Texas Drifter: Eugenic Satire?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – President Wilson could have been secret admirers of Hitler for supporting “better people” through selective genetic breeding using abortion policies. Contemporary supporters of Wilson’s eugenic policies possibly include Al Gore, Clinton, Obama, and most other Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Definition of eugenicist is some one who believes in creating better people through selective genetic breeding policies mostly based on using abortion.
Issue is improving people with free will choices guaranteed by inalienable rights granted by God versus perfectibility of man through Marxist-fascist genetic selection using abortion.
Next issue is proving to Marxist-fascists that God exists. Reader can reference following excerpt published years ago by Texas Drifter, and recently re-published Entry # 187 Marshall’s Law Townall. (Start excerpt)
Using math and logic, there are two ways to duplicate any entity: fragmentation and reproduction.
Fragmentation in math is represented by division. Divide any entity represented by any numerical formula not zero and fragmentation product is not zero. Conversely divide any entity represented by zero by any numerical formula and fragmentation product is zero as entity represented by zero does not exist.
Reproduction in math is represented by multiplication. Multiply any entity represented by any numerical formula not zero and reproduction product is not zero. Conversely multiply any entity represented by zero by any numerical formula and reproduction product is zero as entity represented by zero does not exist.
Translation if God does not exist, then God in above formula would be zero, and absolutely nothing would exist as any fragmentation or reproduction by or of God would not be possible.
Not being religious scholar, to paraphrase biblical adage: God always has been, always is, always will be? If God the always has been, always is, and always will be did not exist, there would be no universe, no galaxy, no solar system, no planet earth, and nothing in or around reader’s life. (End excerpt)
Reader might recall that Heave provided people inalienable rights, so individuals could make free will choices to believe in Heaven as Heaven does not seek slave worshipers; as opposed to Obama and other slave masters who need tyranny to keep their slave followers under control.
Texas Drifter is going to “muddy issue waters” with essay published over twenty years ago: The Myth of Race. (Start excerpt)
Natural observations suggest there are two types of human personalities: libertas and socialis (word is “socialis” not socialist) Naturalist also recognizes two types of communities: socialist and non-socialist.
Two questions arise: did moral and economic socialists partially evolve from other more primitive socialists? Second, did primitive socialists evolve from even more primitive socialists? Since some of earliest socialist states can be found among ants, bees, and termites; these questions deserve serious consideration.
It seems possible that those who most respect property rights, capitalists, could have evolved from other territorial creatures.
A brief analysis of humanity’s place in natural history seems appropriate at this place in training process.
1. Kingdom: Animal
2. Phylum: Chordata
3. Class: Mammalia
4. Order: Primates
5. Family: Hominidae
6. Genus: Homo sapiens
7. Species: Libertas / Socialis
8. Sub-Species: Caucasoids; Negroids; Austrolids; Mongolids; Mixed
9. Cultures: Individualist or Socialist
The concept of race is based on cultural myths. Libertas personalities tend to believe there is only one race: human race. Cultural attitudes can play major roles in determining whether citizen will be libertas or socialis.
An issue of future debate is if libertas citizens tended to evolve from pack animals while socialis citizens evolved from herd animals. (End excerpt)
Moving on to other eugenic related questions; should gays be pro-life as opposed to pro-choice? Gays tend to claim their condition is related to specific genes. If a specific gene for gayness is identified; could not parents who do not want to force their gay child to suffer cruelties of Sharia law, use pro-choice to abort the child simply because child will be born gay?
Side issue, why should humans have higher percentage of gay births than other animals which tends to run about one percent? Some suggest that gay life style is free will choice. Suggestion offered, seems one who has perception that they are not able to manage opposite sex relationships; settle for “another loser” who is not able to manage opposite sex relationships. Many ask why would one choose life style with so many public image problems; could it be that there is more social publicity in belonging to group of victims in some societies?
Point to consider about eugenics: better living through selective genetic breeding might be one of those new technologies that some new technologies should not be used just because it is new.
Better living by better genetic breeding can be used for humans; only problem seems to be that; thought people have souls as opposed to tomatoes and livestock. That is unless one worships plants and animals as gods like environmentalists or Progressive Liberal Democrats.
Advocates for eugenics include Hitler, Chinese communists, and America’s Marxist-fascist Liberal Progressive political leaders, most public sector unions, and Republican carpetbaggers who will not criticize eugenic supporters so as not to appear politically incorrect.
Abortions for cases of rape, incest, health of mother or economic conditions are free will decisions made by individuals not governments (defining not promoting). Reason there are so many free will decisions in America is because many churches hope to reduce problem with government laws not sermons that change peoples’ lives.
Consequences of free will rationalizations for abortions will be “relatively few” when compared to Obama-care for better society kicks in. Obama’s death panels will include seniors and those too sick to save on one end; and eugenic abortions for children with “wrong” genes on other. Translation: Obama’s bureaucrats will kill millions coming into life and millions leaving life. That will be every year not total genocide numbers.
Reader’s assignment, add to eugenics list based on better living through selective genetics using abortion. Part of list for pre-children could include: girls (like in China); those with health problems like diabetes; those with mental health problems; gays; those who will be too stupid or lazy to ever be anything but public subsidy addicts; reader can add to list from here –
Reader may be asking: where is “satire” referred to in title of this writing exercise? Question, do parents have pro-choice right for future children genetically determined to be too stupid or lazy to survive except on public subsidies? Perhaps with one exception, seductive sexy dumb blonde dames; the world can always use more seductive sexy dumb blonde dames. Last thing America needs is more too stupid or too lazy to live except on public subsidies citizens, also known as Obama supporters. TRUE or FALSE
