Texas Drifter: Sunshine Patriot Not Compliment
Marshall’s Law Dateline – There are different kinds or types of patriots.
Two American founding patriots’ comments about sunshine patriots, first Thomas Paine:
“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot, will in this crisis, shrink from the service of his (their) country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell is not easily conquered;”
Other words include those of “Reverend Samuel Davies preached a sermon on the “Curse of Cowardice” in the same county in which Patrick was born. A sermon a part of which follows below, and which many argue had great influence on Patrick H. and Henry Clay.”
“The mean, sneaking wretch, that can desert the cause of his country in such an exigency; his country, and the blessings in which he shared, while in peace and prosperity; that cowardly, ungrateful wretch sins against God and his country and, deserves the curse of both … You that love your country, enlist; for honor will follow you in life or death in such a cause.”
Examples supported by modern day sunshine patriots include those who believe that words by vain cult leaders, and or attorney’s legal actions would have or would change actions of a Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Chavez, or possibly even Obama whose public record ignores rulings by federal judges.
Problem with most conservative celebrity hosts and columnists is their vanity makes them dangerously naïve. How, by causing conservative celebrities to believe they can always use their words to convince tyrants to change and become nice leaders.
If America’s Founding Fathers had been naïve, they would not have included Second Amendment partially based on “America’s Lost Second Tradition Found”. (All Right Magazine) Sample excerpt (Act of Abjuration July 26 1581): Earthly king is no longer earthly king rather only a tyrant; particularly when tyrant’s actions are deliberate, people may not only disallow his authority but follow what law of nature dictates for the defense of their liberty and their posterity even at hazard of people’s lives.
Recent example of sunshine patriots in 1940’s: “You are such a pessimist, see Hitler is building us showers, not gas chambers”.
Question for reader, are you willing to lose America without a whimper; or are you more likely to struggle until end what ever that is, using all resources provided by America’s Founding Fathers?
Question, why have ministers not significantly reduced abortions in America? Clue, preaching to the choir for donations rather than ministering to sinners might be one explanation. What was old country song with lyrics about never seeing Jesus wearing Rolex watch?
Reflection, as this writing exercise is being written, in few hours one hundred seventy-seven years ago 183 patriots paid with their lives for every Future Texans’ liberties. Guess sunshine patriot is someone who lets others stand; fight; and die for their inalienable rights. Pretty wussie ...
Recent contemporary issue questions whether U.S. President or any other federal, state, local “politico” can order domestic law enforcement to “expedite for convenience” murdering American citizens in lieu of their Constitutional due processes on American soil?
Well trained SWAT teams and disciplined snipers are good self defense tools just like guns. Poorly trained undisciplined SWAT teams and snipers serving tyrants are cold blooded murderous paramilitary units.
What is difference between not using U.S. military and using domestic law enforcement para-military SWAT teams in above scenarios? None, citizens are just as dead in both scenarios. Answer to could Obama use domestic law enforcement SWAT teams to murder innocent citizens? Why not, Bush I. did at Ruby Ridge; while Clinton did at Waco.
Why is Texas Drifter adding “sunshine patriots” to list of bad guy players effecting conservatives future? List includes Obama and his allies; Aristocrat ruling elite Republicans like those supporting following example; collaborators; sunshine patriots; and others reader can list.
Consider recent ongoing current events example: LONELY CONSERVATIVE headline as follows: House Passed Continuing Resolution That Funds Obama care - March 6, 2013 By Lonely Conservative.
Other sources reported: The House on Wednesday voted to continue funding the government past March 27, a bill that would avert another showdown over a potential government shutdown.
The so-called “continuing resolution” vote had the support of all but 14 Republicans.
Those 14 Republicans tended to come from the libertarian and tea party wings of the party. They were: Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Jim Bridenstine (Okla.), Paul Broun (Ga.), Ron DeSantis (Fla.), Scott DesJarlais (Tenn.), John Duncan (Tenn.), Phil Gingrich (Ga.), Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Jack Kingston (Ga.), Tom Massie (Ky.), Tom McClintock (Calif.), Bill Posey (Fla.), Matt Salmon (Ariz.) and Steve Stockman (Tex.).
Republican House leaders, Speaker John Boehner (Ohio), Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) voted in favor of the measure. (End excerpts news sources)
Observation, saving Heaven’s favorite Constitutional republic depends on patriots who can be trusted with America’s future. It seems obvious that Sunshine patriots like Boehner and other Republicans who voted for Continuous Resolution can not and should not be trusted with America’s future.
Reader’s assignment is to list sunshine patriots among Republican Senators in U.S. Senate.
Has time arrived for conservative stormy day patriots to denounce sunshine patriots for being definite cowards and possible traitors? Texas Drifter believes answer is yes; and will sign following Sunshine Patriot Not Compliment petition – We do not need wussie sunshine patriots on our side to save America:
Texas Drifter
We the signed below support Texas Drifter's no wussies needed campaign.
1. John R. Marshall, Editor Marshall’s Law Townhall
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Monday, March 4, 2013
Continue Plus 499
Texas Drifter: How To Judge Obama-RINOs Policies
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Issues confronting America’s future can be sub-chaptered into one chapter entitled principles.
The four issues include
1. national security
2. domestic tranquility
3. constitutional integrity
4. private ethical capitalism
Standards for judging above issues can be divided into one of two answers: yes or no.
Some sample issues (States rights issues included with Constitutional integrity):
1. Illegal immigration which is threat to all four issues, national security, domestic tranquility, constitutional integrity, and private ethical capitalism.
2. Social Security is forced extortion contract by federal government upon private citizens and should be honored until process can be returned back to private ethical capitalism.
3. Abortion – States right issue.
4. Public sector charity also called “entitlements” welfare should be returned to States and private ethical capitalism.
5. Education – States right issues.
6. Same sex marriages – States right issues.
7. Public health epidemic caused by illegal immigrants should be prevented by federal government.
8. Fascist green regulations should be left to States regulations of private ethical capitalists.
9. Voting Rights Act Section Five is left over Yankee carpetbagger policy from America’s First Civil War and is States Rights issue.
10. Healthcare primarily individual ethical capitalism with limited overview as States rights issue. Clarification note: Republicans are unintentionally joining one of Obama’s death panels for senior citizens. How, think reader think; increasing Social Security retirement age benefits which all Republicans seem to support will be death sentences for senior citizens, when Obama’s decreasing health care is blended into issue; inevitable results will be sooner deaths for seniors. Now maybe reader knows why Obama and Republican aristocrat ruling elites are non-identical twins –both being too blanked up to know that they are blanked up.
11. Reader can add more samples to list.
News stories headlines should be reports about message based on words of truth; not messenger. Headline back in late 1700’s in America probably proclaimed message of Declaration of Independence; not Jefferson great messenger?
Messages of many conservative talk show celebrities are being lost due to hosts constantly oozing their vanities reminding everyone how great they are. Great Americans do not have to keep reminding everyone how great they are; informed public will know based on actions not self indulgent platitudes.
Genius of U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights was more how documents written than what documents proclaim. Average American citizens do not need Marxist-fascist politicians, Republican aristocrats, or attorneys who know more than God to explain Constitution or Bill of Rights to average American citizen. TRUE or FALSE
Summarizing reader hopefully knows what four issues and two standards are.
Where does this writing exercise flow from here; reader can start by defining principles which need to be re-enforced by integrity and defended by honor. Starting reference points includes: Ten Commandments; Act of Abjuration July 26, 1581; Bill of Rights. Reader can find other reference points at All Right Magazine “Texas Drifter: America’s Lost Second Tradition Found”, or Marshall’s Law Townhall Entry # 406.
As for above principles, conservative hold monopoly on America’s best principles; as Marxist-Fascists and Aristocrat Republican elites are both driven by lust for power financed by stealing private property and or stealing with unethical capitalism. Translation: Good guys motivated by Heaven inspired principles; while bad guys are motivated solely by Satin’s principals.
Reader’s assignment question: are citizens who believe anything Obama, his Administration, or RINOs say too stupid to survive freedom; also these same clown children have no rights to complain about becoming slaves? TRUE or FALSE
Reader might want to reference All Right Magazine Texas Drifter: Portraits of Two Leaders (March 2, 2011) to understand how “shot not heard around the world” applies to following friendly warning.
In “old west days” some gunfighters would “feign a draw” to trick pilgrims into “drawing first” to claim shooting was self defense and justified. Reader should not let Obama provoke them into ill planned fight; just so one of Obama’s SWAT teams might use “necessary force” to murder civilians.
Perhaps reader can show legislation rescinding Bush I or Clinton’s sovereign immunity protections for federal agents who used “necessary force” to murder civilians at Ruby Ridge and Waco?
Reader offended by brutality of question, might ask does anyone really believe that Obama who released thousands of illegal immigrant criminals (some estimates thirty thousand plus) to engage in violent and property crimes against American citizens; would hesitate to use his SWAT teams to murder … reader can finish sentence.
Perhaps not providing sovereign immunity for feds or any other government agents to murder law abiding citizens is another policy difference between conservatives and Marxist-fascists and Aristocrat ruling elite Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Issues confronting America’s future can be sub-chaptered into one chapter entitled principles.
The four issues include
1. national security
2. domestic tranquility
3. constitutional integrity
4. private ethical capitalism
Standards for judging above issues can be divided into one of two answers: yes or no.
Some sample issues (States rights issues included with Constitutional integrity):
1. Illegal immigration which is threat to all four issues, national security, domestic tranquility, constitutional integrity, and private ethical capitalism.
2. Social Security is forced extortion contract by federal government upon private citizens and should be honored until process can be returned back to private ethical capitalism.
3. Abortion – States right issue.
4. Public sector charity also called “entitlements” welfare should be returned to States and private ethical capitalism.
5. Education – States right issues.
6. Same sex marriages – States right issues.
7. Public health epidemic caused by illegal immigrants should be prevented by federal government.
8. Fascist green regulations should be left to States regulations of private ethical capitalists.
9. Voting Rights Act Section Five is left over Yankee carpetbagger policy from America’s First Civil War and is States Rights issue.
10. Healthcare primarily individual ethical capitalism with limited overview as States rights issue. Clarification note: Republicans are unintentionally joining one of Obama’s death panels for senior citizens. How, think reader think; increasing Social Security retirement age benefits which all Republicans seem to support will be death sentences for senior citizens, when Obama’s decreasing health care is blended into issue; inevitable results will be sooner deaths for seniors. Now maybe reader knows why Obama and Republican aristocrat ruling elites are non-identical twins –both being too blanked up to know that they are blanked up.
11. Reader can add more samples to list.
News stories headlines should be reports about message based on words of truth; not messenger. Headline back in late 1700’s in America probably proclaimed message of Declaration of Independence; not Jefferson great messenger?
Messages of many conservative talk show celebrities are being lost due to hosts constantly oozing their vanities reminding everyone how great they are. Great Americans do not have to keep reminding everyone how great they are; informed public will know based on actions not self indulgent platitudes.
Genius of U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights was more how documents written than what documents proclaim. Average American citizens do not need Marxist-fascist politicians, Republican aristocrats, or attorneys who know more than God to explain Constitution or Bill of Rights to average American citizen. TRUE or FALSE
Summarizing reader hopefully knows what four issues and two standards are.
Where does this writing exercise flow from here; reader can start by defining principles which need to be re-enforced by integrity and defended by honor. Starting reference points includes: Ten Commandments; Act of Abjuration July 26, 1581; Bill of Rights. Reader can find other reference points at All Right Magazine “Texas Drifter: America’s Lost Second Tradition Found”, or Marshall’s Law Townhall Entry # 406.
As for above principles, conservative hold monopoly on America’s best principles; as Marxist-Fascists and Aristocrat Republican elites are both driven by lust for power financed by stealing private property and or stealing with unethical capitalism. Translation: Good guys motivated by Heaven inspired principles; while bad guys are motivated solely by Satin’s principals.
Reader’s assignment question: are citizens who believe anything Obama, his Administration, or RINOs say too stupid to survive freedom; also these same clown children have no rights to complain about becoming slaves? TRUE or FALSE
Reader might want to reference All Right Magazine Texas Drifter: Portraits of Two Leaders (March 2, 2011) to understand how “shot not heard around the world” applies to following friendly warning.
In “old west days” some gunfighters would “feign a draw” to trick pilgrims into “drawing first” to claim shooting was self defense and justified. Reader should not let Obama provoke them into ill planned fight; just so one of Obama’s SWAT teams might use “necessary force” to murder civilians.
Perhaps reader can show legislation rescinding Bush I or Clinton’s sovereign immunity protections for federal agents who used “necessary force” to murder civilians at Ruby Ridge and Waco?
Reader offended by brutality of question, might ask does anyone really believe that Obama who released thousands of illegal immigrant criminals (some estimates thirty thousand plus) to engage in violent and property crimes against American citizens; would hesitate to use his SWAT teams to murder … reader can finish sentence.
Perhaps not providing sovereign immunity for feds or any other government agents to murder law abiding citizens is another policy difference between conservatives and Marxist-fascists and Aristocrat ruling elite Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)