Texas Drifter Robespierre Republicans?
Marshall’s Law Dateline – If Obama gets re-elected with help from Robespierre Republicans like Beck and Coulter to just identify two? American Judeo-Christians will have no constitutional republic to celebrate their First Amendment personal free will religious beliefs.
Robespierre Wikipedia brief reference: Maximilien François Marie Isidore de Robespierre (6 May 1758 – 28 July 1794) is one of the best-known and most influential figures of the French Revolution. He largely dominated the Committee of Public Safety and was instrumental in the period of the Revolution commonly known as the Reign of Terror, which ended with his arrest and execution in 1794. Robespierre was influenced by 18th-century Enlightenment philosophes such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Montesquieu, and he was a capable articulator of the beliefs of the left-wing bourgeoisie. His supporters called him "The Incorruptible", while his adversaries called him dictateur sanguinaire (bloodthirsty dictator).
Texas Drifter does not generally endorse specific Judeo-Christian faiths or conservative electoral candidates as both are personal conscience decisions. Citizens need to be reminded Heaven’s Son is not running for President, Reagan is deceased, and most people riding white horses down main street are usually escorted out of town.
Why would vanity driven pretender conservatives help Obama be re-elected? Maybe these conservative pretenders prefer stoning “unwashed” conservative politicians to removing Obama as the Marxist-fascist destroyer of Heaven’s favorite republic he most certainly is. Simple question, would theses same self appointed holier than thou pretender conservatives have condemned Heaven’s favorite Son for offering salvation to a tax collector?
Reader needs to remember that Judgment Day is personal; as one is judged by what they do, not by what family, friends, neighbors, or compatriots do. The Ten Commandments are not a living document allowing for interpretations or convenient changes. Example the command is honor thy father and mother, it does not say honor thy father and mother as long as doing so does not interfere with one’s pop culture life style.
One might claim that the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights are living documents solely as long that they also accept that Constitution can only be changed with Constitutional Amendments not by independent action or combined actions by any or all three branches of government, especially federal judges.
One cannot make the claim that the “oath” to Heaven to uphold protect and defend Constitution and Bill of Rights is a living document, as it as currently administered does not include exemptions or expiration date.
Comments by one who would know better than any living American, George Washington
“…containing within itself (U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights) a provision for its own amendment has a just claim to your confidence and support. Respect for its authority … The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and alter their constitutions of government. But till the constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an authentic act of the whole people, is sacred obligatory upon all.” An ethical obligation ignored by activist judges, and most elected Marxist-fascist Democrats.
More silent words by another dead patriot, James Russell Lowell in 1888, “If the politicians must look after the parties, there should be someone to look after the politicians; someone to ask disagreeable questions and utter uncomfortable truths; somebody to make sure before election, not only what but whom the candidate if elected is going to represent.” An ethical obligation ignored by citizens who voted for Obama and other Marxist-fascist Democrats along with RINOs, Moderate Republicans, and Robespierre Republicans.
This writing exercise is not about asking you to serve at Valley Forge during the winter. You are not being asked to step up to Travis’s line behind walls of the Alamo. You are not being asked to expend a great deal of energy; as even citizens on death beds have spoken up about what is best for America. All this writing exercise is about is reminding you that citizens have fought suffered and died for over two hundred years to leave you your right of free speech.
Free speech basics are: 1) start with being yourself; 2) speak about what you know and believe; 3) write like you speak about personal experiences and beliefs; 4) let family, friends, and history be your earthly judge; consider reasonable suggestions, but ignore name calling and insults; as attack insults suggest that your views have merits that cannot be judged by truth or logic. Still, you never avoid not calling tyrants evil names if they deserve the insults. Just as “a rose by any other name is still a rose”; an evil tyrant by any other name is still an evil tyrant.
Final suggestion, when the choice arrives and it always does, do what is best for America or walk away. Consider basing your decision on not what family members, friends, neighbors, or compatriots will think; make your choice based on the personal legacy you want to take with you to Judgment Day. Never forget, you might fool family, friends, neighbors, compatriots, and even enemies. Rest assured you will never fool your final Judge which is why judgment day is personal.
Closing thought, recall Texas Revolution’s Col. Travis and Col Bowie of Alamo fame truly despised each other; but agreed to postpone their duel to death until Texas had won its War for Independence.
Reader’s assignments, of what value are Robespierre Republicans who publicly cannibalize conservative Republicans for offending Robespierre Republican vanities and or ambitions?
Of what value are Robespierre Republicans if they readily abandon Republican Party Primary majority rule decisions like those selecting a conservative candidate for President; rest of reader’s assignment list at least twenty Robespierre Republicans. List might include: Romney, Beck, Coulter, G. Will, and M. Bachmann.
