Forty Year Spy Report
The assignment began before the instructor was even a rookie. This story starts in 1968 when I was recruited to infiltrate anti-war groups.
The individual who approached the college student explained the assignment as follows: this is a special intelligence operation which requires the recruit to gather and report information on the anti-war movement.
When the recruiter was asked why me, the answer was: two reasons, you don’t look the part, and the operation requires independents since nobody knows the extent of the communists incursions on American soil.
Rules for the assignment were simple:
1) only the recruiter knows of your existence;
2) survive by not getting caught;
3) trust no one but the recruiter;
4) report only to the recruiter; and
5) if the recruiter is lost, the new assignment is to identify own targets and finance independent operations.
Following the taking of an oath to uphold and defend the constitution; specific details were reviewed on how future contacts would be made.
The recruiter’s final advice: never forget that when it comes to this kind of work: international socialists have more resources, are better trained, better organized, and are brutally ruthless; so never forget that this is a “one mistake only” business.
It was not long before the then rookie now a surveillance instructor experienced the organizational skills of the underground. It seemed that every community had an underground contact. It was common practice to allow local contacts to arrange for lodging at safe houses when moving through different towns.
On many occasions these were abandoned or vacant houses or buildings. In some places these shelters were residences of people who were on vacation.
When the rookie asked about the cops, he was told not to worry; because warnings would be made before the pigs arrived. In one instance, a runner came to warn the rookie that the pigs were one the way. Sure enough, the cops arrived about two to three minutes after the house was vacated.
These were the days before scanners. When asked how the process worked, the rookie was told that it helped to have people working on the inside. This same tactic would be deployed by smugglers in the “war against drugs” years later.
When it came to massive resources, the recruiter was right again. The rookie had occasion to observe a meeting which involved financing Weathermen anti-war activities. The organizer in charge stated that the group had just received a one hundred thousand dollar “contribution” from movement supporters. He also stated that more would be available when needed if desired results were achieved.
The reader needs to understand that in the late sixties and early seventies, a hundred thousand dollars was worth a lot more than a hundred thousand dollars in the 1990’s. When the cell leader was asked where the money came from, the response was: The Cubans, the Chinese, or American sympathizers; does it matter? To which the rookie replied, “Not to me.”
One event that taught a valuable lesson was being forced to sit in the back of a police car while one officer held a gun to the rookie’s head, while the cop’s partner raped the rookie’s Maoist traveling companion on the trunk of the patrol car. The officer who raped the young woman said that he wanted some of that “free love” hippies were always talking about.
The lesson here is that the special intelligence operation always comes first. Professional intelligence agents do not jeopardize their assignment by engaging in “feel good” revenge for civilian casualties.
The socialist bad guys had a better networking system with common criminals than patriot agents. In one case, the anti-war underground in return for a fee, arranged for one of their own to drive an embezzler’s car in the opposite direction the thief was going.
Perhaps the primary domestic intelligence industry lesson of the sixties and seventies was that socialist intelligence efforts on American soil since the nineteen thirties have relied on better financed, better organized, and better trained spies and puppet masters.
Some suggest that the greatest risk to undercover agents is succumbing to the other side’s doctrine. This concept can be reinforced when one loses their handler and is confronted with the reality that deactivation is no longer a future option. Explaining not complaining as the rookie had option number five.
Working behind American lines requires adapting to a work place where survivors learn to become independent pragmatic leaders. Sooner or later, every operation manager realizes that regardless of client, undercover agents are always on their own.
It was not unusual to find that socialists and liberals have better skills when it comes to manipulating the news media. For example, socialist organizers were masters at turning peaceful demonstrations into violent riots and making it look like the “pigs” caused the event.
Those who are familiar with “relief valves” in crowd control should easily comprehend the tactic and how the process works. After the relief valve is closed with turned over vehicles; all that remains is getting the press to photograph abuses of overreacting under trained cops.
If the USA had ever used sarin gas on defectors in the Vietnam War, the following events would have transpired:
1) Monday - USA uses sarin gas on defectors in neutral country.
2) Tuesday - Field reports from collaborators alert Hanoi to attack.
3) Wednesday - Chinese communists alert professional activists in American anti war movement.
4) Thursday - News media blankets air waves with sarin story.
5) Friday - Thousands of anti-war protestors demonstrate against USA policy of using sarin gas on defectors.
The USA using sarin gas on defectors, it never happened. If it had, where was the movie of the week about feeling the pain of treasonous defectors with rotten childhoods?
Lessons from those days taught me that the anti-war movement depended on four components: foreign trained professional activists, foreign monies, self gratification driven students, and over reactive law enforcement agencies.
These Chinese Communists orchestrated tactics eventually resulted in the American people losing their will to fight to win; which led to America giving up and going home.
Since hard core socialists think in terms of decades not years, their next move could be predicted by asking the following question: where did the professional’ anti-war activists go after the Vietnam War?
These people and their sympathizers became civil servants, or sought elected or appointed offices. What better place than government to expand:
1) subsidy addiction among the general population,
2) government regulations that destroy property rights,
3) policies which eliminate liberties guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, and
4) entangling alliances or economic treaties that reduce American sovereignty and domestic manufacturing base.
While these socialist policies were being enacted, efforts were also made to reduce America’s military capabilities:
1) continuing negative main stream media propaganda,
2) smaller defense budgets,
3) transferring military technology to foreign adversaries, and
4) establishing foreign naval bases or ports of entry on American soil.
Communist agents tend to rely on the following tactics:
1) lies and broken promises;
2) intimidation;
3) greed;
4) strategic deception (tampering with elections); and
5) diversion tactics.
Covert or closet American socialists have the same primary targets for control as those used by the North Vietnamese to “pacify” South Vietnam:
1) control all levels schools;
2) control social services especially health care services; and
3) control selection and actions of local “chieftains” also called politicians with “politically correct” bureaucratic enforcers (regulatory agencies) and easily manipulated youth
4) manipulate major print, electronic, and in modern times news media (add internet to list)
Instincts combined with practical experiences from October 1968, cause me to raise the following question: Are socialist Democrats and their collaborators (moderate Republicans and anticonservative aristocrats) contemporary America’s
covert traitors?
Friday, October 17, 2008
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Continue Plus 85
America’s First Tradition
Threats to America’s first tradition:
I. Types American Counterfeit Conservatives:
1) Anti-conservative aristocrats: President Bush II,
President Bush II Administration, John “Chamberlain” McCain, most members U.S. Senate including Texas U.S. Senators Cornyn and Hutchinson, many Republican state Governors like Texas Governor Perry, many intellectuals like Newt Gingrich
2) Some conservative radio talk show hosts
3) Neo-conservatives
4) Internationalist conservatives
5) Big government conservatives
6) Unethical capitalist conservatives
The reason patriotic America conservatives need to be able to identify counterfeit conservatives is simple, the enemy from within can easier destroy organization or constitutional republic than outside enemies.
II. Types “Liberal” Threats: morally and ethically depraved, liberal Democrat socialist Marxists like Obama , most members U.S. House of Representatives, public subsidy addicts and their supporters, public subsidy addicts products and services dispersers, most public sector educators, most major news networks, and Greenists.
III Foreign Threats: imperialist nations threatening with economics and or force like China, Mexico, Venezuela, Russia, and Middle East, and international terrorists like Islamic Fascists, and narcotic terrorists. Some imperialist nations like Mexico seek to export poverty to reduce societal tensions to protect brutal corrupt aristocracy. Originally called barbarians now called illegal immigrants, smugglers, and ideological terrorists.
Americans who do not have the courage to defend their republic and or constitution against enemies, tyrants, and hypocrites do not deserve to be free. The destruction of America will result not from its enemies’ strengths rather from it patriots character weaknesses.
Second, conservative Republicans, Reagan Democrats, and conservative talk show hosts unwilling to brutally criticize Bush II and other Republican elected officials for incompetence, greed motivated actions and other America last policies; along with American patriots are all accessories and all deserve the evils they tolerate from both Democrats and Republicans.
Greatest threats to America’s domestic and national security results from middle class citizens ignoring the Marshall adage, those who ignore security spend too much time at cemeteries.
Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Those posing greatest threats to America's first tradition include but are not limited too Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans collaborating with Democrats, and Science is God crowd better known as global warming true believers.
Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."
The first record of the word independence follows, Young Nathan entered Yale College at fourteen, having, ultimately the ministry in view. Just after the battle of Lexington, at a town meeting, with the audacity of boyhood, he cried out, “Let us never lay down our arms till we have achieved independence!”
Where had he learned that new word, not to be found in Shakespeare, or in Spencer, and in Bacon, only as applied to the Independents of England? Is there on record any earlier demand for independence than this bold utterance of the boy in April 1775? One later sentence made the young Nathan’s name immortal: I only regret that I have but one life to give to my country (country not government or political party).
First words of First amendment are not about freedom from religion rather freedom from government religion which is America's first tradition. Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans, and Science is God crowd are all fanatically trying to abolish intent of America's first tradition.
First partial solution, "public employee civil liability legislation" needs to be enacted to offer private citizens civil justice for behavior by public servants who fail to deliver promised services, violate constitutionally protected rights, or engage in incompetent, negligent or criminal conduct. Sovereign immunity is another concept which has been prostituted by pop culture ethics. Sovereign immunity extends only to elected, or appointed officials (including national security institutions engage in national security) not hired domestic employed civil servants.
Child protective service agencies by basing conduct on "good intentions" not due process standards are good examples of civil servants needing to be held accountable by public employee liability legislation. Other examples include: public educators not providing educations, amnesty cities for crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and government employees interfering Southern border national security fence.
Government employees can provide their own public employee civil liability insurance by using their retirement programs trusts as insurance pools.
Second partial solution, upgrading foster child care systems include the following notes that I recorded a decade ago: The primary goal for any foster care management system is to place children from troubled homes in stable loving moral homes. This goal can be neared by using my screening and support strategy.
Since I am in a listing mind state, "America's First Tradition" summarizing points are:
1. The First Amendment is not about separation of church and state by not allowing religious citizens to serve in government. First Amendment is about not letting government become a false God with establishment of state theocracy.
2. The First Amendment is not about carte blanche religious freedoms. The First Amendment is about voluntary beliefs that do not affect social civil order in name of any religion or ideology (including Islamic Fascism, Marxism and Science is God.)
3. Sovereign immunity traditionally only applied to king and his appointees not peasants or serfs. In modern times, sovereign immunity only applies to the constitutional elected and appointments not public sector employees.
Closing thoughts, it is not the original intent of the Bill of Rights that is controversial; it is "living document" interpretations by individuals pursuing personal selfish more equal and better than you privileges that are by definition controversial.
Threats to America’s first tradition:
I. Types American Counterfeit Conservatives:
1) Anti-conservative aristocrats: President Bush II,
President Bush II Administration, John “Chamberlain” McCain, most members U.S. Senate including Texas U.S. Senators Cornyn and Hutchinson, many Republican state Governors like Texas Governor Perry, many intellectuals like Newt Gingrich
2) Some conservative radio talk show hosts
3) Neo-conservatives
4) Internationalist conservatives
5) Big government conservatives
6) Unethical capitalist conservatives
The reason patriotic America conservatives need to be able to identify counterfeit conservatives is simple, the enemy from within can easier destroy organization or constitutional republic than outside enemies.
II. Types “Liberal” Threats: morally and ethically depraved, liberal Democrat socialist Marxists like Obama , most members U.S. House of Representatives, public subsidy addicts and their supporters, public subsidy addicts products and services dispersers, most public sector educators, most major news networks, and Greenists.
III Foreign Threats: imperialist nations threatening with economics and or force like China, Mexico, Venezuela, Russia, and Middle East, and international terrorists like Islamic Fascists, and narcotic terrorists. Some imperialist nations like Mexico seek to export poverty to reduce societal tensions to protect brutal corrupt aristocracy. Originally called barbarians now called illegal immigrants, smugglers, and ideological terrorists.
Americans who do not have the courage to defend their republic and or constitution against enemies, tyrants, and hypocrites do not deserve to be free. The destruction of America will result not from its enemies’ strengths rather from it patriots character weaknesses.
Second, conservative Republicans, Reagan Democrats, and conservative talk show hosts unwilling to brutally criticize Bush II and other Republican elected officials for incompetence, greed motivated actions and other America last policies; along with American patriots are all accessories and all deserve the evils they tolerate from both Democrats and Republicans.
Greatest threats to America’s domestic and national security results from middle class citizens ignoring the Marshall adage, those who ignore security spend too much time at cemeteries.
Moving on to writing exercise theme reviewing America's first tradition; America's first tradition was not freedom from religion, rather freedom from government religion. Your simple reference is first words of First Amendment to Bill of Rights.
Those posing greatest threats to America's first tradition include but are not limited too Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans collaborating with Democrats, and Science is God crowd better known as global warming true believers.
Understanding historical relationships of words independent, Independents, and independence will help conservatives better understand America's first tradition. The word independent first appeared in late 1500's and was defined as "in (not) dependent". Independent then suggested a word describing a person not acting as part of a political party.
Independents as a word appeared in the early 1600's to describe a religious organization that supported "a voluntary association of like minded believers who renounced the support of civil authorities either in reforming itself or extending its practices to persons of a different mind." Independents according to George H. Sabine, also "took the advanced ground that any should be tolerated which did not adversely affect social order."
The first record of the word independence follows, Young Nathan entered Yale College at fourteen, having, ultimately the ministry in view. Just after the battle of Lexington, at a town meeting, with the audacity of boyhood, he cried out, “Let us never lay down our arms till we have achieved independence!”
Where had he learned that new word, not to be found in Shakespeare, or in Spencer, and in Bacon, only as applied to the Independents of England? Is there on record any earlier demand for independence than this bold utterance of the boy in April 1775? One later sentence made the young Nathan’s name immortal: I only regret that I have but one life to give to my country (country not government or political party).
First words of First amendment are not about freedom from religion rather freedom from government religion which is America's first tradition. Islamic fascists, socialist liberal Democrats, moderate Republicans, and Science is God crowd are all fanatically trying to abolish intent of America's first tradition.
First partial solution, "public employee civil liability legislation" needs to be enacted to offer private citizens civil justice for behavior by public servants who fail to deliver promised services, violate constitutionally protected rights, or engage in incompetent, negligent or criminal conduct. Sovereign immunity is another concept which has been prostituted by pop culture ethics. Sovereign immunity extends only to elected, or appointed officials (including national security institutions engage in national security) not hired domestic employed civil servants.
Child protective service agencies by basing conduct on "good intentions" not due process standards are good examples of civil servants needing to be held accountable by public employee liability legislation. Other examples include: public educators not providing educations, amnesty cities for crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and government employees interfering Southern border national security fence.
Government employees can provide their own public employee civil liability insurance by using their retirement programs trusts as insurance pools.
Second partial solution, upgrading foster child care systems include the following notes that I recorded a decade ago: The primary goal for any foster care management system is to place children from troubled homes in stable loving moral homes. This goal can be neared by using my screening and support strategy.
Since I am in a listing mind state, "America's First Tradition" summarizing points are:
1. The First Amendment is not about separation of church and state by not allowing religious citizens to serve in government. First Amendment is about not letting government become a false God with establishment of state theocracy.
2. The First Amendment is not about carte blanche religious freedoms. The First Amendment is about voluntary beliefs that do not affect social civil order in name of any religion or ideology (including Islamic Fascism, Marxism and Science is God.)
3. Sovereign immunity traditionally only applied to king and his appointees not peasants or serfs. In modern times, sovereign immunity only applies to the constitutional elected and appointments not public sector employees.
Closing thoughts, it is not the original intent of the Bill of Rights that is controversial; it is "living document" interpretations by individuals pursuing personal selfish more equal and better than you privileges that are by definition controversial.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Continue Plus 84
Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor
There always comes a time in life when choice is, stand for what is right, like opposing construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor impervious of consequences or walk away.
On side supporting construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor: President Bush, Senator Hutchison, Senator Cornyn, Texas Governor Perry along with Texas’s Lt. Governor, other Texas officials include Speaker of the House, Attorney General, General Land Office, Republican moneylenders, American International Corporate Socialists (AICS), pro NAFTA Groups, and especially Texas Department of Transportation..
On the other side, one part time senile farmer’s son, your author conservative John R. Marshall licensed surveillance instructor and other unnamed patriots.. In the spirit of Col. Travis who asked his volunteers to step on the line not cross the line, this is not about courage, more like somewhere between living by principle not for principal.
The United States Government is about to allow building the world’s largest ground transportation system for Hezbollah’s immerging staging area in Latin America. Route proceeds from Brazil to Monterrey, Mexico through Laredo, Texas to Kansas City to Canada. Having an understanding of Monterrey’s political history will explain why Hezbollah has chose Monterrey as a logistical area to launch attacks into America.
Why no major terrorist attacks in America since 9-11? While the U.S. has been tied down in Iraq and not securing its southern borders or policing domestic premises; foreign terrorists have been quietly preparing for their next attack by establishing sleeper cells on American soil with logistical support supplied by way of Mexico though porous southern border.
Hezbollah has managed to put America’s foreign policy in a catch twenty-two scenario; come down hard on Iran for developing nuclear weapons and threaten U.S. economy with anarchy by releasing sleeper cell attacks on American soil.
The catch twenty-two part, no politician wants to threaten their legacy with actions that could easily result in tens of thousands of citizen casualties on American soil. The less than courageous decision lets the next administration deal with the inevitable.
Bad News: New World Order signifies AICS renewed greedy efforts for old world order attempted by Americans investing in Germany’s Nationalist Socialist Party during WWII. Fact atrocities of French Revolution will fade in comparison to America’s Second Civil War ignited by Trans Texas Corridor better known as Trans Terrorist Corridor.
America’s next civil war fighters will be independent nationalists against alliance of AICS moneylenders and Democratic Party world owes me subsidy addicts. Doubt my words, watch amnesty bi-partisan deal, and economic bi-partisan bail out packages assisting anti-conservative aristocrats and public subsidy addicts.
If Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor supporters did not know their objectives were not in America’s best interest, why have they created special jurisdiction courts to enforce special exemption legislation for Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor to steal private property for international corporate interests?
Path for the Trans Terrorist Corridor includes an estimated two thousand mile twelve hundred foot wide transportation system, which will for foreign corporate interests displace more than a million American citizens and confiscate through imminent domain abuses an estimated million and half acres of prime farm and ranch land.
The spark that starts America’s Second Civil war occurs when property owners, many who owned their land for over a hundred years, object to state troopers evicting senior citizens from homes, farms, and ranches based on orders by Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor special courts.
One of these emotionally distraught property owners will reach for a weapon and be shot dead by overzealous law enforcement.
Neighbors not being sympathetic to friends being gunned down by government agents while stealing property for Republican moneylenders and foreign corporate interests will choose sides.
Governor Perry’s belief that his Texas government can do what it wants, and Texans can take it and like it attitude will call on feds to finish his evil deeds..
The crisis escalates and more Americans choose sides, Middle East terrorists along with radical Hispanics seeking conquest of their homelands will exploit the tensions between Texas landowners and out of control law enforcement.
America’s next uncivil war will not be like America’s first uncivil war where people in blue uniforms lined up in straight lines and shot across open fields at people lined up in gray uniforms.
The weapon of choice in America’s next uncivil war will be deer rifles and hit and run strategies. Politicians need to be reminded that people who can be photographed can be shot by snipers.
A little country logic, since no one has gotten killed yet, it is not too late to delay the inevitable. Consider the following:
1) International corporate interests take their corridor scam to Vermont, those people elect socialists.
2) Texas political prostitutes take their ill-gotten gains better know as bribes and leave Texas.
3) Texas Department of Transportation is reorganized and employees that supported Trans Terrorist Corridor leave Texas.
4) Texas rural property owners go back to farming or ranching and complaining about the weather.
5) I return to looking for work as a ranch scout.
Imagine a future America where Texas politicians and Republican moneylenders are not standing on America’s southern border waving to Middle East and Hispanic terrorists we have made our money, you all come on in.
One not yet discussed consequence of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor, how are Americans not living in Texas going to react to Texans responsible for allowing building of infra-structure that moves terrorists into non Texas communities?
There always comes a time in life when choice is, stand for what is right, like opposing construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor impervious of consequences or walk away.
On side supporting construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor: President Bush, Senator Hutchison, Senator Cornyn, Texas Governor Perry along with Texas’s Lt. Governor, other Texas officials include Speaker of the House, Attorney General, General Land Office, Republican moneylenders, American International Corporate Socialists (AICS), pro NAFTA Groups, and especially Texas Department of Transportation..
On the other side, one part time senile farmer’s son, your author conservative John R. Marshall licensed surveillance instructor and other unnamed patriots.. In the spirit of Col. Travis who asked his volunteers to step on the line not cross the line, this is not about courage, more like somewhere between living by principle not for principal.
The United States Government is about to allow building the world’s largest ground transportation system for Hezbollah’s immerging staging area in Latin America. Route proceeds from Brazil to Monterrey, Mexico through Laredo, Texas to Kansas City to Canada. Having an understanding of Monterrey’s political history will explain why Hezbollah has chose Monterrey as a logistical area to launch attacks into America.
Why no major terrorist attacks in America since 9-11? While the U.S. has been tied down in Iraq and not securing its southern borders or policing domestic premises; foreign terrorists have been quietly preparing for their next attack by establishing sleeper cells on American soil with logistical support supplied by way of Mexico though porous southern border.
Hezbollah has managed to put America’s foreign policy in a catch twenty-two scenario; come down hard on Iran for developing nuclear weapons and threaten U.S. economy with anarchy by releasing sleeper cell attacks on American soil.
The catch twenty-two part, no politician wants to threaten their legacy with actions that could easily result in tens of thousands of citizen casualties on American soil. The less than courageous decision lets the next administration deal with the inevitable.
Bad News: New World Order signifies AICS renewed greedy efforts for old world order attempted by Americans investing in Germany’s Nationalist Socialist Party during WWII. Fact atrocities of French Revolution will fade in comparison to America’s Second Civil War ignited by Trans Texas Corridor better known as Trans Terrorist Corridor.
America’s next civil war fighters will be independent nationalists against alliance of AICS moneylenders and Democratic Party world owes me subsidy addicts. Doubt my words, watch amnesty bi-partisan deal, and economic bi-partisan bail out packages assisting anti-conservative aristocrats and public subsidy addicts.
If Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor supporters did not know their objectives were not in America’s best interest, why have they created special jurisdiction courts to enforce special exemption legislation for Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor to steal private property for international corporate interests?
Path for the Trans Terrorist Corridor includes an estimated two thousand mile twelve hundred foot wide transportation system, which will for foreign corporate interests displace more than a million American citizens and confiscate through imminent domain abuses an estimated million and half acres of prime farm and ranch land.
The spark that starts America’s Second Civil war occurs when property owners, many who owned their land for over a hundred years, object to state troopers evicting senior citizens from homes, farms, and ranches based on orders by Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor special courts.
One of these emotionally distraught property owners will reach for a weapon and be shot dead by overzealous law enforcement.
Neighbors not being sympathetic to friends being gunned down by government agents while stealing property for Republican moneylenders and foreign corporate interests will choose sides.
Governor Perry’s belief that his Texas government can do what it wants, and Texans can take it and like it attitude will call on feds to finish his evil deeds..
The crisis escalates and more Americans choose sides, Middle East terrorists along with radical Hispanics seeking conquest of their homelands will exploit the tensions between Texas landowners and out of control law enforcement.
America’s next uncivil war will not be like America’s first uncivil war where people in blue uniforms lined up in straight lines and shot across open fields at people lined up in gray uniforms.
The weapon of choice in America’s next uncivil war will be deer rifles and hit and run strategies. Politicians need to be reminded that people who can be photographed can be shot by snipers.
A little country logic, since no one has gotten killed yet, it is not too late to delay the inevitable. Consider the following:
1) International corporate interests take their corridor scam to Vermont, those people elect socialists.
2) Texas political prostitutes take their ill-gotten gains better know as bribes and leave Texas.
3) Texas Department of Transportation is reorganized and employees that supported Trans Terrorist Corridor leave Texas.
4) Texas rural property owners go back to farming or ranching and complaining about the weather.
5) I return to looking for work as a ranch scout.
Imagine a future America where Texas politicians and Republican moneylenders are not standing on America’s southern border waving to Middle East and Hispanic terrorists we have made our money, you all come on in.
One not yet discussed consequence of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor, how are Americans not living in Texas going to react to Texans responsible for allowing building of infra-structure that moves terrorists into non Texas communities?
Continue Plus 83
America’s Three Sided Fort
Little background, I have always believed and taught my private sector investigation security team members that dead heroes may be good for movie endings but are bad for business.
Other private security team member principles:
1. Remember always get money up front as it is hard to get relatives of dead fools to pay their bills.
2. Never under estimate enemies, potential threats.
3. Avoid unnecessary confrontations.
4. Always stay alert, always be ready and waiting.
5. Always stay between client/s and threat.
6. If necessary provide cover fire to buy time to evacuate client/s from threat/s.
7. Never assume bad guys are dumb and pose only single threats per incident.
8. Everybody gets paid, everybody does their job and everybody comes home.
Guess my farmer’s son logic is showing, what is the point of working for money if you do not get to enjoy benefits from earnings. I have always considered farm work, ranch work, running intelligence / investigations, or providing security equal but different ways of making money.
Learned years ago, does not matter type of work, never work for liars, thieves, fools, people who hire illegal immigrants, or those too blanked up to know they are blanked up.
So when does my work ethic swerve into how a three sided fort threatens America’s national security? Patience, I am getting there. Remember Alamo most legal residents of America have at least heard name.
Alamo, a place where a group of volunteers and a few regulars not seeking personal recognition (no CNN or Fox News crews on scene) took a stand to buy General Sam Houston time to turn untrained volunteers into a one battle one victory army.
So what does providing cover fire to evacuate a client, or volunteers holed up behind crumbling adobe walls of old church to buy Houston time have to do with current national security?
Simple, government’s story is that United States is involved in Iraq to keep terrorists from attacking Americans on American soil.
Story would sound more plausible if American policy makers were using time being bought by America’s public and private warriors in Iraq to one: secure America’s Southern Border (called perimeter in security business). Two rounds up potential terrorists (called policing premises in security business) on American soil.
Problem with story is that American policy makers are not using time being bought with blood and body parts to do either secure America’s perimeter or police America’s premises.
U.S. troops and private security forces could stay in Iraq for a thousand years with little to show for their honorable duty and sacrifices until American policy makers abandon their three sided fort concept for defending America.
As history ridicules those who welcomed a Trojan horse, history will have greater perpetual contempt for American’s greed motivated defenders of foreign policy based on three sided fort.
Perhaps saddest of all combined words is wasted opportunity. Question, statement, and question: Question, would Sam Houston be remembered as a great American-Texan if he had taken a vacation while people at Alamo were dying to buy him time to build an army?
Statement; I am probably one of most easy going people you will ever meet. However, and there always is a however, If my team members take a cigarette break while I am providing them cover fire to evacuate my client, bad guys will be least of their problems.
Question: If America’s political leaders keep ignoring their opportunity to secure America’s perimeter and police America’s premises; an opportunity being paid for with blood and body parts, what will be legacy of America’s elected officials?
First thing one learns in covert uncivil world is no two bad guys are exactly identical. Iraq and Iran are different predators.
Iraq did not have ability to reach out and strike America; so Saddam lured America into a predictable urban guerrilla war that eventually led to getting caught in middle of a religious theology based civil war.
Iran has ability to reach out and strike America’s homeland, maybe not with missiles but certainly with Hezbollah sleeper cells already on American soil. These groups can count on logistical support from staging areas in Latin America primarily Mexico, and specifically Monterrey, Mexico.
A porous southern border, missing side of America’s three sided fort, will allow logistical opportunities terrorist groups will most certainly exploit.
How many terrorist cells are on American soil, only God and terrorists have that answer. How can anyone believe government policy makers who are still operating under premise that there are only twelve million illegal immigrants on American soil? Actual number of illegal immigrants on American soil is closer to forty million.
If a government cannot keep up with people who are for most part not trying to hide, can same government possibly know how many terrorist cells America’s three sided fort has allowed into America?
Think Custer had a bad day or 911 were horrific days? Just wait until you, your family, friends, and beloved America experience national security policies depending on a three sided fort.
Little background, I have always believed and taught my private sector investigation security team members that dead heroes may be good for movie endings but are bad for business.
Other private security team member principles:
1. Remember always get money up front as it is hard to get relatives of dead fools to pay their bills.
2. Never under estimate enemies, potential threats.
3. Avoid unnecessary confrontations.
4. Always stay alert, always be ready and waiting.
5. Always stay between client/s and threat.
6. If necessary provide cover fire to buy time to evacuate client/s from threat/s.
7. Never assume bad guys are dumb and pose only single threats per incident.
8. Everybody gets paid, everybody does their job and everybody comes home.
Guess my farmer’s son logic is showing, what is the point of working for money if you do not get to enjoy benefits from earnings. I have always considered farm work, ranch work, running intelligence / investigations, or providing security equal but different ways of making money.
Learned years ago, does not matter type of work, never work for liars, thieves, fools, people who hire illegal immigrants, or those too blanked up to know they are blanked up.
So when does my work ethic swerve into how a three sided fort threatens America’s national security? Patience, I am getting there. Remember Alamo most legal residents of America have at least heard name.
Alamo, a place where a group of volunteers and a few regulars not seeking personal recognition (no CNN or Fox News crews on scene) took a stand to buy General Sam Houston time to turn untrained volunteers into a one battle one victory army.
So what does providing cover fire to evacuate a client, or volunteers holed up behind crumbling adobe walls of old church to buy Houston time have to do with current national security?
Simple, government’s story is that United States is involved in Iraq to keep terrorists from attacking Americans on American soil.
Story would sound more plausible if American policy makers were using time being bought by America’s public and private warriors in Iraq to one: secure America’s Southern Border (called perimeter in security business). Two rounds up potential terrorists (called policing premises in security business) on American soil.
Problem with story is that American policy makers are not using time being bought with blood and body parts to do either secure America’s perimeter or police America’s premises.
U.S. troops and private security forces could stay in Iraq for a thousand years with little to show for their honorable duty and sacrifices until American policy makers abandon their three sided fort concept for defending America.
As history ridicules those who welcomed a Trojan horse, history will have greater perpetual contempt for American’s greed motivated defenders of foreign policy based on three sided fort.
Perhaps saddest of all combined words is wasted opportunity. Question, statement, and question: Question, would Sam Houston be remembered as a great American-Texan if he had taken a vacation while people at Alamo were dying to buy him time to build an army?
Statement; I am probably one of most easy going people you will ever meet. However, and there always is a however, If my team members take a cigarette break while I am providing them cover fire to evacuate my client, bad guys will be least of their problems.
Question: If America’s political leaders keep ignoring their opportunity to secure America’s perimeter and police America’s premises; an opportunity being paid for with blood and body parts, what will be legacy of America’s elected officials?
First thing one learns in covert uncivil world is no two bad guys are exactly identical. Iraq and Iran are different predators.
Iraq did not have ability to reach out and strike America; so Saddam lured America into a predictable urban guerrilla war that eventually led to getting caught in middle of a religious theology based civil war.
Iran has ability to reach out and strike America’s homeland, maybe not with missiles but certainly with Hezbollah sleeper cells already on American soil. These groups can count on logistical support from staging areas in Latin America primarily Mexico, and specifically Monterrey, Mexico.
A porous southern border, missing side of America’s three sided fort, will allow logistical opportunities terrorist groups will most certainly exploit.
How many terrorist cells are on American soil, only God and terrorists have that answer. How can anyone believe government policy makers who are still operating under premise that there are only twelve million illegal immigrants on American soil? Actual number of illegal immigrants on American soil is closer to forty million.
If a government cannot keep up with people who are for most part not trying to hide, can same government possibly know how many terrorist cells America’s three sided fort has allowed into America?
Think Custer had a bad day or 911 were horrific days? Just wait until you, your family, friends, and beloved America experience national security policies depending on a three sided fort.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Continue Plus 82
Obituary: American Capitalism
American Capitalism, the economic system based on free will, ethical trade, and supply and demand that enabled America to evolve from a frontier nation to world history’s richest most productive and powerful nation was recently replaced by fascist Marxist nationalism by greedy oath breaking Republican and Democrat politicians.
In Marxist economic systems, all property and means of production are owned by the state too serve the poor better known as public subsidy addicts. In fascist nationalist economic systems all property and means of production are owned by private citizens, but are so regulated by the state for non-conservative aristocrats that eventually there is little difference between Marxist and fascists nationalist economic systems.
Consider governments’ contemporary role, using confiscatory taxes to redistribute wealth, regulating interest rates to manage economy based on credit not assets, control dispersal rates for private retirement accounts, control distribution requirements for public subsidy addicts’ free services and products including mortgages. Now governments are going to “buy into” banks, financial institutions, and eventually other business; even if owners do not want too sell to government.
Seems ironic that what Baby Boomers call compassion, their parents called extortion. Times have changed beyond belief for those, Baby Boomers describe as being “America’s greatest generation”, The greatest generation fought a war to not be part of Hitler’s Nazi fascist nationalist economic system. While Baby Boomers like Bush II, McCain, Obama, anti conservative aristocrats, U.S. Senate and Congress, along with a majority of other Americans will apparently do anything to get their “credit fix” or “entitlement fix” from their messianic nanny government.
American Capitalism, the economic system based on free will, ethical trade, and supply and demand that enabled America to evolve from a frontier nation to world history’s richest most productive and powerful nation was recently replaced by fascist Marxist nationalism by greedy oath breaking Republican and Democrat politicians.
In Marxist economic systems, all property and means of production are owned by the state too serve the poor better known as public subsidy addicts. In fascist nationalist economic systems all property and means of production are owned by private citizens, but are so regulated by the state for non-conservative aristocrats that eventually there is little difference between Marxist and fascists nationalist economic systems.
Consider governments’ contemporary role, using confiscatory taxes to redistribute wealth, regulating interest rates to manage economy based on credit not assets, control dispersal rates for private retirement accounts, control distribution requirements for public subsidy addicts’ free services and products including mortgages. Now governments are going to “buy into” banks, financial institutions, and eventually other business; even if owners do not want too sell to government.
Seems ironic that what Baby Boomers call compassion, their parents called extortion. Times have changed beyond belief for those, Baby Boomers describe as being “America’s greatest generation”, The greatest generation fought a war to not be part of Hitler’s Nazi fascist nationalist economic system. While Baby Boomers like Bush II, McCain, Obama, anti conservative aristocrats, U.S. Senate and Congress, along with a majority of other Americans will apparently do anything to get their “credit fix” or “entitlement fix” from their messianic nanny government.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)