Texas Drifter Separation Of “State And Church”
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Restating the obvious, in America there is no separation of church and state; although there is separation of “state and church”. Bill of Rights is about federal government not respecting establishment of religion and or federal government becoming religion.
First Commandment of Ten is: You shall have no other gods before Me. Restating obvious, there is only one God and it is not President Obama.
Next to last time to restate obvious in this writing exercise, reference the following: Texas Drifter: America’s First Tradition published by: All Right Magazine on December 14, 2010.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Readers should ask themselves, would they be able to celebrate one special birthday this time of the year except for America’s First Tradition? What is it, one might ask? America’s first tradition will be identified after citizens understand threats to America’s first tradition.
Types of domestic threats to America’s first tradition include: counterfeit conservatives also known as Moderate Republicans or “Republicans In Name Only” (RINOs). The reason patriotic American conservatives need to be able to identify counterfeit conservatives is simple. The enemy from within can more easily destroy our constitutional republic than outside enemies.
Other obvious domestic threats include: morally and ethically depraved, progressive liberal Democrat Marxist-fascists like Obama , Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives, public subsidy addicts and their supporters, public subsidy dispersers, many public sector educators, most major news networks, and Greenists.
Foreign threats include: imperialist nations threatening with economies and or force like China, Mexico, Venezuela, Russia, most of Middle East, international terrorists like Islamic Fascists, and cartel terrorists. Some imperialist nations like Mexico seek to export poverty to reduce societal tensions to protect brutal corrupt aristocracy. Originally called barbarians, they are now called illegal immigrants, smugglers, and ideological terrorists.
Americans who do not have the courage to defend their republic and or U.S. Constitution against enemies, tyrants, and hypocrites do not deserve to be free. The destruction of America will result not from its enemies’ strengths rather from it patriots’ character weaknesses.
The greatest threats to America’s domestic tranquility and national security results from middle class citizens ignoring the Marshall’s Law adage, those who ignore national security spend too much time at cemeteries.
America’s first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is the first words of the First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Those posing the greatest threats to America’s first tradition include but are not limited to: Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans collaborating with Democrats, and Science is God crowd, better known as global warming true believers.
Understanding historical relationships of the words “independent,” “Independents,” and “independence” will help conservatives better understand America’s first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500′s and was defined as “in (not) dependent”. Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600′s to describe a religious organization that supported “a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind.” Independents according to George H. Sabine, also “took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order.”
The first record of the word independence follows: Young Nathan Hale entered Yale College at fourteen, having, ultimately the ministry in view. Just after the battle of Lexington, at a town meeting, with the audacity of boyhood, he cried out, “Let us never lay down our arms till we have achieved independence!”
Where had he learned that new word, not to be found in Shakespeare, or in Spencer, and in Bacon, only as applied to the Independents of England? Is there on record any earlier demand for independence than this bold utterance of the boy in April 1775? One later sentence made the young Nathan’s name immortal: I only regret that I have but one life to give to my country (country not government or political party).
The first words of First amendment are not about freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion which is America’s first tradition. Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, Moderate Republicans, and Science is God crowd are all fanatically trying to abolish the intent of America’s first tradition.
The first partial solution is that “public employee civil liability legislation” needs to be enacted to offer private citizens civil justice for behavior by public servants who fail to deliver promised services, violate constitutionally protected rights, or engage in incompetent, negligent or criminal conduct. (Like Social Security’s citizencide policies, reference All Right Magazine Obama’s “Citizencide” Health Care?)
Sovereign immunity is another concept which has been prostituted by Obama’s ethics. Sovereign immunity extends only to elected, or appointed officials (including national security institutions engaged in national security) not hired domestic employed civil servants.
Government employees can provide their own public employee civil liability insurance by using their retirement programs trusts as insurance pools.
To close, it is not the original intent of the Bill of Rights that is controversial; it is “living document” interpretations by individuals pursuing personal selfish more equal and better than you privileges that are by definition controversial.
To close out this writing exercise, reader’s assignment: write and rewrite following obvious truth one million times: Separation of state and church – yes; separation of church and state – no.
Message still has not soaked in; guess millions of American citizens will be forced by Obama and his Administration plus Moderate Republicans to pay for millions of other peoples’ surgical and pharmaceutical abortions. Perhaps all those who complain and tolerate Obama no separation of state and church policies should consider refreshing their memory of word accessory.
