Texas Drifter “This Could Happen To You”
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Some stories are written to entertain, others are written to teach, still others are written to warn of impending dangers. Reader can decide why “This Can Happen To You” was written.
An unknown sage once said that wise men do not compare apples and oranges. Metaphor, this writing exercise represents recent events in Tucson, Arizona as apples. While following story “This Can Happen To You” represents oranges.
Texas Drifter says without hesitation that some vanity driven radio talk show hosts like Glenn Beck and others are not distinguishing between apples and oranges concerning their remarks about recent events in Tucson, Arizona. Perhaps these conservative talk show celebrities are mimicking Moderate Republicans in their desires to be liked by everyone?
Moving on to background information for “This Could Happen To You”; reference following Entry 124 from Marshall’s Law excerpt.
Texas Drifter Consider "Battered Citizen Syndrome"
Posted by Marshall's Law on Monday, March 22, 2010 3:05:40 PM
Entry # 124
Marshall’s Law Dateline – Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus for thirty pieces of silver. Future American historians have moral obligation to record what “pieces of silver” every Democrat Congressman and Senator received for supporting Obama’s health care legislation. America’s citizens have right to know which of these politicians took Judas bribes, and which were just evil.
Even cruel, mean, selfish, sadistic, lying, thieving, totally worthless psychopaths, sociopaths, and poliopaths like Leninist Democrats are entitled to American Constitutional judicial due processes: indictments, trials, appeals and due process punishments. As for their souls, that is Heaven’s domain not citizens. Above words do not change principles that self defense is not a sin. Reference Entry # 121: “Texas Drifter Self Defense Not A Sin?”
Unfortunately many good American citizens have pilgrim like attitudes towards political evils. Why, most are not used to being victimized by fascists like Leninist Democrats and bureaucrats with worker ant personalities. These while in shock good citizens may over react with episodes of violence caused by lost tempers.
I feel a question emerging; why would battered citizen syndrome not be a valid criminal defense argument?
Following excerpt from GREEN WHITE WHITE published January 1999 John R. Marshall page 150, item “068”.
*068*
One wonders if abuses of socialist governments generate a “battered citizen syndrome?” If battered wife syndrome is a valid defense for use of violent solutions; is the battered citizen syndrome also a valid defense for citizens who react in a similar manner against abusive government?
Intellectual consistency requires that those who accept the battered spouse syndrome as a legal defense to justify violence against an abusive spouse must also accept the battered citizen syndrome as valid legal defense for citizen/s who lashes out with violence against abusive government/s which seems synonymous with abusive husbands or spouses.
To accept less is to deny legitimacy of actions by America’s Founding Fathers in 1700’s; actions by Texas rebels in 1830’s, or actions of those who sought to establish nation of Israel following World War II.
What constitutes sufficient legitimate abuse that contributes to battered citizen syndrome can be debated, but existence of battered citizen syndrome can not be debated.
Now Begins “This Could Happen To You”
ACT I
(Headquarters Your Local Police Station)
Shift Commander to Department Chaplin: This situation will be worse than usual. You need to inform Retired Detective Adams (RDA) whose wife of almost forty years was killed last month by driving while intoxicated illegal immigrant that the rest of his family: his daughter only child, grandchildren, and son-in-law were murdered during a home invasion by illegal immigrant gang members by mistake.
ACT II
(Retired Detective Adams responds to mid-night knock at his front door.)
RDA: Not you again? Not the rest of my family?
Chaplin: May I come in?
RDA: No, deliver your sorry to tell you death message and leave.
Chaplin: I am sorry to tell you: your daughter, all three grandchildren, and son-in-law were killed earlier this evening.
RDA: Not another DUI illegal immigrant?
Chaplin: A home invasion by illegal immigrants.
RDA: What the blank do you mean home invasion?
Chaplin: Illegal immigrant gang members hit the wrong home address. The illegals were supposed to kill Mexican Cartel member in the U.S. on a visa from Obama’s State Department. The gang members were supposed to hit a home at 1410 East Jackson, and hit your daughter’s home because they didn’t know that American street addresses are generally divided into East and west or North and South.
RDA: How do you know all this so soon after the incident?
Chaplin: The illegals after kicking in the front door shot your daughter and grand children using shot guns. Your son-in-law hearing the shots; came down stairs shooting three of the illegal (killing two) critically wounding the third before he was killed by the fourth illegal home invader.
After leaving his wounded gang member behind, the wounded gang member called 911. Before dying shortly after police arrived, he kept saying why were all the white people here? Off the record, your old partner got the wounded gang member to identify all involved before he died.
RDA: Who is responsible for all these illegal immigrant crimes on American soil?
Chaplin: Liberal Democrats, Obama his Administration, Moderate Republicans like Bush clan, and all other politicians and special interest groups tolerating America’s southern porous border along with amnesty for illegal immigrants.
RDA: That is a strange answer.
Chaplin: I answered that way so you know that there are too many people for you to get even with.
RDA: You have delivered your death message now get off my property.
Chaplin: I will pray for you.
RDA: Since I have no more family for illegals to murder, you have no reason to ever return to my home. I will bury my dead, grieve for my losses; then I will consider my options. Tell my old partner thanks.
ACT III
Reader can write their own ending with why Retire detective Adams was found by a jury of this peers to have been not guilty due to his having been under the influence of “battered citizens syndrome” at the time of this actions.
End short story “This Could Happen To You”.
Above story in no way attempts to minimize, rationalize, or define recent events in Tucson, Arizona as anything other a despicable criminal conduct deserving appropriate due process punishment. Remember that case is about apples.
“This Could Happen To You” is about oranges where Marxist-Fascist Democrat policies as well as Moderate Republican policies driven by greed are about hundreds of thousands of Americans being deprived of their lives, health, and private property by illegal immigrants, and racist, and public bureaucrats who will commit any crime for higher salaries and better pensions. Perhaps those responsible for such crimes need to be reminded that “not wanting to know” was not a defense in Nuremberg Trials.
Back to comments by celebrity talk show hosts that violence is never an acceptable solution to any atrocity; does not one Commandment reference murder not killing in self defense as sin? Pacifism at any price may make one popular. Seems like an apple and orange comparison.
Three final questions for the Glens Beck types:
1. Of what value were the sacrifices of those who were willing to fight, kill in self defense, and perhaps be crippled or killed while founding, building, and defending Heaven’s favorite constitutional Republic if contemporary Americans are not willing to make the same sacrifices?
2. Does not the oath before Heaven include both foreign and domestic enemies?
3. How can anyone sleep well knowing that they are willing to let others engage in most serious of all human conduct, while their only defense is hoping to talk bad guys into being nicer more compassionate people?
Again maybe the time has arrived for conservative to know like most adults that apples and oranges are different. So writes Texas Drifter.
