Continue Plus 411

Texas Drifter RINO’s-Obama’s Fraternal Vanities

Marshall’s Law Dateline – Question, what is difference between consequences of Moderate Republicans’ vanities, and Obama’s Administration vanities?

Answer starts with definition of vanity: state of being worthless or empty of significance. Translation to reality, despite self serving arrogance of conservative talk show hosts like Limbaugh, S. Hannity, Levin, Beck, and others; vanity is valueless and useless contributor to quality of one’s productivity or work product. M. Levin may be a great court room warrior however his knowledge of surviving on the streets or in alleys seems limited at best. Extreme vanity like that displayed by G. Beck becomes self destructive when vanity changes one into a cult leader.

On to group vanities, RINO’s vanities prevent them from admitting that Romney is a bad choice for America’s future; while RINO’s fraternal vanity brothers and sisters, Democrats, vanities prevent liberals from admitting that Obama is a self destructive choice for America.

Recall repetition is good training tool, the first sin involved vanity based temptation or cowardice plus the reality that you are who you support. Consider following three examples:
1. Bush II who saw world through eyes of an aristocrats’ child was a decent well intentioned man;
2. Romney as a child saw through the eyes of a “world owes me” aristocrat’s child is said to be a mean spirited man;
3. Obama as a child and young adult saw life through the eyes of “the world owes me because I am the most victimized” person in history and he will be remembered as a truly evil person.

Asked another way, what is the difference between Marxist-fascist big government policies of Obama’s Democrats, and conservative big government policies of aristocratic establishment Moderate Republicans?

Most patriots already know Obama’s evil inspired policies and plans for America using America last Democrat politicians, Marxist-fascist public servants, public sector union thugs, anarchists, and illegal immigrants. Following will review pathologies of Obama’s fraternal vanities brothers and sisters: RINOs, moderate conservatives, counterfeit conservatives, conservatives in public only, chameleon conservatives, and unethical capitalists to name just a few.

Few members of list include pretend conservatives like Coulter, Texas Senator Cornyn, Governor Perry, Governor Christie, Huckabee, George Will, American Spectator types, and of course the chameleon conservative’s mentor Romney. Reader’s assignment is add more names to above list.

Hopefully reader will remember following future history fact: America is facing the greatest threat to Heaven’s favorite republic since America’s first civil war in the 1860’s.

One of America’s primary salvations will be for patriots to stand heel and toe; certainly not included in America equation for its renaissance victory are vanity driven conservatives who have, are, and will cut and run from traditional American values and principles not to mention any field of conflict.

Blended Example for one Moderate Republican cut and run ethic: Moderate Republicans are “internationalists” who support sacrificing America’s ethical capitalist economy and society to benefit foreign countries; hence the name internationalist to describe Moderate Republicans. Specific cases:
1. Add to America’s bankrupting national debt to bail out Europe;
2. Buying defective defense department parts from China for America’s military which definitely threatens America’s national security.
3. Put Americans out of work to subsidize unpatriotic American monopolies and aristocracies in other countries (like Mexico);
4. Support porous U.S. Southern Border and amnesty of illegal immigrants which who commit about forty percent of crimes in America based on percentage of illegal immigrants in U.S. jails and prisons; increase local and state public sector infrastructure debts to serve illegal immigrants not counting almost limitless borrowed tax dollars to provide public health, education, social service dollars which will have to be repaid by future American generations. Why would establishment Republican aristocrats support such policies? Simple, they are more socially aligned with Mexican aristocrats than America’s middle working class citizens.
5. More public subsidy addicts, recall Bush II and his unpaid for middle class welfare prescription legislation.
6. More government regulations and bureaucratic fascism, remember Nixon’s EPA, along with Bush II plan of taking education away from states with his “No Child Left Behind” policies;
7. Republican U.S. Senators and U.S. House Leaders compromises with Democrats to achieve image of being compassionate deal makers.
8. Republican Presidential candidates running politically correct elections to show Marxist-fascist Democrats how civilized Republican aristocrats were and are. Remember losers like Ford, Bush I (second election – first election Bush only got elected on Reagan’s “coat tails”), Dole, McCain, Romney the skunk candidate as conservative will have to hold their noses to vote for Romney;
9. RINO’s total contempt for Judeo-Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, ethical capitalists, Reagan Democrats, and other patriots. True fact, why else do RINO run primary campaigns designed to totally destroy their opponents’ characters and reputations while trying to be polite to Marxist-fascist Democrats in general election?
10. Reader can add to above list.

Bottom line, there is no real difference between consequences of electing vanity driven Obama Democrats and vanity driven Republican establishment aristocrats. Reader needs too understand that difference between American aristocrats and America’s middle class is not money or capital assets; the difference is attitude one driven by vanity, the other driven by traditional American values and principles.

Reader’s assignment is create two lists: one of wealthy Americans with middle class attitudes who are not aristocrats, and other list of those with middle class wealth guided by vanity who have appointed themselves to be aristocrats.

To end with first question: what is difference between consequences of Moderate Republicans’ vanities, and Obama’s Administration vanities? Answer is none, just depends on whether you my reader prefer to be slave or indentured servant to fraternal vanities.