Texas Drifter: Understanding Terrorism Basics
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Citizens who better understand how to profile terrorist attacks can better manage problem.
Definition of terrorism, strategy used to coerce or manipulate individual or community behavior using threats or violence.
Distinctions exist between terrorism and sabotage. Terrorism intends to generate human casualties and fatalities. Sabotage seeks to damage infrastructure with human casualties or fatalities being collateral damage.
One impending sabotage exception will be losses suffered when terrorists use weapons generating nuclear electro magnetic pluses. Perhaps most devastating terrorist weapon will be use of bio-weapons which cause pandemics.
Types of terrorists include foreign and domestic. Foreign terrorists include nations like Iran and North Korea; theological fascist organizations or groups like Islamic-fascists; and those motivated by ideological ethnic or race hatreds.
Domestic terrorists are divided into two distinct groups: private sector and public sector.
Private sector terrorists include individuals and groups. Individuals include “impulsive individuals” (like those massacring people at schools, malls, and movie theatres). Second group includes “compulsive individuals” like The Unabomber.
Early “foot prints” terrorists might leave include type of target, number of explosives, types of explosives. Right wing terrorist generally strike government buildings; while Middle East terrorists generally strike civilians with multiple exploding devices.
Private sector groups generally include citizens seeking revenge against what they perceive to be abusive governments. Some have even suggested that some of these group members could be suffering from what Texas Drifter has described as “battered citizen syndrome” which generates same conduct as battered spouse syndrome (issue for another writing exercise).
Second group of terrorists are generated by and for public sector. Such examples include: Ruby Ridge; Waco; extortion by IRS to allow excessive theft of private property by governments; theft of freedom by excessive government regulations; sabotage of cultural principles like destroying, the integrity of U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Another example is federal government allowing invasion of illegal immigrants into America which results in following criminal threat profile. Top six criminal threats in Texas alone are: Mexico drug cartels; Mexican drug cartel prison gangs in Texas prisons; illegal immigrant individuals committing property and violent crimes against Texas residents; trafficking sex crimes against women, and children; Mexico smugglers smuggling Middle East terrorists into U.S.; potential health epidemic introduced into America by illegal immigrants.
If reader has courage to confront “eye awakening” truth; take statistics from Texas DPS March 2013 report. Use report ratio multipled by fifteen to represent America’s other forty-seven states learn how many crimes are being committed by illegals against Americans. These numbers does not even represent frauds committed by illegals for stealing public sector subsidies they are not entitled to have.
Undeniable truth, greatest perpetrators of terrorism against American people involves Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats with help from RINO collaborators and all allies and collaborators providing aid and comfort to first two groups named.
Following excerpt entry # 029 with more general information from training manual used by Texas Drifter - Spy As a Verb: Art and Ethics of Surveillance. Reader can review for no fee reference Marshall’s Law Townhall Index.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, black mall, coup d’état and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d’état; and other methods.
III) Non-Participation …
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since the goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results. However, an “ambush” is the use of violence against players or collaborators. The ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as the threat of or use of non-offensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved.
The goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of the population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or 3) revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Lincoln only freeing slaves in South to create terrorists to attack Southern women, children, and old people, Sherman’s March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious corrupt prosecutions.
Reader should never forget that the odds are more than fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents. Two motives for civil servants to frame the bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which give governments additional power at the expense of constitutional liberties, and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
When it comes to domestic terrorism, domestic governments clearly have the motives; the resources; the opportunities; the mentality; and most important of all, access to the criminal justice system which facilitates framing likely suspects.
One technique for investigating arson cases is to look for items that were on the property before and after the fire started. One case the instructor worked produced the guilty party when it was determined that the suspect had removed a rare coin collection shortly before the fire started.
Another investigative technique is casualty analysis which is used to provide clues regarding prior knowledge and or selective evacuation. When the scenario involves terrorists bombing office buildings during regular office hours; if there are members of a specific agency who “just” happen to be out of the building when the attack occurs, questions should be asked.
One needs to understand that in many cases, civil servant loyalty is confined to the employing agency, and does not extend to other public sector employees. (End excerpt)
Assignment questions
First - five greatest terrorist threats to American citizens are “camouflaged” terrorists. List includes in order of threat risk. (Clue very, very, bottom of lists “right wing” anything)
1. Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrat Politicians;
2. All illegal immigrant facilitators using amnesty as bait through their tolerated porous borders;
3. Aristocratic ruling elite fascists like RINOs;
4. Children over drugged by public education systems which contribute to creating domestic impulsive terrorists attacking schools, theatres, and malls;
5. Public sector employees and public subsidy addicts who are both willing to defend benefits provided by Marxist-fascist political system.
TRUE or FALSE
Second - first thing security consultants called “scouts” in past decades get paid to do, is to objectively assess threats and offer possible defenses if asked. Two things scouts never get paid to do is be client’s friend or babysitter. TRUE or FALSE
