Thursday, March 28, 2013

Continue Plus 509

Texas Drifter: Libertarian Fascism and Other Issues

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Libertarians having liberty to act freely does not give libertarians right to use government to force others to condone, promote, advocate, like, or be accessories to what libertarians do.

Issues reviewed within this writing exercise
1. forcing conservatives to change sacraments of marriage for politically correct libertarians;
2. background checks on private citizens by private citizens to incrementally destroy Second Amendment;
3. discreet communications introductory notes;
4. letting Marxist and RINOs choose conservative political candidates.

Another definition for fascism: implementation of severe dictatorial social regimentation.

First issue is about “cheer leading police” not bedroom police when issue decisions are based on free will decisions not genetic determined decisions. First issue is one of gay “marriage” which to insure constitutional integrity is determined by Tenth Bill of Right: Amendment X - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

To restate obvious, America’s Founding Patriots recorded America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights so that citizens would not need lawyers or activists judges to interpret intentions of Founding Fathers document.

This issue is not about what consenting adults do behind closed doors; this issue is not about adults voluntarily forming civil contracts; this issue is about a minority forcing others, communities, states, or national majority to publicly endorse minority’s personal behavior.

Libertarians’ position seems to be using government or governments to force others to publicly endorse and cheerfully agree with Libertarians personal conduct. Based on above definition, implementation of severe dictatorial social regimentation, one might have new concept: libertarian fascism. What think you reader?

Issue two involves supporting background checks by private citizens on other private citizens before private transactions involving guns not involving commercial businesses.

Will private citizens soon be required to conduct driving under influence histories when selling their motor vehicle to another private citizen? Could it be that someday children will have to run background checks to determine if private citizen wanting to buy their cookies is diabetic?

Translation: private citizen to private citizen gun transaction background checks are subtle efforts by fascists to weaken Second Amendment; plus develop files what weapons private citizens might legally own. Why, simple make it easier for fascist to know where to find guns when governments begins massive gun seizure campaigns. Remember fascist politicians who deny lie.

Example gun transfers which will eventually be included in private citizen to private citizen back ground checks regulations include:
1. estate or legacy gifts
2. personal gifts
3. private citizen to private citizen trades or sales;
4. reader can add to list

Issue three reviews discreet communications basic notes. First acknowledgement, private sector and public sector surveillance tools are managed under similar but different standards.

Types of surveillance tools include:
1. audio surveillance: based on computer targeted key words; voice recognition, and or recording entire conversations. These tools are regulated by concepts like: use of “bugs”; use of “taps”; and “consent” recording
2. visual surveillance: based on captured images using tools like: photographs; “lip readers” analyzing films; cell phone records; print materials like personal writings including e-mail messages. These tools are regulated by concepts like “expectation of privacy”; non-offensive surveillance; and “reasonable time length” surveillance.
3. undercover operative surveillance is subject matter for another writing exercise.

Reader should never forget that surveillance generates at least four products: leads for investigations; evidence for courts; black mail victim; and self gratification for sexual deviants.

Reader should never forget that best audio surveillance sources are cell phones broadcast like radio waves, and internet visuals “broadcast” by cyber waves. Translation, reader’s best communication security tip: keep your mouth shut and do not “write down” or put visuals on social media networks.

Entering issue four, conservatives accepting advice on how to win elections from: Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats; Independents who are too cowardly to admit that they are Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat allies; Republican ruling elite aristocrats like Bush and Rove; or libertarian fascists.

Why should conservative accept advice from above groups who live for the day that they can enslave and or destroy: Judeo-Christians, original constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, non-fascist libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and other American patriots? Conservatives need to accept brutal truths that bad players seek to destroy America’s traditions, values and principles along with all good players in this paragraph.

Review America’s recent political elections history: Reagan was last “real’ stand on his own Republican winner for President; Bush I was elected on Reagan’s political coat tails; then lost re-election for lying to Republican base.

Continuing on, consider Karl Rove’s list of other losers: Dole; Bush II who won by lying about his conservative values; following Rove losers included McCain and Romney.

Translation, conservatives should not ask professional losers for advice on how to win elections.

Why reader asks should conservatives not depend on losers or enemies for advice on how to win elections? Simple majority of Republican base are conservative Christians who believe in constitutional integrity, ethical capitalism, and other traditional values and principles that bad guys consider out of date.

Reader’s assignment question: which two of following relate to Bill of Rights, and which two relate more to conservative political strategies or tactics?
1. not supporting any restrictions on Second Amendment with fascist tactics like personal background checks between private citizens transferring firearms;
2. ignoring or not practicing discreet communication strategies;
3. expecting to win Presidential elections be depending on sworn enemies for advice;
4. not recognizing libertarian fascism as oxymoronic concept.

Clue for above observation”4”: perhaps some Libertarians seeking to be fascists by their actions should become closet lap mates with RINOs who covertly support Obama and his allies.

Sometimes want to be tyrants forget that some principles like faithfully serving oaths to uphold, protect, and defend from all enemies domestic and foreign are worth fighting for. Response question want to be tyrants need to answer, will their efforts to destroy Heaven’s favorite republic be worth cost of their actions?

Easter is about two distinct messages, second is Resurrection. Maybe something reader might think about while enjoying only life they have.? Just asking, not preaching.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Continue Plus 508

Texas Drifter: Managing Social Security’s Racist Employees

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Americans can never hope to reduce discrimination and prejudices until hatreds are first purged from public sector agencies like Social Security.

This writing exercise theme: profiling current American prejudices, and hate crimes resulting in discrimination by federal and other public employees against some based on legal status; ethnic status; religious beliefs, economic status; and gender or age. Example of one of public employees target groups: Christian Anglo male older middle class, low income, or indigent American citizen.

Traditional origins of American healthcare, primarily individual ethical capitalism with limited overview as States rights issue. Clarification note: Republicans are unintentionally joining Obama’s death panels for senior citizens.

How, think reader think; increasing Social Security retirement age benefits which all Republicans seem to support will be death sentences for senior citizens, when Obama’s decreasing health care is blended into issue; inevitable results will be sooner deaths for seniors. Now maybe reader knows why Obama and Republican aristocrat ruling elites are non-identical twins – both being too blanked up to know that they are blanked up.

Hate motivated prejudices include Social Security using SSI to deny Medicaid benefits to citizens of Western European heritage. How, by delaying applicant’s benefits with non-due process application process, and “rigged” appeals until Anglo applicant dies from insufficient health care. Why, to distribute limited health care resources to minorities and illegal immigrants to generate votes for Marxist-fascist politicians like Obama and other Democrat Party candidates.

One technique used by SSI appeals death panels is “new doctor shopping” when their doctor’s recommendations do not please SSI appellate death panels.

One of many cases describing above process, Anglo man retired at sixty-two and started receiving Social security. At age sixty-four male, has severe stroke which requires hospitalization and five hundred plus dollars of monthly medications.

SSI determined man is totally disabled. SSI also ruled: hope man can survive another four months until man is sixty-five and qualifies for Medicare. This man a veteran who had never received welfare or unemployment compensation, would not be “pushed out in hall” to die if SSI were not providing unlimited care to illegal immigrants.

SSI case workers are engaging in political correct policies which are synonymous with pre-meditated murder by negligent health care for merit raises. Translation: bureaucrats assassinating old and disabled for third world dollar amounts.

Some types of public employees involved in hate motivated prejudices include:
1. some Hispanic public employees with punish “pendejo gringo” prejudices;
2. some Black public employees with punish “honky” prejudices;
3. Progressive liberal Democrats and RINOs who want to be politically correct by ignoring hate crimes against Anglo American indigent, disabled, and elderly.

This writing exercise often includes other federal and state agencies like: Child Protective Services; Adult Protective Services; Food Stamps; Medicaid; Medicare; SSI; IRS; and some minority managed public schools. Reader can add to list.

Initial solution to problem is having applicant for public services only submit citizen legal status, Social Security number; date of birth, mailing or contact address, data determining eligibility for services. Information like name, ethnic background, or race provides profile targets hate driven public employees can use to discriminate.

Hate driven public employees creates situations like that provided in Mexico where Mexican public schools teach Mexican children that America stole land from Mexico, and that all Mexican children should grow up hating Americans. Wonder why most all illegal immigrants do not come to America to become Americans rather “colonists to re-conquer” and defacto return parts of America to Mexico.

Public employee hate crimes against Americans, varies from region to region within states. Some real world examples include:
1. Hispanic dominated public agencies discriminate against both Anglos and Blacks;
2. Black dominated public agencies discriminate against both Anglos and Hispanics.

Why above discrimination is bad for society; it is hard for citizens not to engage in discrimination against other citizens, especially when public agencies are actively (which they are) discriminating against targeted private citizens. Reader can recall concept of “domestic tranquility”, hard to achieve when government is engaged in hate crimes.

Above premises can be verified with “independent verifiable” case results comparisons between different “client groups” with similar service requests from same offices. One can start with waiting times in office to see case workers. One South Texas Food Stamp Office had; may still have reputation for making Anglo clients wait six to eight hours to see “case worker” while other “group never had to wait more than couple of hours.

Another example involved local government refusing to check on old Anglo people after hurricane to see if they need assistance; policy was to only check on other group. Fact of life, when local politicians deny, they lie.

Really sad part is most minority members as most Anglos are not prejudice haters based on others race, ethnic background, age, economic class, religious beliefs, and so on.

Problem is minority of all citizens who feel world owes them a living because of their own personal ignorance’s, prejudices, and self destructive hatreds. Problem becomes worse when these people migrate to public sector jobs where they can inflict pain on others. One good example is how Obama along with Marxist-fascist Democrats with support from RINOs, are enjoying inflicting unnecessary pain on others with sequestration cuts.

Guess this example provides reader another example of how anti-Christ is big government. Texas Drifter not being a religious scholar still believes that teaching children to worship prejudice and hate like Obama and his allies; violates at least one of Ten Commandments.

Most American citizens are good people who are blessings to America. Then there are those who thrive on prejudice, hate, and inflicting pain on others who have migrated into public sector jobs. Time has arrived for good Americans to dismiss or at least manage evils among us like Obama and other offending government employees. TRUE or FALSE