Continue Plus 422

Texas Drifter: How To Report Social Security Apartheid

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Some public agencies “protect and serve” while others neglect, abuse and kill. Based on investigative experiences combined with numerous anecdotal reports; Texas Drifter is encouraging citizens to report claims of Social Security, Medicare, SSI, and Medicaid apartheid policies based on denying services until applicant dies so as to not have pay applicants’ due process entitled public services.

Reader can reference following excerpt which appeared in All Right Magazine and Marshall’s Law Townhall: Texas Drifter America’s Final Option.

… Eliminate American apartheid by public bureaucrats issuing SSI disability benefits based on race, ethnic background, and or political affiliation. The process is managed to delay application process for entitled benefits until person legally entitled to benefits dies. Example Black liberal unemployed Obama supporter receives benefits for mental stress issues; while Anglo American documented by physical tests to have congenital heart defect (CHD) issues are denied, re-denied, and delayed SSI benefits by government bureaucrats until patent hopefully dies. Since bureaucrats engaging in these practices seem to be soulless creatures serving their prejudices and hatreds, remember their denials are self serving lies. Since public subsidies are limited resources they should be distributed on documented physical needs; not race, ethnic heritage, gender choice, political affiliation. It seems ironic that those most opposed to South African apartheid are now defending its use in America. (End of excerpt)

Clues that America’s public sector agencies are engaging in apartheid mostly against those of Western European Heritage:

1. Numbers of claims percentages with initial applications, then appeals, reversed before Administrative Judge. Are these cases percentages higher for applicants of Western European Heritage when original applications and denial of appeals were managed by those maybe few, maybe more bigoted Black or Hispanic case workers and administrators?
2. Does not seem proper that applicants should need to obtain legal assistance to qualify for “standard” what should be due process entitled benefits. Perhaps racial and ethnic hatred by some Black and Hispanic public employees is causing need for citizens of Western European heritage to “liberate” their rights from bigoted public employees.
3. Another clue involves bigoted public sector workers “doctor shopping” to delay application process. A non-anecdotal example: government doctor told applicant, “I do not even know why you are here; I do not even need to finish reviewing your application to know your claim is valid. As for the bureaucrats, who knows what they will say? The bureaucrats did not like their physician’s evaluation and found another doctor to say the applicant was in perfect health. Why, apparently to justify denying the applicant’s appeal.
4. Bigoted public employees base their decisions on their subjective feelings not objective medical records based on standardized tests, x-rays, ct scans, or other scientific based evaluations. Another non-anecdotal example, applicant had “bunches” of physical medical records that applicant had “hole in their heart”. The person of Western European heritage was denied benefits by a minority member; so another minority member could be provided services because they were depressed because they lost their employment benefits.
5. Perhaps bigoted public employees should be told progress against discrimination does not mean providing minorities public jobs so they can discriminate against others.
6. Public sector bigots need to start eliminating their agencies’ fraud, corruption, and apartheid based services to save public dollars to be able to provide more services to least of least not public subsidy addicts.

The process to report claims of Social Security, Medicare, SSI, and Medicaid apartheid policies based on denying services until applicant dies; starts with the following. First some non-profit organizations need to serve as a clearing house to collect citizens’ complaints. Second, once a sufficient number of complaints are gathered, this group shall file all complains on internet, and then send complaints to all state and federal elected officials by complaint geo-region.

Note about structure of complaints, they should be submitted as complaint summaries limited to less than one hundred words (100) so as to facilitate type of complaint and identify alleged guilty bigoted public workers. Even alleged bigoted workers are entitled to due process which will more likely than not be settled in civil court where if found guilty, they should forfeit their jobs to protect the public plus assign their pensions to their victims. It is possible some of these public employees might be subject to criminal charges and prison time.

Reader needs to be reminded, bigoted people including bigoted Blacks and Hispanics are not likely to change their mean evil spirited ways because they are asked too. The only ultimate solution is civil and criminal due process justice with penalties. Bigoted minorities need to be reminded that discrimination is a double edged sword. Translation: discrimination by Anglos against Blacks and Hispanics is both un-American and illegal; discrimination by Blacks and Hispanics against Anglos is also un-American and illegal.

Near closing words, the word integrity should be stricken and removed from all Social Security, Medicare, SSI, Medicaid, and other public social service agencies’ forms, files, and correspondence; integrity is one word that will have no future meaning if public agencies continue misusing word integrity.

Thought for you my reader, America’s Founding Father’s provided contemporary Americans the First Amendment so citizens could denounce governments’ neglects, abuses, and killings by racists, bigots, and in some cases evil public uncivil servants no matter their race, ethnic background, or political orientations.

Many an American has fought, died, and been maimed to insure you my reader your first Amendment Rights; please do not dishonor patriots’ sacrifices paid for in blood by acting like a whipped dog too scared to even whimper. Show enough courage to at least report claims of Social Security, Medicare, SSI, and Medicaid apartheid policies based on denying services until applicant dies so as too not have to pay applicants’ due process entitled public services.

Texas Drifter will do something I never thought I would do, in Texas border culture legend speaks of “la bruja mala”, the evil witch. I will try to locate one and offer her a small “mordida” to put a pox or curse only on bigoted evil Social Security, Medicare, SSI, and Medicaid workers carrying out apartheid policies on America’s sick and elderly.

Continue Plus 421

Texas Drifter: Obama-Romney Accessories to Genocide?

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Are Presidential candidate Obama and presumptive candidate Romney both accessories to genocide against American citizens and American “legal residents”?

Starting at the beginning, definition of genocide is “deliberate and systematic destruction of specific culture, political group, or race.” How many individuals have to be injured or destroyed to be considered victims of genocide?

Consider the following: Numbers detailing crimes by illegal immigrants can be vague as most government bureaucrats do not wish to embarrass illegal immigrants by keeping accurate crime statistics on a segment of America’s population that represents ten percent of the population and commits by good estimates thirty to forty percent of violent and property crimes in America.

Doubt this observation, in 2010 there were an estimated 1,246,248 violent crimes and also in 2010 an estimated 9,082,887 property crimes committed in America. Using a ten year old out of date factor twenty five, results still suggest that illegal immigrants committed estimated three hundred eleven thousand plus violent crimes per year, and estimated two million plus property crimes against Americans in one year - 2010. Using a more current multiple factor would no doubt increase those numbers.

Using best above guesstimate estimate numbers for past three years, illegal immigrants have committed violent crimes against more than a million citizens and legal Americans, and more than six million property crimes against same group. Since group targeted by illegal immigrants includes all “legal Americans” are these groups’ casualty numbers large enough to be considered genocide?

As the answer most definitely seems yes, who can be considered accessories to this genocide against legal Americans? Both Obama and Romney by their actions not their words; both support porous borders which enables illegal immigrants to enter America; both support some type of amnesty not called amnesty which entices more illegal immigrants to illegally enter America; both oppose combination of voluntary and involuntary deportation of illegal immigrants; and both support letting illegal immigrants “cut in line” in front of immigrants “jumping through hoops” at great financial expenses to become legal residents and naturalized citizens.

Why would Obama and his Marxist-fascist allies and Romney and his Republican establishment aristocratic friends engage is such un-American due process behaviors?

Simple, Obama wants votes from illegal immigrants to hold on to his political power; while Romney wants want to make cheap labor available to his allies plus serve interests of Mexican aristocrats by allowing illegal immigrants into America which serves as relief valve and keeps Mexico’s corrupt aristocrats in power.

Reader’s assignment, present verbally or in writing why both Obama’s and Romney should not be considered presidential candidates whose actions are facilitating violent and property crimes against millions of Americans, and does not fit definition of accessories to genocide.

Translation, explain why it would be preferable to have one’s family destroyed by Obama’s accessory actions; as opposed to being more preferable to have one’s family destroyed by Romney’s accessory actions? Seems like a good topic for some Sunday morning roundtable talk show.

As for Texas Drifter, I am going to have to say pox on both those choices. Texas Drifter does not feel genocide or being accessory to genocide of any kind against any American is any kind of tolerable idea.