Conservatives Guide To Freedom Fighters
Most ignored fact by American citizens is that words have different meaning to different people. Not all conservatives are conservatives; reference “Guide To American Political Cannibalism”.
There are two types of freedom fighters, those fighting for freedom and those fighting for tyranny. Examples of those fighting for tyranny includes Marxists, imperialists like Japan during World War II, and ideological butchers like Islamic fascists.
American history is best and only definitive history of freedom fighters. Who but a member of American last crowd cold suggest that following events were managed by Freedom fighters?
Could have added more but, following should suffice for this writing exercise: America’s War for Independence, War with Barbary Pirates, War with Britain 1812, Texas War for Independence, and War against Mexico’s imperialism 1845.
Even both sides in America’s Civil War were fought by freedom fighters, despite historical propaganda; Blacks were about only group fighting against slavery. Central issue of Civil War was whether states could voluntarily secede from Union. Northern troops said no, while Southern rebels fought for ultimate states rights issue.
Some including this author would suggest that Indian wars were fought to fulfill a “manifest destiny”. War with Spain was to allow America freedom to become an international power.
Moving on through twentieth century: World War I, World War II, Cold War (including North Korea and Vietnam) were all fought to preserve freedom, Grenada, Iraq War I was fought to defend energy which did and still does fuel freedom’s marketplace.
America is currently involved in one declared and two undeclared wars for freedom: War declared against Islamic Fascism, Undeclared wars against Internationalist Economic Imperialism (issue one world labor force through illegal immigration), and Militaristic Imperialism by countries like China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, and other third world countries.
Moving on too players in America’s current three front war, starting with identifying two sides. There are good guys and bad guys, since this is my writing exercise, I have luxury of identifying my self and traditional conservative patriots as good guys and political cannibals as bad guys (reference again Guide to American political Cannibalism).
Other players on both sides include following six types:
1) scouts, spies and traitors (difference between spies and traitors – spies are professional intelligence agents serving their home team while traitors gather intelligence for betraying their home team)
2) allies, collaborators, and sympathizers (examples - collaborators can be moderate Republicans who reach out to socialist Democrats while sympathizers can be “conservative” talk show hosts who give socialist democrats “benefit of doubt”)
3) professionals/hired guns
4) black market merchants, and criminals
5) pilgrims uniformed “compassionate feel good do gooders” and civillians who just not want to get involved
6) analysis of military institutions will be left to those more qualified than your author whose background is specifically in intelligence gathering
For instance, a covert operation to gather intelligence, sabotage, kidnap, or other objective is concerned with some of following: scout, stalk, “catch off guard”, discreetly leave, and return to base.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, black mail, coup d'etat and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d'etat; and other methods.
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results.
However, an "ambush" is use of violence against players or collaborators. Ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as threat of or use of non-defensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved.
There are two types terrorism: private sector and public sector (domestic and foreign).Goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or 3) revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Sherman's March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Ruby Ridge, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious/corrupt prosecutions.
Citizens should never forget that odds are fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents. Two motives for civil servants to frame bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which gives government more power at expense of constitutional liberties and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
Private sector terrorist objectives include:
1) retaliation or revenge against government terrorism; and
2) self defense from government terrorism; or over reaction to government abuses.
Ultimate source of terrorism is general population who tolerates government abuses of power. It needs to be understood that private sector terrorism is a response to real or perceived injustices caused by public sector actions against private citizens. An example involves parents who did not see provocation by child one, and punish child two for retaliating.
III) Nonparticipation - different than apathy; this tactic was first formalized by the Radical Civil Union in Argentina during the latter part of nineteenth century.
Nonparticipation may be resorted to when peaceful tactics do not achieve partial success and conditions do not warrant the use of violence. This approach may also be used to provide citizen time to acquire appropriate or additional resources for alternate responses.
A key factor in nonparticipation or partial nonparticipation is mass education. Community should be aware that group which has chosen not to support "lesser of two evils" is still politically conscious. In some scenarios, voters are accomplices to tyranny or mob rule. Some include 2008 elections.
This tactic allows the system sufficient time to stagnate from oppression or mismanagement; while providing activist with more material for propaganda.
The Radical Civic Union failed to achieve their long term goals even though their nonparticipation tactic served its purpose. By failing to remain publicly politically active, Radical Civic Union was not in a position to capitalize on initial success.
Nonparticipation extends beyond not voting and does not include being politically dormant. This tactic includes not working for or volunteering to help offending political system. At the same time, citizen should maintain political skills by working only for private nonprofit type organizations.
An element as important as being able to identify players for successful freedom fighters, knowing real world rules for success.
All personnel, weapons and tools are only as efficient as system using them. Bio-mechanical applications of weapons are consistent regardless of target. Types of weapons include: non-lethal and lethal.
All creatures have unique survival skills: for example camouflage stealth, speed, strength, or high reproductive rates. Consciousness resulting form knowledge, experience, and training can eliminate many of negative influences on human decision making processes. Some distractions include: confusion, anger, fear, or disorientation caused by physical/mental exhaustion or panic.
Natural condition or predisposition for a species known as humanity is political competition for social power driven by instinctive, emotional, and life experiences. Temporary or constant stimuli (neutral, favorable, or unfavorable) influences man's emotional state: contentment/apathy; pleasure/happiness; pain/unhappiness; fear/panic; frustration/anger; or curiosity. These have often been described as “terrible twos”.
These emotional states often dominate type of behavior response:
1. autonomous;
2. reflex;
3. innate/instinct;
4. imprinted/conditioned/learned;
5. reasoned and
6. creative/dreams/extended vision.
Injury, age, chemical imbalances, inadequate conditioning or learning can produce fluid personalities which fluctuate between left and right brain dominated personalities. Personality fluidity can also produce dysfunctional behavior which is caused by inappropriate impulse gratification.
Behavior in a neutral environment is amoral, and whether or not response is adequate or inadequate (functional or dysfunctional) depends on effect on stimuli.
There will always be ruling elite who manages social system at convenience or inconvenience of majority. Brutal reality indicates that puppet masters always have, and probably always will manage political systems. Only exception being Heaven’s inspired through America’s Founding Fathers, America’s checks and balances constitutional republic with Bill of Rights.
Power is to social sciences what energy is to physical sciences. Social power is having means to achieve a particular social goal. Might, may or may not make "right," but always determines how conditions will be.
Sufficient social power with appropriate timing controls. This can be expressed in following manner:
SP = Q1 + Q2 over T
Social Power equals Force [Quantity (Q1) plus Quality(Q2)] over Timing.
Quantity equals numerical strength
Quality equals
1) physical force, and or
2) psychological force:
threat
tact
personality/reputation
obligation/debt
mutual agreements
laws/rules
tradition
ideology
knowledge
deceit
negotiation/compromise
Timing may be affected by uncontrollable variable chance.
Power as behavior is amoral in a neutral or Ten Commandments or bill of Rights free environment. Political animals generally do what they perceive to be in their best interest; security not ideology is often ultimate goal.
There are four phases in a political operation: developing plan or goal; choosing strategy; executing strategy tactics; and preparation for opponents' reaction.
Resources and using them (logistics) are necessary conditions. This is obtained by comparing sides and situations:
Blue Client: SP= Q1 + Q2 over T
Green Client: SP = Q1 + Q2 over T
Adjustment options include: advantage of reaction; disadvantage of reaction; advantage of no reaction; and disadvantage of no reaction.
Any evaluation should include following: define problem; cause of problem; impact of problem; solution to problem; and results of solution.
Field encounters will always be at least a little different. Options are evaluated by cost to benefit ratios. Care should be taken to avoid: "it worked then" solutions; "insignificant details" (neglected details become exploitable weaknesses); social myths; over extended or estimated capabilities; and or not utilizing all opportunities.
Exploited mistakes or poor timing causes defeats not strengths, patience is crucial for there may be no second chances in conflict. Chances are, if they're not looking for you, they won't find you. Another technique of good security is being long gone before bad guys arrive or show up.
Artificial consciousness processes (ACP), subject for another writing exercise, may eventually supplement or eventually replace mental discipline, idealism, mysticism, or emotionalism in determining appropriate goals, strategy, tactics, or responses in social power encounters.
Other topics for further review:
- trust, loyalty, training, discipline
- resources and importance of timely replacement of resources
- access to latest technology
- reliable intelligence
- importance of valid communications
- realistic strategy (General Sam Houston knew he had one battle army)
- mental disciple to live with tough decisions
- no time outs when options are winning and losing
- logic and mathematics prove existence of God
First obligation of scouts, intelligence agents, and scouts: their assignments of delivering most accurate information and leave decision making to superiors. Custer ignored his scouts and paid for his foolishness.
Recall words can have different meanings; conservatives in name only are no different than freedom fighters fighting for tyranny. President Washington warned about trusting political pretenders, a trait describing many Republican politicians, advocates, and socialites.
Conserving America’s values, traditions, and constitutional republic depends on conservative actions based on conservative principles; not parroted words motivated only for votes, principal, or social status. Could not First Amendment to peaceably assemble, also extend to not assembling with counterfeit conservative Republicans unworthy of trust? Could answer extend to those who collaborate and sympathize with counterfeit conservative Republicans?
