Texas Drifter: Libertarian Fascism and Other Issues
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Libertarians having liberty to act freely does not give libertarians right to use government to force others to condone, promote, advocate, like, or be accessories to what libertarians do.
Issues reviewed within this writing exercise
1. forcing conservatives to change sacraments of marriage for politically correct libertarians;
2. background checks on private citizens by private citizens to incrementally destroy Second Amendment;
3. discreet communications introductory notes;
4. letting Marxist and RINOs choose conservative political candidates.
Another definition for fascism: implementation of severe dictatorial social regimentation.
First issue is about “cheer leading police” not bedroom police when issue decisions are based on free will decisions not genetic determined decisions. First issue is one of gay “marriage” which to insure constitutional integrity is determined by Tenth Bill of Right: Amendment X - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
To restate obvious, America’s Founding Patriots recorded America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights so that citizens would not need lawyers or activists judges to interpret intentions of Founding Fathers document.
This issue is not about what consenting adults do behind closed doors; this issue is not about adults voluntarily forming civil contracts; this issue is about a minority forcing others, communities, states, or national majority to publicly endorse minority’s personal behavior.
Libertarians’ position seems to be using government or governments to force others to publicly endorse and cheerfully agree with Libertarians personal conduct. Based on above definition, implementation of severe dictatorial social regimentation, one might have new concept: libertarian fascism. What think you reader?
Issue two involves supporting background checks by private citizens on other private citizens before private transactions involving guns not involving commercial businesses.
Will private citizens soon be required to conduct driving under influence histories when selling their motor vehicle to another private citizen? Could it be that someday children will have to run background checks to determine if private citizen wanting to buy their cookies is diabetic?
Translation: private citizen to private citizen gun transaction background checks are subtle efforts by fascists to weaken Second Amendment; plus develop files what weapons private citizens might legally own. Why, simple make it easier for fascist to know where to find guns when governments begins massive gun seizure campaigns. Remember fascist politicians who deny lie.
Example gun transfers which will eventually be included in private citizen to private citizen back ground checks regulations include:
1. estate or legacy gifts
2. personal gifts
3. private citizen to private citizen trades or sales;
4. reader can add to list
Issue three reviews discreet communications basic notes. First acknowledgement, private sector and public sector surveillance tools are managed under similar but different standards.
Types of surveillance tools include:
1. audio surveillance: based on computer targeted key words; voice recognition, and or recording entire conversations. These tools are regulated by concepts like: use of “bugs”; use of “taps”; and “consent” recording
2. visual surveillance: based on captured images using tools like: photographs; “lip readers” analyzing films; cell phone records; print materials like personal writings including e-mail messages. These tools are regulated by concepts like “expectation of privacy”; non-offensive surveillance; and “reasonable time length” surveillance.
3. undercover operative surveillance is subject matter for another writing exercise.
Reader should never forget that surveillance generates at least four products: leads for investigations; evidence for courts; black mail victim; and self gratification for sexual deviants.
Reader should never forget that best audio surveillance sources are cell phones broadcast like radio waves, and internet visuals “broadcast” by cyber waves. Translation, reader’s best communication security tip: keep your mouth shut and do not “write down” or put visuals on social media networks.
Entering issue four, conservatives accepting advice on how to win elections from: Marxist-fascist Progressive Liberal Democrats; Independents who are too cowardly to admit that they are Marxist-fascist Progressive Democrat allies; Republican ruling elite aristocrats like Bush and Rove; or libertarian fascists.
Why should conservative accept advice from above groups who live for the day that they can enslave and or destroy: Judeo-Christians, original constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, non-fascist libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and other American patriots? Conservatives need to accept brutal truths that bad players seek to destroy America’s traditions, values and principles along with all good players in this paragraph.
Review America’s recent political elections history: Reagan was last “real’ stand on his own Republican winner for President; Bush I was elected on Reagan’s political coat tails; then lost re-election for lying to Republican base.
Continuing on, consider Karl Rove’s list of other losers: Dole; Bush II who won by lying about his conservative values; following Rove losers included McCain and Romney.
Translation, conservatives should not ask professional losers for advice on how to win elections.
Why reader asks should conservatives not depend on losers or enemies for advice on how to win elections? Simple majority of Republican base are conservative Christians who believe in constitutional integrity, ethical capitalism, and other traditional values and principles that bad guys consider out of date.
Reader’s assignment question: which two of following relate to Bill of Rights, and which two relate more to conservative political strategies or tactics?
1. not supporting any restrictions on Second Amendment with fascist tactics like personal background checks between private citizens transferring firearms;
2. ignoring or not practicing discreet communication strategies;
3. expecting to win Presidential elections be depending on sworn enemies for advice;
4. not recognizing libertarian fascism as oxymoronic concept.
Clue for above observation”4”: perhaps some Libertarians seeking to be fascists by their actions should become closet lap mates with RINOs who covertly support Obama and his allies.
Sometimes want to be tyrants forget that some principles like faithfully serving oaths to uphold, protect, and defend from all enemies domestic and foreign are worth fighting for. Response question want to be tyrants need to answer, will their efforts to destroy Heaven’s favorite republic be worth cost of their actions?
Easter is about two distinct messages, second is Resurrection. Maybe something reader might think about while enjoying only life they have.? Just asking, not preaching.
