousand years in advance of America’s internationalist aristocrats: noble character is seldom found among those of noble birth, most who are good for nothing … highly gifted families often degenerate into maniacs.
Concerning rule by public subsidy addicts, Aristotle observed: When a democracy is dominated by lower classes {like Democrats} the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. The poor receive it and again want the same supply, like pouring water into a sieve; when either the rich {RINOs} get the better of the poor, or the poor {Democrats} of the rich neither of them will establish a free state. (End insert)
Future historians will write both republics, Athens and America, were eventually broken by frivolous wars and squandering public funds.
If anti-Christ is big government; then are not those supporting big government policies and actions serving anti-Christ?
Reader’s homework thought assignment not test, list five tactics used by both groups occupying America with foreign ideas: Obama and RINOS. Plus list five tactics good guys could use to relegate those occupying America with foreign ideas to insignificant political roles.
Two clues for above homework thought assignment by Texas Drifter
1. Greatest threats to good guys trying to save Haven’s favorite republic are security risks from RINOs who are those “closest” within “dagger range” to good guys. Fools claim RINOs are such nice people. How often is reader likely to meet unfriendly con artist?
2. Why should conservatives not reach out to RINOs? No general ever won a war by converting enemy to fight for their side. Wars are won by motivating one’s own side; converting few of not involved for intelligence; and de-motivating enemy with victory without compassion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)