Press Release: Affirmative Action Is A Sin
Dateline Marshall’s Law Townhall – Affirmative Action is discrimination which is cheating for advantage, which is stealing which is offense against religious law “Thou Shall Not Steal” of Ten Commandments. Translation affirmative action violates Ten Commandments and is a sin.
Participants in affirmative action are pre-meditated sinners; also know as professional thieves. Putting a profession thief on America's Supreme Court does not reflect well on those appointing self acknowledged thieves to public office. Theme for this writing exercise is affirmative action is a sin regardless of Biblical interpretation guiding your life.
It must be noted anti Judeo-Christian: Marxist Fascists Liberal democrats, Obama’s liberation theology gangsters in politics for their own self enrichments, Obama’s political zombies, public subsidy addicts beneficiaries of taxpayer programs, and many government employees are not expected to appreciate any writing exercise about sin or immorality.
Affirmative action type policies are not new to American politics, President Jackson’s creed of equal opportunity without privilege can be traced back to 1820’s. Compare President Jackson’s standards to Obama’s contemporary government policies of defending affirmative action bribes with special privileges based on race, ethnic, heritage, and gender which is a sin defined by the Ten Commandments.
Reinstating the obvious, affirmative action in addition to being a sin; also violates due process concept of U. S. Constitution. Affirmative action is based on seeking retribution through punishment from those not committing any crime. Simply stated your great, great, great grandfathers’ neighbor steals a horse and victim descendents of that crime want you to pay for the horse and do the time.
Not only is affirmative action a sin against heaven, it is also unconstitutional. A different interpretation of a popular expression; it takes a village idiot to be willing to do time for a crime they did not commit. This is a fun writing exercise, know where to start, know points to make, not sure where will end up.
Any organization guided by affirmative action not competitive standards is guaranteed to end up at top of history’s great losers list. Need a perfect example, examine America’ public education system building an institution’s bureaucracy on “time spent" post graduate degrees.
This could be one of those unexpected curves in this writing exercise, everyone knows how contemporary governments and many public employees act more like domestic barbarians than examples of Judeo-Christian traditions. While one private citizens' example involved what were called Sunday Houses. Consider the following information first published by Esther Mueller, "Sunday Houses of Fredericksburg," Texas Monthly, April 1930.
SUNDAY HOUSES. Sunday houses were small second dwellings maintained near a church as a weekend place of residence. They became popular in the late 1800s among farmers and ranchers who lived in areas too remote to permit commuting to services.
The families owning such houses normally left their farms and ranches Saturday morning, journeyed to town, took care of shopping and business, attended an evening dance or party, and spent the night in the Sunday house.
On Sunday they attended church in the morning and either returned home in the afternoon or attended Sunday school in the afternoon, and then spent a second night in town. Sunday houses were also used when a member of the family needed to stay in town to conduct business or receive medical attention. Some Sunday houses became the residences of retired ranchers when their land was turned over to their sons. Although in Texas Sunday Houses were almost exclusively confined to Germans in the Hill
The phenomenon was not unique to Texas. Similar houses were used in the 1660s in Middlebury, Connecticut, and a counterpart to the Sunday house exists in the Pennsylvania Dutch country. Sunday houses were small, usually having only two rooms, and often made of frame rather than rock.
The ground floor usually had a single room with a lean-to kitchen behind and a slant-roofed porch in front. Occasionally a second room was added. The houses were furnished for light housekeeping with a fireplace to provide heat and a place to prepare meals. There was no running water.
Sunday houses originated for several reasons. Since there were few rural churches, a weekend town residence made it easier to attend services. And the social contact of a weekend in town provided compensation for the isolation of rural life. Such German settlements as Fredericksburg, New Braunfels, and Castroville were laid out as farm villages, and it was expected that farmers would build their houses in town and journey each day to outlying fields and pastures, in the European manner. To that end, farmers were granted town lots.
Soon after initial colonization, however, Germans moved out to settle in isolated farmsteads on their land, like their Anglo-American counterparts. The Catholic and Lutheran churches, however, did not soon follow their parishioners into the countryside, but stayed instead in the county seats. Many devout Germans therefore erected Sunday houses, often on the town lots originally intended for their homes.
Certain streets in Fredericksburg were lined with Sunday houses, and a surviving cluster is found on West San Antonio Street, near St. Mary's Catholic Church. Others still stand on West Main and South Milam streets. Clusters of Sunday houses also developed around St. Paul Lutheran Church in Cave Creek and in the village of Harper. The custom began to die in the 1920s with the advent of improved roads and motor vehicles. Esther Mueller, "Sunday Houses of Fredericksburg," Texas Monthly, April 1930.
Back to contemporary times, on second thought perhaps this is a good place to end this writing exercise with fresh memories of America before the advent of domestic anti Judeo-Christian barbarians.
