Continue Plus 507

Texas Drifter: Rand Paul New Package Same Message?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Rand Paul seemingly lacks moral courage to admit how many verifiable illegal immigrants are actually on American soil - number closer to thirty million than ten million - how honest can he be about solving problem if he will not even admit seriousness of problem.

Rand Paul summary: good on constitutional integrity; good on smaller government; good on capitalism; but dud on national security, dud on domestic tranquility, and dud on community moral standards.

Is Rand Paul consistent with Hollywood liberals with his positions that principles are determined by number of decadent supporters? Good starting example is if enough citizens illegally enter America then they should be granted amnesty. Rand Paul’s moral base seems to be guided by how large the mob.

Brutal truth, any immigration policy starts with determining verifiable numbers of illegal immigrants on American soil. Correct number is closer to thirty million than ten million. The difference between adding ten million and thirty million mostly public subsidy addicts is perpetual American bankruptcy.

Any comprehensive immigration policy based on half truths is just another policy foundation based on lies. Perhaps Rand Paul would like to submit his own “independently verifiable numbers” of illegal immigrants on U.S. Soil?

Perhaps Rand Paul’s suggested illegal immigrant defacto amnesty policies are based on mythical “vacuum” of ignoring impact of contemporary events on “human factor”?

Contemporary events affecting human factor can include: personal problems; familial problems; bad jobs market or bad economy; domestic tyranny; decreasing domestic tranquility; and increasing national security threats.

Depriving people of their liberties; properties; or public subsidy addict benefits does not occur in a societal vacuum. People ultimately tend to react to protect their own self interests, and others self interest when in their self interests. Recall Marshall’s social power theory, might may or may not make right, but always determines outcome.

Choices with consequences to reduce annual national deficit, national debt, decreasing domestic tranquility, and increasing national security threats are never made in societal vacuums. Does it seem like Paul’s policies governing illegal immigration are based on La-La Land policies. Amnesty for thirty million new citizens could reach sixty million once the amnesty beneficiaries bring their never to leave relatives to American soil.

Again, Rand Paul seems like typical well intentioned libertarian who happens to be dud on national security. Specifics, libertarians tend to have “hide in fort” national security vision. Consider words by “Reverend Samuel Davies preached in a sermon on the “Curse of Cowardice” in the same county in which Patrick was born. A sermon a part of which follows below, and which many argue had great influence on Patrick H. and Henry Clay.”

"Some cry, let the enemy come down to us, and then we will fight them. But that is the trifling excuse of cowardice or security, not language of prudence or fortitude. The present state of our country: it bleeds in a thousand veins; and without a timely remedy, the wound will prove mortal.” (End excerpt further reference Marshall’s Law Townhall Entry # 410)

Better national security defense option, consider:
1. RINOs and Republican aristocrat elites military campaigns for profits for special interest groups;
2. Libertarians “hide in the fort” so maybe bad people will just leave us alone;
3. Conservatives’ better options: strike forces not occupations for decades, or total victory without compassion and let bad guys clean up mess for war they started.

Some examples: First, managing annoyances by Barbary Coast pirates. Second sending U.S. troops into Mexico; absolutely not, been there done that back in 1840’s. Complete long term waste of American blood and resources; plus Many Mexicans still hate Americans for Mexico losing war Mexico started.

Better solution for second example: Secure border perimeter starting with fence re-enforced with military troops being brought home from over seas. Next provide Mexican cartels and terrorists making war on Americans; lessons by specialized strike teams, artillery, and air power.

America needs to implement policy that any illegal immigrant detained on American soil after sixty days public notification, will face “immediate confiscation forfeiture” of all their assets. Public law based on principle that criminals do not get to keep proceeds for criminal activities. Following one administrative hearing with one appeal illegal immigrant will be deported. Entire process will be completed within thirty days. Greed brought most illegals to America, and greed will send them home.

Being good neighbor works both ways: When Mexico quits enabling narco-cartels to invade America, along with millions of Mexican criminals; plus facilitating Islamic fascist terrorists entering America; and stealing water causing billions of dollars in damages to South Texas agriculture interests; plus invading American waters to destroy American commercial fishing interests like Mexico destroyed their own Gulf of Mexico fishing industry.

Texas Drifter could go on, but prefers to let reader add to list. Translation, Mexico needs to start acting like good neighbor to be treated as good neighbor.

Reality for Rand Paul and other “conservatives” seeking to trade defacto amnesty for votes. Heaven’s only Son could run for President as Republican, and Devil himself could run for President as Democrat. Estimated two-thirds of minorities would still vote for Democrats. Republicans would be better served staying loyal to minorities who already support conservative candidates.

Simple message for Rand Paul from part time teacher not preacher: trading amnesty for minority votes; bad idea, as you may not find your way back from your self made rabbit hole.

Does it seem like Rand Paul might have some loyalty issues? Observation, Tea Party voters brought him to the metaphorical dance; now it seems Paul might be thinking about sneaking out back door to go home with some Republican cockroaches? TRUE or FALSE

Marshall’s Law Dateline Editor’s Press Release:
Some critics are suggesting that Marshall’s Law Townhall uses too many references to “G” and “H” (God and Heaven); and is often too critical of some Republicans and conservatives. Response to criticisms by Texas Drifter follows:

Freedom of association is always balanced by freedom of non-association.
Do not like my writing; do not read it.
Am part time teacher not a preacher.
As for my writing, remember what you like; forget the rest.
If you don’t mind, rather be writing something else.
Why you thinking, free will not for wussies.
Enjoy your life, it is only one you have.