Texas Drifter: Letter To Rubio About Amnesty Compromise
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Political reality in contemporary America: Obama, RINOs, their allies and collaborators do not compromise with their “enemies”. Poliopathic bad guys treatment of their enemies is to enslave, destroy, or eliminate with post natal abortions.
Reader needs to have courage to accept that above bad guys’ enemies includes all those individuals believing or serving America’s traditions, values, principles, and defining documents.
Again re-stating obvious, America’s First Bill of Right allows U.S. citizens to try and disprove or re-affirm this Texas Drifter writing exercise. Read on reader.
Reader needs to distinguish between “compromise among” and “compromise with”.
Three related definitions
1. Compromise has two equal first meanings: mutual concessions and shameful concessions
2. “Among” refers to mutual concessions within company or associations
3. “With” refers to shameful concessions with opposition
Translation:
1. Conservatives compromising with conservatives result in mutual concessions;
2. Conservatives compromising with those in opposition to conservative principles are shameful or dishonorable concessions.
Real world compromise scenarios:
1. Texas Drifter a Southern Conservative, might be able to compromise with Yankee Conservatives some who are celebrity talk show hosts. Point being both are conservatives.
2. Texas Drifter could never compromise with a Boehner or J. McCain because they are political strumpet collaborators.
3. Senator Rubio should not compromise with Democrats on amnesty for illegal immigrants because Progressive Liberals are Marxist-fascist soul less creatures serving Satan itself. Some observations reflect political reality not hyperbole.
Texas Drifter could add more and even more words to this writing exercise, though if reader does not grasp differences between compromising among and compromising with; less than four hundred words into this writing exercise. Would more words really make a difference?
Reader’s assignment: list five real world acceptable political compromises among; and five shameful or dishonorable compromises with. Clue: acceptable compromises among conservatives, and dishonorable compromises by conservatives with enemies.
Three historical examples involving conservatives compromising or not compromising: President Jefferson and President Adams; Ben Franklin not compromising with his son; and Colonel Travis and Colonel Bowie of Alamo fame.
Texas Drifter can attest to truism that two unpleasant conditions about getting old, first one not remembering where something worth remembering was heard or read. Second getting confused about things heard or read, example getting confused about following words:
1. Forgiving virtuous conservatives who learn from their mistakes is virtuous behavior;
2. Being old enough to be ones grandfather, does not mean one is not rich enough to be one’s husband.
Texas Drifter is confused about which above adage was supposed to be tag for this writing exercise; my problem is my problem, not reader’s problem. Enjoy your life it is only one you have.
