Texas Drifter: Condoning Hate Crimes With Silence
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Few have suggested that Texas Drifter should temper his writing exercises to be more politically correct; my response, rights not exercised like muscles always fade away. Besides, as E.N.T.M. asked, where is political correctness designated as part of First Amendment?
Obama like RINOs seem to be masters at resurrecting and perpetuating hatreds between races; different ethnic groups; different economic classes; and any other groups Marxist-fascists and corporate fascists can cause to hate each other. How do many conservatives respond to crimes motivated by hate? Unfortunately too many conservatives condone crimes motivated by hate with silence.
There are always two sides to history, one recorded by winners, and one mostly forgotten by losers. Some examples:
First, consider frontier history of Texas and America’s South Western states:
1. Indians committed atrocities among Native American tribes, against Hispanic Americans and American pioneers moving West;
2. Mexican troops, militias, and border bandits committed atrocities against Indians and American Anglos;
3. Anglo vigilantes and mobs committed atrocities against Hispanic Americans and Native Americans.
Non-politically correct observation, all sides engaged in violent hate crimes. Translation, there are no saints as we all start out as sinners; and some never change from being sinners.
Second, reader is offered “Billy’s Mark”; followed by origins of Republican Party along with more timely examples.
(Excerpt earlier Texas Drifter research project.)
Only those schooled in managing uncivil world problems will be able to protect your civil world. Classic example is “Billy’s Mark”.
William Long Billy Rogers was born in 1822. During April 1846 Billy was camped with his family’s wagon train on the Arroyo Colorado near Paso Real, Texas. The group of fifteen men, three women, and four children was transporting supplies for General Zachary Taylor during the opening days of the American-Mexican War resulting from Mexico’s opposition to the Republic of Texas joining the United States.
During the encampment, the group was surrounded about fifty members of Mexican Army militia unit. The Rogers party agreed to surrender under a flag of truce in return for promises of civilized treatment by the Mexican Army.
Two of the men were immediately shot. The remaining men had their throats cut and were tossed over one bank of the Arroyo Colorado. Since this is a family format, I will just say the women and children were abused, had their throats cut, and were also thrown over same bank of the Arroyo Colorado.
Unfortunately for the offending members of the Mexican Army, Billy Rogers did not die from having his throat cut ear to ear. Billy managed to walk and crawl for four days to help. He was rescued by an American Hispanic woman, who for never known reasons also hated: Mexican aristocracy, Mexican troops, Mexico militias, and Mexican bandits. Billy’s “lady” risked her life more than once while helping Billy regain his health.
Billy was eventually able to identify the guilty for General Taylor who tried but was unable to apprehend the guilty.
Billy turned to the Texas Rangers who managed to track down and kill twenty four of the guilty. After asking about the remaining guilty, the Rangers told Billy he would have to deal with the rest himself.
Billy after learning Spanish from the woman who “saved his life”; whom he eventually married to be his life long partner; decided to follow the Ranger’s advice. During the next several years Billy individually tracked down and personally cut the throats of every single remaining Mexican militia member who participated in the Rogers Massacre.
Some historians put the number from twenty to twenty five, though Billy and “Billy’s Lady” were the only ones knowing the exact number. Some even suggested several were those who had abused “Billy’s Lady”.
Citizens in South Texas came to identify the bodies as those with Billy’s Mark and the incidents were never investigated or questioned by law enforcement. Such was life and death in an uncivil world.
Eventually times became more civil, and Billy was elected first as county sheriff and later to the state legislature. Billy eventually went on to become a successful rancher and businessman. (End research excerpt)
Billy’s Mark teaches all of us three lessons. First there is a time to be civil and time to be uncivil. Second Mexico’s political attitudes towards America: always has been, still are, and may always be motivated by hate against anything American.
Three, if you do have the stomach to know what it takes to totally defeat terrorists or barbarians show those who do what needs to be done the same respect Billy’s neighbors showed Billy’s Mark. Translation, do not judge those fighting and dying in an uncivil world so you can have the luxury of going home every day to play with your wife and kids.
Third example involves “forgotten” origins of Republican Party. Republicans have not earned the right to throw self righteous morality insults at anyone.
Many have forgotten that spiritual foundations of Republican Party can be traced back to John Brown and Kansas Jayhawkers militant abolitionists who murdered those and burned towns of those who would not accept their “divine wisdom”. These terrorists might be compared to American threats by modern Islamic fascists.
Expressing obvious, Quakers and other abolitionists who did not go around murdering people and burning towns were not and are not considered proponents of hate crimes.
Consider actions of another Republican abolitionist, President Lincoln. Many have forgotten that Lincoln’s “first” Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves in the South and not the North. Why, so as create Black terrorists to murder, rape, and torture Southern women, children, and old people “behind the South’s front lines” to break South’s will to fight.
Not saying Lincoln did not do what he thought best to honor his oath to uphold, protect, defend and … See my reader sometimes resurrecting dead hatreds can cause “hurt feelings”.
Republicans also like to point out how evil Democrats supported Ku Klux Klan. What Republicans leave out, is that had Northern Republican politicians and Yankee carpetbaggers had not mistreated and abused every civil right of “defeated” Southerners following North’s “great victory”. There would have been no need for Southerners to create vigilante groups to defend themselves from Republican sanctioned domestic war crimes against the “defeated”.
Another should be obvious observation, explaining why KKK was organized is no defense or justification for what many of “defeated” felt compelled to do.
Sad fact is that post civil war Republicans treated Southern “defeated” as Obama and RINOs enjoy treating Judeo-Christian conservative constitutionalist ethical capitalist patriotic Americans today.
Example four, involves conservatives seemingly tolerating how Obama and RINOs tolerate Muslim Brotherhood genocidal crimes against Coptic Christians.
Reader doubts above observation? Do your own research to determine how many Coptic Christians and other Christians have been murdered, raped and tortured by Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic fascist groups in Egypt, Middle East, other Muslim “democracies”.
Example five, perhaps now reader understands why it is easy for Obama and his allies including RINOs to condone murders, rapes, and other atrocities against American citizens and legal residents by illegal immigrants. Sad truth condoning genocide with silence gets easier the more it is ignored.
There is wisdom in old adage that those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat the past. Especially true for Obama’s Marxist-fascists and RINOs attempting to perpetuate and revive past mostly healed hatreds among most Americans. Why to justify “new revenge” or “social justice” motivated by their purely evil selfish reasons. TRUE or FALSE
Again, reader should never forget that right of association includes right of “not associating”. Also, free speech includes inviting those resurrecting past hatreds (reader knows who) to leave. TRUE or FALSE
The bad guys are people condoning hate motivated violent crimes with their silence. The good guys are those publicly denouncing hate motivated murders, rapes, and atrocities against Coptic Christians by Obama’s ally Muslim Brotherhood. The good guys include those denouncing violent crimes against Americans and legal residents committed by illegal immigrants with tacit approval of Obama and his allies including RINOs and Bush clan types.
Question Texas Drifter not being a religious scholar is not smart enough to answer. Should churches or synagogues or religious groups, deny those condoning murder with their silence, of innocents like Coptic Christians and other Christians? Included should be those condoning with their silence murders, rapes, and atrocities against Americans and legal residents by illegal immigrants in America. Accessories on both lists should be denied the sanctity of religious funerals?
Texas Drifter’s first vote would be yes, how do you my reader vote?
Final assignment question, concerns any Republican House member who helps Speaker “Cockroach” Boehner submit any “Immigration” legislation to “America last” Senate which helps Obama destroy Heaven’s favorite constitutional republic.
Should elected evil among us in U.S. thought by some to be traitors to both Heaven and America, be perpetually socially shunned, and forever denied sanctity of any religious funeral. Same applies to their public and closet collaborators plus their other children of fallen angels allies. TRUE or FALSE
