Texas Drifter: Politically Correct Drugs Problem Not Guns
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Some use prescription drugs to: forget; avoid present; ignore future; or seek spiritual awareness. Others may prescribe drugs to baby sit “problem youth”; bottom line in both scenarios is somebody making money.
Theory for reader to explore and test: problem is not inanimate tools like guns. The problem is more likely abuse of politically correct drugs by many parents whose own youth was formed by recreation drugs like marijuana, cocaine, psychedelic drugs, and a mixed combination of “uppers and downers”
These same baby boomer parents many of whom still live by make love, get high, not war 1960’s philosophy; have subjected their own children to many recently created mental illnesses to reduce their parenting tasks so they might get back to “doing their own thing”. How are many parents reducing their babysitting obligations to their own children? Simply by supplying their children with prescription drugs and electronic gadgets both designed for the children not to “bother” their parents.
Reader needs to consider following from public source: “the risks of some of these drugs are provided so the public can make informed, educated decisions. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration warns that antidepressants can cause suicidal thinking and behavior in children and young adults. Common brand name antidepressants include Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa, Luvox, Wellbutrin, Cymbalta, Effexor, Lexapro, Elavil, Remeron, Sarafem, Trazodone.
Other documented side effects include: delusional thinking / hallucinations; mania / psychosis; violent behavior; homicidal ideation or actions; paranoia; emotional numbing; and psychotic episodes along with other troubling behavior.
Reader is encouraged to pursue additional research on their own to determine consequences of doping up America’s youth on anti-depressants, or opposite side of box stimulants just to make both parents and teachers roles in raising tomorrow’s citizens and leaders easier.
What is difference between some gang member on street corner selling your children non-politically correct drugs; and school administrators providing your children drugs so the school can get more money from taxpayers for having to deal with special needs children?
Seems like not much as both are dealing drugs to children for bottom line profits. Who is big loser in this scenario, other than children? Simple answer, Believers in Second Amendment as Marxist-fascist politicians always try to exploit random tragedies to disarm citizens so criminals can murder, rape, and rob more citizens.
Why, so Liberal Democrats and Republican carpetbaggers can justify disarming more and more private law abiding citizens. Again, why what else could one expect from soul less feral politicians and bureaucrats?
Reader’s Assignment Questions
First, it time to re-design that old bumper sticker to read: When guns are outlawed; only criminals and fascist bureaucrats will have guns. Answer YES or NO
Second, possible bumper sticker: Say no to babysitting with drugs.
That would be terrible bumper sticker; Texas Drifter will let reader come up with their own better catch phrase.
