Texas Drifter: Three Pulpit Patriots From Past
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Only fun part of Texas Drifter suffering from part time dementia, is challenges for editors and reader deciding which side of line Texas Drifter was on when submitting his writing exercises and non-fiction short stories.
Reader should keep following question in mind while reading following: question for more learned conservative Judeo-Christian patriots than Texas Drifter. Are Moderate Republicans (RINOs) counterfeit conservatives, threatening America’s constitutional republic comparable to “false teachers” who “intruded into early Christian churches? Reference JUDE: 4 and consequences for those who believe that Heaven does not punish (national) sin. JUDE: 5
Low dollar research determines why most Democrats and ruling elite aristocratic moderate Republicans dislike, and have only arrogant contempt for conservative Judeo-Christian Americans. Initial evidence is RINOs contempt for following comments made by patriotic Americans from church pulpits.
Example One:
“When war clouds began to gather, this minister not satisfied with a written protest, informed the members of his community of his intention to resign – and that he would preach but once more. This news attracted crowds of hearers from near and far as Peter Muhlenberg, was one of the most popular ministers of Virginia. In his forceful sermon he spoke of duties citizens owe their country. In closing he said: There is a time for preaching and praying. But there is also a time for fighting. Now this time has come! In the same moment he threw off his clerical garment and stood in the uniform of a colonel of the Continental army.”
Example Two:
“Reverend Samuel Davies preached a sermon on the “Curse of Cowardice” in the same county in which Patrick was born. A sermon a part of which follows below, and which many argue had great influence on Patrick H. and Henry Clay.”
“Some cry, let the enemy come down to us, and then we will fight them. But that is the trifling excuse of cowardice or security, not language of prudence or fortitude. The present state of our country: it bleeds in a thousand veins; and without a timely remedy, the wound will prove mortal. And in such circumstances, is it not our duty in the sight of God to take up arms for defense of our country? Certainly it is; and Cursed is he who having no ties sufficiently strong to confine him at home.”
“The mean, sneaking wretch, that can desert the cause of his country in such an exigency; his country, and the blessings in which he shared, while in peace and prosperity; that cowardly, ungrateful wretch sins against God and his country and, deserves the curse of both … You that love your country, enlist; for honor will follow you in life or death in such a cause.”
Example Three:
This speech was delivered in St. John’s Church, Richmond Virginia by Patrick in 1775. Parts of speech from pulpit are as follows:
“Should I keep back my opinions at this time for fear of giving offense, I should consider myself guilty of treason towards my country and an act of disloyalty to the majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
"It is natural for man to indulge in illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of the siren till she transforms us into beasts. … For my part I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst; and to prepare for it.”
“Gentlemen may cry peace, peace, but there is no peace. The war is actually begun. … Is life so dear, or peace so sweet to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God.”
“I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
(Readers who do not know Patrick’s last name probably would not understand why Patrick was influenced by spiritual oratory by reverends like Peter Muhlenberg and Samuel Davies.)
Seems long term interests of those seeking to destroy America’s Constitution would be better served protecting constitutional “due processes” they are so zealously destroying.
Consider brutal Texas Drifter truth: Not identifying some well known contemporary celebrity conservatives, all their optimism, combined with all the optimism in the universe will not change inevitable reality. America as established by its Founding Fathers will eventually cease to exist or die. A more realistic appropriate goal is to delay the evitable.
American patriots, like all other American writers can never become great authors. Great writers only get published in the Bible; to presume or proclaim self appointed greatness is vain blasphemy. A message seemingly ignored by America’s top rated conservative talk show hosts and other want to be cult leaders. Goal of American patriotic writers should be to selflessly inspire and teach contemporary and future patriots how to make better “free will” decisions.
Ultimate question is not “if” but “when” America’s constitutional republic ceases to exist or die. Only children and immature adults believe that America’s constitutional republic will last forever. The question that should concern patriots, is will America’s constitutional republic end before its time? Those responsible for America’s constitutional republic premature time can be left for another writing exercise.
History predicts that America’s constitutional republic will be followed by some type of empire. Possible options include following brutal anarchy; then again Americans unlike Europeans will not easily succumb to tyranny like Europeans did with Hitler’s Nazism; even if that tyranny is described by another name by another false messiah like Obama, Clinton, Bush, or who ever.
Reader’s assignment, answer initial question: question for more learned conservative Judeo-Christian patriots than Texas Drifter. Are moderate Republicans counterfeit conservatives threatening America’s constitutional republic comparable to “false teachers” who “intruded into early Christian churches? Reference JUDE: 4 and consequences of those who believe that Heaven does not punish (national) sin. JUDE: 5
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Monday, February 4, 2013
Continue Plus 489
Texas Drifter: Eugenic Satire?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – President Wilson could have been secret admirers of Hitler for supporting “better people” through selective genetic breeding using abortion policies. Contemporary supporters of Wilson’s eugenic policies possibly include Al Gore, Clinton, Obama, and most other Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Definition of eugenicist is some one who believes in creating better people through selective genetic breeding policies mostly based on using abortion.
Issue is improving people with free will choices guaranteed by inalienable rights granted by God versus perfectibility of man through Marxist-fascist genetic selection using abortion.
Next issue is proving to Marxist-fascists that God exists. Reader can reference following excerpt published years ago by Texas Drifter, and recently re-published Entry # 187 Marshall’s Law Townall. (Start excerpt)
Using math and logic, there are two ways to duplicate any entity: fragmentation and reproduction.
Fragmentation in math is represented by division. Divide any entity represented by any numerical formula not zero and fragmentation product is not zero. Conversely divide any entity represented by zero by any numerical formula and fragmentation product is zero as entity represented by zero does not exist.
Reproduction in math is represented by multiplication. Multiply any entity represented by any numerical formula not zero and reproduction product is not zero. Conversely multiply any entity represented by zero by any numerical formula and reproduction product is zero as entity represented by zero does not exist.
Translation if God does not exist, then God in above formula would be zero, and absolutely nothing would exist as any fragmentation or reproduction by or of God would not be possible.
Not being religious scholar, to paraphrase biblical adage: God always has been, always is, always will be? If God the always has been, always is, and always will be did not exist, there would be no universe, no galaxy, no solar system, no planet earth, and nothing in or around reader’s life. (End excerpt)
Reader might recall that Heave provided people inalienable rights, so individuals could make free will choices to believe in Heaven as Heaven does not seek slave worshipers; as opposed to Obama and other slave masters who need tyranny to keep their slave followers under control.
Texas Drifter is going to “muddy issue waters” with essay published over twenty years ago: The Myth of Race. (Start excerpt)
Natural observations suggest there are two types of human personalities: libertas and socialis (word is “socialis” not socialist) Naturalist also recognizes two types of communities: socialist and non-socialist.
Two questions arise: did moral and economic socialists partially evolve from other more primitive socialists? Second, did primitive socialists evolve from even more primitive socialists? Since some of earliest socialist states can be found among ants, bees, and termites; these questions deserve serious consideration.
It seems possible that those who most respect property rights, capitalists, could have evolved from other territorial creatures.
A brief analysis of humanity’s place in natural history seems appropriate at this place in training process.
1. Kingdom: Animal
2. Phylum: Chordata
3. Class: Mammalia
4. Order: Primates
5. Family: Hominidae
6. Genus: Homo sapiens
7. Species: Libertas / Socialis
8. Sub-Species: Caucasoids; Negroids; Austrolids; Mongolids; Mixed
9. Cultures: Individualist or Socialist
The concept of race is based on cultural myths. Libertas personalities tend to believe there is only one race: human race. Cultural attitudes can play major roles in determining whether citizen will be libertas or socialis.
An issue of future debate is if libertas citizens tended to evolve from pack animals while socialis citizens evolved from herd animals. (End excerpt)
Moving on to other eugenic related questions; should gays be pro-life as opposed to pro-choice? Gays tend to claim their condition is related to specific genes. If a specific gene for gayness is identified; could not parents who do not want to force their gay child to suffer cruelties of Sharia law, use pro-choice to abort the child simply because child will be born gay?
Side issue, why should humans have higher percentage of gay births than other animals which tends to run about one percent? Some suggest that gay life style is free will choice. Suggestion offered, seems one who has perception that they are not able to manage opposite sex relationships; settle for “another loser” who is not able to manage opposite sex relationships. Many ask why would one choose life style with so many public image problems; could it be that there is more social publicity in belonging to group of victims in some societies?
Point to consider about eugenics: better living through selective genetic breeding might be one of those new technologies that some new technologies should not be used just because it is new.
Better living by better genetic breeding can be used for humans; only problem seems to be that; thought people have souls as opposed to tomatoes and livestock. That is unless one worships plants and animals as gods like environmentalists or Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Advocates for eugenics include Hitler, Chinese communists, and America’s Marxist-fascist Liberal Progressive political leaders, most public sector unions, and Republican carpetbaggers who will not criticize eugenic supporters so as not to appear politically incorrect.
Abortions for cases of rape, incest, health of mother or economic conditions are free will decisions made by individuals not governments (defining not promoting). Reason there are so many free will decisions in America is because many churches hope to reduce problem with government laws not sermons that change peoples’ lives.
Consequences of free will rationalizations for abortions will be “relatively few” when compared to Obama-care for better society kicks in. Obama’s death panels will include seniors and those too sick to save on one end; and eugenic abortions for children with “wrong” genes on other. Translation: Obama’s bureaucrats will kill millions coming into life and millions leaving life. That will be every year not total genocide numbers.
Reader’s assignment, add to eugenics list based on better living through selective genetics using abortion. Part of list for pre-children could include: girls (like in China); those with health problems like diabetes; those with mental health problems; gays; those who will be too stupid or lazy to ever be anything but public subsidy addicts; reader can add to list from here –
Reader may be asking: where is “satire” referred to in title of this writing exercise? Question, do parents have pro-choice right for future children genetically determined to be too stupid or lazy to survive except on public subsidies? Perhaps with one exception, seductive sexy dumb blonde dames; the world can always use more seductive sexy dumb blonde dames. Last thing America needs is more too stupid or too lazy to live except on public subsidies citizens, also known as Obama supporters. TRUE or FALSE
Marshall’s Law Dateline – President Wilson could have been secret admirers of Hitler for supporting “better people” through selective genetic breeding using abortion policies. Contemporary supporters of Wilson’s eugenic policies possibly include Al Gore, Clinton, Obama, and most other Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Definition of eugenicist is some one who believes in creating better people through selective genetic breeding policies mostly based on using abortion.
Issue is improving people with free will choices guaranteed by inalienable rights granted by God versus perfectibility of man through Marxist-fascist genetic selection using abortion.
Next issue is proving to Marxist-fascists that God exists. Reader can reference following excerpt published years ago by Texas Drifter, and recently re-published Entry # 187 Marshall’s Law Townall. (Start excerpt)
Using math and logic, there are two ways to duplicate any entity: fragmentation and reproduction.
Fragmentation in math is represented by division. Divide any entity represented by any numerical formula not zero and fragmentation product is not zero. Conversely divide any entity represented by zero by any numerical formula and fragmentation product is zero as entity represented by zero does not exist.
Reproduction in math is represented by multiplication. Multiply any entity represented by any numerical formula not zero and reproduction product is not zero. Conversely multiply any entity represented by zero by any numerical formula and reproduction product is zero as entity represented by zero does not exist.
Translation if God does not exist, then God in above formula would be zero, and absolutely nothing would exist as any fragmentation or reproduction by or of God would not be possible.
Not being religious scholar, to paraphrase biblical adage: God always has been, always is, always will be? If God the always has been, always is, and always will be did not exist, there would be no universe, no galaxy, no solar system, no planet earth, and nothing in or around reader’s life. (End excerpt)
Reader might recall that Heave provided people inalienable rights, so individuals could make free will choices to believe in Heaven as Heaven does not seek slave worshipers; as opposed to Obama and other slave masters who need tyranny to keep their slave followers under control.
Texas Drifter is going to “muddy issue waters” with essay published over twenty years ago: The Myth of Race. (Start excerpt)
Natural observations suggest there are two types of human personalities: libertas and socialis (word is “socialis” not socialist) Naturalist also recognizes two types of communities: socialist and non-socialist.
Two questions arise: did moral and economic socialists partially evolve from other more primitive socialists? Second, did primitive socialists evolve from even more primitive socialists? Since some of earliest socialist states can be found among ants, bees, and termites; these questions deserve serious consideration.
It seems possible that those who most respect property rights, capitalists, could have evolved from other territorial creatures.
A brief analysis of humanity’s place in natural history seems appropriate at this place in training process.
1. Kingdom: Animal
2. Phylum: Chordata
3. Class: Mammalia
4. Order: Primates
5. Family: Hominidae
6. Genus: Homo sapiens
7. Species: Libertas / Socialis
8. Sub-Species: Caucasoids; Negroids; Austrolids; Mongolids; Mixed
9. Cultures: Individualist or Socialist
The concept of race is based on cultural myths. Libertas personalities tend to believe there is only one race: human race. Cultural attitudes can play major roles in determining whether citizen will be libertas or socialis.
An issue of future debate is if libertas citizens tended to evolve from pack animals while socialis citizens evolved from herd animals. (End excerpt)
Moving on to other eugenic related questions; should gays be pro-life as opposed to pro-choice? Gays tend to claim their condition is related to specific genes. If a specific gene for gayness is identified; could not parents who do not want to force their gay child to suffer cruelties of Sharia law, use pro-choice to abort the child simply because child will be born gay?
Side issue, why should humans have higher percentage of gay births than other animals which tends to run about one percent? Some suggest that gay life style is free will choice. Suggestion offered, seems one who has perception that they are not able to manage opposite sex relationships; settle for “another loser” who is not able to manage opposite sex relationships. Many ask why would one choose life style with so many public image problems; could it be that there is more social publicity in belonging to group of victims in some societies?
Point to consider about eugenics: better living through selective genetic breeding might be one of those new technologies that some new technologies should not be used just because it is new.
Better living by better genetic breeding can be used for humans; only problem seems to be that; thought people have souls as opposed to tomatoes and livestock. That is unless one worships plants and animals as gods like environmentalists or Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Advocates for eugenics include Hitler, Chinese communists, and America’s Marxist-fascist Liberal Progressive political leaders, most public sector unions, and Republican carpetbaggers who will not criticize eugenic supporters so as not to appear politically incorrect.
Abortions for cases of rape, incest, health of mother or economic conditions are free will decisions made by individuals not governments (defining not promoting). Reason there are so many free will decisions in America is because many churches hope to reduce problem with government laws not sermons that change peoples’ lives.
Consequences of free will rationalizations for abortions will be “relatively few” when compared to Obama-care for better society kicks in. Obama’s death panels will include seniors and those too sick to save on one end; and eugenic abortions for children with “wrong” genes on other. Translation: Obama’s bureaucrats will kill millions coming into life and millions leaving life. That will be every year not total genocide numbers.
Reader’s assignment, add to eugenics list based on better living through selective genetics using abortion. Part of list for pre-children could include: girls (like in China); those with health problems like diabetes; those with mental health problems; gays; those who will be too stupid or lazy to ever be anything but public subsidy addicts; reader can add to list from here –
Reader may be asking: where is “satire” referred to in title of this writing exercise? Question, do parents have pro-choice right for future children genetically determined to be too stupid or lazy to survive except on public subsidies? Perhaps with one exception, seductive sexy dumb blonde dames; the world can always use more seductive sexy dumb blonde dames. Last thing America needs is more too stupid or too lazy to live except on public subsidies citizens, also known as Obama supporters. TRUE or FALSE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)