Texas Drifter: J. McCain, Boehner Other Losers
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Wiseman’s adage, you represent who you follow.
Definition of loser is someone who is repeatedly unsuccessful, unlucky, or destined to fail.
Issue Senator McCain getting political passes for being “war hero”. One of America’s “smartest and bravest” and most successful generals during America’s War for Independence, was credited with saying: “Are the Americans all asleep and tamely giving up their liberties?” That war hero’s name Benedict Arnold; who perhaps taught us that “war hero” describes past conduct and does not necessarily predict future conduct.
A little irony for those who enjoy irony; it is quite possible that America would have never won America’s War for Independence, without out help of a patriotic general whose name turned out in American history to be synonymous with Judas in Christian history?
Issue of Boehner being a loser; leaders serve interests of their followers, not interests of followers’ enemies. Only thing worse than a leader without followers, is a virgin without integrity. Texas Drifter getting older sometimes gets confused and might have order of leader and virgin backwards?
Regardless of Texas Drifter’s part time dementia, anyone who follows or tolerates Boehner as their chosen leader is poster child for definition of loser; and has no right to complain about consequences of their following a chronic loser. Reader should never forget obvious, leaders without followers are “nothing.” Translation, do not become a loser by following fools, cowards, and or traitors.
Concerning ignored principles justifying Syria “punishment” being managed by, and supported by losers. Truth starts with non-prejudicial investigations. Finding facts not propaganda starts with basics of any murder investigation: first how did person/s die; second results of weapon forensics; third who had motives?
Seems in Syria those with most motives are those fighting Syria’s government. Why, blame Syria for using gas to get Obama to attack Syria to facilitate rebels’ victory. Why could not rebels’ exploit another group with motives? One which might include Obama who might indirectly facilitate “gas” attack to distract American people from what Obama calls “phony” domestic issues. Texas Drifter is just asking non-prejudicial investigation “motive” questions.
Moving on to other losers, list would have to include Texas senator Cornyn. Few examples reader can list more:
1. Non-fiction short story “Prosecutor For Constitution” Posted by Marshall's Law Entry 017 based on North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate); 108th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 2941 – “To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes. In the Senate of the United States: October 7, 2004. (Check it out to see if Cornyn is Bush type internationalist?
2. Cornyn only supports conservatives in public – check out Alaska election where Cornyn supported campaign of liberal Republican over conservative Republican.
3. Cornyn voted to start comprehensive immigration amnesty train running down tracks to destroy America; even though he would later proclaim his opposition to amnesty for illegal immigrants. Reference: Texas Drifter: Guide To Republican Partisan Adulterers And Republican Patriots Posted by Marshall's Law on Wednesday, June 12, 2013 Entry # 457
Moving down loser list, “great Americans” do not need to keep reminding Americans they are great Americans.
“Fair and balanced” seems mostly balanced for Obama Republicans; corporate fascists like W.S.J. masquerading as conservatives; Neo-Conservatives; unethical capitalists like C. of C.; Republican Hippies; “fair and balanced” for any group except “true conservatives”.
Ben Franklin disowned his son for abandoning America for the British during America’s War for Independence. How different those troubled times; as many contemporary Americans will not “abandon friendships” even when those friends support policies which directly threaten America’s constitution, national security, and domestic tranquility. Perhaps some readers should look up definition of “accessory” from earlier Texas Drifter writing exercises.
First assignment question, list leaders, conservatives should stop following and never follow unless reader wants to become a loser.
Second assignment question, two biggest losers are first people too stupid to know they are accessories to helping losers lose. Second those who continue to support, volunteer for, or follow loser leaders. TRUE or False
Clue – Thief breaks into your home then murders your wife and children, before stealing you blind. Who do you blame the thief, or the armed security guard that passed out from drinking on the job?
News Alert – This writing exercise is being interrupted for special news bulletin. – Texas Drifter: Obama’s Next Lie? – Marshall’s Law Dateline – Could Obama announce following?
Obama Reports: Amerika is my democracy. House does not support my plans to make war on Syria. Senate does support my plans to make war on Syria. My vote to make war on Syria breaks tie in my democracy.
Blank your out of date Constitution. I am Amerika’s new god; like it or visit one of my re-education camps. Debate finished, case closed. Long live Amerika’s new emperor.
Remember above “Could Obama announce following?” was only a question. TRUE or FALSE
