Texas Drifter: Obama’s Wussie Foreign Policy?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – In world dominated by “might makes right”; excessive warnings can be construed as weakness or cowardice. Obama’s give both winners and losers same trophies attitude; is perceived as a coward’s policy by want to be “super powers” and terrorists.
A better foreign policy for America’s national security and Americans’ domestic tranquility is measured by never resting vigilance along with dominating victory without compassion.
Two totally unacceptable foreign policies include Obama’s let U.S. kiss your rear to be your friends; and Bush II policies of over reacting to fabricated threats for unethical capitalist profits for his “socialite business friends”.
Recall reader, repetition is good training tool. Which of following represents best foreign policy for America and Americans in “might makes right” world?
1. Foreign policy objectives and lessons learned from patriots like President Washington, President Jefferson, President Monroe, President Jackson, and President Polk.
2. Baby boomer Bush II over reactions to minimal threats to generate profits for his business “associates”.
3. Marxist-fascist baby boomers like Obama and other Progressive liberals like Clinton and J. Kerry who have history’s of despising and “hating” America’s patriotic members of America’s armed forces. Reader can list other “American patriots last” Liberal Democrats.
Texas Drifter is about all written out and will resort to using questions which are also good training tools.
1. How different would America’s history have been if America’s future had depended on military leaders like Col. James Fannin of Goliad, Texas fame, or General George Armstrong of Custer’s Last Stand fame? (Ten words or less)
2. Which of three above options would Texas Drifter likely choose?
3. In real world environment where “self fear” motivated by self interests are most recognized traits by enemies; crazies are managed by reasonable force not reason. TRUE or FALSE
4. One un-discussed primary benefit of using American military assets including troops to secure America’s Southern border, would be allowing Border Patrol and other agencies related to illegal immigration problems to identify, locate, and deport illegals who became illegals by ignoring visa expiration dates. TRUE or FALSE
5. Are amnesty supporters approaching concept of treason by refusing to provide independent verifiable numbers of total illegal immigrants actually on American soil which is probably closer to thirty million than propaganda line of eleven million? YES or NO (Clue: Traitors do not want American tax payers to know true extent of financial costs and threats to domestic tranquility of real numbers of illegals on U.S. soil.)
6. When Obama, his allies including RINOs and other aristocrat ruling elites use word “common” in concepts like “common sense” what do they really mean? Obama and other Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberals mean communist like in communist sense. When RINOs like Bush type clans and self appointed “computer” mogul nobility use common, they actually mean commoners. (Definition of commoner is a lower member of society who does not belong to nobility.)
Two examples include “no child left behind” by making all children same or common as advocated by Bush clan and RINOs. Second example is “common corps” which aims to relegate all children to commoner status. Note when Obama refers to common corps, he really means communist corps or proletariat brats.
Texas Drifter is working around to question, common when used by RINOs and others, means making American children commoners. Obama uses concept common corps to make children communist wards of state. Can reader name any other concepts that should be less offensive to America’s traditions, values, and principles than those used by Obama and other self appointed want to be nobility?
7. Simple bonus question for reader:
Four grown women
One beautiful
One passionate
One experienced
One beginner
All smart
Which one to choose?
