Texas Drifter Right On Why
Editor’s Note – Original title for this Texas Drifter writing exercise was “Mainstream News Media Treasonous Satanic Judas Goats With Less Integrity Than Heroin Addicted Strumpets Needing A Fix”; seemed wordy hence title “Right On Why”.
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Low budget research study re-discovers there are five components to any news report. First four: who, what, when, where, are easy. Fifth component “why” is what separates professional journalists from amateur propagandists.
America’s (who) main stream news networks and news syndicates (what) have evolved from well intentioned compassionate complainers to pure left wing America last propagandists; (when) starting with Woodrow Wilson’s devotion to political elites feudalization (where) of America.
Few examples of America last socialist-fascist news media propagandists. (Remember in pure Marxist political systems, all property and means of production are owned by political elites comparable to Obama, his allies, Obama’s Administration. In fascist political systems all property and means of production are owned by private citizens but are so regulated by political elites like Moderate Republicans that Marxist and fascist political-economic systems eventually end up at same place.)
Back to list of America last socialist-fascists news media propagandists: ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, New York Times, L.A. Times, Associated Press, PBS, and KRGV TV Channel 5 Weslaco, Texas. Two of worst examples include Katy Blank lecturing with socialist editorials as news. Second example includes KRGV TV Channel 5 Weslaco, Texas which editorialized as news that federal Border Patrol Agents were terrorists terrorizing illegal immigrants.
Above America last news media are allowed to practice their scurrilous propaganda as FCC is Obama’s lap playmate. Why, FCC knows as does EPA, Department of Education, Obama, and his allies all know that best economic stimulus package to create public sector jobs for public sector unions is fascism.
Readers, first assignment if you choose to accept it, list first one thousand America last news media sources to cross your mind.
Second, observation-question: why is it that one conservative radio talk show host is ninety-eight (98%) right on the “why” is his on air comments? Then ask why professional schooled trained main stream news journalists are an estimated ninety-eight (98%) inaccurate to totally wrong on “the why” in their news reports?
Simplistic answer would be one is smart and others are stupid. The closer to entire truth answer is that the one uses professional integrity to guide his work, as being truthful with his listeners is not an image making cliché.
As far as main stream media, reader knows Texas Drifter always tries to circle writing exercise endings back to writing exercise beginnings. As far America last propagandists masquerading as professional ethical journalists: “Mainstream News Media Treasonous Satanic Judas Goats With Less Integrity Than Heroin Addicted Strumpets Needing A Fix”.
Friday, August 27, 2010
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Continue Plus 266
Texas Drifter Obama’s Ties To Vietcong
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Future historians should be able to trace Obama and his Administrations’ political roots to North Vietnam’s Vietcong. It does not take an intellectual to conclude that Obama’s and his Administrations’ political policy ties to Vietcong; plus sympathies for Islamic Fascist terrorists does not serve best interest of America’s Constitutional Republic.
Starting with the comrade himself, Obama’s ties to Marxist-fascism can be traced back to those Obama socialized with and studied from during his early community activists years.
Introductory refresher notes: Marshall’s Law Townhall “Forty Year Spy Report; Entry # 010 December 4, 2008
Excerpts …
Assignment began before instructor was even a rookie. This story starts in 1968 when I was recruited to infiltrate anti-war groups which revealed strong influences of foreign Marxist governments.
Since hard core socialists think in terms of decades not years, their next move could be predicted by asking following question: where did the professional’ anti-war activists go after the Vietnam War?
These people and their sympathizers became civil servants, or sought elected or appointed offices. What better place than government to expand:
1) Subsidy addiction among the general population,
2) Government regulations that destroy property rights,
3) Policies which eliminate liberties guaranteed by Bill of Rights, and
4) Entangling alliances or economic treaties that reduce American sovereignty and domestic manufacturing base.
While these socialist policies were being enacted, efforts were also made to reduce America’s military capabilities:
1) Continuing negative main stream media propaganda,
2) Smaller defense budgets,
3) Transferring military technology to foreign adversaries,
4) Establishing foreign naval bases or ports of entry on American soil
5) Destroying America’s intelligence services
Communist agents tend to rely on following tactics:
1) Lies and broken promises;
2) Intimidation;
3) Greed;
4) Strategic deception (tampering with elections); and
5) Diversion tactics.
Covert or closet American socialists have same primary targets for control as those used by the North Vietnamese to “pacify” South Vietnam:
1) Control all levels of schools;
2) Control social services especially health care services; and
3) Control selection and actions of local “chieftains” also called politicians with “politically correct” bureaucratic enforcers (regulatory agencies) and easily manipulated youth
4) Manipulate major print, electronic, in modern times news media (add internet to list)
Instincts combined with field not desk experiences from October 1968 to December 2008, cause me to ponder following question: are socialist Democrats and their collaborators (moderate Republicans and anticonservative aristocrats) intentional and unintentional traitors too traditional America?
Answer will displease many as American baby boomers influenced by utopian Marxism in late sixties and early seventies are using same tactics of “revolutionaries” who established Marxist governments in Russia, China, Cuba, Vietnam and other countries to change America’s political and economic systems into communist fascist America.
End Excerpts …
Start Excerpts KGAB Third Monday Border security / Lenin, SDS, Obama …
7) Background: Marx, Hegel, Thomas Carlyle, Lenin, Bobby Seale, SDS Weathermen, and Obama (note – some information concluded from George H. Sabine writings 1961):
Marx: A socialist party must co-operate with middle-class revolutionists until the revolution succeeds. It must then turn against its allies; it must keep its own center of power intact; and though it cannot hope to make a successful socialist revolution, it must use every means of subversion and obstruction to prevent either business or government from becoming settled. It must force poor peasants against rich peasants; it must aim to nationalize the land; and it must force the revolutionary government as far as possible toward an attack on private property.
Hegel: political theme, state is morally superior to civil society.
Thomas Carlyle: hero worship is an authentic quality that appears from time to time in history. Examples then and now: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, and Obama.
Lenin: A socialist must never forget, namely that the democratic process is the only possible road to socialism ... it is impossible to construct socialism in an economy that lacks high level of production and democratic government … the more original, more class conscious, better armed minority forces its will upon the majority; a revolutionary party takes control and gets its majority later.
Lenin also supported “land hunger” poor economic times to get support from what are called today, public subsidy addicts and public employees. Lenin argued that the state produced by the revolution will be repressive like the state replaced by the revolution. Does role of “Soviets” Party of 1905 and Democratic Liberals’ Party in 2009 represent carbon copies? The answer can be found in Lenin’s SATE AND REVOLUTION. Conservatives need to not get lost in Marxist-Leninist- Fascist ideological theory and move on to learning strategies advocated by Lenin, and groups like Weathermen.
8) SDS Position Paper
1. Marxist – Leninist – Weatherman: beliefs same (as Obama and his Administration): hate private property, hate capitalists hate defenders of capitalism armed forces and constitutional domestic law enforcement agencies; and are willing to use any tactic to destroy their historical enemies and win. Obama’s role with Ayers might not have been social; probably instructor-student as Bill Ayers reportedly and may still teach revolution strategy; Bobbie Seale would have made good role model for Obama. Readers can and should research Bill Ayers speeches.
2. SDS split on strategy differences over targeting students with workers – Obama’s recent speech to students like old days
3. Public manners: cater sympathetically to masses “hero worship” and curse, insult, intimidate, destroy, or neutralize those challenging threatening political messiahs (like Obama).
4. Coup d tat – Weathermen took over SDS and controlled covertly – spent 40 years for “this is their time” in history; will not go quietly – history of Weathermen success of taking control of SDS; will probably try covert take over of U.S. government -
Use of word change in Obama’s campaign and in SDS position paper, (inside joke among radical leftists) “SDS Position Paper” distributed in late sixties: How do we continue to raise their (the peoples’) consciousness? Exhaust all political means. By using all means to exhaust the people until people become very clear as to what they have to do … change the system for a better one.” cited in March 1969 issue of the MOVEMENT, Interview with Bobby Seale.
Americans need to spend as much time studying leftist strategy as do studying leftists beliefs – easier to destroy enemy if know what they are going to do as opposed to what they are dreaming. Want to know how Obama is doing his part as revolutionary; review contemporary leftist writings. The current answer is Lenin would have “been impressed” with Obama’s early successes.
On the brighter side, as Custer’s scouts warned Custer; Leninist-Weathermen-Obama supporters and collaborators will learn that stealing America’s Constitutional Republic from fifty million to sixty million American Patriots; is different than stealing SDS from estimated one hundred thousand spoiled brats most of whom were still living on their parents’ money while staying high through college.
Only one question remains to be answered, will you the person you see every day in the mirror be remembered as an American Patriot; Leninist-Obama supporter; or one of those “not interested in politics” leeches living off victories of patriots’ battles?
End excerpts …
Remember Vietcong had four targets just like Obama and his Administration:
1. Control minds – public education system using Teacher’s Unions and NEA;
2. Control bodies with health care – reader should know what plan is being referenced;
3. Control personal conduct – ever heard of EPA – Hitler had Gestapo, Stalin had KGB, and Obama has EPA which would not doubt have had admiration of purely evil polipathic tyrants like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others reader can add to list.
4. Activist judges and anti-Constitution prosecutors.
Most peaceful way to neutralize above bureaucratic threats to America’s Constitutional Republic has four steps:
1. Elect Conservatives to House;
2. Elect Conservatives to Senate;
3. Elect Conservative President;
4. Refuse to appropriate any more tax dollars to fund: Department of Education; socialist health care programs designed to destroy America’s capitalist health care system; and especially EPA that needs to become footnote in American history.
Above four objectives are best peaceful ways to purge socialist-fascist threats to America’s domestic tranquility. Adjustments will need to made during America’s renaissance process. Reader should never forget that compromises with America’s domestic and foreign enemies will only cost more patriots their lives and unnecessarily drag out America’s political renaissance.
Reader should accept perpetual reality that Marxist–fascist like Obama, his Administration, liberal Democrats, Moderate Republicans, other Obama allies, plus Obama’s worshipers, have the moral standards and integrity of heroin addicts needing a fix on their best days. Reader should never ever trust or give these people slightest benefit of doubt, even on minor issues like is sun shining outside. America’s is waiting to be saved, how many conservatives will you register to vote today?
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Future historians should be able to trace Obama and his Administrations’ political roots to North Vietnam’s Vietcong. It does not take an intellectual to conclude that Obama’s and his Administrations’ political policy ties to Vietcong; plus sympathies for Islamic Fascist terrorists does not serve best interest of America’s Constitutional Republic.
Starting with the comrade himself, Obama’s ties to Marxist-fascism can be traced back to those Obama socialized with and studied from during his early community activists years.
Introductory refresher notes: Marshall’s Law Townhall “Forty Year Spy Report; Entry # 010 December 4, 2008
Excerpts …
Assignment began before instructor was even a rookie. This story starts in 1968 when I was recruited to infiltrate anti-war groups which revealed strong influences of foreign Marxist governments.
Since hard core socialists think in terms of decades not years, their next move could be predicted by asking following question: where did the professional’ anti-war activists go after the Vietnam War?
These people and their sympathizers became civil servants, or sought elected or appointed offices. What better place than government to expand:
1) Subsidy addiction among the general population,
2) Government regulations that destroy property rights,
3) Policies which eliminate liberties guaranteed by Bill of Rights, and
4) Entangling alliances or economic treaties that reduce American sovereignty and domestic manufacturing base.
While these socialist policies were being enacted, efforts were also made to reduce America’s military capabilities:
1) Continuing negative main stream media propaganda,
2) Smaller defense budgets,
3) Transferring military technology to foreign adversaries,
4) Establishing foreign naval bases or ports of entry on American soil
5) Destroying America’s intelligence services
Communist agents tend to rely on following tactics:
1) Lies and broken promises;
2) Intimidation;
3) Greed;
4) Strategic deception (tampering with elections); and
5) Diversion tactics.
Covert or closet American socialists have same primary targets for control as those used by the North Vietnamese to “pacify” South Vietnam:
1) Control all levels of schools;
2) Control social services especially health care services; and
3) Control selection and actions of local “chieftains” also called politicians with “politically correct” bureaucratic enforcers (regulatory agencies) and easily manipulated youth
4) Manipulate major print, electronic, in modern times news media (add internet to list)
Instincts combined with field not desk experiences from October 1968 to December 2008, cause me to ponder following question: are socialist Democrats and their collaborators (moderate Republicans and anticonservative aristocrats) intentional and unintentional traitors too traditional America?
Answer will displease many as American baby boomers influenced by utopian Marxism in late sixties and early seventies are using same tactics of “revolutionaries” who established Marxist governments in Russia, China, Cuba, Vietnam and other countries to change America’s political and economic systems into communist fascist America.
End Excerpts …
Start Excerpts KGAB Third Monday Border security / Lenin, SDS, Obama …
7) Background: Marx, Hegel, Thomas Carlyle, Lenin, Bobby Seale, SDS Weathermen, and Obama (note – some information concluded from George H. Sabine writings 1961):
Marx: A socialist party must co-operate with middle-class revolutionists until the revolution succeeds. It must then turn against its allies; it must keep its own center of power intact; and though it cannot hope to make a successful socialist revolution, it must use every means of subversion and obstruction to prevent either business or government from becoming settled. It must force poor peasants against rich peasants; it must aim to nationalize the land; and it must force the revolutionary government as far as possible toward an attack on private property.
Hegel: political theme, state is morally superior to civil society.
Thomas Carlyle: hero worship is an authentic quality that appears from time to time in history. Examples then and now: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, and Obama.
Lenin: A socialist must never forget, namely that the democratic process is the only possible road to socialism ... it is impossible to construct socialism in an economy that lacks high level of production and democratic government … the more original, more class conscious, better armed minority forces its will upon the majority; a revolutionary party takes control and gets its majority later.
Lenin also supported “land hunger” poor economic times to get support from what are called today, public subsidy addicts and public employees. Lenin argued that the state produced by the revolution will be repressive like the state replaced by the revolution. Does role of “Soviets” Party of 1905 and Democratic Liberals’ Party in 2009 represent carbon copies? The answer can be found in Lenin’s SATE AND REVOLUTION. Conservatives need to not get lost in Marxist-Leninist- Fascist ideological theory and move on to learning strategies advocated by Lenin, and groups like Weathermen.
8) SDS Position Paper
1. Marxist – Leninist – Weatherman: beliefs same (as Obama and his Administration): hate private property, hate capitalists hate defenders of capitalism armed forces and constitutional domestic law enforcement agencies; and are willing to use any tactic to destroy their historical enemies and win. Obama’s role with Ayers might not have been social; probably instructor-student as Bill Ayers reportedly and may still teach revolution strategy; Bobbie Seale would have made good role model for Obama. Readers can and should research Bill Ayers speeches.
2. SDS split on strategy differences over targeting students with workers – Obama’s recent speech to students like old days
3. Public manners: cater sympathetically to masses “hero worship” and curse, insult, intimidate, destroy, or neutralize those challenging threatening political messiahs (like Obama).
4. Coup d tat – Weathermen took over SDS and controlled covertly – spent 40 years for “this is their time” in history; will not go quietly – history of Weathermen success of taking control of SDS; will probably try covert take over of U.S. government -
Use of word change in Obama’s campaign and in SDS position paper, (inside joke among radical leftists) “SDS Position Paper” distributed in late sixties: How do we continue to raise their (the peoples’) consciousness? Exhaust all political means. By using all means to exhaust the people until people become very clear as to what they have to do … change the system for a better one.” cited in March 1969 issue of the MOVEMENT, Interview with Bobby Seale.
Americans need to spend as much time studying leftist strategy as do studying leftists beliefs – easier to destroy enemy if know what they are going to do as opposed to what they are dreaming. Want to know how Obama is doing his part as revolutionary; review contemporary leftist writings. The current answer is Lenin would have “been impressed” with Obama’s early successes.
On the brighter side, as Custer’s scouts warned Custer; Leninist-Weathermen-Obama supporters and collaborators will learn that stealing America’s Constitutional Republic from fifty million to sixty million American Patriots; is different than stealing SDS from estimated one hundred thousand spoiled brats most of whom were still living on their parents’ money while staying high through college.
Only one question remains to be answered, will you the person you see every day in the mirror be remembered as an American Patriot; Leninist-Obama supporter; or one of those “not interested in politics” leeches living off victories of patriots’ battles?
End excerpts …
Remember Vietcong had four targets just like Obama and his Administration:
1. Control minds – public education system using Teacher’s Unions and NEA;
2. Control bodies with health care – reader should know what plan is being referenced;
3. Control personal conduct – ever heard of EPA – Hitler had Gestapo, Stalin had KGB, and Obama has EPA which would not doubt have had admiration of purely evil polipathic tyrants like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others reader can add to list.
4. Activist judges and anti-Constitution prosecutors.
Most peaceful way to neutralize above bureaucratic threats to America’s Constitutional Republic has four steps:
1. Elect Conservatives to House;
2. Elect Conservatives to Senate;
3. Elect Conservative President;
4. Refuse to appropriate any more tax dollars to fund: Department of Education; socialist health care programs designed to destroy America’s capitalist health care system; and especially EPA that needs to become footnote in American history.
Above four objectives are best peaceful ways to purge socialist-fascist threats to America’s domestic tranquility. Adjustments will need to made during America’s renaissance process. Reader should never forget that compromises with America’s domestic and foreign enemies will only cost more patriots their lives and unnecessarily drag out America’s political renaissance.
Reader should accept perpetual reality that Marxist–fascist like Obama, his Administration, liberal Democrats, Moderate Republicans, other Obama allies, plus Obama’s worshipers, have the moral standards and integrity of heroin addicts needing a fix on their best days. Reader should never ever trust or give these people slightest benefit of doubt, even on minor issues like is sun shining outside. America’s is waiting to be saved, how many conservatives will you register to vote today?
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Continue Plus 265
Texas Drifter Myths About Freedom Of Religion
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Really inexpensive research study reveals that some conservatives are politically incorrect fools by supporting some myths about First Amendment. Conservatives who suggest that Constitution guarantees any religion right to build any “house of worship” anywhere they want are what Lenin used to call “useful idiots”.
Freedom of religious protections does not extend to any ideology which engages in murdering innocent American civilians to replace America’s Constitution with Islamic Fascist Sharia Law. A trait some might say is displayed by those wishing to build “stick in the eye” mosque next to hallowed ground for those honoring memory of 911 casualties.
Reader can follow “money trail” of those funding what some have called rude insensitive conduct by some Muslims to build mosque which shadow will cover part of America’s hallowed ground. Americans need to quit without thinking talking like fools; people wishing to murder you and your family are not beyond lying to you about their real world motives.
Side note about Texas Drifter, one my very few cheap thrills in life is being professionally right when everyone else is wrong. Your author was involved in a murder of a child decades and decades ago. Two senior investigators reported to case supervisor they felt child’s death was an accident as “distraught” father “could not wait to confess” his negligence was responsible for his step son’s death.
The supervisor turned to me and asked “you agree rookie”? My response, no both investigators are wrong, they stopped their investigation with “distraught” father’s confession. If they had kept doing their job; they would have discovered facts: one, two, three, four, five, and probably many more facts waiting to be discovered which will show the negligent accident was pre-meditated. (As reader can guess, Texas Drifter has never had any trouble making new friends among incompetent or lazy associates.)
It certainly would be nice if so called Conservative politicians, radio talk show hosts, and others would stop saying: "terrorists at war with America have a right to have their collaborators and sympathizers build religious centers next to places they murder innocent Americans, but it is rude or insensitive for terrorists to do so." Grow up pilgrims do you really think people who murder your family and friends are concerned about hurting your feelings?
Many also make argument that not all Muslims support Islamic Fascists strategies and objectives. How can anyone know which side Muslims not publicly denouncing Islamic Fascist terrorist activities support?
Back to myths about First Amendment, Constitution does not specify “separation of church and state”; so purge that concept from your mind. First Amendment prohibits respect for specific religious beliefs which would establish political theocracy in America.
Times have evolved where there is a thin line between theology and ideology; both are belief systems, one is based on spiritual beliefs and the other on atheist human beliefs. Due process consistency demands that rule by ideology elite is no more constitutional than rule by theocracy elite.
One of inalienable principles in Declaration of Independence which was is included in First Amendment is free will pursuit of happiness can not be achieved in either religious theocracy or ideological fascist tyranny.
First myth buster, religious sects engaged in murdering Americans and attempting to replace Constitution with Sharia law are not guaranteed First amendment protections. Same applies to collaborators and sympathizers who either fund or receive money from bad guys for propaganda like building mosque near 911.
Moving on to next myth buster, atheist ideologies Marxism, socialism, Leninist-Obama Policies, Liberal Democrats, and Moderate Republicans are included in First Amendment prohibitions against establishing preferential treatment for political ideologies which restricts pursuit of free will happiness as defined in Declaration of Independence. Translation: a non-religion with same unconstitutional results as unconstitutional theocracy is still unconstitutional.
Consider, are following socialist moral beliefs which violate one of Commandments, “thou shall not steal”, unconstitutional?
Some Americans owe all other Americans free: health care; free housing; free utilities; free food; free living expenses; free transportation and related expenses; free spending money; free access to other citizens property; free career advancements not based on qualifications or skills; free tax payer services for illegal immigrants; free education for the world excluding American private schools and home schooling systems.
Respecting establishment prohibitions against religious theocracy by all due process standards must also apply to those trying to force godless man made religion on American citizens.
Perhaps some reference material should be included before continuing this writing exercise.
(Excerpts) America’s First Tradition
Posted by Marshall's Law on Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:52:56 PM
Entry 003
America's first tradition will be identified after citizens understand threats to America's first tradition. Types of threats to America’s first tradition include:
I. Types American Counterfeit Conservatives:
The reason patriotic America conservatives need to be able to identify counterfeit conservatives is simple, the enemy from within can easier destroy organization or constitutional republic than outside enemies.
II. Types “Liberal” Threats: morally and ethically depraved, liberal Democrat socialist Marxists like Obama , most members U.S. House of Representatives, public subsidy addicts and their supporters, public subsidy addicts products and services dispersers, most public sector educators, most major news networks, and Greenists.
III Foreign Threats: imperialist nations threatening with economics and or force like China, Mexico, Venezuela, Russia, and Middle East, and international terrorists like Islamic Fascists, and narcotic terrorists. Some imperialist nations like Mexico seek to export poverty to reduce societal tensions to protect brutal corrupt aristocracy. Originally called barbarians now called illegal immigrants, smugglers, and ideological terrorists.
Americans who do not have the courage to defend their republic and or constitution against enemies, tyrants, and hypocrites do not deserve to be free. The destruction of America will result not from its enemies’ strengths rather from it patriots character weaknesses.
Greatest threats to America’s domestic and national security results from middle class citizens ignoring the Marshall adage, those who ignore security spend too much time at cemeteries.
Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Those posing greatest threats to America's first tradition include but are not limited too Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans collaborating with Democrats, and Science is God crowd better known as global warming true believers.
Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."
The first record of the word independence follows, Young Nathan entered Yale College at fourteen, having, ultimately the ministry in view. Just after the battle of Lexington, at a town meeting, with the audacity of boyhood, he cried out, “Let us never lay down our arms till we have achieved independence!”
Where had he learned that new word, not to be found in Shakespeare, or in Spencer, and in Bacon, only as applied to the Independents of England? Is there on record any earlier demand for independence than this bold utterance of the boy in April 1775? One later sentence made the young Nathan’s name immortal: I only regret that I have but one life to give to my country (country not government or political party).
First words of First Amendment are not about freedom from religion rather freedom from government religion which is America's first tradition. Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans, and Science is God crowd are all fanatically trying to abolish intent of America's first tradition.
First partial solution, "public employee civil liability legislation" needs to be enacted to offer private citizens civil justice for behavior by public servants who fail to deliver promised services, violate constitutionally protected rights, or engage in incompetent, negligent or criminal conduct. Sovereign immunity is another concept which has been prostituted by pop culture ethics. Sovereign immunity extends only to elected, or appointed officials (including national security institutions engage in national security) not hired domestic employed civil servants.
Child protective service agencies by basing conduct on "good intentions" not due process standards are good examples of civil servants needing to be held accountable by public employee liability legislation. Other examples include: public educators not providing educations, amnesty cities for crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and government employees interfering Southern border national security fence.
Government employees can provide their own public employee civil liability insurance by using their retirement programs trusts as insurance pools.
Since I am in a listing mind state, "America's First Tradition" summarizing points are:
1. The First Amendment is not about separation of church and state by not allowing religious citizens to serve in government. First Amendment is about not letting government become a false God with establishment of state theocracy.
2. The First Amendment is not about carte blanche religious freedoms. The First Amendment is about voluntary beliefs that do not affect social civil order in name of any religion or ideology (including Islamic Fascism, Marxism and Science is God.)
3. Sovereign immunity traditionally only applied to king and his appointees not peasants or serfs. In modern times, sovereign immunity only applies to the constitutional elected and appointments not public sector employees.
Closing thoughts, it is not the original intent of the Bill of Rights that is controversial; it is "living document" interpretations by individuals pursuing personal selfish more equal and better than you privileges that are by definition controversial.
In closing, Texas Drifter is not a religious scholar so reader might know following answers better than me: Heaven probably judges Judeo-Christians by their actions not their words. Second, terrorists slapping Judeo-Christians admonishing Judeo-Christians to turn the other cheek, probably do not have best interests of Judeo-Christians in their evil hearts. What say you reader?
Marshall’s Law Townhall Dateline – Really inexpensive research study reveals that some conservatives are politically incorrect fools by supporting some myths about First Amendment. Conservatives who suggest that Constitution guarantees any religion right to build any “house of worship” anywhere they want are what Lenin used to call “useful idiots”.
Freedom of religious protections does not extend to any ideology which engages in murdering innocent American civilians to replace America’s Constitution with Islamic Fascist Sharia Law. A trait some might say is displayed by those wishing to build “stick in the eye” mosque next to hallowed ground for those honoring memory of 911 casualties.
Reader can follow “money trail” of those funding what some have called rude insensitive conduct by some Muslims to build mosque which shadow will cover part of America’s hallowed ground. Americans need to quit without thinking talking like fools; people wishing to murder you and your family are not beyond lying to you about their real world motives.
Side note about Texas Drifter, one my very few cheap thrills in life is being professionally right when everyone else is wrong. Your author was involved in a murder of a child decades and decades ago. Two senior investigators reported to case supervisor they felt child’s death was an accident as “distraught” father “could not wait to confess” his negligence was responsible for his step son’s death.
The supervisor turned to me and asked “you agree rookie”? My response, no both investigators are wrong, they stopped their investigation with “distraught” father’s confession. If they had kept doing their job; they would have discovered facts: one, two, three, four, five, and probably many more facts waiting to be discovered which will show the negligent accident was pre-meditated. (As reader can guess, Texas Drifter has never had any trouble making new friends among incompetent or lazy associates.)
It certainly would be nice if so called Conservative politicians, radio talk show hosts, and others would stop saying: "terrorists at war with America have a right to have their collaborators and sympathizers build religious centers next to places they murder innocent Americans, but it is rude or insensitive for terrorists to do so." Grow up pilgrims do you really think people who murder your family and friends are concerned about hurting your feelings?
Many also make argument that not all Muslims support Islamic Fascists strategies and objectives. How can anyone know which side Muslims not publicly denouncing Islamic Fascist terrorist activities support?
Back to myths about First Amendment, Constitution does not specify “separation of church and state”; so purge that concept from your mind. First Amendment prohibits respect for specific religious beliefs which would establish political theocracy in America.
Times have evolved where there is a thin line between theology and ideology; both are belief systems, one is based on spiritual beliefs and the other on atheist human beliefs. Due process consistency demands that rule by ideology elite is no more constitutional than rule by theocracy elite.
One of inalienable principles in Declaration of Independence which was is included in First Amendment is free will pursuit of happiness can not be achieved in either religious theocracy or ideological fascist tyranny.
First myth buster, religious sects engaged in murdering Americans and attempting to replace Constitution with Sharia law are not guaranteed First amendment protections. Same applies to collaborators and sympathizers who either fund or receive money from bad guys for propaganda like building mosque near 911.
Moving on to next myth buster, atheist ideologies Marxism, socialism, Leninist-Obama Policies, Liberal Democrats, and Moderate Republicans are included in First Amendment prohibitions against establishing preferential treatment for political ideologies which restricts pursuit of free will happiness as defined in Declaration of Independence. Translation: a non-religion with same unconstitutional results as unconstitutional theocracy is still unconstitutional.
Consider, are following socialist moral beliefs which violate one of Commandments, “thou shall not steal”, unconstitutional?
Some Americans owe all other Americans free: health care; free housing; free utilities; free food; free living expenses; free transportation and related expenses; free spending money; free access to other citizens property; free career advancements not based on qualifications or skills; free tax payer services for illegal immigrants; free education for the world excluding American private schools and home schooling systems.
Respecting establishment prohibitions against religious theocracy by all due process standards must also apply to those trying to force godless man made religion on American citizens.
Perhaps some reference material should be included before continuing this writing exercise.
(Excerpts) America’s First Tradition
Posted by Marshall's Law on Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:52:56 PM
Entry 003
America's first tradition will be identified after citizens understand threats to America's first tradition. Types of threats to America’s first tradition include:
I. Types American Counterfeit Conservatives:
The reason patriotic America conservatives need to be able to identify counterfeit conservatives is simple, the enemy from within can easier destroy organization or constitutional republic than outside enemies.
II. Types “Liberal” Threats: morally and ethically depraved, liberal Democrat socialist Marxists like Obama , most members U.S. House of Representatives, public subsidy addicts and their supporters, public subsidy addicts products and services dispersers, most public sector educators, most major news networks, and Greenists.
III Foreign Threats: imperialist nations threatening with economics and or force like China, Mexico, Venezuela, Russia, and Middle East, and international terrorists like Islamic Fascists, and narcotic terrorists. Some imperialist nations like Mexico seek to export poverty to reduce societal tensions to protect brutal corrupt aristocracy. Originally called barbarians now called illegal immigrants, smugglers, and ideological terrorists.
Americans who do not have the courage to defend their republic and or constitution against enemies, tyrants, and hypocrites do not deserve to be free. The destruction of America will result not from its enemies’ strengths rather from it patriots character weaknesses.
Greatest threats to America’s domestic and national security results from middle class citizens ignoring the Marshall adage, those who ignore security spend too much time at cemeteries.
Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Those posing greatest threats to America's first tradition include but are not limited too Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans collaborating with Democrats, and Science is God crowd better known as global warming true believers.
Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."
The first record of the word independence follows, Young Nathan entered Yale College at fourteen, having, ultimately the ministry in view. Just after the battle of Lexington, at a town meeting, with the audacity of boyhood, he cried out, “Let us never lay down our arms till we have achieved independence!”
Where had he learned that new word, not to be found in Shakespeare, or in Spencer, and in Bacon, only as applied to the Independents of England? Is there on record any earlier demand for independence than this bold utterance of the boy in April 1775? One later sentence made the young Nathan’s name immortal: I only regret that I have but one life to give to my country (country not government or political party).
First words of First Amendment are not about freedom from religion rather freedom from government religion which is America's first tradition. Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans, and Science is God crowd are all fanatically trying to abolish intent of America's first tradition.
First partial solution, "public employee civil liability legislation" needs to be enacted to offer private citizens civil justice for behavior by public servants who fail to deliver promised services, violate constitutionally protected rights, or engage in incompetent, negligent or criminal conduct. Sovereign immunity is another concept which has been prostituted by pop culture ethics. Sovereign immunity extends only to elected, or appointed officials (including national security institutions engage in national security) not hired domestic employed civil servants.
Child protective service agencies by basing conduct on "good intentions" not due process standards are good examples of civil servants needing to be held accountable by public employee liability legislation. Other examples include: public educators not providing educations, amnesty cities for crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and government employees interfering Southern border national security fence.
Government employees can provide their own public employee civil liability insurance by using their retirement programs trusts as insurance pools.
Since I am in a listing mind state, "America's First Tradition" summarizing points are:
1. The First Amendment is not about separation of church and state by not allowing religious citizens to serve in government. First Amendment is about not letting government become a false God with establishment of state theocracy.
2. The First Amendment is not about carte blanche religious freedoms. The First Amendment is about voluntary beliefs that do not affect social civil order in name of any religion or ideology (including Islamic Fascism, Marxism and Science is God.)
3. Sovereign immunity traditionally only applied to king and his appointees not peasants or serfs. In modern times, sovereign immunity only applies to the constitutional elected and appointments not public sector employees.
Closing thoughts, it is not the original intent of the Bill of Rights that is controversial; it is "living document" interpretations by individuals pursuing personal selfish more equal and better than you privileges that are by definition controversial.
In closing, Texas Drifter is not a religious scholar so reader might know following answers better than me: Heaven probably judges Judeo-Christians by their actions not their words. Second, terrorists slapping Judeo-Christians admonishing Judeo-Christians to turn the other cheek, probably do not have best interests of Judeo-Christians in their evil hearts. What say you reader?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)