Texas Drifter: How Conservatives Promote Tyranny
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Most over used under valued words in contemporary English are love, friend, and great American.
Third Inalienable Right, pursuit of free will also known as happiness, distinguishes between self destructive behavior and destructive behavior to others. Example, one has right to stay indoors at home and get drunk, one does not have right to drink and drive.
America’s Bill of Rights distinguishes between separation of state and church and no separation of church and state. Bill of Rights establishes: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …
Point of this writing exercise, is to present principle that providing platform for evil by "legitimizing" evil by "socializing" with evil is being accessory to evil. B. Franklin disowned his son for supporting English royalty during America’s founding struggles for liberty and justice for all.
Example, Texas Drifter, not being a religious scholar; asks did not Heaven’s Son shame the money lenders by casting money lenders out of temple?
Another question, would Heaven’s Son if those events had occurred in contemporary times; have provided money lenders platform to promote their evil ways for ratings on his radio or television show?
It seems that most current day conservative talk show hosts may be providing their 2016 presidential favorite Rubio a recycled Bush clan comprehensive immigration platform to legitimize their “rising star’s” efforts to get 2016 Republican nomination –pretty phony.
Recall Texas Drifter’s position: no conversation with any politician until border is secured as in past tense, plus no conversation with any politician until actual real world numbers of illegal immigrants on U.S. soil are determined by numbers which can be verified by independent private sector sources.
Republicans like Bush clan RINOs and their allies believe that comprehensive immigration policies will get Republican nominees more votes. Honest truth is Republicans should be working to keep estimated thirty-five percent of American Hispanics currently voting for Republicans; rather than wasting time and resources trying to get estimated sixty-five percent of Hispanics who will never ever vote for any Republican.
Translation illustration: Democrats could nominate the devil himself as their presidential candidate. Republicans could nominate someone with moral reputation of Pope. The result would be estimated sixty to seventy percent of American Hispanics voting for Democrats. The numbers of illegals voting for Democrats would be even higher, probably close to ninety-nine percent.
Conservatives need to understand that having a nice personality is not a pass for doing evil deeds. Friends should be chosen on their actions, character, and integrity. Actions are still best evaluation tools for determining character and integrity.
Some examples:
1. My friend is great drinking buddy; ignored fact is that friend is child molester.
2. RGV talk show host team - one host is some kind of make up it up as they go along conservative who claims other host who is Marxist-fascist is one of his best friends. Conservatives and libertarians can tolerate differences, question how can one be friends with someone who supports Obama’s dictatorship of America?
3. Heard parishioner say our priest is great teacher, though they forgot their priest likes to diddle little boys.
4. Clinton was a great President; who only had personality defect; being sexual predator who sexually assaulted women and young girls.
5. Bush II is really a nice man, who betrayed America’s nationalist economic interests for internationalist interests, supported liberal Supreme Court candidates, expanded socialist health care with prescription drugs, never heard of civil liberty he did not repress, supported porous border which allowed millions of illegal immigrants to invade America and commit millions violent and property crimes against American citizens, supported socialism for corrupt “too big to fail” financial interests.
6. Fox News is “fair and balance”; Fox News business model seems to serve moderate and middle of road (RINOs to Obama light) aristocratic ruling elites not conservatives. Compare Fox News to other news outlets. Main stream media reports Stalin was good to Soviet children. Fox News reports Staling was good to Soviet children but also murdered more innocents than Hitler. Conservative news sources might report Stalin like all murdering tyrants deserves to spend eternity in hell.
7. One major conservative radio host likes to provide radio and video media platforms for those wising to destroy America and every thing America stands for; why, apparently show how sensitive he is to both sides of issues even evil Marxist-fascist beliefs. Another conservative radio talk show host likes to provide format for Marxist fascist loons to show how easy they are to embarrass. Both hosts are motivated by their vanities; some one should remind them that truly “great Americans” do not have to keep reminding their audiences how great they are.
Reader might be better served from getting their news and related information from those more interested in providing truth, than stroking in some cases cult personalities. Few better known good places to start: Drudge Report; Breitbart.com; CNS News.com; reader might list their own suggestions including Townhall.com and All Right Magazine; plus many others conservatives might share with others.
Assignment question, reader can better avoid being conservative who promotes tyranny by being critical of news sources that promote cult leaders; or believe sources which for profits or vanities offer platforms for evil believers or evil doers, just to show how fair or sensitivity information sources are. TRUE or FALSE
