Texas Drifter: How To Judge Obama-RINOs Policies
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Issues confronting America’s future can be sub-chaptered into one chapter entitled principles.
The four issues include
1. national security
2. domestic tranquility
3. constitutional integrity
4. private ethical capitalism
Standards for judging above issues can be divided into one of two answers: yes or no.
Some sample issues (States rights issues included with Constitutional integrity):
1. Illegal immigration which is threat to all four issues, national security, domestic tranquility, constitutional integrity, and private ethical capitalism.
2. Social Security is forced extortion contract by federal government upon private citizens and should be honored until process can be returned back to private ethical capitalism.
3. Abortion – States right issue.
4. Public sector charity also called “entitlements” welfare should be returned to States and private ethical capitalism.
5. Education – States right issues.
6. Same sex marriages – States right issues.
7. Public health epidemic caused by illegal immigrants should be prevented by federal government.
8. Fascist green regulations should be left to States regulations of private ethical capitalists.
9. Voting Rights Act Section Five is left over Yankee carpetbagger policy from America’s First Civil War and is States Rights issue.
10. Healthcare primarily individual ethical capitalism with limited overview as States rights issue. Clarification note: Republicans are unintentionally joining one of Obama’s death panels for senior citizens. How, think reader think; increasing Social Security retirement age benefits which all Republicans seem to support will be death sentences for senior citizens, when Obama’s decreasing health care is blended into issue; inevitable results will be sooner deaths for seniors. Now maybe reader knows why Obama and Republican aristocrat ruling elites are non-identical twins –both being too blanked up to know that they are blanked up.
11. Reader can add more samples to list.
News stories headlines should be reports about message based on words of truth; not messenger. Headline back in late 1700’s in America probably proclaimed message of Declaration of Independence; not Jefferson great messenger?
Messages of many conservative talk show celebrities are being lost due to hosts constantly oozing their vanities reminding everyone how great they are. Great Americans do not have to keep reminding everyone how great they are; informed public will know based on actions not self indulgent platitudes.
Genius of U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights was more how documents written than what documents proclaim. Average American citizens do not need Marxist-fascist politicians, Republican aristocrats, or attorneys who know more than God to explain Constitution or Bill of Rights to average American citizen. TRUE or FALSE
Summarizing reader hopefully knows what four issues and two standards are.
Where does this writing exercise flow from here; reader can start by defining principles which need to be re-enforced by integrity and defended by honor. Starting reference points includes: Ten Commandments; Act of Abjuration July 26, 1581; Bill of Rights. Reader can find other reference points at All Right Magazine “Texas Drifter: America’s Lost Second Tradition Found”, or Marshall’s Law Townhall Entry # 406.
As for above principles, conservative hold monopoly on America’s best principles; as Marxist-Fascists and Aristocrat Republican elites are both driven by lust for power financed by stealing private property and or stealing with unethical capitalism. Translation: Good guys motivated by Heaven inspired principles; while bad guys are motivated solely by Satin’s principals.
Reader’s assignment question: are citizens who believe anything Obama, his Administration, or RINOs say too stupid to survive freedom; also these same clown children have no rights to complain about becoming slaves? TRUE or FALSE
Reader might want to reference All Right Magazine Texas Drifter: Portraits of Two Leaders (March 2, 2011) to understand how “shot not heard around the world” applies to following friendly warning.
In “old west days” some gunfighters would “feign a draw” to trick pilgrims into “drawing first” to claim shooting was self defense and justified. Reader should not let Obama provoke them into ill planned fight; just so one of Obama’s SWAT teams might use “necessary force” to murder civilians.
Perhaps reader can show legislation rescinding Bush I or Clinton’s sovereign immunity protections for federal agents who used “necessary force” to murder civilians at Ruby Ridge and Waco?
Reader offended by brutality of question, might ask does anyone really believe that Obama who released thousands of illegal immigrant criminals (some estimates thirty thousand plus) to engage in violent and property crimes against American citizens; would hesitate to use his SWAT teams to murder … reader can finish sentence.
Perhaps not providing sovereign immunity for feds or any other government agents to murder law abiding citizens is another policy difference between conservatives and Marxist-fascists and Aristocrat ruling elite Republicans. TRUE or FALSE
