Pox On America’s Addictocracy
Mobocracy is rule by mob. Addictocracy is rule by gangster puppets for public sector subsidy addicts. This writing exercise reviews America’s evolution from constitutional republic to addictocracy masquerading as politically correct democracy.
Original title was “Principles Addicts Lessons”. First goal of all American patriots is national security. Why national security, no national security no place for America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights to exist. The first two objectives in any and every security plan are control perimeter and secure premises. These two objectives require "backed up" threats with measured force and “edge” intelligence on both good guys and bad guys. Only after objectives are accomplished and being managed, are plans enacted to resolve beyond perimeter threats.
One example of not having edge intelligence is Custer’s Last Stand; though perhaps a better example could be used since Custer’s vanity ignored his scout’s warnings and resulted in getting good troops massacred. Custer’s lessons, good intelligence is worthless if ignored. A comparable example involves tying up and destroying terrorists on Middle Eastern soil and not exploiting troops’ sacrifices by not securing America’s Southern porous border. Patriots need to learn to distinguish between command decisions based on error in judgment, and bad decisions based on inexperience, vanity, or greed.
I can already imagine whining, why do you need intelligence on good guys? Answer is simple, winning is about comparing capabilities/resources and appropriate timing between combating sides. Learning question, your side has twenty volunteer professionals with fully automatic weapons. The bad guys have two hundred conscripts with single shot black powder muskets. You learn the bad guys always take naps in the same gulley between two and four every afternoon. What would your attack strategy be? Helping you with the answer, there are only two places in combat scenarios, first place and losers.
Not a silly illustration when you consider terrorists generally operate with only one advantage surprise attacks mostly on civilians. Identifying bad guys is easier than identifying undependable good guys which can be as useless as bad guys.
The first component of securing premises is separating good guys from: bad guys, bad guys’ collaborators, and undependable good guys. How dangerous can undependable good guys be, ever heard name Brutus? Addicts are the largest number of undependable people in America. By some estimates addicts represent seventy percent of America’s legal population.
Definition of addict, one who devotes or surrenders oneself to something habitually or obsessively; not an unavoidable sin since the choice to start addictive behavior is usually voluntary. Addictions threatening America’s National Security in ascending order are public subsidy products and services, drugs (recreation), out of control emotions: vanity, hate, and greed.
Drugs include socially accepted drugs and non-socially accepted drugs. Any inadequate entertainment list covers obsessions with sex, partying, sports, hobbies, and passive events like watching television and playing video games.
Vanity addictions are tied to knowing what is best for everyone else with salvation ideologies like Greenism. Forcing “green” beliefs on others violates the Bill of Rights provisions about “respecting no establishment of religion” which includes Marxist-fascist ideologies.
Hate and prejudice are third category is this group of addictions. Discrimination and special privileges for minorities against Caucasians is no more acceptable that reverse behavior against minorities regardless of what politically correct crowd advocates.
Greatest addiction threat to America’s National Security and constitutional republic is without a doubt greed driven addiction. Two primary types of greed include private sector and public sector. Private sector greed based addiction starts with internationalism’s trading “fair market profits” at the expense of national security by destroying America’s domestic manufacturing base. Next group is represented by unethical capitalists. You can develop your own list. Third are credit addicts who always exist on borrowed time. Fourth are those who steal or defraud private citizens out of their money or property.
Next group of addicts threatening America’s traditional future are public sector addicts. First are public sector credit addicts who are unfamiliar with concepts of balanced public budgets. Second are elected and appointed public officials addicted to political power which is dispersed as taxpayer public subsides through gifts, grants, or government contracts.
Examples include U.S. Senators and Congressman, state and local officials addicted to campaign donations generated by collateral retail profits from criminal activities as a result of porous Southern border. Another way of saying, most American politicians are simply laundering money from violent crimes against honest hard working American citizens. Truth be known, popular support for most elected and appointed public officials is less than ten percent because Americans know what politicians are afraid to admit, most elected officials are little more than gangster puppets.
Third group of public sector addicts include many civil servant who provide incompetent or no services for extravagant salaries and benefits. How can any organization ever improve when promotions not employment terminations are solutions for stupidity, incompetence, or citizen abuse? Fourth group of public sector addicts include those dependent on stealing public finances or property.
The last and largest public subsidy addicts group, beneficiaries of taxpayer funded subsidies, but some estimates over seventy percent of American population.
Absolute truth, addicts are not known to choose best behavior over their addictions. Some addicts who put their addictions before doing what is right, heroin addicts, alcoholics, gambling addicts, and credit addicts. A better known example Judas betrayed Jesus for greed. Can any non-addicted person, really expect America’s private and public sector addicts to abandon their addictions for America’ National Security or Constitution?
Controlling America’s Southern porous perimeter is easy, physical barriers and reduce motivation to cross. Illegal immigrants crossed for greed, and greed will peacefully force them to return to their homes. Give illegals sixty days to return home with illegally earned property; then implement zero tolerance asset forfeiture programs with not appeasable deportations.
Next, limit public services and subsidies to only American citizens and legal residents, none to illegal immigrants no exceptions. Also confiscate property of those providing aid or comfort to illegals. Examples: knowingly transport and lose vehicle; knowing provide lodging and lose home, employ and lose business. Learned decades ago as security consultant, that I was not hired to be anyone’ friend; rather consult on ways to protect health, freedom and property. These policies would make it easier to apprehend terrorists as there would be fewer illegal immigrants in country.
As for politicians like Osama and Bush type family clans who are both vying to be America’s next addictocracy political puppet; remind them that supporting amnesty type programs are encouraging illegals to enter America, and they should be considered accessories to every crime committed by every illegal immigrant against any American citizen or legal resident.
As patriots tend to be citizens with individual consciences not persons with consciences guided by addiction, it is up to each patriot to choose their own strategy for dealing with America’s evolving addictocracy.
Obama like Bush’s regime will not be good for America. Why, not because Obama is half black; rather racist motivations by American Blacks and many Hispanics, along with politically correct racism by America’s liberals and compassionate Republicans who were and still are willing to trade leadership integrity for false prophets.
The one character trait that American last crowd members all share in common is they have personalities of two year old children in adult bodies.
If life were fair, perhaps Obama, Bush, and rest of America’s never grew up adults should by law be required to wear only diapers so American conservative patriotic citizens will never forget who was, is responsible for pox on America’s addictocracy.
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Continue Plus 93
Press Release
Brownsville, Texas: President – Elect Obama Turns to American Tax Payer Funded “America Last” College for Transitional Team.
President –Elect Obama has turned too University Texas Brownsville - Texas Southmost College as one of Obama’s transitional team members.
UTB -TSC has a long standing reputation for opposing U.S. national security by vehemently supporting a porous southern border between United States and Mexico.
Other policies supported by UTB – TSC includes ignoring not condemning collateral retail profits from criminal activities for Texas border businesses from: drug smuggling, smuggling illegal immigrants, drug trafficking, gun smuggling, putting Americans out of work with cheaper illegal wages by illegal immigrants.
Continued tolerated abuses of extortion, kidnapping, kidnapping, thieving, sexual torture, rape, fraud of public resources for education, health, and other public services; all mostly from American Hispanic citizens. Other injuries and deaths again to mostly Hispanic Americans as well as other crimes are all caused by illegal immigrants.
Other threats ignored by UTB –TSC include providing citizenship to an estimated thirty five to forty million uneducated illiterate illegal immigrants who will totally destroy America’s traditions, values, and Constitution. Results some have suggested is consistent with UTB –TSC discretionary support for racist agenda like “reconquesta”.
UTB –TSC porous border policies also contribute to major massive public health threats caused by uncontrolled illegal immigration. Threats to national security from foreign terrorists and imperialist nations can be reviewed by other news agencies.
Texas author, John R. Marshall, suggests UTB - TSC staff, employees, and leftist racist students have right to promote Obama policies; only not with public tax dollars. One Amendment does not allow government to “respect establishment of religion.”
Consistency does not allow government to “respect establishment of racist beliefs that promote domestic disorder, and threaten national security.” Soluton UTB -TSC be denied all federal tax dollars until offending behavior stopped, with ban on federal tax dollars for ten years as a lesson for future offensive behavior. Concerned citizens can retain private sector attorney to implement process.
It is doubtful a President Obama, liberal Democrats or their propagandist news media, counterfeit conservative Republicans, Southern border politicians, or those associated with UTB – TSC will have desire to abandon their American last policies to improve U.S. National Security even if it means saving lives of their own children.
The only solution seems to be patriots and traditional conservatives.
Brownsville, Texas: President – Elect Obama Turns to American Tax Payer Funded “America Last” College for Transitional Team.
President –Elect Obama has turned too University Texas Brownsville - Texas Southmost College as one of Obama’s transitional team members.
UTB -TSC has a long standing reputation for opposing U.S. national security by vehemently supporting a porous southern border between United States and Mexico.
Other policies supported by UTB – TSC includes ignoring not condemning collateral retail profits from criminal activities for Texas border businesses from: drug smuggling, smuggling illegal immigrants, drug trafficking, gun smuggling, putting Americans out of work with cheaper illegal wages by illegal immigrants.
Continued tolerated abuses of extortion, kidnapping, kidnapping, thieving, sexual torture, rape, fraud of public resources for education, health, and other public services; all mostly from American Hispanic citizens. Other injuries and deaths again to mostly Hispanic Americans as well as other crimes are all caused by illegal immigrants.
Other threats ignored by UTB –TSC include providing citizenship to an estimated thirty five to forty million uneducated illiterate illegal immigrants who will totally destroy America’s traditions, values, and Constitution. Results some have suggested is consistent with UTB –TSC discretionary support for racist agenda like “reconquesta”.
UTB –TSC porous border policies also contribute to major massive public health threats caused by uncontrolled illegal immigration. Threats to national security from foreign terrorists and imperialist nations can be reviewed by other news agencies.
Texas author, John R. Marshall, suggests UTB - TSC staff, employees, and leftist racist students have right to promote Obama policies; only not with public tax dollars. One Amendment does not allow government to “respect establishment of religion.”
Consistency does not allow government to “respect establishment of racist beliefs that promote domestic disorder, and threaten national security.” Soluton UTB -TSC be denied all federal tax dollars until offending behavior stopped, with ban on federal tax dollars for ten years as a lesson for future offensive behavior. Concerned citizens can retain private sector attorney to implement process.
It is doubtful a President Obama, liberal Democrats or their propagandist news media, counterfeit conservative Republicans, Southern border politicians, or those associated with UTB – TSC will have desire to abandon their American last policies to improve U.S. National Security even if it means saving lives of their own children.
The only solution seems to be patriots and traditional conservatives.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Citizens Passions 92
Questions Needing Answers
1) Did Black or African Americans have to engage in racist or criminal strategies to get Obama elected President?
2) If the answer is yes, then Obama should not be allowed to serve out his term as President; if the answer is no, then all public policies involving “equal employment opportunity commission” and affirmative action” should be immediately abolished. Why should public sanctioned discrimination policies exist if minority members can democratically be elected to highest office in America’s Constitution?
3) If Obama did not need EEOC or Affirmative Action policies to protect himself from Western European Anglos for his political successes; who are the racial discrimination threats to minority members’ political ambitions?
Answer includes those exploiting many Black and Hispanic minority groups for political power and profits; groups like liberal Democrats, major news broadcasts announcers and propagandists also called journalists and reporters.
Continuing, Hollywood, celebrities seeking career enhancing exposure, also are other special interest groups like educators, health care experts, social service workers, and activist judges using public subsidy addictions for votes to control minority members’ political behavior.
1) Did Black or African Americans have to engage in racist or criminal strategies to get Obama elected President?
2) If the answer is yes, then Obama should not be allowed to serve out his term as President; if the answer is no, then all public policies involving “equal employment opportunity commission” and affirmative action” should be immediately abolished. Why should public sanctioned discrimination policies exist if minority members can democratically be elected to highest office in America’s Constitution?
3) If Obama did not need EEOC or Affirmative Action policies to protect himself from Western European Anglos for his political successes; who are the racial discrimination threats to minority members’ political ambitions?
Answer includes those exploiting many Black and Hispanic minority groups for political power and profits; groups like liberal Democrats, major news broadcasts announcers and propagandists also called journalists and reporters.
Continuing, Hollywood, celebrities seeking career enhancing exposure, also are other special interest groups like educators, health care experts, social service workers, and activist judges using public subsidy addictions for votes to control minority members’ political behavior.
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Continue Plus 91
2008 Presidential Election Random Isolated Events
The 2008 Presidential election was held between two similar candidates. Obama supported Marxist redistrbution of wealth using excessive taxes to take from those earning more than two hundred thousand dollars to give too non-tax payers.
McCain supported oppressive taxes against oil company’s excessive profits; despite the fact that America’s oil companies compete against foriegn corporate-national enterprises and other nations. America’s thus far private sector not nationalized oil companies are critical to national security reserves which America will need in future times.
Other comparisons between Obama and McCain include both being loyal to Greenism, the world’s next fascist movement.
Two disadvantages Obama displays over McCain are Obama’s lack of loyalty to public integrity by not as promised limiting campaign dollars to federal funds. Second, Obama’s preference for anti-American groups seeking to destroy America‘s heritage, traditions, and constitution.
Groups supporting McCain’s election include: anti-conservative aristocrat families; some examples: Bush, Dole, and symbolic name Romanoff’s. Also included are unethical capitalists, internationalist conservatives, blindly optimistic pilgrim conservatives, populist conservatives, and counterfeit conservatives. Final group forcing to tolerate McCain’s campaign are traditional patriotic realist conservatives.
As for Obama, socialist intellectuals, and hordes of socialist journalists, entertainers, and court jesters; their place in history is with Trotsky and Lenin.
Politicians like Clintons and their socialist Gestapo supporters like public educators and public subsidy addicts, public subsidy distribution services bureaucrats, environmental fascists like Greenists closer mirror Stalin’s understanding of manipulating power for power; and will eventually do away with Obama’s sheep as Stalin did away with Lenin's and Trotsky true followers.
The mob atmosphere enforcers for socialist democrats include black minority racists whose influence on the 2008 was significant. Also included were large segments of minority Hispanic racists who were more in the game for handouts than supporting Osama’s political agenda. Final mob rule enforcers include socialist activist judges.
Outside threats to America’s traditions and constitutional republic included threats to democratic process from illegal votes by what used to be called barbarians, now called illegal immigrants.
Additional standard threats included international traffickers, international smugglers, international terrorists like Islamic Fascists; and imperialist nations like Russia, China, Middle East, Mexico, and Venezuela. You the reader can add to list.
No matter who is elected America’s next President, American citizens need to return to using domestic resources for basic principles like Common National Defense, Domestic Security protecting individual life and individual liberties, and free will pursuits of happiness.
There are not enough pubic or private monies to allow America to continue pursuing nationalistic fascist policies in ownership policies for financial institutions, insurance companies, mortgage companies, banks, vehicle manufacturing plants, and other “bargains” of the week.
Similar policies need to be adapted to using public resources for bottomless pits for education grants, private health donations, and all the other public welfare subsidies except to for possibly food.
Ugly truth is that limitless public subsidy addictions for non-producers merely forces working middle class citizens out of affordable products and services markets. Creating artificially high market places to benefit non-producers which punishes middle class producers is not reasonable, fair, or economic justice.
Socialist support opposite economic policies, as it is easier to steal or extort money for redistribution than get hardworking middle class to donate their money to those not believed worthy of donations.
The only differences between America’s 2008 Presidential candidates, one is a committed Marxist socialist living to destroy America, and the other only advocates Marxist socialist policies against successful American companies important to America’s national security when it is politically correct too.
The 2008 Presidential election was held between two similar candidates. Obama supported Marxist redistrbution of wealth using excessive taxes to take from those earning more than two hundred thousand dollars to give too non-tax payers.
McCain supported oppressive taxes against oil company’s excessive profits; despite the fact that America’s oil companies compete against foriegn corporate-national enterprises and other nations. America’s thus far private sector not nationalized oil companies are critical to national security reserves which America will need in future times.
Other comparisons between Obama and McCain include both being loyal to Greenism, the world’s next fascist movement.
Two disadvantages Obama displays over McCain are Obama’s lack of loyalty to public integrity by not as promised limiting campaign dollars to federal funds. Second, Obama’s preference for anti-American groups seeking to destroy America‘s heritage, traditions, and constitution.
Groups supporting McCain’s election include: anti-conservative aristocrat families; some examples: Bush, Dole, and symbolic name Romanoff’s. Also included are unethical capitalists, internationalist conservatives, blindly optimistic pilgrim conservatives, populist conservatives, and counterfeit conservatives. Final group forcing to tolerate McCain’s campaign are traditional patriotic realist conservatives.
As for Obama, socialist intellectuals, and hordes of socialist journalists, entertainers, and court jesters; their place in history is with Trotsky and Lenin.
Politicians like Clintons and their socialist Gestapo supporters like public educators and public subsidy addicts, public subsidy distribution services bureaucrats, environmental fascists like Greenists closer mirror Stalin’s understanding of manipulating power for power; and will eventually do away with Obama’s sheep as Stalin did away with Lenin's and Trotsky true followers.
The mob atmosphere enforcers for socialist democrats include black minority racists whose influence on the 2008 was significant. Also included were large segments of minority Hispanic racists who were more in the game for handouts than supporting Osama’s political agenda. Final mob rule enforcers include socialist activist judges.
Outside threats to America’s traditions and constitutional republic included threats to democratic process from illegal votes by what used to be called barbarians, now called illegal immigrants.
Additional standard threats included international traffickers, international smugglers, international terrorists like Islamic Fascists; and imperialist nations like Russia, China, Middle East, Mexico, and Venezuela. You the reader can add to list.
No matter who is elected America’s next President, American citizens need to return to using domestic resources for basic principles like Common National Defense, Domestic Security protecting individual life and individual liberties, and free will pursuits of happiness.
There are not enough pubic or private monies to allow America to continue pursuing nationalistic fascist policies in ownership policies for financial institutions, insurance companies, mortgage companies, banks, vehicle manufacturing plants, and other “bargains” of the week.
Similar policies need to be adapted to using public resources for bottomless pits for education grants, private health donations, and all the other public welfare subsidies except to for possibly food.
Ugly truth is that limitless public subsidy addictions for non-producers merely forces working middle class citizens out of affordable products and services markets. Creating artificially high market places to benefit non-producers which punishes middle class producers is not reasonable, fair, or economic justice.
Socialist support opposite economic policies, as it is easier to steal or extort money for redistribution than get hardworking middle class to donate their money to those not believed worthy of donations.
The only differences between America’s 2008 Presidential candidates, one is a committed Marxist socialist living to destroy America, and the other only advocates Marxist socialist policies against successful American companies important to America’s national security when it is politically correct too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)