Continue Plus 43

Guide To American Racists

Much of life is guided by attitude. Your author knows middle class citizens who act like aristocrats, and millionaires who think like middle class citizens. The majority of racists in America are liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans, not conservatives.

Americans with European heritages did not fight America's deadliest war known as Civil War to replace private sector slavery with public sector slavery better known as public subsidy addiction.

American power brokers with European heritages did not adopt civil rights legislation to substitute limited discrimination by a majority to replace it with minority discrimination against a majority. The goal for the uninformed was to improve due process system not turn victims into fascists.

Again for the umpteenth time, repetition is often used as a teaching tool. In Marxist socialist systems, all property and means of production are owned by government. In fascist socialist systems, all property and means of production are owned by individuals; but are so regulated by government, that eventually there is no difference between Marxist socialism and fascist socialism.

Having to choose between Stalin and Hitler is really not much of a choice. Abandoning "equal opportunity without privilege" for privileges based on gender, race, or ethnic differences is more than a start towards really bad government.

To consider another contemporary issue, higher than average violent crime rates against American citizens with Hispanic heritages. Premise: it is not a majority of American citizens with European heritages facilitating murders, sexual tortures, kidnappings, extortions, robberies, injuries and deaths in traffic accidents of American citizens with Hispanic heritages.

The harsh reality is that those supporting a porous southern border with Mexico by opposing the homeland security fence have blood on their hands for every crime committed against every American citizen with Hispanic heritage by illegal immigrants exploiting America's porous border to enter America.

These same "well intentioned'" selfish foolish Americans by supporting a porous border by encouraging people to illegally enter America, are also morally responsible for all deaths and injuries to desperate illegal immigrants caused by weather, terrain, or smugglers.

Illegal immigrants despite government and news media fabrications represent an estimated thirty to forty million people living in America. This number is about ten percent of America's total population. Illegal immigrants represent thirty to forty percent of America's jail and prison population.

Translation ten percent of America's population, are committing about forty percent of crimes with majority of those crimes being committed against American citizens with Hispanic heritages not American citizens with European heritages.

The groups supporting porous borders and higher than average crimes against American citizens with Hispanic heritages include: 1) those prejudice against American citizens with European heritages - groups like La Raza, Brown Berets, those supporting "Reconquesta" from America; 2) those placing interest of Mexico's aristocracy above that of America's national security - many border communities' politicians; 3) Democrats socialist liberals especially border universities; and 4) internationalist moderate Republican who place profits from unethical capitalism above American ideals and national security - example, destroying America's domestic manufacturing base which without America will lose it next major war.

American conservatives need to quit tolerating accusations of being guilty for sins and crimes committed by minority racists; Mexico first America last crowd; Democrat Party socialist liberals; and Republican Party internationalist moderates. Those threatening America's traditions, ideals, Constitution, and security like bullies, only understand certain attitudes.

Citizens Plus 42

Just Theory Or Future News

FRIDAY: Libraries receiving tax dollars cannot constitutionally violate free speech by denying access to internet sites based on religious or conservative views. Libraries cannot also constitutionally violate free speech rights by utilizing private sector search engines to deny access to internet sites based on religious or conservative ideologies.

Private companies can sometimes violate citizen rights that governments can never violate, however private companies cannot violate rights through government agencies.

Examples, libraries receiving tax dollars blocking my access to my conservative blog; libraries receiving tax dollars block others access to my conservative blog site; libraries receiving tax dollars blocking myself or others access to any non-pornographic web site.

In some cases the librarian or library volunteers may not know that the constitutional rights offending system has been implemented by in system technicians.

I am not ready to publicly confront those involved in my situation; will instead pass information to other sources. My only advantage is that the possible bad guys do not know I am passing on information to other sources for possibly other actions like legal actions.

The answer I would like to know, is blocking my access by a publicly funded agency one of a series of random events representing poor social ethics of a border community: Or, is denying access part of concentrated efforts by a few liberal Democrats or internationalist moderate Republicans?

You can judge for yourself by reviewing “Citizens Passions” found through Google blog search if my writing exercises are entitled to U.S. constitutional protections.Final conclusion, consequences of planned or unplanned unconstitutional activities are same.

TUESDAY: Sometimes scenarios become a theory because the other side changes their strategy. This time they did not know my old age weakness; a waekness that will not result in the same mistake being made twice.