Texas Drifter Reality Check For TSA Employees
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline - Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agency’s employees need to understand two realities of personal accountability in America’s Constitutional due process political system. Sometimes best answers are questions. First, were “just following orders” valid defense arguments in Nierenberg trials?
Second question, could government employees who sexually molest children, who physically or sexually assault and or psychologically torture other Americans easily drift into accepting jobs at concentration camps?
Texas Drifter asked in Marshall’s Law Entry # 070 in September 02, 2009 “FEMA Death Camps What are Odds”? Based on recent actions of TSA employees following unconscionable orders that answer to Texas Drifter’s September 2009 question have improved considerably: True or False?
Review of excerpts from Entry # 070
FEMA Death Camps What Are Odds
Dateline Marshall’s Law – What are odds that FEMA disaster relief camps could be used for political death camps?
How could anyone believe Democratic Party Liberals, President Obama his Administration, and political zombie supporters who publicly support aggressive euthanasia counseling and policies for elderly, chronically ill like those with AIDS, disabled children and veterans would not misuse FEMA disaster camps for nefarious politics?
How could anyone believe, same people who hate America and the Americans so much that put them in charge of running earth's largest, wealthiest, most powerful free world constitutional republic, would not resort to misusing FEMA Disaster relief camps?
After all, are not these same liberals trying to bankrupt America with addiction like deficit spending? These same Marxists-fascists have already nationalized America’s financial institutions, banks, vehicle manufacturing industry, housing mortgage industry, and want to nationalize private medical industry, oil industry and all other American industries.
Moving on to theme of this writing exercise, most important words in intelligence agent’s arsenal are why and how. Why are bad guys doing “X” and how do bad guys intend to do “why”?
In closing, Marshall’s Law Townhall odds of conservatives losing communications system and ending up in some Obama FEMA Re-education Camp ninety percent to one hundred percent.
Successfully defending communication system components internet integrity and independence, along with radio talk shows and print columnists; odds of staying out of Obama FEMA Re-education Camps maybe fifty-fifty; there are few sure bets in domestic cold wars, and fewer still in civil wars, wars against terrorists, and wars between nations.
Not knowing how professional odds makers determine odds, discretion suggests that letting professional odds makers from Las Vegas or somewhere else suggest more realistic odds would better serve reading public. End Entry # 070 insert.
Some only learn from examples of short stories. Since Texas Drifter strives to accomplish two objectives in his writing exercises: one let his written words speak for his spoken words; and two paint with words like artists paint with colors.
Following is example of Texas Drifter painting with words like artists paint with colors. Entry # 068 "Short Story News Break: Last Letter"
Dateline Marshall’s Law – America’s major news networks and Hollywood leftists pass off Obama’s propaganda as truth. Seems only “fair” for Marshall’s Law to present America’s future history as contemporary non-fiction entertainment. Thus satisfying equality standards of both Obama worshiping groups: journalists, and leftists who only believe in capitalism for celebrities that history once called court jesters.
Explaining not complaining, Marshall’s Law writing exercises are intended to portray current events in America. As contemporary government policies are evolving into scenarios stranger than fiction, conclusion might be that fictitious short stories are non-fiction writing exercises. Example, non-fiction short story screen play concept entitled. “Last Letter.”
Players: Ranch Owner, Dog, Texas drifter, & Letter Author
Act I
Ranch Owner: Drifter, postmaster gave me a letter he said might be for one of my workers. Envelope is addressed to Texas Drifter (hands letter to Drifter).
Drifter: (takes letter and quips) Thanks.
Rancher Owner: Did not know your real name was Texas Drifter.
Drifter: Did not say it was. (Dog growls at Ranch Owner as Drifter turns to walk away.)
Ranch Owner: Never did like that dog; Hey Drifter know why I keep you around?
Drifter (stops and turns half way around): Then things are even, Dog never liked you either. Why you keep me around, good work for ten dollars a day; plus food, shelter, and expenses.
Ranch Owner: That too, mostly cause trespassing , vandalism to, stealing from, and poaching on this ranch has completely stopped since you signed on as security scout.
Texas Drifter: If I told you how I do my job, you would cut my meager wages, or run me and Dog off. I half way like working here; so do not change that by bringing me any more mail.
Ranch Owner: Go read your mail; that is last letter I will ever bring you.
Texas Drifter: Sounds fair enough, here is a list of some supplies Dog and I need.
Sundown next day: Drifter sets pot of coffee and metal bowl full of beer on small camp fire, and opens letter.
My Dearest Texas Drifter,
Just a few words to dispel your anxieties about Obama’s FEMA man made natural disaster camps; there are probably forty thousand to fifty thousand citizens here. Camp is fenced in to protect us from outsiders wanting in to escape worsening conditions in this part of America. We are truly lucky ones despite less than perfect conditions, we at least have security, and solace knowing Obama’s Administration and Democrats especially Blue Dog Democrats are doing everything they can to provide for us.
Sanitary conditions are an open ditch. Food is served once a day and consists of liquid powdered milk over uncooked rice. Medical care is limited to barbiturates. Healthy camp residents are engaged in constructing red brick buildings to be used as showers. Rumors abound that Obama will visit to dedicate new showers we are all looking forward to enjoying.
I bribed one of guards with my wedding rings to mail you this letter to let you know even though times may be hard, FEMA and Obama, as well as Democrats including Blue Dog Democrats are doing everything they can to help us rebuild ours and America’s future.
(Texas Drifter crumbles letter and envelope and gently drops into camp fire.)
Texas Drifter whispers: You know Dog, tears still never change anything.
(Picks up coffee pot and asks Dog): Want some coffee in your beer?
Dog (smiles by bearing teeth with soft growl):
Drifter: Just asking, I finish my coffee; you finish your beer; be time to go earn our meager wages.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Monday, November 15, 2010
Continue Plus 293
Texas Drifter Justice For Feral Gate Keepers
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Justice is a sword with two edges, one is for private citizens deserving justice; the second edge is for political leaders and public bureaucrats deserving justice.
One Webster’s Dictionary defines “feral” as having escaped from domestication or civilization and becoming uncivilized or wild. This writing exercise “Justice For Feral Gate Keepers” reviews due processes for Democrats or Moderate Republicans and public bureaucrats seeking sovereign immunity from their crimes against or civil rights violations against private citizens.
More background information from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: “Sovereign immunity, or crown immunity, is a type of immunity that in common law jurisdictions trace its origins from early English law. Generally speaking it is doctrine that the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution; hence the saying, "the king (or queen) can do no wrong". In many cases, states have waived this immunity to allow for suits; in some cases, an individual may technically appear as defendant on the state's behalf.”
Does “spirit” of America’s Constitution suggest that justice may be delayed but should never be denied? Answer might be found in Article I Section 3 excerpt: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Reader’s first assignment finding other examples in U.S. Constitution re-enforcing above justice delayed but not denied concept.
Reader’s second assignment review brief “The General Epistle of Jude”; as those wiser than Texas Drifter have suggested that spiritual intent in U.S. Constitution had its Biblical origin in above New Testament Book. As Founding Fathers were men guided by Judeo-Christian teachings; do you my reader agree that this could be source denying elected kings and their bureaucrats, sovereign immunity for crimes and civil rights violations against private citizens?
Moving on to other “closer to home “examples; first using red light cameras to issue citations as greed motivated tool to generate extortion funds for municipal coffers.
First problem is replacing due process courts and being able to cross examine witness testifying against accused; with no witness capable of being cross examined for some bureaucratic administrator to assess extortion threats. Should this major due process violation result in bureaucrats being forced to reimburse those victimized their money with interest?
Second problem, should traffic accidents caused by drivers reacting to flash of camera light which causes drivers to swerve into oncoming traffic be allowed to seek civil damages from those enacting such greed based policies?
Recall, justice for incompetent, corrupt, racist, criminally engaging and or civil rights violating elected, appointed, or employed public officials or bureaucrats can only be delayed never denied.
Public gate keepers need to remember President Jackson’s adage, “equal opportunity without privilege”. Immunity from civil and criminal prosecution is not equal opportunity; plus earning twice wages of private sector employees is certainly unearned privilege.
Answer to strengthen spirit of Constitution involves adopting “Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation” for all municipal, education, county, state and federal employees. The policy shall be underwritten by public employee pension funds and assets.
Reader can correct following if incorrect: were not Founding Fathers objectives for America’s Constitutional due process political system, a government of, by, and for private citizens?
When did those patriotic conservative Judeo-Christian objectives become: government of Marxist-Fascist Democrats and Moderate Republicans, by over paid incompetent unaccountable in many cases minority ethnic racist bureaucrats; for public sector special interest groups like: public subsidy addicts, public sector unions, world owes me aristocrats, illegal immigrants, and Islamic terrorists?
Perhaps first legislation for America’s 2011 Congress should be Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation?
Final question, as Texas Drifter is getting all written out; who wants to be a citizen in a country without justice for feral gate keepers?
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Justice is a sword with two edges, one is for private citizens deserving justice; the second edge is for political leaders and public bureaucrats deserving justice.
One Webster’s Dictionary defines “feral” as having escaped from domestication or civilization and becoming uncivilized or wild. This writing exercise “Justice For Feral Gate Keepers” reviews due processes for Democrats or Moderate Republicans and public bureaucrats seeking sovereign immunity from their crimes against or civil rights violations against private citizens.
More background information from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: “Sovereign immunity, or crown immunity, is a type of immunity that in common law jurisdictions trace its origins from early English law. Generally speaking it is doctrine that the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution; hence the saying, "the king (or queen) can do no wrong". In many cases, states have waived this immunity to allow for suits; in some cases, an individual may technically appear as defendant on the state's behalf.”
Does “spirit” of America’s Constitution suggest that justice may be delayed but should never be denied? Answer might be found in Article I Section 3 excerpt: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Reader’s first assignment finding other examples in U.S. Constitution re-enforcing above justice delayed but not denied concept.
Reader’s second assignment review brief “The General Epistle of Jude”; as those wiser than Texas Drifter have suggested that spiritual intent in U.S. Constitution had its Biblical origin in above New Testament Book. As Founding Fathers were men guided by Judeo-Christian teachings; do you my reader agree that this could be source denying elected kings and their bureaucrats, sovereign immunity for crimes and civil rights violations against private citizens?
Moving on to other “closer to home “examples; first using red light cameras to issue citations as greed motivated tool to generate extortion funds for municipal coffers.
First problem is replacing due process courts and being able to cross examine witness testifying against accused; with no witness capable of being cross examined for some bureaucratic administrator to assess extortion threats. Should this major due process violation result in bureaucrats being forced to reimburse those victimized their money with interest?
Second problem, should traffic accidents caused by drivers reacting to flash of camera light which causes drivers to swerve into oncoming traffic be allowed to seek civil damages from those enacting such greed based policies?
Recall, justice for incompetent, corrupt, racist, criminally engaging and or civil rights violating elected, appointed, or employed public officials or bureaucrats can only be delayed never denied.
Public gate keepers need to remember President Jackson’s adage, “equal opportunity without privilege”. Immunity from civil and criminal prosecution is not equal opportunity; plus earning twice wages of private sector employees is certainly unearned privilege.
Answer to strengthen spirit of Constitution involves adopting “Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation” for all municipal, education, county, state and federal employees. The policy shall be underwritten by public employee pension funds and assets.
Reader can correct following if incorrect: were not Founding Fathers objectives for America’s Constitutional due process political system, a government of, by, and for private citizens?
When did those patriotic conservative Judeo-Christian objectives become: government of Marxist-Fascist Democrats and Moderate Republicans, by over paid incompetent unaccountable in many cases minority ethnic racist bureaucrats; for public sector special interest groups like: public subsidy addicts, public sector unions, world owes me aristocrats, illegal immigrants, and Islamic terrorists?
Perhaps first legislation for America’s 2011 Congress should be Public Employee Civil Liability Legislation?
Final question, as Texas Drifter is getting all written out; who wants to be a citizen in a country without justice for feral gate keepers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)